PHILADELPHIA - NOVEMBER 07: Peyton Manning #18 of the Indianapolis Colts congratulates Michael Vick #7 of the Philadelphia Eagles after their game on November 7 2010 at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia Pennsylvania. The Eagles defeated the Colts 26-24. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)
In case you hadn’t heard, All-World quarterback Peyton Manning is on the open market. He’s the most decorated free agent of all time, and is attracting attention from about half the league. So far Manning’s camp has heard from at least 12 teams.
Are the Eagles one of them? It’s tough to say. The Eagles generally don’t like to conduct business out in the open, a lesson we learned last season during the Nnamdi Asomugha sweepstakes. But that hasn’t stopped seemingly every sports writer in town from suggesting the Eagles sign the longtime Colt.
The argument is compelling: in Manning the Eagles would receive one of the most gifted quarterbacks in NFL history. He would run the offense like a true field general and take control of the franchise in a way we haven’t seen in recent memory. Even at 35, his production in recent years makes it reasonable to believe that Peyton still has some game left in him.
This is assuming, of course, that his neck injury – you know, the one that sidelined him for all of last year – is fully healed. And for the Eagles, signing Manning also comes with the assumption that he’s okay with playing against his brother at least twice a year (he isn’t) and that the Eagles would be able to get enough back if they traded Vick (they wouldn’t).
Outside of a grainy YouTube video, Peyton hasn’t proven that he can regain even some of the form that made him the only four time league MVP. But even if Manning regained all, or even most, of the talent that made him arguably the best of his generation, he still doesn’t necessarily fit in Philly. For proof, take a look at the Super Bowl teams from the last ten years:
|2002||Tampa Bay Buccaneers||Oakland Raiders||Brad Johnson|
|2003||New England Patriots||Carolina Panthers||Tom Brady|
|2004||New England Patriots||Philadelphia Eagles||Tom Brady|
|2005||Pittsburgh Steelers||Seattle Seahawks||Ben Roethlisberger|
|2006||Indianapolis Colts||Chicago Bears||Peyton Manning|
|2007||New York Giants||New England Patriots||Eli Manning|
|2008||Pittsburgh Steelers||Arizona Cardinals||Ben Roethlisberger|
|2009||New Orleans Saints||Indianapolis Colts||Drew Brees|
|2010||Green Bay Packers||Pittsburgh Steelers||Aaron Rodgers|
|2011||New York Giants||New England Patriots||Eli Manning|
Notice anything? Over the past decade, the teams that hoisted the Lombardi Trophy have done it through consistency at the quarterback position. While you could argue that Brad Johnson and 2005 Ben Roethlisberger are exceptions to the rule, neither quarterback was being counted on to put up huge numbers.
The furor over Manning isn’t surprising in towns like
Eagles fans watched (often with our hands over our eyes) as a Super Bowl contender collapsed under the weight of inconsistency on both sides of the ball. Too many free agents with too little experience in the system ended up being a major contributor to the dismal 8-8 record last season.
I know what you’re thinking: "Patrick, you’re an idiot/dope/moron. This isn’t Jarrad Page. This is Peyton freakin’ Manning."
Point taken, fair reader. But let’s also consider something we saw firsthand. Stop me when this sounds familiar: a highly decorated quarterback with over a decade of service under his belt leaves the only team he’s ever known. He ends up on a team with a new system, and isn’t quite able to grasp his new offense by year’s end. While I don’t think anyone would question Manning’s cardiovascular endurance, the parallels are too similar.
Head coach Andy Reid is widely expected to have one more year to turn his team around. Betting the farm on an aging quarterback with potential severe neck problems doesn’t sound like the best way to do that, regardless of who the quarterback is.
Shelling out the kind of money Manning will command and hoping the offseason is enough time to get him acclimated is a riskier move than all of last year’s signings. Vick likely isn’t good enough to carry the team to a Super Bowl berth, but he also hasn’t had a full offseason as the quarterback. The Eagles brass has indicated that they’re willing to give him that.
And with improvements likely coming through free agency and the draft, the Eagles are better off staying the course than rolling the dice again – even if they’re rolling them on Peyton freakin’ Manning.
For more Eagles news, humor and irreverence, follow Patrick on Twitter at @PatrickWall_NFL.
Do you want the Eagles to sign Peyton Manning?
Yes (244 votes)
No (912 votes)
1156 total votes