The Thanksgiving game: Good or Bad?
![]() |
While the Eagles organization has certainly been painting this as quite and honor and exciting event, I've noticed that it's been met with some mixed reaction among fans. I was checking out the Eagles Fancast show and the boys mentioned that their spouses were less than happy about the idea of a football game taking over Thanksgiving. I imagine that little debate will be one that rages on in many Eagles households...
Eagles president Joe Banner doesn't think that will be a problem.
The other problem is the pissing match between the NFL and major cable providers over the NFL network. The Thanksgiving night game was specifically devised by the NFL as a way to pump up their new network. Currently Comcast carries the NFL network only as part of a sports tier that costs an extra $5 a month. However, if the game is a sellout(which it will be) the NFL will allow it to be shown locally on free TV. So people in the Philly area will get to see the games regardless, but fans outside of the reach of local Philly TV will have to have NFL network to catch the game.
So what are your thoughts? Personally, I've said this before, I dislike primetime games. I know it's an ego stroke for the team and players and it means the league/networks think you're a good team that people want to see... but I just like football on Sunday. I like turning the game on at one and being part of the action that is a full slate of NFL games. I like watching Chris Berman do the highlights at the end of the day. But that's just me... and despite that I am looking forward to the Thanksgiving game.
0 recs |
14
comments
Comments
Personally
by Whodie126 on Apr 18, 2008 10:16 AM EDT 0 recs
Love it
Another note, it is a prime time game which for me is fantastic. I live outside of Denver and the prime time games are often the only ones I get to watch at home. I've spent more than one Sunday afternoon glued to my laptop screen reading play by play on ESPN...
J
by cavortingEagle on Apr 18, 2008 12:32 PM EDT 0 recs
Problem
That being said, I agree with the cable companies. Why does the NFL Network need to be in every home?
by Kulp on
Apr 18, 2008 12:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Beholden to Comcast - sucks
As far as NFLN goes, I wouldn't pay for it that's for sure - most of the programing is garbage. I'm getting it as part of my introductory digital cable offer free. If I don't make the switch to satellite, I'll ditch NFLN when the year runs out...
J
by cavortingEagle on
Apr 18, 2008 1:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
NFLN
80% of the channel is reruns of "Total Access"
Then they replay some games.
I do pay for it, but frankly only because it's parts of the sports package I already had to watch Fox soccer channel and GOL TV.
by JasonB on
Apr 18, 2008 2:24 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Why take sides?
Now, I don't want to imply that the cable companies are angels here... but this is a money grab by the NFL first and foremost.
They took games that we used to get for free and put them on their own channel.
by JasonB on
Apr 18, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Primetime
As to the satellite question, I live in Rochester, NY -- Time Warner country. Last August I switched to DirecTV for the sole purpose of purchasing NFL Sunday Ticket. I split the cost with 3 buddies, which was fantastic, and we ate and drank every Sunday at my place.
DirecTV is OK -- about the same cost as cable. But everyone in Rochester who has cable does not and can not get the NFL Network. This was a big deal when the Giants/Pats game was a Saturday nighter last season.
by BFH on Apr 18, 2008 12:42 PM EDT 0 recs
Primetime
by LeonSA on Apr 18, 2008 1:05 PM EDT 0 recs
True
by JasonB on
Apr 18, 2008 1:20 PM EDT
up
0 recs
And
by LeonSA on Apr 18, 2008 1:11 PM EDT 0 recs
Hmm,
I like the Season Ticket because I get to watch the rest of the NFC East everyweek. It helps a lot scouting them for when they play the Birds.
And no the Giants didn't look like a SB team until, umm nevermind.
The NFL network is horrible.....
by topcat6 on Apr 18, 2008 4:20 PM EDT 0 recs
NFL cuts their noses off...
In this day and age of digital cable, internet video and diverse fan bases - why can't people watch the games they want to watch? I'm a Philly native stuck in the NYC market (2 local teams, arggh!) - so I, too, have spent days refreshing the gameday screen on my laptop. I would gladly pay for Sunday Ticket to see the Eagles - but I can't get it here in the city in an apartment building. I'd pay for Sunday Ticket on my digital cable - but DirectTV has exclusive rights. I'd pay for the stupid field pass too if I could have video over the web instead of just radio. Why don't they want my money?
I get NFL network - but they don't broadcast in HD here, which sucks. I'll be in Philly for thanksgiving, though - which IS a football holiday. When the birds played Christmas the other year - we had serious family fights over the football being on while the kids wanted to watch Christmas videos! THAT was a killer, let me tell you.
by flygirl on Apr 18, 2008 5:21 PM EDT 0 recs
It really is ridiculous
by JasonB on
Apr 18, 2008 5:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Is it the NFL...
I guess it's probably both...
I wish there was a way to Pay-Per-View the individual games you wanted to watch each week. I'd probably pay 6-7 bucks to watch the Eagles on weeks they're not national (or blacked out by the Donkeys), but the cost of the Sunday Ticket is a bit much for me - even if I had DirectTV and could get my wife to agree to it.
For now, I typically hit refresh until halftime and head on over to the local sports bar for lunch and a frosty beverage...
by cavortingEagle on
Apr 18, 2008 6:30 PM EDT
up
0 recs







