Getting to Know Eagles Rookie TE Martell Webb
This afternoon, I was lucky enough to be able to sit down with former Michigan tight end Martell Webb, one of the Eagles' prized pickups from the undrafted free agent pool. A four-year letterman at Michigan, the 6'3" 276-pound Webb developed a reputation for his excellent blocking and special teams play and was scouted heavily by the Eagles before the draft. Not just a one-dimentional player, Webb also possesses an impressive background as a receiver, having been recruited out of high school as one of the top 20 receivers in the nation.
BQ: So Martell, tell us how you felt when the NFL lockout was finally lifted. I’m sure there was just a whirlwind of activity for you.
MW: You know, it was a big stress reliever. I was very happy, waiting for the calls to come back.
BQ: Your agent told me that you chose the Eagles out of about a dozen teams that were interested. What made you decide on Philly?
MW: Just because of the relationship I had with the coaching staff before the lockout and during the draft. You know, I had a couple of workouts with [Tight Ends Coach Tom] Melvin and that played a big part, that and the West Coast offense.
BQ: Still, it must be tough for an undrafted rookie to adjust to the pro level in such a short period of time. Tell us about your experience in training camp so far.
MW: Everything's coming fast, like, you gotta learn everything at a rapid pace, you know? Just because of the league year, there was no minicamp. I had to get a playbook and learn stuff as quick as possible because, you know, they play you out there you gotta be ready. You can't mess up.
BQ: So, how do you see yourself contributing to the team? What skills do you bring to the table?
MW: Well, I'm a big athletic guy, so I like to move around and I like to stick my head in there, you know? Make plays. I can do a lot for this team, like on special teams, or just any packages that they want me to be in.
More after the jump...
BQ: Going back to your days at Michigan, was there any one play that you were particularly proud of?
MW: It was something that nobody noticed. It was an Indiana game. It was the last drive, it was the last play of the game and we were down. I had made a key block for [QB Denard Robinson] to get him in and the game was just about to end and everybody gave him all the praise, but I knew that happened because of me. I mean, but that's what a tight end is. They do the little things to help the team out that nobody acknowledges, but I know I got the job done so I'm fired up.
BQ: Which player on the Eagles offense has impressed you the most so far and why?
MW: The player that impressed me the most? Michael Vick. Most definitely Michael Vick. He's just a general out there, telling everybody where to go. He helps everybody out. He picks up on things so quick and helps everybody out. He's just a leader, I can't explain it. It's my first time being around somebody that leads as much as he does. It's something that you gotta pinch yourself, like, "Am I dreaming?" He's a great leader that I love to be around.
BQ: Which Eagles defensive player has been the toughest to go up against?
MW: That's hard to say, because there's so many kinds of players on the defense and everybody plays hard and physical, so that's kinda tough. Everybody's playing with fresh legs, so it's hard to say right now.
BQ: Last question: which team are you most excited to face during the preseason and why?
MW: Most definitely the Ravens, just because of the defense. All of the defense, all of the veterans on that team - that's a dream come true if I go out there and play my best against a team like that.
You can follow Martell Webb on Twitter @WorldWideWebb80. Check out his aforementioned highlight play below at the 13:35 mark. Webb is in the backfield wearing #80.
52 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Doesn’t he have 0% chance of making the 51 man roster with Celek, Lee, and Harbor competing? Or is he really that impressive?
like a goal line bulldozer? like how they originally used nick cole?
I've been waiting my whole life for an Eagles Championship
R2C2!
RIP JJ
by sports00fan00 on Aug 2, 2011 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually see him making it over Lee. Lee is more of a receiver type. Webb has a real talent as a blocker.
The first Drauschak.
by birds'n'raiders on Aug 2, 2011 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Donald Lee has been one of the best pass blocking tight ends the past three seasons. 153 pass blocking snaps, only 8 pressures allowed.
He also had a 48 catch, 6 TD season back in 2007. He’s a complete tight end and I hope he takes Harbor’s spot as the No.2
BTW, great interview Bob and thanks!
If Reno Mahe can make the final roster...
Martell Webb has at least a 20% chance to make it as a special teamer. You can never have enough 6’3 270+ pound players that are mobile, agile, and hostile.
by bradyjkim on Aug 2, 2011 9:11 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
wish i could rec on a phone
Guenth
by phuckthat on Aug 2, 2011 10:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I'll hook you up.
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
Hope he makes it.
"If Revis has an Island, Asomugha should have a continent." - #5
"Or if the rest of the defense if even decent then
our two Rookie safety’s don’t have to go all Ed Reed-Palamolu-Dawkins-super sayan badass mode to help us win." - W_E
Sending pics of your junk > dog killing > generally being a douche > sexual assault allegations > being on the Cowboys.
In other news...
It looks like we picked up a new safety.
http://twitter.com/#!/ProFootballTalk/status/98561882981531648
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/02/jarrad-page-joins-the-eagles/
Probably not much cap room left. but I’m not sure it matters. Seriously, it seem like soon, people will be paying us to let them play.
Off topic
This is regarding signing Desean. Do you think that we are bringing in and paying FA’s so we have less cap space therefore obtaining more leverage when structuring Desean’s contract?
Desean has to be slowly learning that he isn’t going to get paid Nnamdi money. Also (if using this method of closing our cap space), we can say “Desean, this number gets us to 99/100% of our cap as required. It is literally impossible to pay you any more due to the new CBA.” That is a true “take it or leave it” scenario. And he is not in the position to “leave it” because penalties are so strict on players who hold out.
I think this could be a brilliant business move on the F.O.‘s side (as usual) but not a great move in terms of Desean’s future production. DJ deserves money and lots of it. Not Nnamdi money, but at this point, DJ really is one of the faces of the Eagles. Vick, Desean and Reid are the guys that come to my mind when I think “Eagles”. I really don’t want to see an unhappy Desean Jackson at all.
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
If/when Vick gets to restructure his contract, there will be plenty of money to give to DeSean
An important thing to keep in mind – DeSean’s signed on to play for 600,000 this year. Anything the team decides to give him beyond that for this season really shouldn’t be looked at as anything but an added bonus for him.
So, if I’m DeSean and I’m getting offered a 5y/$35-40m contract prior to the season, I’m thinking real hard about accepting it.
True
But Desean is a top player in the NFL. Not only receiver, but ST and as a runner. He contribute a ton. He deserves top 10 receiver money and probably expects top 5. Don’t you think? 5yr/40 mil isn’t that great. Granted, it’s a huge upgrade but realistically, I can’t imagine him having that outlook. I don’t think anyone would when discussing that amount of money on what is likely your last big pay day. Plus, he probably thinks he deserves back pay for all that he has done with such a minimal salary.
I just hope it happens and it makes him happy…. not in the “good enough” way but in the “I can’t wait to play how I’m paid” way.
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
5 yr/40 million
that’s about on par with a top 10 receiver’s salary.
by The Mad Hopper on Aug 2, 2011 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions
yea
That is a “fair” salary. Could we afford that? Do you think he would accept it? I mean… I think he expects a top 5, “star” level contract.
I can’t wait to not have to worry about this stuff.
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
That's for him and the front office to determine, then
But, by all indications, they won’t pay him top-5 money. And if they don’t warrant his potential risk-reward to be equivalent with the demands, then it is what it is.
One positive of all this is that Rosenhaus admitted earlier in the offseason to blowing the goat when it came time to negotiate with the Eagles over T.O. I feel like at this juncture, if Rosenhaus were to be jostled by any team, it would be the Eagles. Now, that’s not to say DeSean wouldn’t get a fair market value contract – but it is saying that Rosenhaus might be willing to talk a bit longer with them than most to avoid another catastrophe to add to his resume, as reviewed by the court of public opinion.
DeSean has zero leverage with the new CBA, so we will offer him a team-friendly extension that pays him decently (IMO it should be around $7M per year for 4 & $20M gtd; if 5 years or beyond, $6M per year with only half gtd). He will have the choice of taking it or playing on his rookie contract and testing FA after next year. Personally, I am ok with both, BECAUSE if he wants to test FA, we will franchise him and trade him.
I very much doubt that Joe the Genius and Howie the Magician will lose DeSean without getting something in return, hence the “franchise and trade him.”
Much rather keep him and his play making ability though. Also, I like the kid and would like to see him as an Eagle for a long time.
we've got people begging to play for us
I bet even Osi umenyiora wants us to trade for him…. So why would you want to start treating your players like shit and wanting to leave??
I’d much rather pay the man, even 6 yrs 50 mill.. And keep him happy, he is so valuable to this offence.. That packers game wudda been won if he wasn’t injured, if he showed up in the bears game it wudda been won too, miracle at the meadowlands, cowboys first game… He is so vital to our O
Michael Vick for MVP
by maximdim on Aug 3, 2011 12:44 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
What is the value, though, of him receiving money immediately?
That’s a bargaining chip the Eagles go to the negotiating table with for the next couple weeks. DeSean is under contract for $600,000 right now. He could, hypothetically, play out the season under the contract.
Both sides have shown, in their ways, that they either do not want to do so, or are willing to help the player out. But, don’t think that getting money right now shouldn’t (and won’t) come at the cost of a few back-loaded benjamins.
If he were to sign a deal this offseason, it would almost certainly be for less than Santonio got, just because there is no open market for DeSean’s services. And players, rightfully so, like their guarantees in hand.
I bet even Osi umenyiora wants us to trade for him….
How about no.
So why would you want to start treating your players like shit and wanting to leave??
Don’t mistake the art of “Doing Business” with pushing someone out the door. If DeSean wants to stay an Eagle by signing an extension NOW, then he is going to have to do so with a yearly average that is below his perceived market value. Why in the world would we overpay him when he has absolutely ZERO LEVERAGE right now? That is just plain fucking stupid, to be brutally honest.
I’d much rather pay the man, even 6 yrs 50 mill.. And keep him happy, he is so valuable to this offence.. That packers game wudda been won if he wasn’t injured, if he showed up in the bears game it wudda been won too, miracle at the meadowlands, cowboys first game… He is so vital to our O
I am not sure where to start with this paragraph, so let me just say that 1- 6 yrs $50M is probably right around where his extension will end up, but neither side is going to start the negotiation at their desired end point, that is just not how negotiations go, 2- He is very valuable to this offense, even when he is playing the part of “dangerous decoy”, and 3- Because he is so valuable to this offense, he needs to find a way to show up in those big games because that is what top paid WR’s do, and if he is going to be paid like a top paid WR than it can’t be all or nothing with him on the stat sheet, he needs to show up every game.
One more off topic thing
In the words of Charlie Kelly, “can I open up to you for a second?”
All these one-year deals have got me a bit nervous. It seems as though they really are setting the standard at “Superbowl or bust”. And that’s not just a saying at this point… they really seem to be going for it. It’s as if Charlie Manuel gave the F.O. the green light. We are swinging for the fences no doubt. But at the same time, that means if we don’t win a superbowl, this season will be a complete failure. Is this how we are looking at it? Granted, the idea and goal is no different from any other year, but we have also never gone this “all out” before.
I suppose I’m nervous because winning the Superbowl is an incredibly difficult and highly desired goal for this city, team, and fan base. If we don’t get there, with all the 1-yr signings, were all these offseason moves made in vain? Will all the 1-yr players that we are currently excited about walk? Will we be drastically different next year if we don’t take home the Lombardi? Why wouldn’t we at least sing these players for two years? The F.O. can cut a player at any time. Ryan Harris, Ronnie Brown, Vince Young… they are all good and young. Why only one year?
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
No
because look who they gave the one year deals too. Older veterans, injury risks, and the fallen trying to rise again. it is all in all a great plan by our front office. So sure why we are all in, these players all come with their fair share of risk and wouldn’t have made much more anywhere else or are just that excited about playing for this team. That makes me excited.
"I will never have my best season," Brian Dawkins
Mike Vick is a piece of shit
We be journalizing, son.
by JimmyK on Jul 21, 2011 7:21 PM EDT
by Talon Talent on Aug 2, 2011 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
To add to Talon’s well thought out reply, it also gives us the option of keeping the guys who work out and cutting ties with the guys who don’t work out after only 1 year, something the WASH’s of the world can’t do because they sign FAs to long deals and/or lots of guaranteed money.
Example- If Jenkins works out, he sticks around at a resonable price, but if he doesn’t work out, we cut him and try again with another FA next off-season or we use one of our 30 or so draft picks on a DT prospect. We are literally getting the best of both worlds with these short contracts and the longer ones with cheaper guarantees.
Right
I understand with Cullens, but how about with the 1-yr deal guys. We could have structured the contract to where we pay just as much this year and we can still cut them the next. Now, if they over-perform, we’ll have to sign them to a bigger contract if we want to keep them, or have no no trade value if we want to dump them.
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
Players Perspective
Being on a good team generally overvalues all the players on it. So if Brown or Young or Harris get a starting gig due to injury they will be much more highly valued next season. Also, their chances for success are better with improved players around them.
For Brown specifically, I think he just wants to win a SB. Jenkins deal is 5 years. DRC has two more years (as does DeSean). Lee, Higgins, Mathis, Page are unlikely to make the team anyway but will get some good exposure.
Exactly!
If Brown, Young, and Harris play like stars, we won’t get ANYTHING back because they are FA’s next season. If we had them for one or two more years, then we can receive compensation for them. Since we don’t, then they have no reason to come back to Philly next year no matter how good they were and how badly we want them. If we make it to the SB and lose due to injuries or some BS reason, we won’t have the same team to try again because so many of our players will be free agents and we will receive zero compensation. When they are under contract, the F.O. has the control.
Maybe I’m just not “getting” it. Maybe there is a mental block that inhibits me from seeing the benefit. Consider this:
Vick goes down, Young comes in a tears it up. He carries us to the NFCCG. We lose. We have a great team, a great O-line, Harris makes the pro bowl, Brown is the best #2 RB in football. Young has emerged as a leader and a winner. During the next offseason, these players are FA’s so they can take the fattest contract they can find and don’t return to Philly and we lose our winning formula.
Now consider if we had signed them to a 2 or three year contract. We could trade Young for a player or a 2nd round pick, we could keep Harris at RT and restructure his contract or trade him for compensation and the same with Ronnie Brown. If they totally suck, we cut them and lose nothing.
How can the first scenario possibly be better? Am I missing something?
"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath
I think you get it very well, signing them to 2-3 year deals gives us the ability to trade them and get something back should they develop into valuable assets this year.
My point is more immediate, if they don’t fit the need that we have pencilled them into right now, then cutting them right now will cost us very little (as opposed to having to choose between keeping them and hoping they turn it around BECAUSE we have them signed to longer deals OR cutting them) and everyone that we have signed has question marks, none of these guys are guaranteed Pro Bowlers (outside of NA)
There are lots of things to take into account
The first of which is: many of the deals are ‘show me’ contracts. David Harris wants to prove to 31 NFL teams he’s a healthy, quality RT – he didn’t want to sign for more than a year. Vince Young wants to learn from one of the best QB gurus in the game, and help the team win if called upon – he didn’t want to sign for more than a year. Ronnie Brown wants to win a god-damned Super Bowl – he didn’t want to sign for more than a year.
See the pattern? Players know how binding contracts are, and they’d rather take a quick flyer on the Eagles to revitalize their careers and cash in next offseason then give the rights to the Eagles (and, perhaps, gain a bit more guaranteed money – but likely less overall cash in the long run) to do with them what they will.
The way you suggest is always the best scenario for the team – but it’s not always the right fit for the player. Points from both sides have to be considered when dealing with single- and multi-year deals.
The guys on one year deals aren’t top talent. There will be the same kind of players out on the market next year.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook
youtube: jarred page chris chambers
Guenth
by phuckthat on Aug 2, 2011 10:44 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
This guy has big, blocking TE converted to outstanding OT written all over him. Practice squad if nothing else.
I was wondering that myself
Whether this guy could have a Jason Peters type career. He’d need to add some size, but he could have the body type to be a tackle at some point.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook
by JasonB on Aug 2, 2011 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Celek
Has some compititiion this yr. He better step his game up cuz last yr he was a shell of his former self. He is one of my favorite youngsters so im rooting for him.
"Running through the meadows,laughing with revolvers"- Warcloud.
by Dunta Is A PUNK on Aug 3, 2011 1:42 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
The player that impressed me the most? Michael Vick. Most definitely Michael Vick. He’s just a general out there, telling everybody where to go. He helps everybody out. He picks up on things so quick and helps everybody out. He’s just a leader, I can’t explain it. It’s my first time being around somebody that leads as much as he does. It’s something that you gotta pinch yourself, like, “Am I dreaming?” He’s a great leader that I love to be around.
Awesome.
"If I can get you to think twice, I'm in your head."
-Brian Dawkins
Nnamdi, Asante, DRC; The Three Graces...charm, beauty, and creativity.

































