FirstRowSports Seized: What Was The Point of "Stop SOPA" Campaign?
This post is kind of off topic, but also not really, but it's not about Eagles football. So if you all you want is Eagles news, keep scrolling down.
For those of you still reading, you no doubt noticed the giant internet wide protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act or SOPA, which was a bill in congress that would have given the government the authority to take down foreign based sites that infringe on US based copyrights. Sites like Wikipedia & Reddit went dark, heavyweights like Facebook & Google lodged their objections to the bill, even SBNation expressed their opposition.
The bill was eventually shelved, but in reality, the campaign was failure. Because as it turns out, the feds can already take down whatever copyright infringing sites they want and are doing so at an increasing rate ahead of the Super Bowl.
In a new round of seizures the US authorities have taken control of domain names belonging to several popular sports streaming sites including Firstrowsports.tv, Firstrowsports.com and Soccertvlive.net. All affected sites now redirect to a notice from DOJ/ICE. In common with last year’s campaign, the new round of seizures appears to be part of another "Super Bowl Crackdown" targeting sites that link to unauthorized sports streams.
Isn't that what everyone was worried about with these SOPA and PIPA bills? So that all turned out to be much ado about nothing in the end right? The idea was to stop something from becoming law that is already actually law? And why was congress even debating this if it's already law? Other than to fill their campaign warchests with Hollywood's lobbying cash that is...
To be honest, there is no doubt that these sites were flat out stealing content and profiting off it. Anyone who has watched a game on FirstRowSports has dealt with the constant annoying popups... So I really can't feel bad for them. Stealing is stealing and there's really no way around that...
But people aren't necessarily using these sites simply because they don't want to pay to watch their favorite sports. Some are... but many, including many people who are members of this site, are doing it because they have virtually no other choice. Unless you have Direct TV, which is not an option for all both practically and otherwise, you simply have no option to watch an out of market NFL game. That means that if you're anywhere outside of the Philly area and you don't have a dish, you're out of luck. And that's not acceptable.
If the NFL wants to take down sites that illegally stream their content that's fine. But if they really want to combat the problem of online piracy, they should be worrying about the cause, not the symptoms of it. The cause is the lack of choice that they've given NFL fans. The symptom is these illegal streaming sites. Make the NFL ticket available to all, give us a legal online option... and it will help stop streaming sites like this. It won't get rid of them... but it will help and will do so in a fan friendly way.
91 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
NBC is streaming the game online anyways...
but they didn’t/couldn’t take down http://www.firstrowsports.eu/
That is great.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
by Christopher A on Feb 2, 2012 6:23 PM EST up reply actions
No, that was not what “Stop SOPA” was about. Maybe some people thought it was but it wasn’t.
The government has always had the right to take down sites that hosted illegal and copyrighted products, they just had to go through a defined and extensive set of steps to get it done. What SOPA would’ve done, it would’ve given the government free reign to take down (or make it impossible to find) any site immeadiately and without warning for anything that a company deemed “copyright infringement”. For example, if the NFL decided that you didn’t have authorization to produce written descriptions of the game, they could shut down BGN. Or if someone posted something that was copyrighted in the fanpost section or fanshot section, they could shut the site down as well. And it would’ve given the government power to shut down sites and isolate sites that they deemed “offensive”. The potential for abuse was through the roof.
There are rules on the internet, and while convenient, sites like firstrowsports are illegal.
The Curse of Lombardi
Iggles Nest
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."
by d-jackfan10 on Feb 2, 2012 6:19 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
The government has always had the right to take down sites that hosted illegal and copyrighted products
Partially true.
I know the US government has jurisdiction over a variety of domains including ‘.com’ and ‘.net’ but there are a number of them that don’t fall under US control. I think. EU may be one of them (it’d make sense) and the reason why FirstRowSports is still up
http://theboilermaker.blogspot.com/
by Bryan Steedman on Feb 2, 2012 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, correct.
If you posses a domain with a tld under the jurisdiction of another country, the USA cannot seize it — which is why sites like piratebay continue to jump from .fr to .se and .it, etc. — they’re trying to stay one step ahead of the law as countries slowly start assisting the US with seizing domain names.
by UnclaimedFright on Feb 2, 2012 6:49 PM EST up reply actions
Right, they’re able to take down sites that are hosted within the United States. But they can’t stop sites like PirateBay that are hosted in countries like Sweeden.
The Curse of Lombardi
Iggles Nest
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."
It goes beyond that, though. Those sites were illegal and they had the right to take them down, as much as we all wish they wouldn’t… But SOPA would give the government to cut down on “enabling” sites too. Basically if you were doing anything to “support” illegal downloads, they could force restrictions on you too.
This could have affects on blogs like SBNation by making them solely responsible for material here. If I decide to link to an illegal streaming site and you don’t take it down, SBN/BGN get screwed.
It also gives them the power to shut down new sites that might encourage illegal file sharing, such as social networking sites. Also you can ay goodbye to any highlight videos on youtube or anything that features a song that’s owned by a major record label.
IMO, the worst offense is that they would be essentially censoring the internet and blocking our ability to get to sites that they don’t like. That puts us in the same territory as China, North Korea, Iran, etc.
Formerly DeSean10
36-5-20-JJ -- Forever Bleeding Green
Team Kuechly, J. Jenkins, Iloka
Wow, grammar fail… I typed that a little to fast.
Formerly DeSean10
36-5-20-JJ -- Forever Bleeding Green
Team Kuechly, J. Jenkins, Iloka
too fast
AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.
by KByars on Feb 2, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
hehehe
AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.
That’s not really what SOPA was about as I understood it. It was about foreign sites. The US already can shut down domestic sites.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
And as this shows, they can shut down foreign sites as well. Especially if they are hosted by US services.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
Coordination with foreign governments.
The Curse of Lombardi
Iggles Nest
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."
Coordination my ass. Coercion and withdrawal of support is more apropos
"Start playing with some jam in here"
by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Feb 3, 2012 8:25 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Correct
That’s the only kind of support the US can get internationally.
by UnclaimedFright on Feb 3, 2012 3:39 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, the point is more about the process
This wasn’t a sudden thing, it was something that had likely been ongoing for some time.
In order to shut websites down now, the authorities have to provide extensive evidence of piracy on a significant scale. Under SOPA the way it was written, the process would have been streamlined to the point of essentially being a kill button for any website with any copyrighted material displayed at any level.
Nope.
it wasnt just government
the real issue is that a previously civil law violation turned into a criminal law violation. Where now a lawsuit is required from those who feel infringed upon, SOPA and PIPA would have made this a police enforceable action. The process would also change to being driven by the copyright holders, so that a copyright holder who feels that someone may have infringed upon them can request a shutdown, and everyone has to comply (ISPs, DNS, hosting providers, etc) or face criminal punishment. There is no due process, and the copyright holders have already shown themselves to have no issues abusing the rights they currently have. They would be worse if these new laws had passed.
The takedown here is a continuation of a current process, and while driven by corporations, it still required a govt body to act on their request.
I still love JimmyK’s picture of the series of rapes with the nfl ending up with a pile of cash. That is the truth. Even people with directv (me) dont always buy this as it is too expensive. Now that the Eagles sucked this year, they may not get many national games next year, and it may be worth it for me to buy, but any chance of 6-8 definite games, then there is no way I purchase sunday ticket. I just have to hope a new pirate comes around, or I will just follow through message boards. I hope that commenting on games doesnt become illegal too ( which may have been possible under SOPA/PIPA) .
Sorry, JasonB
SOPA was about taking down any sites that linked to an “illegal” site. For instance, this Adult Swim show that is plastered all over BGN right now. If the site for that show has AnyThing illegal on it, BGN could be shut down also, just for linking to it. That is what SOPA was about. That’s why Wikipedia blacked out. Of the hundreds (or thousands) of links on that site, if even one linked page is deemed to be “illegal” by the US Government, then all of Wikipedia could be shut down.
by philabronc53 on Feb 3, 2012 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
whateva...
This is a never ending battle, one dies another spawns…
"Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that."-Bill Shankly
Got bad knees and a high motor? Well cmon on over to PHILLY, we'll do our best to put you in the right position and do a better job!
by theaction on Feb 2, 2012 6:27 PM EST via mobile reply actions
They'll win,
Eventually, because they have the money and money rules the world.
by UnclaimedFright on Feb 2, 2012 6:53 PM EST up reply actions
Mostly what Anthro and Djack said. Fighting SOPA wasn’t fighting for piracy, it was fighting for freedom of expression and the existence of user created content.
AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.
Totally
If nfl.com streamed eagles games for 5 bucks a piece I would gladly pay that rather go to the bar 10am on a sunday. (west coast).
Also I think that the fault in their logic is that each person who pirates something is a lost sale. I don’t think anyone would have paid to see the expendables.
"Eli made a good tackle. I tried to run him over. ... Next time I'll try to jump over his head or something." - Asante Samuel
by abains007 on Feb 2, 2012 6:49 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
It kind of was...
Let’s be honest. It wasn’t all about privacy and freedom. It was about getting shit for free too.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
Yeah, that too.
The Curse of Lombardi
Iggles Nest
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."
I’m sure there was an element of that too, but the legislation as it was written would have been easily abused.
AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.
Yes, but
You can’t have a conversation about people wanting to get shit for free without having a conversation about archaic copyright law.
The statute for copyrighting entertainment is 75 years. Sorry, that’s just too long to have exclusive rights to a piece of work in the modern age.
by UnclaimedFright on Feb 2, 2012 10:13 PM EST up reply actions
Is Megaupload ever coming back?
"There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail, should we fall, we will know that we have lived.--"Anomander Rake, Son of Darkness
Evil is relative…You can’t hang a sign on it. You can’t touch it or taste it or cut it with a sword. Evil depends on where you are standing, pointing your indicting finger. -Glen Cook The Black Company
Totally
Give us a solution. What about streaming a game for 5 bucks or so, from nfl.com. I would gladly
"Eli made a good tackle. I tried to run him over. ... Next time I'll try to jump over his head or something." - Asante Samuel
by abains007 on Feb 2, 2012 6:41 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Fail
"Eli made a good tackle. I tried to run him over. ... Next time I'll try to jump over his head or something." - Asante Samuel
by abains007 on Feb 2, 2012 6:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
waiting for an NFL-Apple agreement
I’m assuming these two very powerful companies are discussing ways for users to purchase live NFL game broadcasts over iTunes. It would be difficult to enforce blackout rules, but could generate a huge amount of revenue for both Apple and the NFL.
Technically there is a legal online option
I believe that you can buy the online-only portion of Sunday Ticket. The issue is that it’s $350 a year, which is what Sunday Ticket subscribers pay for the whole thing, TV and online.
Never argue with an idiot. They'll bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Sunday Ticket
You also need a DirectTV subscription, as far as I know. It’s really just a product for Sports Bars to broadcast multiple games at once. They should have a product for individual games, even if it’s $10-20 per game. There’s lots of fans living outside their home markets that would gladly pay that much for a good-quality live stream (and perhaps without commercials?)
by dlh on Feb 2, 2012 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
I thought there was a small package that could be purchased, but it was still too much for me. There was no one game option. The choices were a month of a certain market, or all 16 games in a week , or something similar. I think you may need directv for that also, and I am not sure if it is still offered. I would be surprised if anyone had purchased it, as the price per game came down to purely stupid.
Piracy evolves out of inequality.
Price out your fans like that, and they’ll turn to piracy.
Rather than trying to fix the model, because rich people usually got there by being greedy, they’re going the other way with it – punish the shit out of using the alternative.
That’s what SOPA was about, the ability to unilaterally punish websites for being remotely linked to copyrighted content.
Just another example of how the “elite” in the USA just really don’t get the will of the American people.
by UnclaimedFright on Feb 2, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions
You either need a Directv subscription along with that or you need to prove that it’s impossible for you to get DirecTV.
If you just don’t like the dish service… too bad.
And from what I’ve heard, the streaming service dish offers is terrible.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
Fios tech told me that DirecTV’s contract with the NFL is up after the 2012 season and then NFL will offer NFL ticket to Verizon, Comcast Dish Network, DirecTV, etc…. I guess they figured they were losing out on money by having an exclusive contract with DirecTV only. I live in Baltimore and I have Fios and DTV with the cheapest package they have just so I can get the ticket.
by Shady25 on Feb 2, 2012 11:08 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
To be honest, there is no doubt that these sites were flat out stealing content and profiting off it. Anyone who has watched a game on FirstRowSports has dealt with the constant annoying popups…</blockquote
Adblock works wonders.
And the site is very practical. Simply put, when it comes to college sports I get more games than I do with both the basic cable package here and the additional subscription channels. It’s also very nice during football because when one o clock hits we get a Lions game on Fox and a Browns game on CBS and if you want anything else you’re hosed. So besides actually getting a worthwhile game being able to switch between games works when there’s more exciting games or because of fantasy football implications.
http://theboilermaker.blogspot.com/
Welp...
Fixed.
To be honest, there is no doubt that these sites were flat out stealing content and profiting off it. Anyone who has watched a game on FirstRowSports has dealt with the constant annoying popups…
Adblock works wonders.
And the site is very practical. Simply put, when it comes to college sports I get more games than I do with both the basic cable package here and the additional subscription channels. It’s also very nice during football because when one o clock hits we get a Lions game on Fox and a Browns game on CBS and if you want anything else you’re hosed. So besides actually getting a worthwhile game being able to switch between games works when there’s more exciting games or because of fantasy football implications.
http://theboilermaker.blogspot.com/
That’s the point. If the NFL made their legal offering as practical, a streaming site with garbage video and constant ads wouldn’t be as attractive to people.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
I use the site mentioned here with Adblock and there are no ads on the page, no pop-up ads, no pop-up on the video ads or video ads thanks to it. I’ve brought up the site elsewhere and it’s a colossal mess without adblock, though.
http://theboilermaker.blogspot.com/
by Bryan Steedman on Feb 2, 2012 9:45 PM EST up reply actions
you can get sunday ticket through ps3 now
by VRFC8 on Feb 2, 2012 6:46 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Kind of
It’s the same deal with the Dish online service. Must already have DIsh or prove that it’s impossible.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
I LOL’d last night when the government was going to go after thepiratebay.org so they changed their name to thepiratebay.se so our government can’t touch it. This is the situation that SOPA would really effect. If sopa was in affect they could block access to any website they wanted instead of having to try and take it down. Were going to see a lot of pirate and illegal streaming sites moving away from .com, .org. and .net.
"Fuckin right G."
.TV is not a US domain and they shut a site with that down…
So they can block access to non US domains.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
.tv is leased by a foreign government but it is owned by an American company based in Virginia so our government can force it to be shutdown. It isn’t legal to block foreign domains from US citizens. It would be if sopa/pipa/or acta is ever passed though.
"Fuckin right G."
We could have our own great wall.

Like this, but digital.
AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.
Last year they shut down Channelsurfing.net and atdhe.net.
Both sites are back up under a slightly different name.
Plus, if I remember correctly, they already shutdown firstrowsports when it was a different name, and like 2 weeks later it popped back up again. Seems like all they are really doing is wasting their time.
Its all about the []_[]
#FirePaulHolmgren
I’m sure they’ll pop up again, but the point is that they have power to take them down already.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.
title

Just talkin about practice
Follow me on Twitter - @Teachin2daChoir
by The Mad Hopper on Feb 2, 2012 7:10 PM EST reply actions 3 recs

Last name Ever
First name Greatest
#PayDeSeanJackson
by Djax10 on Feb 2, 2012 9:35 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Was the site down for a few hours?
AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.
OK so I'm not crazy
I experienced the same thing.
I am Sandy's bitch.
Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever
Im going to be called crazy, conspiracy nut.........
but since the inception of a few controlling the masses(basically civilization) things like religion, gladiator games, and now TV are used to control the mob(masses). Keep the mob entertained and busy and pull the strings from behind the scenes. Censorship, yellow journalism….etc have evolved and mutated into many different but similar beasts. Welcome to reality.
On a happy note, happiness comes from within. So ignorance is bliss. Move on there’s nothing to see here:)
At least one more year of Andy and Juan. If they don't win it all they both better be gone!
No way Eagles draft a LB in the first round 2012.
We will see if Spags was in the right place at the right time in the Gmens SB run. Or was that the fluke year and he really is just mediocre.
Damn….I need a new way to watch Eagles games then
by Bleeding Green in the H on Feb 2, 2012 9:47 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
But if they really want to combat the problem of online piracy, they should be worrying about the cause, not the symptoms of it. The cause is the lack of choice that they’ve given NFL fans. The symptom is these illegal streaming sites.
good line. hey they shouldnt even charge us, just make it so the stream has to come from their servers. or at least give FOX or CBS the ability to show their games online, commercials and all…
SOPA and PIPA were way worse than the DMCA used to take down these sites, don't forget it.
Isn’t that what everyone was worried about with these SOPA and PIPA bills? So that all turned out to be much ado about nothing in the end right? The idea was to stop something from becoming law that is already actually law?
No, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act already exists and has for many years.
SOPA and PIPA were more terrible.
- payment partners of a website could be required to stop processing payments to a website suspected of infringement even if the website was never held liable in a US Court. Hollywood could strange any website from making any money just be accusing them and then drawing out the court process for years and years.
- the justice department could make sites disappear without any due process
- uses of the DMCA like this one taking down frontrowsports.tv and megaupload shows that the government already has the power to take down infringing websites and prosecute pirates. SOPA and PIPA are unneccessary for their stated goals. Instead, their purpose would have been to strong-arm tools for the RIAA and Hollywood to chill the internet which they view as the enemy of their business: people going to movie theaters and buying CDs at a record store. They don’t like the idea that people can be entertained watching YouTube videos for free instead of paying $12 to see Jack and Jill or that they can download the song they want for $1.00 on iTunes instead of paying $17 for the CD.
- it wouldn’t stop piracy. As we see today, even with all the laws and all the kings horses and men we still have firstrowsports.eu up and thepiratebay.org running at full steam. It would take about 5 seconds after the bill was passed for any pirate website to find the next loophole, they probably already have. It’s the legit websites like SBNation, Youtube, Twitter, etc. that would be sweating bullets and censoring content like crazy to prevent liability.
Its not really as simple as everybody imagines
Why wouldn’t the NFL want to expand its market to be more profitable? The NFL has TV deals in place with networks that don’t necessarily allow for streaming redistribution. Its easy to say things should work this way from behind our computers, but lets try sitting down at the offices of the NFL and try to work this out. I promise its a hell of a lot harder to figure out the situation. It sucks but the foundations of those connections to the major cable networks are what enable us to watch the NFL today.
I live in Miami so my only option to watch Eagles games is by illegal streaming. It sucks every time a site gets taken down, but I’m not going to whine and complain about it because I know its illegal. By allowing content to be redistributed, sites like firstrowsports would make tremendous profits off of NFL’s trademark(which they are legally obligated to protect) and the NFL would theoretically go broke. Look at how much money the Kim Dotcom guy made off of Megaupload. The vast majority of that stuff was pirated material. I would definitely like a choice of being able to watch the Eagles in a foreign market, but a model of illegal streams taking money away from the NFL should not be a legal solution to this.
i understand what you are saying, but I think you have something wrong here. The NFL is more profitable by not expanding its markets in this case. DirectTv understands the number of subscribers that it can lock into 2 year deals by having the only place to get the NFL for out of market viewers. This gives them an enormous sales position against cable and over-the-air options for viewers. Because of this, they pay an amount more than everyone else would combine to pay to offer this.
It may work out that the NFL could try to sell to all the cable providers and make more money, but that would involve more contracts/lawyers/salesmen, and as it is they have a single billion dollar check from a distribution channel. If this were offered to everyone, then none of these providers would have a sales advantage, and capitalizing on the package would be harder to do.
The NFL makes more money off of this remaining exclusive, and the players do benefit from this. The owners and execs likely benefit even more however. The availability of the product to the viewers ends up in this case being much less of a priority than making cash. The thing that pisses me off is that removing the streams just makes me watch less, it doesnt make me actually buy the package.
is it me or i felt like it was the end of the world when bgn was down for a couple hours, needed a daily dose of eagles content
My mojo so dope. BITCH!
"People always call me up and ask me: "Why do you think you can fly?"
"Because I'm an Eagle:)." Randall Cunningham
More a music and movie issue
Daniel Ash of Bauhaus/Love and Rockets said in an interview “I know of lot of bands whose careers were killed by Napster.” Prince’s complaints are well-documented. Most people with Internet access have cable or satellite TV, I don’t think illegal game streaming is as big a deal as musicians having their music downloaded for free. The second and third tier musicians who sign with record labels often spend their own money for recording costs (sometimes for promotion as well) with the promise of a sales cut. Then everybody downloads it for free, and they don’t have the established fan base that will go order the physical CD or download from iTunes out of loyalty. With movies, if you download a whodunit movie, you aren’t going to pay to watch it a second time when you know what happens. I run a small record label, I’ve been on both sides of the issue. SOPA was whipping out an axe when you needed a scalpel.
Yes, all true, but ignoring the fact that piracy can be a symptom
But it doesn’t address the issues on the other side.
Why does the whodunit movie, that probably cost 10 million to make, have a ticket price of $12.00?
Movie studios justify these ticket prices with “Well Avatar cost 120 million to make!”
But the whodunit you’re seeing didn’t cost that much. Why did it’s ticket price get raised as if you were trying to pay off a 120 million budget?
If you’re going to try and cheat the people, the people are going to try and cheat you back.
by UnclaimedFright on Feb 3, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
In my case it was a very good thing
I make money on Youtube, currently legally through a third party company helping me with a partnership. I am ignored by the companies that own the video games I play (they don’t really care about what I do, so they let it go), BUT SOPA would have made me vulnerable despite that allowance by the intellectual property owner (and not protect me under current rules allowing me to apply my own take on those games).
here’s to PIPA following it out the door.
The last paragraph gives an insight as to how to combat the real problem and not the symptom.
Right church, wrong pew (as they say). The Cable companies are one of the biggest scams going! WIth the technology they have today, why cant a channel like ESPN, ESPN2, NFLN, etc run multiple games at once where you select the game you want to watch on that channel at that time? Why, because people will pay to have it instead of demanding it from a company we pay $100+/mo to! As a person who works two jobs, and a child on the way, I (and my wife) rarely watch tv. But when we do, we watch only a about 10 channels. So why does the cable company FORCE me to get the FOOD NETWORK, or LIFETIME, or USA, or whatever channels I will never watch. Because they can. BULLSHIT!! The cable companies and sattelite companies are the ones that should be regulated. The government does nothing about that though do they!
"Obviously, I lobbied for him to be here. But what a difference a year makes." -- Donovan McNabb
I have more free time than you. I watch The Simpsons/Family Guy, football (and, occasionally, some Phillies games) HBO and Encore. The other 500+ channels go unused.
by Live from Quahog on Feb 3, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
If the NFL wants to take down sites that illegally stream their content that’s fine. But if they really want to combat the problem of online piracy, they should be worrying about the cause, not the symptoms of it. The cause is the lack of choice that they’ve given NFL fans. The symptom is these illegal streaming sites. Make the NFL ticket available to all, give us a legal online option… and it will help stop streaming sites like this. It won’t get rid of them… but it will help and will do so in a fan friendly way.
2011 New York Giants- Worst NFC Champs Ever
FAIL
I was going to say that’s it in a nutshell. These sites exist because there is a demand for them. The NFL will never be able to get rid of them. What they need to do is compete. How do they compete with free? Easy, compete on convenience.
Look at the MLB. They have awesome mobile apps that pretty cheap, with audio. And the video is pretty cheap, and can be accessed on mobile devices, AppleTVs, and the web. That is the epitome of fan friendly.
Compare that to the NFL. The mobile apps only work with Verizon. There goes at least half your audience. The video is only on DirecTV, and there goes another half or more of your audience. That is the epitome of fan unfriendly.
I’ll keep illegally streaming movies because there isn’t a better option. I’d LOVE to pay for it, like I do for the MLB. But I’m not changing my phone provider (I like ATT and besides I’m in a 2 year contract) nor my TV provider (I like Comcast and besides the internet would be more expensive). Let me give you money NFL!!
2011 New York Giants- Worst NFC Champs Ever
I don't think you understand SOPA/PIPA Jason
Jason,
I agree with most of the sports topics you write, but I don’t think you fully understand what the fuss with SOPA and PIPA were about. I live out of state and work at a high profile IT company, so I have to deal with using Sunday Ticket through my PS3 (overpriced) and know quite a bit about the Tech Industry. The Frontrowsports takedown is not the same takedown that people want to prevent with SOPA/PIPA. Frontrow was direct streaming it off their site. SOPA/PIPA state that if you have link to a site, your site can be taken down. (Why Google is pissed). For example if I posted a link to download “Invincible” as a comment they could take down BGN. Right now they can not do that, they can take down sites right hosting or streaming, but not if there is a link to another site.
by DieHardPhilly33 on Feb 3, 2012 10:47 AM EST reply actions

by 





























