Monday Morning Media Roundup
![]() |
Second, did anyone catch Brian Dawkins playing special teams on that final kickoff? He insisted he be allowed on the field to ensure there would be no game winning return.
Although the Westbrook TD is getting all the press, you could very well say that the game was won after the goal line stand led by Takeo Spikes.
Spikes and his defensive teammates also were grateful for the three straight timeouts in Sunday's game. That helped sharpen their focus.
"When you have a defense back on the goal, you never want to give them a chance to breathe, get a chance to get together," Spikes said. "(The coaches) did that for us, so we were able to talk to each other and we knew what was at hand."
After the game McNabb revealed that he was close to not coming out after the half.
But McNabb stayed in. He said the arm didn't bother him when he was playing, only when he was on the sideline, but this is a guy who once played most of a game on a broken ankle. Mostly, this is a guy who has found ways to win a lot of games in this league. Reid remembers those things, even if the howling wolves don't. That's what made this one hug-worthy.
Really good article from Les Bowen about the huge block thrown by Runyan on the Westbrook 50+ yard TD run.
Despite the fumble, LJ got some well deserved kudos.
No reason to wallow, said quarterback Donovan McNabb: "In situations like that, it's important you have confidence in the next guy."
McNabb told Smith as much. So did Brian Westbrook.
"Even a couple of the trainers came over to me," Smith said. "They were all, like, 'Hang in there. We're going to need you to make a play.' "
Smith did just that in the third quarter, his team trailing by eight.
On third-and-3 from the Redskins' 29, McNabb hit him with a crucial conversion: a 7-yard pass over the middle. Eleven more yards were tacked on for a facemask penalty.
Two plays and 3 yards later, third-and-7 from the Skins' 8, McNabb found Smith over the middle again for Smith's first touchdown since last Dec. 10, the last time he was fully healthy in a game against the Redskins.
We got little to no pressure on the QB yesterday, but then again neither did the Skins.
McNabb was sacked just twice Sunday. It's only the third time this season that the Eagles have allowed fewer than 3 sacks in a game.
Les Bowen highlights some great teamwork on that Westbrook TD.
"I pinned back and gave him what we call 'chicken,' " Andrews said. " 'Chicken' is when you thump a guy, real good."
Downfield, the wideouts and tight end L.J. Smith were pushing the secondary out of the play. Defensive tackle Cornelius Griffin came hard in pursuit, looking for Westbrook to cut back, but Griffin, focused on the ballcarrier, didn't see Jon Runyan lying in the weeds. Defenders tend to regret that. Griffin's chin ran full-speed into Runyan's left shoulder, and Westbrook was able to cut back to the middle, at the Washington 40, with wide-open spaces all around him.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
20
by 700 Level on Nov 12, 2007 9:47 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Red Zone Comment
Hopefully this means those Red Zone problems are behind us for good now. A healthy LJ Smith and more creative play calling seems to be doing the trick.
by slackerjoe on Nov 12, 2007 9:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
The Trend is Your Friend
Jets - 0 for 4 in redzone, 1 TD in game
Bears - 1 for 4 in redzone, 1 TD in game
Vikings - 2 for 5 in redzone, 2 TD's in game
Cowboys - 2 for 3 in redzone, 2 TD's in game
Redskins - 3 for 3 in redzone, 5 TD's in game
by Andrew on Nov 12, 2007 12:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah we fixed our redzone problems
by JoeD on Nov 12, 2007 12:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
not true...
then again, gibbs' play calling in the fourth quarter was terrible
by 700 Level on Nov 12, 2007 1:08 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad Donovan and Andy Reid
by MaxB on Nov 12, 2007 8:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Where has Kevin Curtis gone?
by TexasLax on Nov 12, 2007 9:33 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I think that would be the best thing
by MaxB on Nov 12, 2007 11:24 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Defense
We need a Defensive End, maybe two, a Nickel Corner, a Safety, and perhaps a Linebacker before we start thinking about Wideouts.
by Andrew on Nov 12, 2007 11:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I wouldn't mind seeing safety or corner addressed in the draft.
by JasonB on Nov 13, 2007 12:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why not all of the above?
by Dire Radiant on Nov 13, 2007 9:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Go-To Receivers Don't Grow on Trees
Assuming that Randy Moss resigns with New England, who is going to be available through Free Agnecy? No one that I can think of.
So that leaves acquiring a #1 WR via trade. Would Steve Smith be available from Carolina? What would it take to deal for one of the Cincy WRs? Should we go after a guy like Roy Williams on the Lions?
And if we're serious about rebuilding this team, do you really want to spend a 1st round pick to acquire a #1 WR who will be at his peak for another 3 or 4 years?
Here are my picks for the current #1 WRs in the NFL (in no particular order):
- Terrell Owens
- Randy Moss
- Chad Johnson
- TJ Houshmanzadeh
- Marvin Harrison
- Reggie Wayne
- Steve Smith
- Torry Holt
- Plaxico Burress
- Braylon Edwards
- Roy Williams
- Lee Evans
- Larry Fitzgerald
- Greg Jennings?
- Marques Colston??
- Anquan Boldin???
by slackerjoe on Nov 12, 2007 11:47 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
#1
By that criteria:
Chad Johnson, Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Roy Williams, Donald Driver, Lee Evans, Anquan Boldin, Tory Holt, Isaac Bruce, Terrell Owens, Randy Moss, Larry Fitzgerald, Javon Walker, Joey Galloway, Andre Johnson, and Steve Smith all make the list. Plaxico is an erratic #1. He acts like one some years, other years he becomes invisible. Colston has not been in the league long enough to determine if he is a #1 (last year) or a good possession receiver (this year). Braylon Edwards and Santonio Holmes look like a #1's this season. Laverneus Coles is a #1 trapped with Jello-Arm Pennington.
If you want a #1 in 2008, you have to either look to the draft or go after guys who will be available in free agency, like Larry Fitzgerald and Randy Moss, or through a trade such as possibly Chad Johnson.
by Andrew on Nov 13, 2007 9:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Franchise WR's
I often give thought to the best way to attain a franchise WR. The Patriots (Moss) and Eagles (TO) did so via trade. The Giants got Plaxico through free agency. The Cardinals have 2 franchise WR's that they drafted. NFL draft history (and Eagles history) are littered with first round WR busts, however.
In my opinion, the preferred method should be via free agency or trade. The "hit rate" just seems to be a lot higher. Every season some WR becomes available who can completely change an offense -- this is usually do to the fact that this WR or team is "disgruntled" (Chad Johnson!) or the team that currently has him is about to go through some sort of rebuilding period.
If Larry Fitzgerald becomes available, it would be very exciting for the Eagles to get him. The guy catches everything, he's as much of a "team" guy as you are going to find at that position, and he's still young.
Will they? Probably not. It's hard to imagine investing that kind of money in a WR group. But they do have the money.
by BFH on Nov 13, 2007 11:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Available Money for FA's
Does someone more knowledgable than me know the details of this rule?
Since the Eagles didn't extend any of their players (thanks in part to some new NFL rules about not being allowed to extend second year players like Gaither), could it be that the front office has their sights set on making a big splash in free agency in '08?
by slackerjoe on Nov 13, 2007 11:12 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
They should have a lot of room next year
I think they will have over 30 million to spend.
by JasonB on Nov 13, 2007 1:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Woohoo!
by BrianS on Nov 13, 2007 1:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ANd Suggs from Baltimore!
by JasonB on Nov 13, 2007 1:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cap
They are $23 million under for next year with 48 players signed, but that might actually be closer to $25-26 million depending upon the Patterson, Brown and Cole bonuses.
Cutting Kearse frees up $4.5 million. Cutting Howard frees up $1.1 million. Cutting McDougle frees up $900,000. I have a tought time seeing any of those guys make the team.
If McNabb is traded, $6.3 million in cap can be freed up.
Other major cap hogs are Tra Thomas ($5.9 million), John Runyan ($4.2 million), and Takeo Spikes ($5 million).
Positions not signed for next year include the #1 Tight End, #3 and #4 Cornerbacks, #4 Safety, #5 Defensive Tackle, Long Snapper, Punt/Kick Returner.
The Eagles definitely have almost $25 million, likely will have $30 million, and could have $35-50 million in cap space depending on how many aging veterans are kept on the team. If they blow up the team and go on a real youth movement on both lines and at Quarterback, they would have a ton of money to spend in free agency or for trades.
by Andrew on Nov 13, 2007 10:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cutting Kearse
by JasonB on Nov 14, 2007 1:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
When you cut a player, you only get to save the unpaid salary vs. the cap and any roster bonuses due that year. Signing bonuses get accelerated.
That's why the Eagles have mostly stuck to extending guys and signing guys using hefty roster bonuses, so that if the bet was wrong, they don't get burned when they cut the player.
by Andrew on Nov 14, 2007 9:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus
Of course, everyone gets that 7 mil.
by JasonB on Nov 15, 2007 10:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cap
by Andrew on Nov 15, 2007 2:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
RE: Cutting Kearse
* I reserve the right to be wrong.
by BFH on Nov 14, 2007 9:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















