*Poll* Is the NFL hurting the entertainment value of the game?
'm writing a class research paper and part of my topic is that the NFL is ruining much of the entertainment value of pro football and it's main appeal, the violence of the sport. The NFL is a violent game and the league is trying to minimize that but they are also trying to protect the players we love to watch. What is your take on this issue? Please answer the poll question below
Note - I do not plan on using any of your quotes , if for some reason I did you will remain anonymous unless requested. Thank you
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like the violence
but I believe they have successfully transformed the game to as Nardawg said, “non-stop strategy” battle. I believe the decision that came about due to the Eagles getting man handled by Carolina in the championship game in the early 2000’s was the catalyst of the change. Of coarse that was the 5 yard rule for the DB’s. After that the big hitting safety’s like Roy Williams started to become a liability. LB’s now needed to be able to turn hips and run down field in coverage. Therefore also getting rid of the bigger and big hitting LB’s.
I do not think the game suffered from the change. It’s evolving as it needs. But make no mistake. The most recent HUGE push to make the head to head contact illegal and fine able is due to the fact that NFL, saw these player law suits coming and they have started to be proactive in fluffing their image, to limit their liability.
Eagles go 8-8 or 9-7 in 2012/2013 season. 2/17/12
No way Eagles draft a LB in the first round 2012.
We will see if Spags was in the right place at the right time in the Gmens SB run. Or was that the fluke year and he really is just mediocre.
by MightyJoeBanner on Feb 20, 2012 8:10 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I don't see the entertainment value of the game being hurt
The game is and always will be violent but I don’t know anyone who enjoys seeing the type of hits that the league is clamping down on. Seeing a player lying on the ground unconcious or staggering around after a blow to the head can ruin a game as a spectacle and leave me only concerned for the guy’s safety.
So many people engage in hyperbole on this topic, saying things like “the game is turning into a flag football league”, which is patent nonsense. None of the rule changes would affect a hit like this, which I enjoy, but would help to ensure that ones like this one are less frequent.
(This has nothing to do with the player’s respective teams, they were just the first two hits that came to mind.)
It's the most successful sport in America
So statiscally, the answer is no
and they’re not trying to tone down the violence, they’re trying to get rid of the career ending, possibly life threatening helmet to helmet hits…
People who argue that they’re being soft are meat head mongoloids that don’t nderstand the game. Never ever in a million years was it ever taught to tackle by spearing someone with the crown of your helmet
JoeD AKA The Voice Of Reason
Doesnt matter
To me it might hurt the entertainment of the game a little bit because big hits are one of the reasons we watch…But seriously how selfish is it to think that the entertainment loss outweighs players who have to deal with serious depression issues after they retire because they suffered 8 concussions. Its a non-issue in IMO and I think Goodells handling it the right way.
You must've read Aikman's story this morning
He’s saying the same thing. He doesn’t think the NFL will remain the #1 sport in America. He made the point people weren’t complaining about missing Thursday night games because they didn’t have the NFL Network, and that’s kind of scary. He also mentioned the NFL has too many nights for football. Sunday, Monday, Thursday and Saturday games are killing the appeal of the “BIG GAME”.
Brian Dawkins for President

by 




























