Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

I Haven't Seen Real Eagle Football In 13 Years And Counting!


I'd like to start off by saying I am a long time eagles fan. I am 40 years old and grew up with the gang green defense. I have yet to go down to the linc by choice. I still watch the birds almost every week. I usually DVR them to avoid the mass amounts of commercials during the game and with 3 kids and a busy work schedule i can cut the game down to a bout 2 hours. I used to got to the vet 2 or 3 times a year and never missed a Dallas game cause my hatred for those cockroaches was so strong. I would get great pleasure in seeing them lose even before Jerry Jones owned the team. I own a Reggie White and Wes Hopkins jersey and still wear them proudly. However, after witnessing the first few seasons of Andy Reid's tenure I realized that Eagle Football was no longer the tough hard nosed eagle football I had loved so much . What was I watching now? A coach that seemed over matched? A offense that was called a west coast offense that didn't resemble the great Bill Walsh's to any degree. The only similarities to the eagles i knew and Reid's were Dawk, Trott and the great blitzing scheme of the late great Jim Johnson. I always thought if Reid could improve and balance the offense that we could win a super bowl cause the division had gotten weak. Parcells left the division (2 super bowls '86 & '90). Gibbs and his hogs were long gone ( 3 SB's '82, '87 & '91). The Cowboys domination of the division had finally come to an end (SB's '92, '93 & '95.) A huge big bay window had opened when Reid took over and the great NFC east that Vermeil, Ryan and Rhodes had to deal with was over.

Reid, I quickly realized was not gonna change. He was not gonna take running the ball serious. His drafts weren't gonna get better and I told all my friends 11 years ago that, "Reid will never win a super bowl", and I took allot of slack for that statement. Which was a pretty bold statement given the fact that the NFC east was becoming so weak. I mean honestly would Reid have lasted more than a couple of years as Eagles coach back in the 80's and 90's? Please, I think not. I remember watching the Super bowl against the pats and saying to my brother-in-law that he will throw the ball 50 times and they will turn it over a bunch and lose. Westbrook had 15 carries! Sound familiar? However, deep down I wanted them to win. The Eagles winning a super bowl was more important than me being right.

After the super bowl lose (24 -21). I blamed Reid rightfully so. I mean his style is what cost them the game in my opinion. So I started to say to myself why wont he change? I mean what makes a great coach great? The answer is that no coach is perfect but what makes a great coach is recognizing your weaknesses and correcting them. Great coaches aren't born great they become great. They admit their faults to themselves and improve on them. Bill Walsh for example. He became coach of the 49Er's in 1979. He had Reid type numbers his first two years. What I mean by that is he threw the ball allot. In 79 he threw it 602 times and rushed 480 times. Again in 1980 he threw the ball 597 times and ran it 415. They finished 2-14 in '79 and 6-10 in '80, which was Montana's first full season as a starter. Then in 1981 Walsh won his first ot three Super bowls. I asked myself what changed? Well I am sure he improved personnel but if you look at the the numbers he passed the ball 517 times and ran it 560. HE CHANGED! Never again did he have lopsided numbers in fact from 1981 to 1988 he averaged 525 pass attempts to 521 rush attempts. ( I didn't included the '82 season cause of the strike.) Here is a coach who saw a weakness a love for passing the football and corrected it. In fact , in the 3 seasons he won the super bowl he ran the ball more times than passed it. I'm not saying you have to run the ball more than pass it to win the big one but for crying out loud you gotta have balance. I mean why make it easier for the opposing defense and why wear your defense out by keeping them on the field. Reid over 13 seasons as Eagles head coach averages 557 pass attempts to 416 rush attempts and over those years has had a QB in place that has rushed for 60 to 100 of those 416 attempts per season. Much more than Montana who accounted for 30 to 50 rush attempts per season. I now the rules in the NFL now favor passing the football but you win super bowls with balance and a very good defense which can be great if you have a balanced offensive attack. Don't you find it ironic how we once had a coach in Buddy Ryan who later became Houston's Defensive coordinator. He took a swing at Kevin Gilbride who was the offensive coordinator for not running the football and wearing his defense out. Now we have a offensive coordinator in Mornhinweg that defensive line coach Washburn got in a shouting match with over the same thing. Boy o boy how things have changed in eagle land. I think if Buddy and Andy were paired up you'd have to pull Ryan off of him every game.

Talent evaluation is key to being a successful coach. Reid may not pick every player drafted or signed but he has the final decision over a player for sure. With this I could write all day and tomorrow about the bad drafts and free agent singes but I'll just touch on one. Again back to Walsh who invented the West coast offense. He is quoted on ESPN films as saying why he drafted Joe Montana. "We drafted Joe cause he throws the most accurate and catch-able ball I have ever seen". Walsh felt this was key for the west coast offense to work. Reid drafts McNabb! Anyone who watched him at Syracuse knows he wasn't a very accurate passer and didn't throw a catch-able ball at all. I mean common on. This was a huge mistake on Reids part. For crying out loud this is his system he should have known that. The worst part is now he has Vick who despite throwing a more catch-able ball than McNabb isn't very accurate. So here we have Reid making the same mistakes ten years later. The crazy part is the bay window is still open, but in 13 years Reid has yet to capitalize on it!

My fellow eagles fans. I could go on and on about Reid his arrogance and how stubborn he is. He will not change. But until we stop financially supporting this franchise their will be know change at coach. I'm not asking you to stop being a Eagles fan. We all bleed green but we gotta hit em where it hurts. In the wallet. Let Lurie know the Eagles belong to us. Don't buy their merchandise and watch them from home. Cause if you don't Andy will stay. Jeff Lurie and Joe Banner are not football men they are financial wizards. Next year the Eagles probably will go 12-4, and Andy will get a new contract. But I'll bet the house Andy Reid won't win the Super Bowl and that's whats most important to me.

Poll
Jeff Lurie wants Andy Reid back for 2012. Do you?
yes
97 votes
no
35 votes

132 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 157 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

DId you delete and then repost this? I saw that it disappeared and now it’s back.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.

by JasonB on Jan 5, 2012 5:53 PM EST reply actions  

Historically from 1960 to 1999 Eagles football has been losing football. Sooo i guess the last 13 years isnt real Eagles ball?

"World Champions...World F***in Champions" -Chase Utley

by Kevin_S on Jan 5, 2012 5:54 PM EST reply actions  

If you say so.

Do you think Eagles fans pack the linc cause of Andy Reid?

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know many stadiums that are packed with fans because of a coach

by The Mad Hopper on Jan 5, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

They pack the stadium because of what Buddy did

Buddy brought life back into pro football in this town. Before he came the eagles were blacked out on tv some sundays. Reid is a tease he wins just enough to keep filling the seats.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Umm, no. They pack the stadium for the players, like in every other sport. It’s nice to have a big name coach, but in no way does the coaching staff heavily impact the number of fans in attendance.

by The Mad Hopper on Jan 5, 2012 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

They pack the stadium

because loyalty to the team is paramount. You’ll never see the Linc with noticeable holes in the seats, as was the case with Cincinnati. Win or lose, the fans will be there, which made some of the players’ arrogant attitude towards them this season that much more infuriating.

And yes this is Philly, you welcome to come check us

by jaws1385 on Jan 6, 2012 8:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I remember those nasty days

Not knowing if the game would be on TV or not, hoping some company would buy the rest up so we could watch the game.

Marion Campbell? Oh good Lord.

Why come you don't have a tattoo?

by goodfella46er on Jan 5, 2012 9:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Back to the future

With Marion Campbell, Rich Kotite…

Happyfella misses the FG.. Eagles lose again…

yeah.. I recall “REAL” eagles football. Lets leave that carcus buried, shall we?

by milroyigglesfan on Jan 10, 2012 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

This is just patently false:
They pack the stadium because of what Buddy did

Fans go for a team, not a coach. It’s the players that fans go to watch. And a style of football, which can be attributed to a coach. Oh and winning. Winning is usually pretty important. Don’t tell Buddy Ryan that though, he wasn’t very good at it.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 6, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

OK...

You think fans packing the Linc in 2010 showed up because Buddy Ryan was the coach of the team 20 years ago?

If it’s all just about how awesome this coach was for five years in the 80’s, why are the fans still showing up? If Andy Reid and his teams are so anti-Philly, why is the stadium still sold out every week?

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 6, 2012 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

The memories of Buddy’s glorious playoff wins are still fueling the fan support for this team. Isn’t that obvious to everyone?

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Jan 7, 2012 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

plural?

He only had 1 playoff win in philly

by Joshua Peppel on Jan 8, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Buddy had zero playoff wins in Philadelphia

He went 0-3 in the playoffs and that is why he was fired. As much as it galls me to type this, Rich Kotite won a playoff game. Granted it was with Buddy’s team but he won one, not Buddy.

Vick will go Bad Newz Kennels on that shitass secondary. - EvilBanner

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Jan 8, 2012 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Clyde was being sarcastic.

In fact, I’m positive he was being sarcastic. And yea, Buddy didn’t even manage one playoff win.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 9, 2012 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I knew Clyde was being sarcastic

I thought Joshua was serious when he thought Buddy had 1 playoff win.

Vick will go Bad Newz Kennels on that shitass secondary. - EvilBanner

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Jan 10, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I know.

I was responding to Joshua seemingly not recognizing the sarcasm. Though, now that I read it again, he may well have recognized it.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 10, 2012 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't compare Montana to Mcnabb

Mcnabb was the best qb in that draft class hands down. Outside of peyton and maybe Luck, there aren’t any qb’s coming of college in the last 30 years that are in the same league as Montana

by Saidrick on Jan 5, 2012 6:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

You actually read the whole post thank you.

Most guys just comment on the title. He was but we didnt have to draft him. Montana was drafted last pick 3rd round, 82nd overall. Crazy right.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

crazy right.

Truthfully… No. Not at all.

VOID!!!

by dt3 on Jan 5, 2012 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

You would get more people to read your whole post if you used the opening paragraph to catch people’s attention and try to drag hem in… Not with breaking down your DVR habits and hate for commercials. Lost me right there.

VOID!!!

by dt3 on Jan 5, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

OUCH.

Your right i forgot andy reids followers have short attention spans and selective memories.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

so its justifiable for you to want to skip meaningless commercials

but ridiculous for us to not want to have to read a paragraph of meaningless information in an already long post?

by STZ513 on Jan 5, 2012 9:41 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I never said it was ridiculous.

What is this Russia. I can write whatever I want and you can say whatever you want. You dont have to agree and you dont have to read it. I hope andy proves me wrong. If it makes you feel better to put down what I wrote thats fine.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Giving you constructive criticism on how to open an article is not a put down… Coming at me with this short attention span BS is a different story.

VOID!!!

by dt3 on Jan 5, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

you shouldnt be accusing anyone of put downs when your response to criticism is

“ouch. your right I forgot andy reids followers have short attention spans and selective memories”

seriously, lets try and keep things civil here

by STZ513 on Jan 6, 2012 1:18 AM EST up reply actions  

So, are you saying that you pine for the days of Ray Rhodes?

I’m not the biggest Andy Reid fan but even I can admit that he’s had a nice run. By the way i voted no.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Jan 5, 2012 6:24 PM EST reply actions  

Na not a Rhodes fan. He was just a good defensive coordinator.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

im not old enough to remember the things youve referenced

but in todays football. the best defense is a great offense. saints, packers and patriots are testament to that

claude giroux and shady mccoy. the future

by griffeagles on Jan 5, 2012 6:26 PM EST reply actions  

But a great offense has to have a balanced attack.

You cant just throw the football and expect to win. Pats havent won a superbowl since they became a passing only team and the saints won it with a balanced attack. Last year Saints went out early cause they were one dimensional. The Pack well they got Rodgers and he is as accurate as Montana was.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

we were the 2nd best rushing attack in the league

what more do u want

JoeD AKA The Voice Of Reason

by Joe_D on Jan 5, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

16th overall in the league in rushing yards this year

Joe – Mc Coy averaged 18 carries per game this year. Sorry thats not enough for one of the best backs in the league. Vick rushed 76 times this year. We were 12th in attempts but that is skewd because u and i both no that about 50 of his 76 attempts were pass plays that fell apart and he scrambled for yards. McCoy needs to run the ball 25 times a game end of story.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Why? So he can get worn out and have a 5 year career? 18-23 is the best for him…

I'm great like Gatsby.

by Clint Eastwood on Jan 5, 2012 8:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Lets just agree on over 20 and have a back up running back rush 5 to 10 per game ok. I just dont wana c him get 15 rushes some games he has to have over twenty every game. oh 5 to 7 years in the league is normal for most backs in the nfl

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

What does an extra 5 -7 touches do? honestly

let’s say he averages 5 yards per carry. Does an extra 25 -35 yards nullify all the turnovers or something?

JoeD AKA The Voice Of Reason

by Joe_D on Jan 5, 2012 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure it does and its time of possession and giving your defense a break. With McCoy he could break one anytime. Plus most Off. Line. would rather run block than pass block. Its easier. Id do just for the beating you can put on them.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not about yards

It’s about keeping the opposing defense off-balance, bringing the safeties up and making the throws easier for your QB, and giving your own defense time to rest

by Kevin888 on Jan 7, 2012 12:08 AM EST up reply actions  

normal?

16th is righ in the middle. Thats normal right?

by Joshua Peppel on Jan 8, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

25 carries a game plus about 50 catches=450 touches a year. Read this and tell me if you think thats the move for McCoy.

http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_3157_Stop_running_back_abuse!.html

320 touches a year (about 20 a game) is perfect

by dstern77 on Jan 9, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

Offensive and defensive lines made huge strides.
So did rushing offense.

we get a couple LBs, safety, backup QB, and keep DJax or get a WR …

then learn how to tackle, catch balls, and not throw picks?

we’ll be home field next year…

by milroyigglesfan on Jan 10, 2012 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

You must hate winning.

"Difficulties strengthen the mind, as labor does the body."
― Seneca

by NJBammer on Jan 5, 2012 6:48 PM EST reply actions  

we all are

JoeD AKA The Voice Of Reason

by Joe_D on Jan 5, 2012 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Yup, you and all the fans since the Superbowl started, which is how many coaches other than Andy Reid ago? We all want a SP, and since the start of the SB era no coach in Eagles history has been REMOTELY as successful as Reid. The team hasn’t managed to win the SB, and given the state of the media in Philly that makes him somehow a failure.

I guess I just enjoy each game, and I always hope for a SB and and let down when we don’t get one, but I really really love watching the Eagles win football games, and since they’ve won a heck of a lot more than they’ve lost, including quite a few playoff games, since Reid’s been here, I can’t help but wonder at the fans who ignore his virtues while obessing over this faults.

"Difficulties strengthen the mind, as labor does the body."
― Seneca

by NJBammer on Jan 5, 2012 7:30 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Reid has benefited from a weak league.

During his era as eagles coach the division and conference has stunk compared to years ago. Come on. He hasnt capitalized on it. Hes a ham and egger is all.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

During those early years the division sucked, and we took advantage.

The conference had some very goog teams though

by dstern77 on Jan 6, 2012 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe the division sucked

because the eagles team was simply better?

by milroyigglesfan on Jan 10, 2012 6:48 PM EST up reply actions  

and they said the same thing about McNabb before he left.

We dont know how good we got it. lol what a joke. Reid is the most over rated coach in Eagles history!

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Everything you just said was wrong...

Who was better than Reid?

I'm great like Gatsby.

by Clint Eastwood on Jan 6, 2012 8:30 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Greasy Neale won consecutive championships.

Reid beat up on a weak NFC East for years. They’ve finally caught up with him, and all of a sudden even 10 wins are hard to come by. Don’t be fooled by those gaudy numbers pre-2004.

And yes this is Philly, you welcome to come check us

by jaws1385 on Jan 6, 2012 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I guess he's like Roy Halladay

really lucky to be pitching against teams which can’t score any runs.

If the Birds stunk over the last 14 years, the NFC East other teams would look a lot better. But I guess you can’t argue against circular logic.

"Difficulties strengthen the mind, as labor does the body."
― Seneca

by NJBammer on Jan 6, 2012 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

No one's saying they stunk

But how many championships do they have to show for all of Reid’s trouble? ’Nuff said.

And yes this is Philly, you welcome to come check us

by jaws1385 on Jan 6, 2012 8:51 AM EST up reply actions  

And "circular logic"??

Know what you’re talking about before you say it. My argument is not fallacious, and it does not rely upon its own proposition. It’s FACT. Reid’s record does not mean as much as you think it does because beating weak teams is no measure of a great coach. A great coach WINS CHAMPIONSHIPS. Reid’s a GOOD coach, nothing more.

And yes this is Philly, you welcome to come check us

by jaws1385 on Jan 6, 2012 8:58 AM EST up reply actions  

If that’s your measure, you are correct.

"Difficulties strengthen the mind, as labor does the body."
― Seneca

by NJBammer on Jan 6, 2012 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Then again,

if that’s your measure, then you’d just as soon go 0-16 every year as go 8-8 or 13-3 if you don’t win the Superbowl. I guess I see life different, which was the point of my post.

"Difficulties strengthen the mind, as labor does the body."
― Seneca

by NJBammer on Jan 6, 2012 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course dude. Reid aint no Greasy Neale. I won’t be happy until we get another guy who can coach like Ol’ Greasy. LOL

You get asked who’s better than Reid and you go back to a guy who was born in 1891? I feel like that should tell you something

by dstern77 on Jan 6, 2012 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Talk to me when Fatass wins a championship.

And yes this is Philly, you welcome to come check us

by jaws1385 on Jan 6, 2012 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

We would have had 10 plus wins if not for those horrible turnovers committed by the players. Not Reid?

by Joshua Peppel on Jan 8, 2012 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I get it brother

im 25 going on 26 soon and I grew up watching tough defense and an all around blue collar team.

To be honest with you, most of the NFL is more like the eagles. very few “power” teams around these days. its a passing league and defense more and more are being built to rush the qb

JoeD AKA The Voice Of Reason

by Joe_D on Jan 5, 2012 7:24 PM EST reply actions  

Smashmouth D and Toughness - THAT'S Eagles Football

I agree with you, frontiersman, and with Joe here. The NFL’s trending toward high-octane offense has been disappointing to say the least, and watching Reid lead the Eagles down that path, away from good defense, has been maddening to watch. A couple teams, like the Ravens and Steelers, actually still play defense the way it should be played (James Harrison aside). We lost our last bastion of toughness on defense when Dawk left. The Gang Green defense would look at us and laugh; Andre, Reggie, and Jerome are spinning in their graves.

And yes this is Philly, you welcome to come check us

by jaws1385 on Jan 6, 2012 8:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Tune in next week for frontiersman’s rant on why bluray sucks and a retrospective on his old VHS collection.

You can’t break down run/pass ratios and try to compare it to the game 30 years ago. It’s retar… You just can’t do it.

VOID!!!

by dt3 on Jan 5, 2012 8:31 PM EST reply actions  

The game has changed

You need to accept that. There’s a reason there’s 3 5000+ passers this year.

I'm great like Gatsby.

by Clint Eastwood on Jan 6, 2012 8:24 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Lol betamax ftw!

I had alien women suck me off when god said let there be light i turned it the fuck off I'll leave your body drenched in the blood of all your ancestors
You'll never be at peace, like the souls of child molestors I'll cut you and bless your festering wounds with alcohol This is the final call, for all the rappers that wanna brawl Immortal Technique, the wrong motherfucker to diss
'Cause I allow God to let you motherfuckers existI got a Black Panther mentality with a spic fist You don't want beef with people like me so don't pretend
I'll resurrect your aborted baby and kill it again You get no props in hip-hop like feminine men You ain't hardcore, I'll smack the shit out of your mother You wanna be gutter? I'll leave you laid out in the street Signed yours truly, the motherfucking Immortal Technique

by So. Cal Swag on Jan 5, 2012 8:46 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Fact:

Al Bundy’s family was the last family to own a betamax VCR.

Why come you don't have a tattoo?

by goodfella46er on Jan 5, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I will post again next year after they lose in the playoffs again.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

1 team out of 32 win the superbowl

You’ve got great odds there…

I'm great like Gatsby.

by Clint Eastwood on Jan 6, 2012 8:25 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

CHAD HALL IS AN AMERICAN HERO

Veritas Liberabit Te

by DSmith215 on Jan 5, 2012 8:36 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

HONESTLY IM DISAPPOINTED SO FAR

I thought eagles fans wanted a super bowl but now im realizing most of you are happy with just mediocrity.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 8:57 PM EST reply actions  

Most Eagles fans are happy with mediocrity.

Long memories of losing seasons under Marion Campbell, Mike McCormack and Rich Kotite have people feeling safe with the 8-8, 9-7 consistency of reid. That is no way to live.

God Damn you, Andy Reid.

The fat queen has failed us again. Reid must go.

by EvilBanner on Jan 5, 2012 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

EB

you know damn well 8-8 and 9-7 is not consistent with AR’s record……

JoeD AKA The Voice Of Reason

by Joe_D on Jan 5, 2012 9:31 PM EST up reply actions  

He's 62-49-1 since the SB

That’s 8.86 wins per season, 7 losses per season and .14 ties.

He’s a mediocre coach.

God Damn you, Andy Reid.

The fat queen has failed us again. Reid must go.

by EvilBanner on Jan 5, 2012 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

over 9.7 wins pr season in his time as coach

you cant just take out the time before the 2004 season and call him mediocre.

by STZ513 on Jan 5, 2012 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Hes averaged 8.86 wins per season since the SB

Hes got a winning percentage of 1.000 since we were 4-8 this year

Whatever

You cant just select stats from a period of your choice, right after a stretch where we averaged 11-12 wins a year. Also its kind of ridiculous that even when you do that hes averaging almost 9 wins…God what a miserable era

by dstern77 on Jan 6, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea, but they've played 7 seasons since the Eagles went to the Super Bowl under Reid

And those 7 seasons have not been nearly as successful as Reid’s run from 2000-2004. The numbers are starting to tell you that Reid’s tenure as head coach of the Eagles has peaked. No, it has not been a miserable era, but is it time to believe that he’s taken the team as far as he can? I tend to believe that he has.

Vick will go Bad Newz Kennels on that shitass secondary. - EvilBanner

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Jan 8, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont see it that way at all. Since 2004 we’ve made the playoffs 4 of 7 years. The years we didn’t make it:

2005: McNabb misses 7 games with injury, and TO pouts the whole year

2007: Were 5-5 coming off back to back wins and suffer a stretch where we lose 3 games in a row by 4 points or less. 2 of losses were with AJ Feeley as QB. We rebound and win the next 3 to finish 8-8. Hard to blame the coach when the team fights hard and loses tough games with the backup QB out there.

2011: The reason we just finished. I chalk it up to a lack of continuity in our coaching and personnel on defense and O-Line during a shortened offseason.

by dstern77 on Jan 9, 2012 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Reid’s regular season winning percentage 2000-2004 was .738 with a record of 7-5 in the playoffs
Reid’s regular season winning percentate 2005-2011 was .545 with a record of 3-4 in the playoffs.
Reid hasn’t won a playoff game the last 3 seasons.

I know I’m not going to convince you, but those numbers still tell me he’s peaked.

Vick will go Bad Newz Kennels on that shitass secondary. - EvilBanner

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Jan 10, 2012 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

cause and effect analysis

you claim its all “Reid”
but lets look at the personnel issues over that span shall we?

TO meltdown, Donovan injury, Trade Donovan, promote Kolb, virtually retool the team (how many vets did we “let go”) 2011 retooled the coaching staff.. no offseason to speak of, new position coaches,

If Reid is sitting on aging players and out of touch coaches, you have a point…
But the guy continues to shake things up… recently we’ve been fighting some bad mojo factors.

I don’t see how you can look at the 2009 team, or the 2010 team, and convince me that Cowher or Gruden gets you a SB win with those teams…

by milroyigglesfan on Jan 10, 2012 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Head coaches with better records (wins per season) than Reid over the last 6 seasons: (Since what he did up to and including the super bowl year did not count, I’m going to go ahead and just not count the 6-10 season, either):

Belichick – 12.66
Tomlin – 11 (only 5 seasons, started in 2007)
Harbaugh – 11 (only 4 seasons, started in 2008)
Smith – 10.75 (only 4 seasons, started in 2008)
McCarthy – 10.5
Payton – 10.33
Turner – 9.8 (only 5 seasons, started in 2007)
Coughlin – 9.5
Reid – 9.33

So, that puts him at 9th in the NFL. 9th out of 32 is not mediocre. It isn’t stellar, but it isn’t mediocre. 9.33 wins, 2 division titles, 4 playoff appearances, and 3 playoff wins over 6 seasons isn’t mediocre. I think you were looking for “Considerably above average”.

Nope.

by bigmeanie08 on Jan 7, 2012 3:27 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah because going 6-10 and 5-11 more often increases your chances of getting a S/B trophy

by emtmess on Jan 6, 2012 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, most Eagles fans do want a Superbowl. And winning a Superbowl doesn’t rely heavily on defense, like it used to. It relies on high scoring offenses. Take a look at a lot of the past Superbowl winning teams, and outside of Pittsburgh and Baltimore way back in 2000, not a lot of teams employ the hard nosed defense you are saying we need to win.

Even the teams that are in the playoffs this year, aside from the aforementioned Pittsburgh and Baltimore, have poor defenses, and rely on their offense to win the games. I don’t see where the criticism of having a high scoring offense makes you a more impassioned fan than the rest of us.

by The Mad Hopper on Jan 5, 2012 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

The thing you have to realize is we’ve been having this argument for a long time. Lurie said AR is back next year, so we just sort of have to deal at this point.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Jan 5, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

So being 5-11 will win us a superbowl?

We’ve been one of the better teams in the nfl for most of the last 10 years.

I'm great like Gatsby.

by Clint Eastwood on Jan 6, 2012 8:28 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

We want a SB.

What fan doesn’t. We also aren’t delusional. Something I’m not sure I can say for you. SB or no Reid is the most successful Eagles coach in the SB era. That’s a fact. You can chime in with weak NFC bullshit all you want, the numbers don’t lie. And you point to Buddy Ryan as as someone to uphold? Really? I thought you said you wanted to win a SB. I’m not sure if you are aware of this, but you have to actually win playoff games before you can win a SB…

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 6, 2012 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Example: New England

YR W – L Passes Runs
’00-01 5 11 565 424
’01-02 11-5 482 473 Won SB
’02-03 9
7 605 395
’03-04 14-2 537 473 Won SB
’04-05 14-2 485 524 Won SB
’05-06 10-6 564 439
’06-07 12-4 527 499
’07-08 16-0 586 451 Lost SB
’08-09 11-5 534 513
’09-10 10-6 592 466
’10-11 14-2 507 454
’11-12 13-3 612 438
No team that has ever attempt 600 passes or more in a regular season and has gone on & won the SB.

by frontiersman on Jan 5, 2012 11:17 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t know what that has to do with anything, but in Andy Reid’s tenure, he has only attempted over 600 passes twice. In 2010 the Eagles threw the ball 561 times, compared to 541 attempts by the Green Bay Packers. In 2009 the eagles attempted 553 passes, compared to 544 times by New Orleans.

Whatever point you are trying to make here, it doesn’t work.

by The Mad Hopper on Jan 6, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Good post, rec'd despite of the spelling issues...

I agree with most of what you said. They don’t know when to run or when to pass, they don’t establish the run, so the defense can pretty much go after the Qb, no wonder Vick’s play regressed this year, the defenses knew that they were pretty much going to pass the ball. I’m not sure how to fix that, if it’s an Andy problem or a Marty problem. I thought they did use Duce and Buck better when Childress was in charge, they still didn’t run the ball enough, but they did have some sort of balance. Where as now, probably most of our rushes this year are in the 4th quarter when we’re up by a lot, comparatively, the other 3 quarters our run/pass ratio is probably way off.

But here’s one thing I’ll say about Andy, he was stuck with Donovan forever, and when he got rid of him, I thought he turned a new page and he is trying to re-invent himself a little bit. I don’t blame him for the last 2 years because 2 years ago he turned the Kolb injury into a positive by going out on a limb and inserting Vick and keeping him in there despite of Kolb returning and we all saw how that worked out. The most recent year, he did some good things by changing his philosophy on both the offensive and defensive lines and that worked out well, but the whole lockout situation really effed us up this past season. I know where you’re coming from, cuz I’ve been watching the Eagles since the early 90’s myself, but I don’t think Reid is the biggest problem here, I think we are on the verge of something special and hopefully all of us can be patient enough to finally enjoy the Super Bowl year that is not too far away (maybe even in 2012) !!!

But I definitely felt what you felt, especially after the Seattle game, in regards to the defense being soft and not hard-hitting, that’s when I thought that this was not Eagles football, I’ve never seen them like this, good thing they cleaned that up a little bit. I think the players had pretty much quit on the coaches for most of the season but somehow put up a fight in the last 4 games to save Reid’s job. I hope next year is much better with a new D-Coordinator and in my personal opinion, we all need a change at O-Coordinator.

But great job, and keep posting, minus all the spelling mistakes.

Lurie: Fire, fire !
Banner: Where ?
Lurie: In Andy Reid's Belly.
Banner: Oh, is that what it is, and it seems to be growing. But how did you find out ?
Lurie: Well, I did an analysis and talked to some people outside of the organization.
Banner: Well, then it must be right, you're a genius !
Lurie: Thanks, btw, you get a pay raise next year for being $5 mill. under the cap for this year, great job !
Banner: Ha ha, thanks.
(And they both laugh all the way to the bank. In other unrelated news, there have been reports of Eagles fans all over the Delaware Valley pulling their hair out.)

by Eagladelphia on Jan 6, 2012 2:46 AM EST reply actions  

Thanks I will spell check next time.

Was teaching two of my kids how to play Wii at same time I was writing this. lol

by frontiersman on Jan 6, 2012 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, we need a coach who will get the team to play Real Eagle Football. Maybe they can hire a True Scotsman to do it.

by Rujasu on Jan 6, 2012 9:37 AM EST reply actions  

tl; dr.

just going off the title (you love that, don’t you), when you say you havent seen real eagle football in 13 years and counting, are you implying that exactly 14 years ago you DID see ‘real eagles football’???

by RogerPodacter on Jan 6, 2012 10:11 AM EST reply actions  

Here is the thing:

Andy Reid may not win a SB here and that should be the ultimate goal for any coach. But winning a SB shouldn’t be the requirement for any coach. Winning a SB requires many things that a coach simply does not and cannot control. What should be the measuring stick for a coach, IMO, is getting within striking distance of a SB consistently. Recently, Reid has slipped in that regard, but for 10+ years he brought this team from being terrible to being SB contenders almost every year. He has had plenty chances and this year was a very big misstep. If next year doesn’t have us getting back within striking distance, I have no problem saying it’s time to move on (I wouldn’t have even complained that much this year).

What really bugs me about all the Reid haters is this delusion that they have been watching a shitty Eagles team for 13 years. To hear you all talk it’s as if we were 2-14 every year. What you have actually been watching is the most successful Eagles run in the SB era. It’s ok to admit that fact while also saying that you think Reid’s time should be done.

And another thing: chill out with the Buddy Ryan fellating already. Is there a more overrated figure in Eagles history? Oooh he had tough, mean defenses and he was a real blue-collar asshole. Hooray! How about win a damn playoff game? You wanna talk mediocre? Buddy Ryan was a mediocre head coach. Brilliant defensive coordinator, sure, but mediocre head coach.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 6, 2012 11:08 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

These are my sentiments exactly. How is there so much nostalgia for a coach that never won a playoff game and told Cris Carter to fuck off cause “all he does is catch touchdown passes”. The whole Ryan family is overrated coaches IMO. Reid always won playoff games and dominated the division. It just so happens we ran into some tough teams:

2000: The Giants when they went to the Super Bowl,
2001:The Rams “Greatest Show on Turf”, who lost the SB but were considered the best team all year
2002: Bucs w. Gruden, SB Champions
2004: The Pats Dynasty winning its 3rd SB in 4 years

Also its easy to have a 3-year run with one core group of players. Reid has shown ability to run a franchise from one group of players to the next. When Vincent, Trotter, Douglas, and Bobby Taylor were getting old we were prepared because Reid drafted Sheldon, Trent Cole, and Lito. When McNabb moved we didn’t have to suffer a rebuilding year beccause Reid drafted Kolb (who the Cardinals thought enough to offer a lot for) and because he signed Mike Vick (which a lot of Eagles fans/media thought was incredibly stupid). Reid’s forsight has kept us from these 2-3 year rebuilding periods that most franchises have to endure at some point.

by dstern77 on Jan 6, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll take the old Buddy days

He was missing meetings and having lots of off the field issues. He credits Buddy for cutting him and snapping him outta a downward spiral.

by frontiersman on Jan 6, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

So you want a mean defense that finishes in the middle of the pack, wins nothing, but has an attitude?

If you dont like Big Red, then F#%@ You!
-Ricky Bobby

by GreenInBaltimore on Jan 6, 2012 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

that's not exactly the truth.

I found Buddy ball more exciting but it was never going to win a SB. well it’s best chance was ruined by FOG. Andy is a better winner. Buddy had a more of an endearing product/brand of football.

At least one more year of Andy and Juan. If they don't win it all they both better be gone!

by MightyJoeBanner on Jan 7, 2012 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll take the old Buddy days

Of course you would. And this is why I think you are delusional. If you think Reid is mediocre how can you call Ryan anything but? HE NEVER WON A PLAYOFF GAME! Good God, run a strong defense and football fans will forgive you of anything apparently.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 6, 2012 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

It just so happens we ran into some tough teams:

This is fucking hilarious.

Yep, like the Cardinals and the Panthers.

Reid was FAVORED AT HOME in the early conference championship games and we got raped.

God Damn you, Andy Reid.

The fat queen has failed us again. Reid must go.

by EvilBanner on Jan 6, 2012 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Those weren't bad teams.

Both were only a few minutes away from winning the Super Bowls. Panthers were going back-and-forth with the 14-2 Patriots down to the last few seconds and the Warner-Fitzgerald combo was destroying the best defense in ’08.

Should the Eagles lost to them? No. But there isn’t any reason to discredit them.

RIP Jim Johnson, best ever.
"WHY IS THIS PINK-HAIRED BITCH A CAR?!"

by Imp on Jan 6, 2012 8:47 PM EST up reply actions  

My memories from the Panthers game are Levon Kirkland trying to keep up with the receiver going thru the middle and Pinkston being too scared to play against the physical Panthers secondary.

I'm all-in for the 2012 season !

by Eagladelphia on Jan 7, 2012 7:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Levon Kirkland wasn’t on the 2003 team and therefore didn’t play in that Panthers game. You’re remembering the year before against Tampa.

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Jan 7, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it was Joe Jurevicius running free across the field and Kirkland trying to catch him… it was sad, yeah it could have been the Bucs game, it’s all a blur now. If it wasn’t Kirkland then maybe our Safety Bishop blew a play in the Panthers game… can’t remember anymore…

I'm all-in for the 2012 season !

by Eagladelphia on Jan 9, 2012 6:09 AM EST up reply actions  

The Cardinals ran all over the heavily favored Cardinals the week before and damn near beat the Steelers in the Super Bowl. Plus that game wasn’t on Reid, what I took out of that Cardinals game was that:

1) No one could stop Larry Fitz that year. Sheldon Brown was a good corner, but he just had no chance.
2) McNabb fails in the clutch, as I watched him miss numerous receivers when he had a chance to come back against their weak defense.

The Panthers loss proved that we needed to place higher emphasis on getting talented WR’s to which Reid adjusted and made a priority in upcoming drafts.

what makes a great coach is recognizing your weaknesses and correcting them.

Look for Reid to have a similar epiphany about Linebackers

by dstern77 on Jan 7, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

The Cardinals ran all over a heavily favored Panthers team*

by dstern77 on Jan 7, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

I’ve seen two Eagles last two years: the week 17 last year against Dallas and this year second Redskins game. They were both completely meaningless, but fun as hell. You’re missing out buddy.

RIP Jim Johnson, best ever.
"WHY IS THIS PINK-HAIRED BITCH A CAR?!"

by Imp on Jan 6, 2012 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

Its a new Era in NFL football. It evolved. You want defense, running and a Super Bowl. But look at all of the top seeds in the playoffs this year. High flying passing teams with shitty defenses.
I dont think that any of the 12 playoff teams this year are feared because of their defense. You may be able to make a case for Balt, Hou, or SF….but they’ve all 3 been torched in one game or another. And these passing teams that are seeded ahead of them are just the kind of teams that can nullify their ‘good’ defenses.

If you dont like Big Red, then F#%@ You!
-Ricky Bobby

by GreenInBaltimore on Jan 6, 2012 12:38 PM EST reply actions  

that's yet to be seen

Balt, 49ers and Hou have the kind of defenses that could thwart these big attacks enough to eek out a win. That’s why they play the game.

At least one more year of Andy and Juan. If they don't win it all they both better be gone!

by MightyJoeBanner on Jan 7, 2012 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

The Eagles should go back to old time Eagles football — 240 lb tackles, and leather helmets, no face masks. That’s tough smash mouth shit there. The game has changed a bit in the last 50 years, but that’s no reason the Eagles have to go along with the changes in the league. Make Chad Hall a linebacker!

Oh boy, is this great!

by MayIhave10,000marblesplease? on Jan 6, 2012 1:00 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

It's called the linc, you go there to see the Eagles play football

/TROLL

Formerly number5
RIP JJ
"But for you to open your big fucking mouth and call Shady "overrated" makes me want to take my big cock and shut you up." - Brotherman initiates EB’s prison stay/Brotherman on getting his dick wet.

by HawaiianGreen on Jan 6, 2012 3:43 PM EST reply actions  

I too am a 35+ year Eagles fan.

Only I remember things differently than you. I remember the team winning a moajority of it’s games in the 80’s and 90’s yet still not comming close to winning a SB. Then came Reid. Not only did he win games but there was actually a chance trhe team wouls win a SB. 4 years straight. 2 losing season in 13 years. Yeah Reid sucks big time.

The problem with nostalgia is that if you look at it too long it starts to take over reality. Instead of saying you pine for those Buddy Ryan days say you wish the Eagles would hire a DC that coaches the type of playing style. Unfortunately, that playing style is not goingto win a SB. Look at the teams in the playoffs right now….only 2 are truely smash mouth (Ravens, 49ers) with one (Broncos) just a step away. The Steelers are no longer a black and blue team. Everybody else is going to air it out. The sad part is with the right OC none of these teams would have been able to beat the Eagles. Not the Packers, not the Saints, and definitely not the 49ers. Yes, Castillo was bad but, he was not calling the plays that prevented the Eagles from scoring a TD in the 4th quarter of 6 of their 8 loses while leading the game going into half time. Even in the Seattle game where they should have passed the ball 30-40 times they guessed wrong and went with a heavy dose of running the ball.

I tell you what fire Marty and hire Norv Turner if he gets the axe and watch the Eagles win a SB. It’s the playcalling that holds his team back. Childress was a horrible HC but you must admit that while he was the OC this team ruled offensively and didn’t have 1/3 of the weapons it has now.

I am good with Andy for 1 more season. Bring in Spags, start using Shady more in the begininnig of the game and watch what happens……

I would love to blow up Texas Stadium... With team still in it
36 plus years of rooting for the Eagles I think are comming to fruition this year.
I am not a FAN.... I am a FANATIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by eaglelover1 on Jan 6, 2012 6:17 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Agree with the whole Marty thing, I can’t stand that guy, he thinks he’s way smarter than he actually is. Washburn should have just knocked him out.

Lurie: Fire, fire !
Banner: Where ?
Lurie: In Andy Reid's Belly.
Banner: Oh, is that what it is, and it seems to be growing. But how did you find out ?
Lurie: Well, I did an analysis and talked to some people outside of the organization.
Banner: Well, then it must be right, you're a genius !
Lurie: Thanks, btw, you get a pay raise next year for being $5 mill. under the cap for this year, great job !
Banner: Ha ha, thanks.
(And they both laugh all the way to the bank. In other unrelated news, there have been reports of Eagles fans all over the Delaware Valley pulling their hair out.)

by Eagladelphia on Jan 6, 2012 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Marty would of drew up a killer attack to

outsmart Washburn

At least one more year of Andy and Juan. If they don't win it all they both better be gone!

by MightyJoeBanner on Jan 7, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmmm...

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Jan 7, 2012 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You idiot. Post something of value for once.

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 8, 2012 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

i thought that was a great analogy…

by RogerPodacter on Jan 8, 2012 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't even particularly care for KByars

But you don’t think its hypocritical that at least half of your comments are bashing other people, and therefore completely unrelated to football?

Formerly DeSean10
36-5-20-JJ -- Forever Bleeding Green

"i was never back on (the Eagles' bandwagon)… they’ll go 8-8 at best and Reid should be fired at the end of the season…. and all you loyalists will be crying your eyes out… and jumping off ledges cuz u didn’t see it coming" - Eagladelphia

by AnthroEagle on Jan 8, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

There is just one little clique of childish douche-bags that I hammer and you are one of them.

Elsewise, please refer to my post. I really don’t give flying monkey poop about your opinion so long as you STFU.

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 8, 2012 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Really? And you’re not a childish douchebag? I don’t know whether or not I fit your description; I don’t think I can see myself objectively if what you say is true. But you trolling people, attacking them, saying nothing about football, and telling people to “STFU” isn’t childish? You’re just as bad as all the people you attack, except your an enormous hypocrite too. And you’ve clearly stated you don’t care, but then why do you care how anyone else acts? Try walking the talk.

Formerly DeSean10
36-5-20-JJ -- Forever Bleeding Green

"i was never back on (the Eagles' bandwagon)… they’ll go 8-8 at best and Reid should be fired at the end of the season…. and all you loyalists will be crying your eyes out… and jumping off ledges cuz u didn’t see it coming" - Eagladelphia

by AnthroEagle on Jan 8, 2012 9:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop. The whore needs to learn to self-soothe. Until she does, outbursts like this will continue to happen.
This simple slogan should help: Ignore the whore, it only wants attention.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Jan 8, 2012 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Throw Clint Eastwood and couple of the other ‘in-girls’ of your little minion clique here on BGN and you turn it into a high school study hall. You guys have somehow fooled yourselves into thinking that you are in some way relevant. Guess what? You aren’t.

Now, unable to accept the fact that you hang here without purpose or a clue, I suppose one of you minions will post a photo with snarky titles on it as a mode of psychic defense. I don’t know how I shall ever survive the experience.

And AnthroPus, please re-read my tag. I hold you to a higher standard than myself because I can, because I simply choose to do so, and I do so because I have no respect for you and your little friends. I don’t like mean little clique-ish minions. Deal with it.

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 8, 2012 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Okay, I tried to hold a mature conversation with you and you chose not to try. That’s fine. But don’t pull this “holier than thou” crap when you know damn well you’re no better. Goodnight.

Formerly DeSean10
36-5-20-JJ -- Forever Bleeding Green

"i was never back on (the Eagles' bandwagon)… they’ll go 8-8 at best and Reid should be fired at the end of the season…. and all you loyalists will be crying your eyes out… and jumping off ledges cuz u didn’t see it coming" - Eagladelphia

by AnthroEagle on Jan 8, 2012 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Bullshit. You’ve piled on me the in the past with your girlfriends, but now your are trying to distance yourself from them because you want to pretend that you aren’t a minion.

AnthroMinion, nothing separates you from that little crowd except that you, on occasion, have actually posted marginally relevant and readable discussions regarding football. That’s really the saddest thing… to think that you could be an individual and behave intelligently should you have made that decision. But you chose to make yourself into an asshole by hanging with this little pack of juvenile turds and joining them by acting the bully. You engaged me first, so you’ll just have to forgive me if I feel free to stomp your ass verbally any time I choose.

And for the record, I’m not holier than you, I’m just better than you. Are we clear? I think we are clear. Carry on.

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 8, 2012 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude

The best thing to do is not get into it with some people on here, it’s just a waste of time and energy, I agree with some of the things you’ve said about a few of the people on here. Hey, we’re both shunned, so at least we have that in common.

I'm all-in for the 2012 season !

by Eagladelphia on Jan 9, 2012 6:08 AM EST up reply actions  

I feel for you Eagledelphia. From what I see you don’t deserve the childish attitude that the minions have taken towards you. I didn’t originally, but now fuck them. I’ll be happy to go toe to toe with any and all. They’re nothing but hyenas.

These dickwads jumped on me before the season started when i said there was too much change with coaches, players and schemes for a short pre-season. I dared to say that the Eagles weren’t going to live up to expectations. These minions jumped down my throat like I had killed their pit bull or something.

This site has turned into a catty little girls club that thinks they are the ‘in’ crowd. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The Minions are a bunch of Internet Mall Ninjas and pre-teen bitches worthy of heaping helpings of abuse any time I have the time or the interest. I’m not here to make friends and I couldn’t give a rat’s ass what any of them say. I’m here to read aggregated articles about Eagles football and glean the few good opinions (shrinking in number) out of the noise of this growing pile of wannabe-expert, macho-man manure.

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 9, 2012 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I hear you

But they’re just kids, believe it or not, they get a kick out getting a raise from the likes of you and I. So the best thing is to just ignore them, and let them be. I realized that I really don’t have the energy to deal with all the people that like to come at me here for whatever reason, so I just do what I’m here to do and that’s it. Every once in a while if they start acting up too much, it’s good to have a little bit of fun at their expense though, and I get a kick out of that, but I’m trying to cut down even on that. You’re much better than them, just ignore it all. Trust me.

I'm all-in for the 2012 season !

by Eagladelphia on Jan 10, 2012 7:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Are we clear Anthro?

You are suddenly very quiet.
You wrote: “I tried to hold a mature conversation with you…”

You are a lying, two-faced prick. How can you ATTEMPT to shun me in one string, and then try to have mature conversation in another?

Has anybody mentioned to you that Anthropology is just about the WORST major someone could take up if they ever expect to get anywhere in the real world? Anthies just set themselves up for failure before hand so the expectations and pressure won’t be too high for them and no one will be surprised when they fail. Unless of course your last name is Leakey or Chagnon. Otherwise, you are just a waste of student loans. Your a freakin Neathertal – archaic, over, like a knucle walking T.O.

Clear?

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 9, 2012 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not quiet, but apparently if someone doesn’t talk to you they don’t exist. Which in the internet world is true ( very astute observation there!) You’re an immature asshole. I probably shouldn’t even respond to this, but I guess I can’t help but respond when I’m being provoked. And if you’re provoking me that makes you an antagonist, if you’re an antagonist causing problems, and if you’re causing problems you’re lowering the quality of this site. Congrats, by your own logic, you are at fault for making this site less than what it could be.

And since this is what you want, I guess I can get all high-and-mighty on your ass for a minute then. I’m not just an anthro major, you arrogant son of a bitch. I’m also majoring in archaeology and history. I hold a 3.9 GPA and plan on going to graduate school. I’ll then teach Native American history as a professor. I’ll make a modest $50-100k per year and love what I’m doing and love my life. You, on the other hand, will continue to be a bitter person who gets fulfillment from trolling online.

Let’s make sure I address everything. The shunning? Yeah, i didn’t start that. Other people who happen to think you’re a huge asshole did. I just happen to agree.

And you know, the only people I’m “mean” to on this site are Eagla and you, since you decided to attack me for no good reason (other than a delusional sense of heroism for the pretend people you think I hate on), and since Eagla does nothing but disagree with everyone so he can start fights. Maybe if he actually took a stance and stuck with it instead of being spineless and completely irrelevant as far as football discussions go…

There ya go, I put on my douchebag hat for you. Happy now?

Oh, and we’re very clear. Keep on being an internet “gangsta” — you have no idea how awesome you are.

Formerly DeSean10
36-5-20-JJ -- Forever Bleeding Green

"i was never back on (the Eagles' bandwagon)… they’ll go 8-8 at best and Reid should be fired at the end of the season…. and all you loyalists will be crying your eyes out… and jumping off ledges cuz u didn’t see it coming" - Eagladelphia

by AnthroEagle on Jan 10, 2012 12:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup

that’s me, you’ve got me figured out so well, only if I could change my ways, can you help me ?

I'm all-in for the 2012 season !

by Eagladelphia on Jan 10, 2012 7:10 AM EST up reply actions  

But would have probably thrown a half back option when it was time to punch back.

I'm all-in for the 2012 season !

by Eagladelphia on Jan 7, 2012 7:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Gang green and Buddy ball

was the most exciting defense and game style I have witnessed in Philadelphia Eagle history. During those times I always wondered what it would be like to have a Houston Oilers style offense. A team that could just throw up yards and points but it’s defense sucked. Now I know.

Andy was carried by Jim Johnson’s defense in many ways. And when Jim’s defense let us down….we lost NFC Champ games and the SB. Not that our offense isn’t/wasn’t potent. Just that it seemed when Andy went flat our “D” did too. Besides the Carolina NFC Champ game and Jim’s defense SHUT CAROLINA DOWN!!!!!!!!! But our offense got raped! And the 5 yard bump rule was made bc of that game.

Any way I see a lot of people ishing on Buddy’s results…..but it was mean and more ferocious than imaginable compared to today’s standards bc guys would of been fined, suspended and maybe even thrown out of the league. And Randall was electric. The team just had a swagger that engulfed the city.

At least one more year of Andy and Juan. If they don't win it all they both better be gone!

by MightyJoeBanner on Jan 7, 2012 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

Any way I see a lot of people ishing on Buddy’s results

What results? He never won a playoff game. He was never going to sniff a SB. Either the point is to win and try to win a SB or it isn’t. Who cares about swagger engulfing a city if you don’t field a winning team? That swagger will only carry a team so far. People are talking out of both sides of their mouths. One second it’s that Reid is a failure because he hasn’t won a SB. The next second it’s all Buddy Ryan this and Buddy Ryan that. Which is it?

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Jan 9, 2012 9:37 AM EST up reply actions  

He was not gonna take running the ball serious.

So the three headed monster (Staley, Buckhalter, Westbrook) wasn’t taking running the ball serious? Shady’s season this year wasn’t taking running the ball serious? The Eagles were 6th in the NFL in rushing this season.

The fact is, running the ball does not guarantee success like it used to. Look at every playoff team. I’d say there are three teams whose running game was the sole reason they got there – the Ravens, the Texans, and the Broncos. The best teams in the playoffs (Patriots, Saints, Packers, and for the most part, the 49ers) got there with their passing game.

Look at the difference between Buddy’s point of view on quarterbacks and Andy’s point of view. In Buddy’s own words, quarterbacks were “overpaid, overrated divas.” Who is the most important player on the field? Wouldn’t you want a coach who will put his focus on quarterback play?

by TommykUD on Jan 8, 2012 10:01 AM EST reply actions  

yes but...

We don’t have the QB’s on the packers, saints or packers. And we never will. And when we had the 3 headed monster of running backs, dont you recall Staley saying how we could have beaten Tampa in the championship game if we would have just run the ball ? Runyan said the same thing. The past 13 years have been filled with Andy Reid panicking in big games and passing the ball 50 times and hes too friggin stupid to change.

by Gdog2009 on Jan 8, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

You do realize that the Eagles lost the game 27-10, right? When you’re down 17 points in the second half, you don’t run the ball as much as you would. You would be killing yourself by running and running and running some more.

And you mean to say that McNabb in 02, 03, and 04 wasn’t one of the top 3 quarterbacks in the league?

by TommykUD on Jan 8, 2012 11:42 PM EST up reply actions  

no no no

I’m assuming you watched the game and just didnt look up the score on ESPN. I was at the game. That score looks bloated because of Ronde Barbers 90 yard runback on a mcnabb interception. The Eagles were within a score almost the entire game. Staley was ripping off huge chunks when they ran the ball. So what did reid do ? He had Mcnabb throw it million times, all over the place too. In the dirt, over receivers heads and the one pass he was dea on was unfortunately to Ronde. And Mcnabb in big games has NEVER been a top 3 QB in this league. Much like Tony Romo now. I could see the Reid not running if our running game sucked, but it doesnt. And hes just too dense to realize that.

by Gdog2009 on Jan 9, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I completely agree

In the big game it really shows that he totally abandons the run. I never said he has to just run the ball. BALANCE the offense he doesnt think much of the run. In big games he gets totally out of balance and has lost many big games cause of it. Hey look at the Giants last week they ran all over the Falcons D. They hadnt run the ball that much in one game all year. Tell you what the Saints will loose if they dont run it. If they abandon the run and pass it 45 or 50 times they will loose. We will see.

by frontiersman on Jan 13, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree...

I agree with the OP 100%. Buddy ball was the reason I became an Eagles fan(over the Giants) -I lived in Jerzee so it could have gone either way. Ironically it is the Giants who over the years have played more of the football style I prefer.
Unfortunately “buddy ball” days are long gone. Andy Reid has won a lot but the NFC east hasn’t been nearly as good as it was in the past. I hate that he wont run the ball despite every indication in the world that its the way to win in this league. UNLESS you have Peyton Manning, Drew Brees, Aaron Rogers or Tom Brady and the O line and receivers to go with them. The Eagles have NEVER had a QB like that and chances are they never will. So RUN THE FUCKING BALL ANDY ! —I digress
—he will never do it consistently. So IMO…no I dont want Andy back, but I’m not writing the checks.

by Gdog2009 on Jan 8, 2012 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Real Eagles Football???

From my childhood, real Eagles football was almost as humiliating as real Phillies Baseball. Both teams sucked. They were just about the worst in their leagues. Utterly pathetic and embarrasing. But we still watched and cheered them on. The one thing I miss about those old school Eagles teams were their linebackers (and defenses in general). They could be a rough, hardnosed bunch that other teams did not like to play. But the Eagles couldn’t mount an offense to save their lives.

The only team that had a chance back then were the 76ers with Wilt the Stilt. How things have changed. Philly was nothing in sports until the Flyers came along. God bless ’em. It was great to see Bernie Parent on the ice last week. He gave the best interview when he came off the ice.

Interviewer: “Bernie, how are you feeling?”
Bernie: “Can’t…. Breathe…. come… back…. later.”

Real Eagles Football from before Andy? That’s something I never want to see again.

Whoever you are, when I log off, you cease to exist.

The operative IQ of a group is no higher than that of it's lowest scoring member.

I reserve the right to hold other posters to a higher standard than I myself maintain. Why? Because I am an unrpentent lout. Deal with it.

by IggleGreen on Jan 8, 2012 4:30 PM EST reply actions  

UGH

I am so sick of this “back in the day when the Eagles D was good” asshattery. Guess what: they had a great Defense and never won a damn thing. The vaunted Buddy Ryan couldn’t offensively coach his way out of a paper bag and it looks like that Tradition is continuing up the turnpike (Rob must be the milkman’s baby).

Was it exciting to watch the 90s defenses? Yes, but it lead to nothing. It’s like laughing at the kid who talks back to the teacher. Sure you see him do it and say… “Wow that kid is cool” then he gets his ass thrown in the principals office and nothing is achieved.

So yeah I hope for your sake we go back. Hell let’s bring back Kotite and lose games because the charts were wet, or we can all get real pumped up about beating Dallas once while they go win superbowls. Awesome idea.

by Wet_Skeletonz on Jan 9, 2012 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

good point.

I think what it comes down to…do you want to NOT go to the Superbowl as a finesse team who gets man-handled in the playoffs by more physical teams OR —-do you want to get knocked out of the playoffs because your team cant move the ball offensively( unless you get a few broken plays that turn to gold) but the defense absolutely rapes the opposing teams offense…..
I like option B myself. But they both produce the same result.

by Gdog2009 on Jan 10, 2012 11:44 AM EST up reply actions  

exactly

my point both Buddy and Reid have failed so far. I’m not defending the team at all. I’m just sick and tired of this nostalgic crap that gets rammed down my throat all the time. We have a pretty finesse offense now. If we can get the defense to hold a bucket of water we will be right there.

by Wet_Skeletonz on Jan 10, 2012 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

The playoffs last weekend backed up what I am saying.

Looks like the incredible pass only teams like Greenbay and new orleans had great success against the tougher more balanced teams like SF and NY. The Pats are next to go.

by frontiersman on Jan 19, 2012 4:32 PM EST reply actions  

lets be honest..

New Orleans lost because their defense blows, and they weren’t in the dome, where they are unstoppable. . Not because they dont run the ball.
And the pack lost because they were flat. Giants are also the hot team RIGHT NOW….and as evidenced by Green Bay last year, thats all that matters.

by Gdog2009 on Jan 19, 2012 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

furthermore...

you cant compare the saints and packers to the Eagles—-those are two teams that CAN pass the ball 50 times a game and still win. (as evidenced by their recent super bowl wins)
The Eagles cant do that because they dont have a Brees or Rodgers—-Andy is delusional if he thinks Vick or Mcnabb are/were even in the same league. So in short—-passing all the time CAN win—if you have a first ballot hall of famer QB.

by Gdog2009 on Jan 19, 2012 5:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eagle_small
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #52: For who? For what?
Oldschool_small
A Different Kind of Eagles Redraft
Baldeagle_small
Do the Eagles draft poorly for defense? (UPDATED 5/25)
Dogbert_small
Building the 53-Man Roster: Part 13(!) of 53
Hill_small
Mock Bleacher Report Article

Recent FanPosts

Small
I know I know but what about this guy
Mickey-mouse-trap-graphicshunt
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #51.5: ASCII art is awesome.
Small
2012: The Season of No Excuses
Small
LeSean McCoy, Arian Foster, Matt Forte, Ray Rice or another running back: Who is the best?
Small
All-time mock draft on MtD
Small
Bell is out.. Now what???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bgnqr_small JasonB

Editors

Img_1084_small Bob_Q

Westy2_small Route36

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Briandawkins1_small Ben_Larivee

Fb_small Patrick Wall