Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Monday morning news from all over

Did anyone catch Brian Westbrook doing some reporting for NFL Network during the Giants/Bucs game? I thought he did pretty good job and it was nice to see an Eagle out there for once.

Some new stuff about some possible Eagles front office/coaching changes.

Eagles general manager Tom Heckert interviews today for the Atlanta Falcons' GM job. The buzz in NFL circles is that Heckert has a good chance of being hired to run Atlanta's football operations . . . The Ravens are expected to interview Eagles secondary coach John Harbaugh for their head-coaching job

You'd have to think Harbaugh is somewhat of a longshot to get an NFL head coaching job right now, but it's great to hear that he's at least getting interviews. He also recetnly had a second interview for the vacant head coaching job at UCLA.

Now that it's pretty obvious that he's coming back, McNabb is asking for help next year.

"I'm not getting any younger," McNabb said Monday, as he packed up and started his offseason suddenly content in the knowledge that the Eagles will be, once again, his team.

"It's important that you look into the draft and you look into free agency and you try to bring in guys that will definitely help in all situations," McNabb said. "It's not just one position. It's one, two or three guys that will help get you over the hump. It's important right now. I'm not getting any younger. It's about trying to bring in more firepower. It's "How can you help us now?'

On the subject of "firepower" I thought this little note from the same article was pretty funny...

Whatever help he gets likely won't come through the draft. The Eagles have gotten only one impact skill position player from the draft since 2002 -- and that is Reggie Brown, who plainly took a step backward this year.

While head coach Andy Reid called Brown's season "a career year" due to 61 catches, Brown himself called it a disappointment. Four touchdowns (51st in the league) and 780 yards (38th) is not enough from a player the Eagles just gave $27 million in a contract extension to be the big-play guy on their receiving corps.

David Aldridge seems to feel that the Eagles need to go get Randy Moss. I suppose it's technically possible since he'll be a free agent, but it certainly doesn't seem like he's going anywhere.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Moss
Is the one guy I can't see the Eagles going after. Ocho Cinco may have some issues, but I think Moss reminds them way too much of TO.
700 Level

by 700 Level on Jan 7, 2008 9:43 AM EST reply actions  

Same deal...
We need more of a diamond in the rough.  Moss and TO and the rest of the "#1" receivers have too much head on their shoulders and we'll be headed for another problem all over again.  I'd be happier with someone who fit that 6'4"-6'6" category and weighed about 220 lbs if not more.  Wait...that sounds like Gasperson.  Look at the production of Green Bay, you can really only name one of their receivers with the rest being young guys.  I would rather have 5 good receivers that are content to let the ball get spread around then have 1 amazing wide receiver who'll get pissed off if we give the ball to westbrook too much.  I wouldn't mind Fitzgerald, but I'd rather bump up someone we have to the starting list who knows the offense and has earned his shot and spend the money elsewhere.  

Also, I don't think that there is a hope in hell that Reid would pay a #1 receiver salary.  Heck, he already shelled out about $26 million for Brown.  I say we get a solid DE in free agency and draft a great WR in the Draft that can be brought up in our way of thinking before his ego gets too big.  

I could be absolutely wrong here though...

by thwalls on Jan 7, 2008 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Typo..
Sorry, Brown did get only about $10 million, my bad.

by thwalls on Jan 7, 2008 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Brown
"While head coach Andy Reid called Brown's season "a career year" due to 61 catches, Brown himself called it a disappointment. Four touchdowns (51st in the league) and 780 yards (38th) is not enough from a player the Eagles just gave $27 million in a contract extension to be the big-play guy on their receiving corps."

Well, first of all, they gave Brown about $10M, not $27M.  The rest of that contract is not guaranteed.  They gave Curtis even more, because the market continues to go up.  $3M or so per year for a starting wideout doesn't seem unreasonable though.

Second, Brown lost several touchdowns and several dozen yards this year through circumstances outside his control including one in the 1st Giants game where McNabb stepped over the line of scrimmage and one in the Miami game where LJ Smith pointlessly held on a flea-flicker touchdown.  He also of course had that drop against Chicago which really hurt the team in the end.  Brown did end up with a higher catch percentage (50% in 2006, 54.5% in 2007), and that includes and 8 of 23 stretch in the first 4 games where McNabb was really struggling and he and McNabb were not on the same page.

In the last 12 games, Brown was 53 of 89 for 699 yards and 4 TD's, or 54 of 90 for 745 yards and 5 TD's if you include the flea-flicker LJ nullified.  I think he did pretty well considering the circumstances of this year and last (this year - struggling McNabb recovering from injury, last year a more accurate Garcia with a better connection with Brown AND Stallworth injured for 4-5 weeks making Brown more of the offensive focus in the passing game).  I'd expect next year Brown should approach 1000 yards and 70 catches with 6-10 TD's.

by Andrew @ Bleeding Green Nation on Jan 7, 2008 12:19 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah
I mostly got a kick out of how REggie and Andy described the same year...

I've said several times this year that this offense needs another weapon. If there was a great TE out there to be had, I'd make that my #1 priority and I'd be happy with Curtis and Brown at WR. That said, if a big time WR were out there I'd happily take him too.

The problem is, there isn't a TE like out there. Even the lower tier WRs that could be out there are better than the likes of Dallas Clark IMO.

So, for that reason I'd like to see another WR brought in here. Frankly, if we "added" a healthy LJ and a less than top notch WR like a Javon Walker... I'd be happy with that. Walker isn't the bonafide "#1" everyone seems to want but he does make the WR corps better 1-3 than it is now. Plus, a healthy LJ is going to give us a lot more production out of the TE spot than we got this year.

by JasonB on Jan 7, 2008 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

stallworth injury last year...
was a big reason Brown did so well.  he was the de facto number 1 during those games.  this year he was opposite curtis, who was healthy all year.

by brooksy on Jan 7, 2008 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

#1-#2
Brown was also the #1 with Garcia down the stretch from the Titans game through Dallas.  More yards, more attempts, more catches, more touchdowns than Stallworth, by about 5-10% in the first 3 categories.

Stallworth's season in 2006 was almost all the Texans, 1st Giants, Jaguars, and 1st Redskins games, when he was the whole passing offense and Brown was nothing (twice the attempts, 4 times the receptions, 5 times the yards, more touchdowns).  Brown had the same situation when Baskett was starting from Weeks 3 to 7.

by Andrew @ Bleeding Green Nation on Jan 7, 2008 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

The point is that we still
NEED to add more weapons. It's great to talk about catch percentage and Stall from 06. This has alot to do with the decisions for 08 and all but we have to get real.

Reid and Co want to play like the old niners, packers, broncos type of west coast based offense. Where you spead the balls out and keep anyone from keying on anyone. If you remember Reid said that when TO was here he thinks that he could have done a better job of utilizing other players. It's a great system and we have to deal with it.

So what I see missing a good pass catching FB,not too many of these in the league. A better WR than (Avant, Lewis, Baskett)Which shouldn't be too hard to find. Walker would fit in good with his speed. And a dependable TE. Lewis is a great example, not a great athlete but a great football player. I think that LJ is a head case and I think he should go.

Andrew alot of players have great day's that inflate their stats. It has been happening since forever. You can't just erase players stats on great games. If you are comparing I like the DVOA system that you introduced me to.But that is a team thing. And all stats come from the team. I would like to see some DVOA stats with and without players. That looks like the best way to rate a player. By the impact on the teams production with or without him.

 Cause that would mean that ever WR stats vs certian teams. When a D stinks. I like to rate my players from big games first and stats second. That's why a guy like Joe Montana is considered a top 3 QB all time because he was great when it mattered and stats don't matter in his case. He is considered better than Marino and Marino has better stats.

by topcat6 on Jan 7, 2008 5:25 PM EST reply actions  

Weapons
What you really need is either a guy to get consistently doubled in the secondary or a guy to get more attention from the linebackers.

Westbrook already generally occupies a linebacker and a safety.  McNabb, when mobile, also usually sucks up another linebacker.  If the Eagles were in a 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB set, the three WR's would be singled covered, and there would still be another LB to cover Smith, and a LB spying McNabb who could run free to the play once it was clear he isn't scrambling.  Another playmaker at WR or TE who sucks up additional secondary help means someone else down the wideout chain is running free.  This was the secret to New England's success this year, and the Eagles with TO.  Moss and TO would generally cause a double or even triple coverage situation, leaving a guy like Kevin Faulk or Wes Welker or the 2004 version of Westbrook running free in space out of the backfield, because you also had to put serious coverage on Stallworth and Watson for New England, or Pinkston and Lewis for Philadelphia.

These wideouts would be adequate with a Witten/Gates/Gonzales/Sharpe level of Tight End, or a Tight End like Smith would be adequate with a TO/Johnson/Moss/Rice/Holt/Smith level of receiver.  The other alternative is Smith/Curtis/Brown/someone else taking another step up and becoming that threat.

The final alternative is a 2 back system where you get say Westbrook and Moats on the field at the same time, with Moats a running threat and Westbrook a receivign threat.  But Moats never developed into that player either, and Buckhalter is too limited now in his ability to help that way as well.

by Andrew @ Bleeding Green Nation on Jan 7, 2008 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Montana
"That's why a guy like Joe Montana is considered a top 3 QB all time because he was great when it mattered and stats don't matter in his case. He is considered better than Marino and Marino has better stats."

Oh, I disagree there.  Marino was far more technically proficient as a QB than Montana.

Montana being big when it mattered oftentimes came from him digging himself a whole in the first 3 quarters and then getting out of it in the 4th.  Elway was the same way.  Wouldn't you rather have a QB who with capable people around him, wouldn't dig himself into holes to begin with?

That's what McNabb is like.  If you think about the past decade with the Eagles, McNabb has not usually had to make these heroic 4th quarter comebacks everyone likes to rate QB's on.  That's because he took care of business in quarters 1, 2, and 3 so that 3 times out of 4, he was winning in the last quarter.  Is he a bad QB because he's only had a handful of games like the 2005 trip to Kansas City where he overcame an 18 point deficit for the win because most of the time he put the Eagles in the position of being the team up by 3 scores?

Marino suffered from never having the defense and running game around him that Montana had (the Dolphins generally had a top 5 passing attack and a bottom 10 rushing attack and defense, the 49ers had a top 5 to top 10 defense and a top 5 to top 15 rushing attack).  Put Marino onto the 49ers, and they would be even better than they were with Montana.

This is no different than the Manning/Brady debate today.  Only to people who credit a QB with the accomplishments of his teammates is Brady a better QB than Manning.

by Andrew @ Bleeding Green Nation on Jan 7, 2008 9:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Weapons, Montana
"The final alternative is a 2 back system where you get say Westbrook and Moats on the field at the same time, with Moats a running threat and Westbrook a receivign threat.  But Moats never developed into that player either, and Buckhalter is too limited now in his ability to help that way as well."

That's why I said getting a good FB. I can't think of one that is out there right now so that would be hard to do. We should still look. I agree with you and would like to point out that the niners ran alot of two back misdirection stuff in I know in 94 and I've seen alot of that on NFL network from the 80's. Reid and Co has done this before when we had Staley/Buck/Westbrook and it worked really well. I would love to see that package come back here.

I like Moats we should hope that he hasn't stagnated too much and he has been working hard to fix his ball handling skills. If he can I think that he could be a kick returner for us next year and a part of a two back package.

 "Buckhalter is too limited now in his ability to help that way as well."

Andrew I have been saying this for a while. I love his game but he can't ever turn back the clock. I think he should be traded. Flat out we could get a pick for him in like 09 or something and have it determined on his performance. We don't need him in the back field just because he knows the system. That's BS and we should have a playmaker to help BWEST. No way can I accept him being on the team next year if they use him 10 times a game including KR.

"Montana being big when it mattered oftentimes came from him digging himself a whole in the first 3 quarters and then getting out of it in the 4th.  Elway was the same way.  Wouldn't you rather have a QB who with capable people around him, wouldn't dig himself into holes to begin with?"

I haven't seen to many Montana games. I've seen alot of him in I think 92 or 93 and alot when he was in KC. He was really good IMO. He isn't tall or athletic he just was a great football player.

You are right about Marino and his situation. I've debated this a million and one times and I can't disagree with the pro Marino guys. Because Marino didn't have the support that Montana did. I just can't stop thinking about all the big games that he stayed cool. This is rare and he has done it too many times for me to forget.

by topcat6 on Jan 8, 2008 5:32 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Evilbanner_small
An apologist's justification.
Small
Coping with the Giants win Or "Why I Put The Gun Down"
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #34: The Glory of the East Returns.
Dscn0101_small
Understanding The Wide-9 MIKE
Sbnation_avatar_small
Beating Up on Bad Teams?

Recent FanPosts

Small
Give Me Da GM Keys....Eagles Style
Deviljj_small
The road to recovery for the Eagles is now solely on the back of Michael Vick
Stop_small
Mock Draft 1.0
Small
5 Names on Defense
Small
mock with resigns and some trades
20090903_zaf_e47_865-michael-vick_small
-The Case Against Signing DeSean Jackson-
Jim_thorpe_pic_small
I Dont Cope, I Justify
Small
Predict the Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bgnqr_small JasonB

Editors

Img_1084_small Bob_Q

Westy2_small Route36

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Briandawkins1_small Ben_Larivee