DeSean Jackson Trade Speculation Emerges

Rob Carr

Could the Eagles trade DeSean Jackson this offseason?

The re-signing of Eagles wide receivers Riley Cooper and Jeremy Maclin reunites them with DeSean Jackson, who is already under contract. That leaves the Eagles with three key wide receivers on the team. The question everyone asking now is: how will all three fit into the Eagles offense? BGN took a look how things might play out. But thinking about it more... maybe that's not the right question to ask. Perhaps the right question is: what do these moves mean for DeSean Jackson's future?

I've often downplayed the idea that the Eagles will trade Jackson this offseason, but I have to admit the team's urgency to re-sign Maclin and Cooper has me wondering. And now it seems like there's some speculation going around online that Jackson might not be in the Eagles plans moving forward. Jimmy Kempski of touched on this topic in a post he released this morning. Jimmy makes a number of good points, including that the Eagles have a lot of cap space tied up in the receiver position. The idea of a Jackson trade, while hard to swallow at first, isn't totally impossible.

On the surface, this seems like a crazy proposition. DeSean Jackson is coming off a career year. The numbers don't lie: 82 receptions for 1332 yards (16.2 y/r), and 9 TD is some high quality production. Jackson accounted for over 32% of the team's passing yards and 28% of the passing touchdowns. According to a Pro Football Focus stat called "WR Rating", which shows the quarterback rating when a receiver is thrown at, Jackson ranked third in the league. Eagles quarterbacks (Vick and Foles) finished for a combined 124.4 QB rating when targeting Jackson.

But the motivation to move Jackson wouldn't be production related. Sometimes there are issues beyond the surface. Take note of this Howard Eskin tweet, in response to Kempski's column:

In other words, Eskin is hearing that the Eagles may be interested in cutting bait with Jackson due to his "drama." What drama, you ask? Well, there's the fact he said he definitely feels he's deserving of a raise shortly after the season ended. There's also the notion he doesn't get along with Eagles wide receivers coach Bob Bicknell, as Kempski mentioned in his column.

It's hard to imagine what kind of value Jackson has even if this speculation is true. The talented receiver will turn 28 in December and he carries big cap numbers on his contract beyond the 2014 season: $12M in 2015, $10.5M in 2016. The Eagles might not get great return value in a trade. This isn't an uncommon concurrence, though. Look no further than the end of Asante Samuel's career in Philly. Samuel wore out his welcome and the team didn't want to keep his presence around, or his big contract, so they traded him to Atlanta for very little in return (a 7th round pick that became Bryce Brown). Then again, Samuel wasn't coming off a career year the way Jackson is.

Right now, all of this is simply speculation. There are no official reports on Jackson being on the trade block. But it seems like the idea is slowly emerging as a legitimate possibility.

Needless to say, this will be a very interesting Eagles offseason.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bleeding Green Nation

You must be a member of Bleeding Green Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bleeding Green Nation. You should read them.

Join Bleeding Green Nation

You must be a member of Bleeding Green Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bleeding Green Nation. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.