SB Nation Philly Editor's Pick
Analysis of the Vince Young W/L argument (Warning: Long)
I have been trying to figure out the love for Vince Young (VY) ever since news broke that we might sign him. I've been repeatedly bashed for hating on Vince Young but no one can give me a solid argument as to why he deserves so much credit.
The arguments I usually get are ‘he has a ton of potential' or he is 30-18 as a starter. The potential is a tough thing to argue and I don't totally disagree. Yes, he is a gifted athlete no question there and I'm not here to argue his athletic ability. When he needs to, he can run and he's won games doing just that.
The 30-18 record argument is weak yet it's everyone's go to argument. It's worse than the Cowboys telling us how many rings they have. Has anyone bothered to look at his stats in these games? I didn't want to have to do this analysis but I wanted to see if I was crazy or not. After all it is possible that I was unjustly hating on this guy. After discussing this with Foos who seemed to echo my thoughts I decided to dig into the wins to see exactly how good VY was. Well I'm here to tell you that I am not crazy and after the jump you will see what I mean.
I did an analysis on every win VY has started in, I tried to be as fair as I could when deciding who or what the main reason they won each game was. There are 30 Ws here with two you will see I don't think should be counted at all. Even though VY started the games he was knocked out before the end of the first half.
I have included the team they beat, that teams final record that year, VY's passing stats and the score of the game along with my brief analysis on who/what won the game and why. It's interesting to note that just 7 teams that VY "won" against in these 30 games were over .500 at the end of the year.
*Remember I'm not here to argue whether VY is an athlete or not, we know he is. I'll give him some credit for his rushing in games because it is part of who he is as a QB but I want to focus on the job he does as a passer. There is no doubt in my mind that he could win a decent amount of games by running alone.
2006 Season
Beat Washington (5-11) - 25-22 - VY 161 yards 1 TD 0 INT 85.6 Rating
Travis Henry 178 yards 1 TD was the reason this game was won. Young had a decent game for a rookie who was 0-5 but Henry put the Titans in position for Rob Bironas's 3 FGs and scored a TD.
Beat Houston (6-10) - 28-22 - VY 87 yards 1 TD 0 INT 87.4 Rating
Tennessee's Defense/ST had 3 Fumble recoveries 1 for a TD 2 INTs and a Punt Return TD. It's hard to argue this one, even with VY having an okay game with 2 TDs 1 passing and 1 rushing but low overall numbers.
Beat Philadelphia (10-6) - 31-13 - VY 101 yards 1 TD 0 INT 66.7 Rating
Travis Henry ran all over the Eagles for 143 Yards 1 TD and the Defense scored 2 TDs. No question here.
Beat New York Giants (8-8) - 24-21 - VY 249 yards 2 TDs 0 INTs 107.9 Rating
VY flat out, he also had 69 rushing yards and a rushing TD.
Beat Indianapolis Colts (12-4) 20-17 - VY 163 yards 2 TDs 2 INTs 72.6
I'm giving this to VY but its close he had an okay game throwing 2 TDs but he also threw 2 picks and if not for a 60 yard FG with time expiring this is in the loss column. He only completed 1 pass on the final drive and barely got them in range.
Beat Houston (6-10) - 26-20 (OT) - VY 218 yards 0 TDs 1 INT 73.6 Rating
The passing stats are bad VY won this game on the ground with his 86 rushing yards and 2 yard rushing TD in OT.
Beat Jacksonville (8-8) - 24-17 - VY 85 yards 0 TDs 0 INTs 70.1 Rating
The Defense had 3 INTs for 2 TDs and a Fumble return for TD, no question here those passing stats are pitiful.
Beat Buffalo (7-9) - 30-29 - VY 183 yards 2 TDs 0 INTs 127.7 Rating
VY won this game he also had 61 rushing yards and 1 TD.
2006 Summary - Was a decent year for VY as a rookie he looked like a rookie should have. I give him credit for 4 wins I want to say 3 since he won one game purely by running but I'm trying to be fair. At this point there was reason to believe he could be an elite QB, but then he actually gets worse.
2007 Season
Beat Jacksonville (11-5) - 13-10 - VY 78 yards 0 TDs 1 INT 47.9 Rating
The stats speak for themselves, he was lucky the run game was working Chris Brown 175 yards, Lendale White 66 yards and VY 22 yards and the games only TD. He won this one on the ground.
Beat New Orleans (7-9) - 31-14 - VY 164 yards 2 TDs 1 INT 97.5 Rating
This looks like it should by VY but the Tennessee D had 4 INTs 1 for a TD and a Fumble recovery VY had 50 yards or less yards on both his TD pass scoring drive. Many will argue that he should get credit for this one but fact is ANY starting NFL QB should score when given the ball with half the field.
Beat Atlanta (4-12) - 20-13 - VY 157 yards 0 TDs 3 INTs 34.5 Rating
He is lucky his D bailed him out by getting 2 INTs 1 for a TD and held Atlanta to 6 points (one of VYs picks was returned for their only TD) and 200 yards of total offense.
Beat Oakland (4-12) - 13-9 - VY 42 yards 0 TDs 0 INTs 50.3 Rating
I thought I was going to read he was injured in this game, he wasn't and that's horrid. His team bailed him out again Lendale White 133 rushing yards, Chris Henry 48 yards and a TD (VY only had 11 rushing yards). Defense had a fumble recovery and an INT
Beat Carolina (7-9) - 20-7 - VY 110 yards 0 TDs 2 INTs 36.5 Rating
Again bailed out Lendale White 100 yards rushing and a TD VY had 25 yards and a TD. Defense also held the Panthers to 191 yards and 2 turnovers and gave up a late game garbage TD.
Beat Houston (8-8) - 28-20 - VY 248 Yards 2 TDs 1 INT 99.9 Rating
This was a total team effort but I'll give VY the credit he had 3 TDs when you add in his rushing TD. He also had a fumble lost (2 turnovers total)
Beat Kansas City (4-12) - 26-17 - VY 191 yards 2 TDs 0 INTs 109.6 Rating
Titans D also stepped up getting 2 INTs and a fumble recovery but VY played well against the very bad Chiefs.
Beat New York Jets (4-12) - 10-6 - VY 166 yards 0 TDs 1 INT 60 Passer Rating
Lendale White had 103 yards rushing, Chris Brown had the only TD rushing and the D pitched in 2 INTs.
Beat Indianapolis (13-3) - 16-10 - VY 157 yards 0 TDs 0 INTs 103 Rating
This is one of the games that I know shouldn't count. First VY was injured in the second and had to leave. Second The Colts had clinched the division and pulled their starters early in the second quarter starting with Peyton Manning.
2007 Summary - I give VY credit for 4 wins although again, I'd like to say 3 because that Jacksonville game was won on the ground.
2008 Season
Beat Jacksonville (5-11) - 17-10 - VY 110 yards 1 TD 2 INTs 45.6 Rating
Again a bad stat line boosted by CJ in the screen game. 1 of his INTs was directly responsible for the Jacksonville TD. The Defense gets the credit they bailed him out with 7 sacks a fumble recovery, 2 INTs and held the Jags to 189 total yards.
2008 Summary - I'm not giving him credit for this win in 2008, he was bad in this game but the Jags were worse. The 2008 Titans defense was second only to the Steelers.
2009
Beat Jacksonville (7-9) - 30-13 - VY 125 yards 1 TD 0 INTs 114.1 Rating
When you stomp a team I expect more than 125 yards and 1 TD. CJ was the star here 228 yards and 2 TDs, the D also had 2 picks.
Beat San Fran (8-8) - 34-27 - VY 172 yards 0 TDs 0 INTs 92.4 rating
CJ and the D did all the work again VY just didn't lose this game. CJ had 135 yards rushing 2 TDs the Defense had 3 INTs and 1 TD.
Beat Buffalo (6-10) - 41-17 - VY 210 Yards 1 TD 1 INT 90.4 Rating
This one was all CJ and the D too CJ had 132 yards 2 TDs and the Defense had 2 INTs for 2 TDs. VY managed the game and by that I mean he managed not to lose a massive lead.
Beat Houston (9-7) - 20-17 - VY 116 yards 1 TD 0 INT 84.7 Rating
CJ had 151 rushing yards VY had 73 with a lost fumble. I'll give him credit but this was pretty much all rushing.
Beat Arizona (10-6) - 20-17 - VY 387 yards 1 TD 0 INT 99.7 Rating
VY had a great game against one of the worst passing defenses in the league that year. He gets the credit but CJs 154 yards rushing and a TD were also a big part of why the passing game was so effective against one of the worst passing Ds in the league that year.
Beat St Louis (1-15) - 47-7 - VY 132 yards 1 TD 0 INTs 156.2 Rating
VY left half way through the second quarter so he doesn't get credit for this one CJ had 117 yards 2 TDs, the D had 5 INTs 1 for a TD and Collins had 154 yards passing and a TD all deserve credit before Young.
Beat Miami (7-9) - 27-24 (OT) - VY 236 Yards 3 TDs 1 INT 103.3 Rating
Great game all around D had 3 picks and a fumble recovery, CJ had 104 rushing yards. VY gets the credit it's one of the best games statistically he's ever had.
Beat Seattle (5-11) - 17-13 - VY 171 yards 0 TDs 1 INT 63.2 Rating
This goes to CJ 134 yards rushing 2 TDs, there is no argument here.
2009 Summary - This was a great year for Chris Johnson and the Titans D, VY didn't have to do much of anything. I give him credit for 3 wins.
2010
Beat Oakland (8-8) 38-13 - VY 154 yards 2 TDs 0 INTs 142.8 Rating
CJ had 142 yards 2 TDs and Javon Ringer had 33 yards and a TD but I'll give VY the credit he had a decent game against the Raiders and I'm sure the running game opened up the passing game.
Beat New York Giants (10-6) - 29-10 - VY 118 yards 1 TD 0 INTs 105.7 Rating
CJ had 125 yards 2 TDs and the D had 2 INTs and a fumble recovery. In my eyes any QB in the league could have managed this game so I'm not giving him the credit.
Beat Dallas (6-10) - 34-27 - VY 173 Yards 2 TDs 0 INTs 97.6 Rating
CJ had 131 yards 2 TDs, the D picked off Dallas 3 times this was a whole team effort. Dallas was the 7th worst team against the pass in 2010 He should have good numbers but I'll give him credit since he threw for 2 TDs.
Beat Jacksonville (8-8) - 30-3 - VY 61 yards 1 TD 0 INTs 142.5 Rating
He threw for a TD but was knocked out of the game 10 minutes in I'm not giving him credit for a game he didn't even finish a quarter in. CJ had 111 yards and a TD.
2010 Summary - I'm giving him credit for 2 wins here the rest of the games his team stepped it up and the ball was barely put in his hands, except to hand it off to CJ.
There is my breakdown, like it or hate it. It's my opinion so I'm sure people will argue one way or the other but the fact remains that he's beaten just 7 teams over .500 in his 30 wins (23%). Of his 30 wins I believe he was responsible for 14 wins [2006 (4) 2007 (4) 2008 (1) 2009 (3) 2010 (2)]. Also, I was generous with 2 of those 14 which were games he won with his legs.
VY was bailed out a lot by great Defensive play and a consistently stout running game. I sent this on to Foos to show him what I found and he was kind enough to do the analysis of the losses below. We both believed that VY would be responsible for quite a few of the losses.
I hope the best for VY now that he is an Eagle; I root for the name on the front not the name on the back. I will support him while he is here and if he can help us get a ring then great. I believe he came to the right place if he's looking to learn how to become a better QB and a better person. I just cannot understand while people believe he is somehow one of the best QBs in the league. Does he have potential? Sure, but so does Kevin Kolb and people were thrilled to send him packing. As a backup we could have worse, but let's not get it twisted, if Vick gets hurt there is a massive drop off from him to Young. I get that and we will be lucky if VY never sees the field this year.
Finally I'll end with this, VY's career stat line is almost identical to Alex Smiths, yet Alex Smith is regarded as a bust and one of the worst QBs in the league. Is that just because he doesn't have the W/L record of Young? That to me is ridiculous.
|
COMP |
ATT |
COMP% |
Yards |
AVG |
TD |
INT |
RATING |
|
|
VY |
689 |
1190 |
57.9 |
8098 |
6.81 |
42 |
42 |
75.7 |
|
AS |
864 |
1514 |
57.1 |
9399 |
6.21 |
51 |
53 |
72.1 |
********************************************************************************************************************
So, Whodie and I speak pretty regularly, and when talks began surfacing that the Eagles were looking to sign Vince Young as a backup, of course we decided to explore this avenue in depth. We both had a similar feeling that his value as a quarterback is severely overrated by the media, and especially fans, and were anxious to see the reaction from the fanbase. Not totally surprising, this move was met with a lot of optimism and not much criticism. However, the popular justification for this being a prudent signing was Young's career record. Just like pitchers in baseball, "career record" is a less than reliable stat to base one's evaluation of a quarterback. Again, after some discussion, and admittedly not many facts to go on, we both had a feeling that there was a good chance that Vince probably didn't have much to do with many of these 30 wins, and there was a good possibility that his poor play had a lot to do with the losses. Whodie looked into the wins (see above), and I tend to agree with his analysis. I just don't see how we can give so much credit to Young for "leading his team to victory" when the vast majority of the time it was a combination of the running game and superb defensive play that ultimately lead to a victorious outcome for the Titans. So, as to the other side of the coin, I'm going to look at his 18 losses and attempt to determine, without bias, where the responsibility for these losses should fall. I'm penning this before looking at the information, so there's a chance I'll finish this study and conclude that there were other circumstances most of the time. If that's the case, I'll freely admit it, but something tells me it won't be.
2006
10/1 Cowboys (L) 14-45 Young 14/29 155 1 TD 2 Int 2 Fumbles (1 Lost)
Young's first professional start. Entering the fourth quarter, the Titans actually had a manageable deficit here, with the score standing at 28-14. I mean a 14 point 4th quarter comeback is difficult, at that point the game was clearly a lot closer than the final score. However, a Vince Young 4th quarter interception and also a lost fumble quickly ended any comeback hopes. Overall, his numbers aren't good, and also take into account that about 2/3rds of his passing yards came after the Cowboys extended their lead beyond 14, and they look worse. Young also had 3 yards on 5 carries! Slow down there, killer. Looking at the overall game, though, the Cowboys simply dominated. The Titans couldn't run, couldn't pass, and couldn't defend. I'm going to chalk this one up to team loss, but let's not kid ourselves here, Young didn't do anything to help the team attempt to win and also turned the ball over twice in the fourth quarter, allowing Dallas to extend their lead.
10/8 Colts (L) 13-14 Young 10/21 63 1 Int (Rush TD)
Actually a pretty close game here. Horrible numbers. 3 yards per passing attempt? Really? Young also collected 43 yards on 4 rushing attempts with a TD. So he's responsible for just over 100 total yards with a TD and an Int. On the surface, I'd be willing to call this a case of getting beat by a better team. But looking more into the stats, I found out that around 60 of Vince's 106 total yards came on the Titan's opening drive for a TD. If you remove the stats from their opening drive, he's got three quarters of nonexistent production, with incompletions, a turnover and general poor play. Had he been able to manufacture a drive that ended within the Colts' 30 at any point in 3 quarters, Tennessee wins this game. Sorry Vince, I'm hanging this one on you.
11/5 Jaguars (L) 7-37 Young 15/36 163 1 TD 3 Ints 1 Fumble Lost
Ok. Going into the fourth quarter the Titans were down 37-0, Young had 80 passing yards, 3 Ints, a lost fumble and 10 rushing yards on 3 attempts. He accumulated 8 of his completions, 80 passing yards and his TD in garbage time. Up til then, he was a turnover machine with no production. Loss to Vince.
11/12 Ravens (L) 26-27 Young 13/25 211 1 Int 8/39 Rushing TD
Another close game. Tennessee actually jumped out 26-7 on Baltimore. I can't hang this one solely on Young. He accumulated most of his stats early, but then the Ravens simply shut everything down. The turning point may have actually come as a result of bad play calling. Baltimore intercepted a pass inside the Titans 30 off of an option play. Vince didn't really do anything to help manufacture any kind of scoring over the last 2 and a half quarters, and clearly a field goal at any point would have sealed the game, but the Ravens simply shut everything down on Tennessee.
12/31 Patriots (L) 23-40 Young 15/36 227 2 Ints 2/29 Rushing TD
Cut to the chase. Tennessee was down 3 at the end of the 3rd quarter. 2 Vince Young 4th quarter Ints all but ended this game. Vince, it's on you.
2006 Summary - 3 VY Losses, 2 Not his fault
2007
9/16 Colts (L) 20-22 Young 17/27 184 TD 5/53 Rushing 1 fumble lost
At first this looks like a team loss, doesn't it? Digging a little deeper, I'm going to have to disagree. Young had a pretty solid game up until the 4th quarter. Tennessee was down 2, had the ball with about 2 minutes to go and was driving, presumably for the winning score, right? Wanna guess where that fumble lost popped up? Yup. Vince coughed it up on the final drive. A few Indy kneel downs and the game was over. Sorry Vince.
10/14 Bucs (L) 10-13 Young 10/20 125 Int 3/6 Rushing Fumble lost
Vince didn't do anything. He left in the 3rd quarter down 10-0 with a quad strain. Kerry Collins came in and brought Tennessee back to tie the game, only to watch Jeff Garcia (!) march Tampa down on the final drive for a game winning field goal. The Titans ran for over 100 yards, Kerry Collins was the only reason the Titans had a chance to win in the fourth quarter. Young coughed up the ball twice. On you big fella.
11/11 Jags (L) 13-28 Young 24/41 257 Td 2 Int 8/52 Rushing
Outside of Young, the Titans had exactly 10 offensive yards. Not Young's fault.
11/19 Denver (L) 20-34 Young 26/41 305 1 TD 2 Int 11/74 Rushing TD
Outside of Young, the Titans had about 50 offensive yards, and 4 fumbles. Not winning like that. I realize he's got 2 ints here, but this was probably his career day at this point and his team was clearly not helping, offensively or defensively.
11/25 Bengals (L) 6-35 Young 19/31 246 Int 2/6 Rushing Fumble Lost
Total team shitstorm here. Probably could argue that turning the ball over twice isn't helping, and the fact that most of his passing yards came in the 4th down 29, but there was no running game, to speak of and their defense was useless. Team loss.
12/9 Chargers (L) 17-23 OT Young 13/21 121 2 Int 2/2 Rushing
Lendale White was carrying this team most of the game. And the Chargers actually build up a 17-3 lead in the 4th! Young completed 1 pass in the final 18 minutes of regulation and lead the Titans to a 3 and out on their drive in OT. The Chargers marched down for the winning score. Young contributed nothing of value to this game. The defense giving up a lead in the 4th quarter isn't helpful, but the fact that Young had 3 drives to at least kill some clock time and managed to hold onto the ball for a total of 3 minutes on those three drives is awful. What happened to the vaunted scrambling ability? Throw in the 2 ints and the lack of any TD help and things aren't looking good. Had Lendale White not run all over the Chargers D, it's an easy call that Young shit the bed. I'm still giving it to him here. A "winning qb" finds some way to sustain a drive for over a minute in the 4th quarter, and he had 3(!) chances.
2007 Summary - Bad Vince 3 Bad Team 3
2008
12/28 Colts (L) 0-23 Young 9/13 55 5/25 Rushing
Yup that's the entire line. The Titans had 125 total yards of offense and ran 35 plays. What a frigging disgrace. Team loss.
2008 Summary - 0 Vince Loss 1 Team Loss
2009
12/6 Colts (L) 17-27 Young 24/43 241 2 Td 1 Int 4/16 Rushing
He had a good game here. Not much else to say. Peyton was Peyton and the Titans turned the ball over via fumbles. None for Vince. Team loss.
12/25 Chargers (L) 17-42 Young 8/21 89 2 Ints 6/40 Rushing Fumble Lost
The game was pretty close in the first quarter. A second quarter interception let San Diego go into the locker room 21-10 instead of 21-14. An early 3rd quarter fumble lost let San Diego extend their lead to 28-10. A late 3rd quarter interception, and San Diego was up 35-10. Game was manageable until Young pretty much turned the ball over on 3 consecutive drives. By the way, QB rating of 11.9? Way to go, guy! On you Vince.
2009 Summary - 1 For Vince 1 For the Team
2010
9/19 Steelers (L) 11-19 Young 7/10 66 2 Int 2/12 Rushing 2 Fumbles (1 Lost)
Vince was yanked after 3 quarters after his 3rd turnover down 19-3. Kerry Collins came in, led the Titans to a TD and a 2 pt conversion, got the ball back, but got stopped on the final drive attempting to tie the game. Collins almost pulled Vince's ass out of the fire here, but fell short. Chalk one up to Vince.
10/3 Broncos (L) 20-26 Young 17/28 173 1 TD 1/18 Rushing
Nothing to write home about. Not much of a rushing game. To be honest, this was just a game of "who sucks the least?" Team loss.
10/31 Chargers (L) 25-33 Young 10/21 253 2 TD 2/3 Rushing
Overall this may be his best game as a pro. Avoided turnovers all together, solid rating, 2 TDs. Injured in the 4th and taken out. Collins came in to finish, and did a decent job as well. Tennessee's defense just couldn't stop Rivers. Team loss.
11/21 Redskins (L) 16-19 Young 12/16 165 3/20 Rushing 1 Fumble Lost
What a tale of two awfully inept teams, huh? I'm going to go with team loss here, but those stats aren't anything showing me that he contributed in a manner that helped his team have a chance to win. Just a crazy game actually. As an unrelated note, Donovan McNabb had 380 yards passing. How the hell do you accumulate 380 passing yards and have 1 TD? Craziness.
2010 Summary - Bad Vince 1 Team Loss 3
Total ---- Vince Losses 8, Team Losses 10
Here's my thoughts on this exercise: Vince played the strongest roll in 8 of the 18 losses that he has on his record. From the other 10, there were a few that he played extraordinarily well, but for the most part, he just had passing yards in the mid 100's with some rushing thrown in. Even in team losses, most NFL quarterbacks routinely accumulate over 200 passing yards. Vince really doesn't do that very often. As for the blowout losses, it's very routine for quarterbacks to accumulate massive passing stats in the final quarter and a half when defenses switch to the prevent defense. Somehow Young doesn't. It doesn't matter what kind of game situation it is, but his career numbers seem to somehow sit comfortably in the mid 100's for passing yards. That's not an NFL quarterback, folks. As a few side notes, two things jump out at me: inconsistency and fumbles. Even looking through Whodie's games, I've never seen lines that constantly fluxuate anywhere between 60 passing yards for an entire game to extreme cases of 300 passing yards.
In closing, I just don't see it. To me, Young is a gifted athlete that is not a quarterback, and the main argument for picking him up is based on his "career record." I think it's pretty clear that those numbers really don't hold much water. Do with this what you will... But just remember, we are now one of these:
via t2.gstatic.com
Away from this guy under center:
via t0.gstatic.com
Don't get me wrong. I hope Andy can work the same magic he did with Vick in this case and I'll be the first to admit I was wrong if that happens, but I think he had a lot more to work with in Vick's case to being with. As the old saying goes, shit in - shit out.
132 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Just curious, who would you have chosen then?
I’m not a VY fan, but I don’t mind the decision. Who did you want backing up Vick this year? Just please don’t say Kafka, Garcia, Favre, or McNabb…
by cin7 on Jul 31, 2011 3:40 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
orton?
i know we couldn’t have seen it coming but he seems like a viable back up now lol
by phillyfan330 on Jul 31, 2011 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
orton's a no
he would have had to been traded for, and wanted to start wherever he went, so it wouldn’t have been a fit for either team
I think Kafka is a viable option at least he knows the playbook. VY was just signed he has to pick up the playbook and learn that first. Then you are talking about changing a lot to make him into a QB and that will take at least a year. It took Vick a year here before he did what he did last year.
Signing him wasn’t a horrible decision a backup with NFL game experience is never a bad thing, especially when your only other QB is entering his second year.. That’s not what I’m arguing here. I’m arguing against the people who believe that VY was brought in here to be a difference maker. Or the people that say he is a great QB because in my honest opinion neither of those are true.
They call me The Professor.
I don’t think anyone is arguing that VY is a difference maker (for the Eagles). He’s just the best backup in the league right now, nothing more. You might be arguing with your alter-ego on this one.
Plenty of people on this site have said he is a difference maker. And I don’t agree that he’s the best backup in the league either.
They call me The Professor.
How’s he going to make a difference?
That’s my question.
Who’s a better backup?
That’s tough to say it’s really subjective I think every team in the league hopes their backup won’t ever play.
They call me The Professor.
If you dont agree that he’s the best back up in the league, then you must think someone’s better, right? Do you have a name?
Who I think is a better backup is all opinion and wasn’t the point of this article. All it’s going to do is start a tangent argument that is purely opinion based … I’ll post my names anyway but this is my opinion it has nothing to do with the original post so any connection people try to make will be without cause.
In no particular order …
Sage Rosenfels, performed really well in Houston in relief and should have been the starter in Minny if not for the Favre Circus last year. This is close since Rosenfels hasn’t really put up monster numbers but he has an extremely accurate arm and a good to great completion percentage. In our particular offense I think he would do very well because of his accuracy and ability to throw the short pass well.
Brian Hoyer, first he’s been raised in the Belicheck camp which is probably as good as producing NFL QBs as Andy Reid and Co. He doesn’t have enough NFL game experience to prove it but I would like to have him as my backup.
Shaun Hill, he did a good job in short starting stints in SF and DET he’s put up strong numbers on horrible teams and usually he’s been thrown in to bad situations. This is purely based on backup abilities. Shaun Hill is exactly what you want as a backup, he can come in and give you a chance to win but you don’t want him to be your every day starter.
John Kitna, Anyone that can put up 4k yards on a horrible Lions team is a good QB. His TD/INT ratio sucks but he played for BAD teams. I always like Kitna I thought that he got stuck in a bad situation. He mentored Carson Palmer and that’s a good thing to have on a team. People will bring up the 0-16 Lions but forget that Kitna was on IR at week 5. In relief of Romo last year in just 9 games Kitna had over 2,000 yards and 16TDs again that’s what you want from a backup.
They call me The Professor.
You're very
wrong. Are you watched every game? I watched. You analize the stats and not the performance on the field. If you wnat analize stats, you could see VY only get better after his sophomore season. In the last 2 seasons he´s stas are similiar to Brady with that same age. Also, after the 0-6 start, he give the Titans offense another dimension. CJ was good all year, but it not saved the titans to start 0-6. How many times in that season he run for the first down and give the titans offense another chance? I cant count that with the two hands. Vs the Jaguars, Bills, Texans, 49ers he was very important. Cardinals he won sigle handed. And one last point. Why the Titans can’t win without him? In the 0-6 start, CJ was very good in his 2k season and the players are the same. Why they can’t win? And don’t give that “VY only wins teams under 50% mark” thing. Give 10 names who have a winning record against over 50% teams if you could. You can make a case against VY of the field, but not on the field. He´s a proven winner in every level. period.
by Fernando brazil on Aug 1, 2011 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Give 10 names who have a winning record against over 50% teams if you could
Why does everyone want me to do their work for them. If you want to prove me wrong do the leg work or don’t say anything.
Cardinals he won sigle handed
Did you read my post? I gave him credit for the Cards game.
Why they can’t win? And don’t give that "VY only wins teams under 50% mark"
Why not, it’s a perfectly logical explanation. The Titans as a team win versus teams under .500 and vs teams above .500 the same regardless of QB.
They call me The Professor.
man
Collins had the same run game in the 0-6 start. Why he can’t win? Also this year the Titans are good when VY was good, he was the team MVP in mid season per the Tennessean, the most VY haters of all time. When Fisher began his show, the team lost every game.
by Fernando brazil on Aug 1, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
you wrote the article
if you want to bash a qb for winning record against teams over 50%, you need to know how is the record of the top qbs against these teams.
by Fernando brazil on Aug 1, 2011 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
im not a VY fan, but this was a good signing
he came relatively cheap as a free agent, so the eagles didnt have to give up a pick or a player for him, he is a raw, gifted athlete that hasnt developed his professional game or mental maturity yet. I trust Andy and Marty in doing everything possible to develop him into a true qb, but if it doesnt work out, he is cut.
furthermore, do not underestimate Kafka’s development. Am I saying that he would be absolutely fine filling in for an extended stretch if God forbid Vick goes down for a while, probably not, but from what ive read and seen about him this training camp, he has brought his A game, and I would not be surprised to see Kafka listed as the #2 QB entering the season.
this was a low/no risk – high reward signing and I think we should let it play out
“he is a raw, gifted athlete that hasnt developed his professional game or mental maturity yet.”
My only issue here is that he’s already 28. It’s not like we are talking about a guy that’s 24, 2 years out of college. He’s had 5 years in the league with regular playing time to develop. Some guys just flat out never develop into a quality NFL player. I feel pretty strongly that that might be the case with Young.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Jul 31, 2011 5:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
i agree with you
there is a good chance that he may never grow up, but at the same time, he did not have the coaching support around him to properly develop him. Jeff Fisher is a defensive genius, but has no good experience developing quarterbacks. VY was thrown into the fire as a rookie and just went out and tried to make plays. all I’m saying is that if any coaching tandem can develop and get the most out of VY, its Andy and Marty
by BadCo'09 on Jul 31, 2011 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Jeff Fisher did a pretty good job with Steve McNair I mean he did win co-MVP with Peyton Manning in 2003.
They call me The Professor.
yes, but McNair had 2 full seasons to develop before he was the starter
Young had a couple weeks before he was the starter. And I think it’s fair to day that, so far at least, McNair was a far better QB
I mean VY had 5 years to learn and couldn’t keep the job. And yes McNair was the far better QB.
They call me The Professor.
I mean VY had 5 years to learn and couldn’t keep the job
I mean McNabb had 9 years to learn and couldnt keep the job. All those wins must be attributed to Dawkins, JJ and Bwest I guess. Who needs a QB really…why do teams even have one anyways?
FLY #7 FLY !!!
In MUDD I trust !!!
McNabb was a very successful QB he put up huge numbers. The fact that he didn’t win a Super Bowl was not entirely his fault.
I suppose I don’t see your point, if you are saying the VY = McNabb then I’m not sure what to tell you because that is nowhere near the case.
They call me The Professor.
Thats my point. You just don\t get what ive been saying the whole time. Its a team game. Regardless of personal numbers (as youve pointed above), all that matters are Ws and Ls. Every player on a team is important and they are all part of the Ws and Ls. Its that simple! Young has played good enough to get his team 30 wins with the Titans. He’s gone to a pro bowl. He’s already shown that he can win important games. He’s still young and still has a high ceiling. He can be a turd all he wants caracterwise, and frankly I wouldnt put up with any of it, but this is Andy Reids team. If someone acts up in the locker room, expecially if youre a back up, he’ll get benched or cut. What do we care? Look at how long they are going with out their best WRs. They dont care for any non-sense. If Young doesnt want to learn, fine he can leave. But if he does, he could easily be an asset in the game, or future game or future pick. It was a smart move by the organization. I dont get why you had to go and spend half a day looking for the stats when your argument was baseless to begin with …
FLY #7 FLY !!!
In MUDD I trust !!!
This argument means you missed the entire point of this exercise.
Young has played good enough to get his team 30 wins
I disagree in some games he was downright awful but when you get 2 TDs and/or 3+ turnovers from your Defense I could win an NFL game.
W/L is not an accurate assessment of how good a QB is. You haven’t provided any evidence as to why VY is a good/great QB. Here’s a hint, you can’t.
I agree he is a serviceable backup, I along with most NFL fans hope that our backup never sees the field so that’s fine by me. Its the unjust love he’s getting for “winning” 30 games that is annoying. It’s like people have never watched him play.
If he’s good enough to be a starter like some believe then at least ONE of the QB starved teams in the NFL would have at least tried to trade for him or sign him when he was released. That in itself is EXTREMELY telling.
They call me The Professor.
what you think
about this:
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/6834507/nfl-peyton-manning-top-two-qbr-seasons
Note: VY’s 2010 season was better than 09.
by Fernando brazil on Aug 5, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions
It very well might be
But Vick was pretty old when he came here too.
The bottom line is, players like this are worth a flyer. And that’s all the Eagles have committed to Vince. There is no long-term plan in place for Young as an Eagle. He will be Vick’s understudy for this season, and then we’ll go from there.
But to overreact to what amounts to an insurance policy isn’t the best response, in my opinion.
I’d also like to add that in a loss to the patriots that Collins started, Young came in to play about 2 and 1/2 quarters. He accumulated 0 passing yards. God damn 0. The loss goes to Collins because he was the starter but how does an NFL quarterback not at least complete a checkdown pass over 2 and 1/2 quarters? That’s just mind blowing…
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Jul 31, 2011 5:23 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I think it’s at least a bit comparable to bringing in Vick two years ago. Vick was 29 and Vince is 28 now. Vick’s biggest criticism when he was in Atlanta was his passing it looks like he developed terrificly under Andy and Marty. Vick always had “potential” to do that, as is said about Young now. I believe that under this coaching staff Vince could develop into a better qb, even though it probably won’t be the type of change that Vick underwent.
We don't need luck
Young’s already said he’s willing to do whatever needs done to learn from the coaches and players and help the team win a championship.
I can very easily, and do, liken the debate of VY's merits to that of Kevin Kolb
It’s all about stats to some people, while to others, it’s all about the intangibles.
I like the fact that you broke down his starts; it shows that you bring something to the table, and have an idea as to what you’re talking about.
The only other point I’m going to make is that while you point out that the defense won a lot of the games VY started, without VT @ QB, the outcome could have been vastly different.
"I'm 95% sure that 100% of what he says is wrong."
Sometimes true but not really, any NFL starting QB should be able to put up about 125 yards passing and 1 TD in a game (sometimes less than 80 yards). Especially some of the games VY was in where the defense was getting multiple TOs and giving him short fields. I don’t think that speaks to what VY is, he is a serviceable QB but he’s in a group with A LOT of other QBs in the league. At this point I don’t think he’ll ever be anything more than a career backup.
They call me The Professor.
I agree whole heartedly with this
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Jul 31, 2011 9:19 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Unless your name is Rasputin, you can't predict the future
and neither can anyone else.
I value your opinion as a learned fan of OUR Philadelphia Eagles, but I don’t think the jury’s out on VY and his career. I Do think that if anyone can revive it, it’s our coaching staff.
"I'm 95% sure that 100% of what he says is wrong."
by Ralf E Chubbs on Jul 31, 2011 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Neither of us are really debating if Young is a serviceable back up for this team. We are simply pointing out that the apparent love for him based solely on his “career record” and being a “winner” is akin to blind faith. If you pulled his career record out and simply showed me his career passer rating, td/int ratio, and passing ypg I’d surely say that I’m looking at a career back up quarterback whose team has maybe won 50% of the games he’s started. Had the Titans had a lesser defense and/or running game during his 48 starts, there’s a good chance that his career record would reflect his mediocracy as an NFL
quarterback.
We are simply showing everyone what he is instead of the smoke and mirrors that his record provides.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Jul 31, 2011 9:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Again, I compare this to K2-
While others just look at his Win/Loss and TD/Int ratios, we’ve had the opportunity to see him from the beginning, and we understand there’s more to him than just stats… perhaps it’s the same with VY.
That’s the point I’m trying to make
"I'm 95% sure that 100% of what he says is wrong."
by Ralf E Chubbs on Jul 31, 2011 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions
:::::keeping self from saying something about Kolb:::::
Q: What do a leaky tampon and Sean McDermott's defense have in common?
A: They are equally ineffective in the red zone.
"If Roger Goodell was on fire and I had to piss on him to put him out, I wouldn't do it...I hate him and will never respect him."
--The often wrong (but right in this instance) James Harrison.
so say something about Vince Young then haha
"I'm 95% sure that 100% of what he says is wrong."
by Ralf E Chubbs on Aug 1, 2011 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Whodie
Look through the stats you posted for the 2009 season and check out the QB rating for each game. With the exception of one poor performance against Seattle, they’re all excellent. That’s why he shows potential: a bad QB can put up huge numbers week after week, but you’re not gonna see those high QB ratings with such consistency from somebody who doesn’t have potential.
Bleeding Green Nation -- Home of the REAL Slim Shady
36-5-20-JJ Bleeding Green Forever
Very good passer ratings yes but there is more to it than that.
This is why I showed the stats but also tried to explain what happened in the game. The stats only tell half the story.
Take the St Louis game in 2009 47-7 win and he had a line of 132 yards 1 TD 0 INTs 156.2 Rating. That’s an awesome rating and by looking at the score and the line you would say VY won this game. But he actually left the game halfway through the second quarter. He had 6 attempts for 8 completions, this completion percentage will skew the QB rating greatly he also had 16.5 yards per pass this will also skew the passer rating.
6 passes for 132 yards but 1 was 66 yard (half his yards) screen pass to CJ for a TD so it’s hard to really give VY credit for that CJ did most of the work. It’s very easy to get a higher passer rating with fewer pass attempts especially if you get a long pass that will skew your average yards. It’s a flaw in the calculation. Had VY stayed in this particular game it’s likely that this rating would have dropped.
They call me The Professor.
But I’m not arguing who won that game — I’m arguing that this shows that Vince has potential. For any QB to complete 75% of his passes and gain 132 yds on 8 attempts is pretty impressive, especially when he maintains that sort of play over a streak of consecutive games.
Bleeding Green Nation -- Home of the REAL Slim Shady
36-5-20-JJ Bleeding Green Forever
I don’t agree, the passer rating equation is weighted and it is easily skewed by small sample sizes with extreme results, high average caused by 1 play. VY’s average passer rating for 09 was 82.8 which was good for 18th in the league and put him in the same class as Alex Smith and David Garrard. You would have to also tell me that you believe Alex Smith and David Garrard have potential as well and I doubt you will agree that 1 or both of them do.
They call me The Professor.
Garrard was an excellent QB in 09, actually. I’m not a big Alex Smith fan, but he doesn’t have the physical skills that Young does in terms of athleticism, size, and arm strength. And 18th in the league means he’s better than 14 other starters — I’ll take that from a back up any day, especially when that’s his third year in the league.
My main point is that people are showing plenty of reasons to support the pick-up of VY. You may not agree with them, but to say that people aren’t putting forth valid arguments is BS. You may not like my argument, but to say its not a legitimate reason to be optimistic would be false.
Bleeding Green Nation -- Home of the REAL Slim Shady
36-5-20-JJ Bleeding Green Forever
My main point is that people are showing plenty of reasons to support the pick-up of VY
My argument isn’t against the pick up of VY, I’ve said multiple times he’s a serviceable backup. My argument is against the people who think he is a top tier starter or was one of the best QBs in the league as a starter … he wasn’t.
They call me The Professor.
Alright, well it sounded like you weren’t excited and you think his potential is limited to being a below-average backup. I personally think he has a lot of upside based on the numbers he put up in 2009, and I think he’ll be a good backup. He doesn’t have to win the games; we have the screen game, Shady, and the defense for that.
Bleeding Green Nation -- Home of the REAL Slim Shady
36-5-20-JJ Bleeding Green Forever
I personally think he will be nothing but a career backup, this is ALL opinion as I’m not in the profession of analyzing QBs. He definitely has potential and this is the best situation for him.
The numbers of 2009 are a good point, the passer rating equation is weighted and small sample sizes like low pass attempts can heavily make a passer rating greater than it is. This isn’t the best example but I don’t have time to look up a better one. Look at the 59-0 loss the Titans had to the Patriots.
VY was 0/2 with an INT and had a 0 passer rating. Kerry Collins was 2/12 for -7 yards with an INT and he had a 4.9 passer rating. Clearly VY was better but Collins had the better passer rating. Personally I’ve never liked that stat.
We definitely agree that there is a chance he could be good. I just think that the percentage that happens is much lower than you do.
They call me The Professor.
Love it. Rec
I’d say that Kafka’s performance makes me more comfortable with him at 2 QB rather than Young. I’d like to cut Young and develop Johnson as the third at this point.
"If Revis has an Island, Asomugha should have a continent." - #5
"Or if the rest of the defense if even decent then
our two Rookie safety’s don’t have to go all Ed Reed-Palamolu-Dawkins-super sayan badass mode to help us win." - W_E
Sending pics of your junk > dog killing > generally being a douche > sexual assault allegations > being on the Cowboys.
I can't disagree with any of this.
I do not like Vince Young a little bit. He’s always been incredibly overrated and he doesn’t have half the tools of Vick. I would have gone a different route in the backup QB route, possibly trading for Orton.
Q: What do a leaky tampon and Sean McDermott's defense have in common?
A: They are equally ineffective in the red zone.
"If Roger Goodell was on fire and I had to piss on him to put him out, I wouldn't do it...I hate him and will never respect him."
--The often wrong (but right in this instance) James Harrison.
This is the analysis this site is missing from it’s regular posters. An ability to make a case and defend it using evidence. Keep up the good work.
Whodie and I used to put together stuff like this pretty often. But now, why invest a few hours of time on a regular basis when it gets bumped off the front page in 25 minutes with 10 posts entitled “lolskins!”, “haha Giants”, “the cowgurlz are the sux”, and “madden!” Know what I mean?
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Aug 1, 2011 10:45 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Yeah it’s a shame. An adverse of effect of the Eagles getting so good and so popular, is the saturation in members of this blog.
by Eaglesadvocate on Aug 1, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I think it’s more than that. We have just raised a younger generation that, probably due to the anonymity provided by the Internet, has lost the need to engage in thought provoking conversation. It’s much easier to simply call someone a name when you disagree with their opinion.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Aug 1, 2011 11:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m not sure that’s fair. I’m part of that “younger generation,” as are a bunch of other positive contributors here. I think it has more to do with the way JIBTA got glorified here, and now people think the trolls are entertaining. People have more fun trolling and bashing trolls than actually focusing on football.
Bleeding Green Nation -- Home of the REAL Slim Shady
36-5-20-JJ Bleeding Green Forever
I’m not saying it’s everyone. And I do realize younger people are good contributors here, and it was poor of me to limit my criticism to younger people because age doesn’t stop other individuals from acting in this manner. In general, it just seems like an easier route is to just call someone names rather than find some information to back up your view if it duffers from that of someone else’s.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Aug 1, 2011 11:48 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’m part of the younger generation too. The real ‘problem’ and I’m not sure I’d call it a problem is the increased traffic due to SBN becoming part of yahoo and the increased publicity of the site.
It’s a good thing for BGN more hits more members more contributors, this is why the site was started. Unfortunately you have to deal with a lot of idiots like PE.com, or Yardbarker.
There used to be stat riddled posts all the time EXAMPLE A. Now majority of the posts are people just giving opinions with nothing to back it up and then attacking anyone and everyone that disagrees with them. You gain little from reading two people arguing without any factual backing. This post almost got bump by a post named ‘Most Butthurt LOLGiants Fan’ that is pathetic.
They call me The Professor.
Haters gotta hate
And try very hard to justify their hate.
Past two season, VY is 13-7.
Over that same time span, Chris Johnson, Jeff Fisher, and the Titans defense are 1-11 without VY.
You’re not going to put up big numbers playing Fisherball, its not going to happen. But on 3rd and 4th downs, you can make enough plays to turn a L into a W. In the NFL a couple of extra 3rd down conversions can be the difference in a game.
So I take it you didn’t read the post. I think I clearly defined that VY is not the case for the majority of those wins.
Can you give me some stats to back up your claim? Otherwise you are going opinion vs opinion backed by facts and I’m winning every time.
They call me The Professor.
Stat line
Over 2009 & 2010 (you know, relevant years to who he is today as a player) the Titans were
13-7 with VY
1-11 with anyone else
If the Titans were carrying VY like you posit, you’d think they could have managed more than one win with someone else. But they didn’t.
Top 5 in passer rating last year before injury.
20-10 TD to INT ratio last two years.
Best deep ball in the league last year.
Top 5 in passer rating last year before injury.
Yes then he regressed toward the mean VY’s average passer rating for 09 was 82.8 which was good for 18th in the league and put him in the same class as Alex Smith and David Garrard.
Best deep ball in the league last year.
Yes and David Garrard was number 2, whats your point? Peyton Manning was ranked 18th is VY better than Peyton Manning?
They call me The Professor.
I don't think regressed means what you think it means
2009 was 82.8
2010 was 98.6
In fact, he’s shown marked improvement every year in that category, though I only talk about 2009 and 2010 because that’s what’s relevant to who he is as a player today.
besides
Even if he was the 18th best in the league, there are 32 starting QBs.
Your 33rd best should be the top backup.
Even if he was the 18th best in the league, there are 32 starting QBs.
This proves how bad your reading comprehension is. I said Peyton Manning was ranked 18th in deep ball percentage. So since VY was number 1 he is better than Peyton?
They call me The Professor.
Read your own post
You said his passer rating made him 18th, I didn’t say that. Coincidence that you also said Manning was 18th in deep ball.
Even if he was the 18th best in the league, there are 32 starting QBs.
Your 33rd best should be the top backup.
Is that how the NFL works? Teams are allowed to pick the top 32 qbs to be starters and then everyone after that is designated to be signed as a backup?
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
Please reference the Section and Sub-section. I’d like to take a look at that…
(shouldn’t be needed, but you never know with this guy /sarcasm)
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
Someone didn't bother reading the post:
Haters gotta hate
And try very hard to justify their hate.
Past two season, VY is 13-7.
If you aren’t going to actually particpate in the discussion as presented, why bother?
keep reading
1-11 without him.
Teams that carry a QB do not do so poorly without him. Why couldn’t Chris Johnson and Co win more than one game with Kerry Collins are anyone else if they did most of the work?
Because they played better teams, VY’s wins were mainly against sub .500 teams
Also the Titans are 4-11 in games without VY in the past 2 years and in the 11 losses only one team finished under .500. That’s a big difference, VY’s Titans beat just 7 teams out of 30 that were over .500 had he played in those 11 games that ratio means the Titans probably would have won 2.5 of those 11 games. It’s not as big a difference as you would like everyone to believe.
They call me The Professor.
that's weak
No other team has such ups and downs based on schedule. This is the NFl, not FBS where you play cupcakes for easy wins. There are no easy wins, especially for a team like the Titans which was one of the worst in the league without Young.
The Titans weren’t one of the worst in the league without Young, they could win against sub .500 teams with or without him. They couldn’t win against teams better than .500 with or without him.
Over the last 15 games he hasn’t played in the Titans are 4-11 against 10 teams over .500 and 5 teams below. If you look at why VY is done in his career you can assume that he would have won 2.3 of the 10 games against the teams above .500 and 3.8 of the games against the teams below .500
That means VY probably would have went 6-9 which is better but not by much and with the variation as you point out I think it would have been closer to 4-11.
They call me The Professor.
I’d link my stats from pro-football-reference.com, but the search query makes it too long.
VY over his career is 13-14 against teams with winning records.
Over the same timespan, the Titans are 0-10 against teams with winning records.
VY is 13-14 for his career against teams with winning records.
13-14 is a lot better than 7-30, I don’t know where you got that number from.
With 13-14 you split those games and are a borderline playoff team again.
For reference, only 5 QBs in the NFL are better than .500 over the last 5 years against teams with winning records.
we got that number from looking at their records at the end of the season. Just because Young beats a team in Week 3 that’s 2-1 doesn’t mean he’s beaten a better than .500 team if they finish 7-9.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
I said over .500 seriously dude at least try and read the post.
2006 Washington 5-11
2006 Houston 6-10
2006 Philadelphia 10-6
2006 NYG 8-8
2006 Indianapolis 12-4
2006 Houston 6-10
2006 Jacksonville 8-8
2006 Buffalo 7-9
2007 Jacksonville 11-5
2007 New Orleans 7-9
2007 Atlanta 4-12
2007 Oakland 4-12
2007 Carolina 7-9
2007 Houston 8-8
2007 Kansas City 4-12
2007 NYJ 4-12
2007 Indianapolis 13-3
2008 Jacksonville 5-11
2009 Jacksonville 7-9
2009 San Fran 8-8
2009 Buffalo 6-10
2009 Houston 9-7
2009 Arizona 10-6
2009 St Louis 1-15
2009 Miami 7-9
2009 Seattle 5-11
2010 Oakland 8-8
2010 NYG 10-6
2010 Dallas 6-10
2010 Jacksonville 8-8
They call me The Professor.
Um, you don’t subtract the loss or win. It’s part of their record. Where did you get that notion?
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
They were +500 against the rest of the NFL. All of those 8-8 teams would be 9-7 had they beaten Young. That’s the point.
According to whom?
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
They have a chapter specifically covering methodology for discussing inclusion/exclusion of particular NFL games when discussing a quarterback’s career win/loss record against +.500 teams?
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
Now, let me preface this by saying I realize this isn’t how NFL scheduling works, but if the Eagles and Giants played the exact same opponents and we wanted to discuss specifically who had a better record versus the rest of the NFL, then yes, I can agree with removing the 2 games where the Eagles and Giants play each other. But in this case, there’s no need to remove the Titans game.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
That is not how statistics work. So VY is the reason they beat the 8-8 Jacksonville team? Because he only played the first 10 minutes. The teams ended the season 8-8 you don’t subtract the game against the Titans, if you do then you are fabricating the statistics and not using the actually sample.
They call me The Professor.
You’re measuring how good they are as a team.
Those 8-8 teams were +500 against the rest of the league.
And VY also has a couple losses where he didn’t finish they game. Over the sample size you presume those wash out.
Okay let’s take another stance. They beat 6 teams that finished 8-8, 2 times it was Jacksonville which according to you gets thrown out since they play Jacksonville twice a year and when 1-1 against them so that’s a push.
So 4 teams that were 8-8, so we will say they beat 11 teams that were .500 or better that’s still horrible out of 30 wins especially since in the 18 games the Titans lost with VY at the helm 13 of them were .500 or better (only 1 was actually .500) That is a HUGE gap, its clear to see that the Titans as a team were good against average to below average teams regardless of QB and they were bad against the elite teams regardless of QB.
They call me The Professor.
And the Eagles would be 16-0 had they beaten every team they played last year too…
That argument makes no sense.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
All of those 8-8 teams would be 9-7 had they beaten Young.
But they didn’t… And that’s reality.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
No, your point is that we should remove a viable data point from the statistical analysis. That’s called selective inclusion, or “cherry picking” in layman’s terms. That defies the point of statistical analysis. That’s my point.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
This format can be confusing, I just answered that above.
That is not a fabricated statistic any more than breaking out the winning teams is fabricated.
Its a subset.
You have the entire record, 30-17
Whodie then made a subset of the 30. Then he made a subset of the +500 teams.
Thats not fabricating, thats looking at different subsets.
Perhaps because the Titans trusted Collins more than they should have?
Whodie pointed out that CJ got more carries when VY started. Why was that? Why didn’t CJ get the same workload with Collins? If he had (as he should have most likely) perhaps the Titans would have won a few more of those games. I haven’t studied the Titans games enough to know the answer here, but the facts as presented in this post make a pretty convincing argument for VY being an excellent athlete but only a mediocre QB. I would guess that the context of those other games might be a handy tool in figuring out just what happened instead of blindly attributing everything to Young.
You’re not going to put up big numbers playing Fisherball
Really? In Young’s 48 career starts, he’s passed for 235 or more yards 9 times. In 2010 alone Kerry Collins did it (playing “Fisherball”) 5 times. I think it’s pretty easy to see that you can put up numbers playing “Fisherball” if you’re a competent quarterback.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
Excellent work guys.
I am actually excited for VY, but that’s because I think he has excellent athletic potential and I trust Vick, Reid and Co. to maximize it if possible. The reason I believe this is because I hated the Vick signing. I was a very vocal critic of Vick’s pre-Philly time and believed he was not nearly the incredible QB many others said he was. After his transformation, I trust that if Young has a shot at becoming a decent NFL QB, it will be from learning in Philly.
However, he is pure potential at this point. I wholeheartedly agree with the W-L argument as being bogus. Many people around here had no trouble running McNabb out of town on a rail after giving every other player and unit credit for winning games except for him, so why is VY not given the same scrutiny?
As for the best backup argument: I’m not convinced Young will be the #2 guy this year without a doubt. In fact, I would bet that Kafka will be the #2 guy at least to start the year.
I agree with pretty much all of this
Except for the last sentence. I think it will depend on how both of them look in preseason, which I know is an argument with limited validity anyway – would people have expected Vick to play as well as he did if they focused on his preseason performance?
Basically in a nutshell:
The arguments for Young:
1) Similar enough player to Vick that plugging him in there if Vick gets injured doesn’t change the game plan much – translation, “he should be able to do what Vick does”.
2) Vick’s own previous career wasn’t that impressive and he was also considered better at running than passing, and that changed in Phhilly – translation, “Andy Reid should be able to do with him what he did with Vick.”
Those against:
1) His statistics aren’t that impressive. (which is why he’s coming considered to be a backup)
2) He didn’t make that much of a difference in his team’s overall performance.
3) (not addressed much here but in the back of everyone’s head) Character concerns.
"Verde que te quiero verde..."
Το πράσινο είναι ζωή!
That's right, I bleed green multiculturally
"if you shut someone down with class, it's more effective" - Udalango
Except for the last sentence. I think it will depend on how both of them look in preseason,
This is true but I also think it depends on him picking up the playbook more than anything. Vick was here for over a year before he was put in the position he was last year. I’m not sure VY is going to pick up the play book in 2 weeks to even give him a fair shot in preseason.
They call me The Professor.
This is my thinking as well:
This is true but I also think it depends on him picking up the playbook more than anything.
I expect that Kafka will have the upperhand given that he knows the system and seems to be well-liked (as a QB) by the offensive staff. Not to mention that through a couple days of practice he supposedly looks pretty good.
I believe that Young could overtake Kafka (obviously) but I personally don’t think it will happen right away or even necessarily this season.
I love these stat heavy posts btw.
We need a lot more of that around here. Not because BGN isn’t great but because you can never have too much information.
This was a crazy long article but I do like this kind of work.
Now, my question is without bringing up stats etc. Vicks record before he came to Philly was really not what you would expect for a starting caliber quarterback. With that being said, what precludes VY from turning his QB career around with him being part of Philly’s coaching scheme? I know you didnt outright say that but we are really looking at an unknown here. To me, what makes me believe that we have a solid backup is the fact that Philly has a great track record with QB’s in their system. I guess you could say I have faith in the coaches in turning VY around then I do VY turning himself around. Stats can go back and forth in regards to how you apply them in context, but to me everything that VY or Vick for that matter did before they got here is moot.
One other thing, its a great time to be an Eagles fan.
Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination.-Oscar Wilde
"I would go to battle any time with these guys"-MV7
I agree with everything you’ve said. The same thing is true about Vick he wasn’t much of a QB before he got here either. Like I said in the post the ‘potential’ argument is a tough one to argue, the guy is a freak athlete and if any team can turn him around it’s our team.
I also think he is a serviceable backup, this wasn’t meant to say he cannot be a good backup. He will probably be a career backup the rest of his career (IMHO). The purpose of this article was to combat the argument that VY is an elite QB because he’s 30-18 as a starter.
I also don’t think VY will be here next year for two theories. He’s only signed for one year so either he wanted to use this as a stepping stone to getting a starting job next year or the Eagles don’t have as much faith in VY as they did with Vick (2 year deal second year was team option). Either way I doubt he is an Eagle next year unless he gets /Vick’d
They call me The Professor.
Yeah
the W/L is a bit like the QB rating where it is horribly junky in how it applies to the rated individual. I agree, I think Young will be a good/maybe great backup and really what else could you want? I’ve never really liked him since his college years but I am hoping that AR and Co can salvage him so in case Vick does go down (which I really hope he doesnt to 1) shut everybody up about his injury liability and 2) he gives us the best shot) we will have a solid filler.
I do disagree with him being a career backup due to the fact that if AR and Co build this repuatation as QB guru’s people are going to be snapping at their leftovers. This could work out in our favor if we use him in the future for trade bait.
Again, great job on the stat write up I wish I had more time to do stuff like that.
Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination.-Oscar Wilde
"I would go to battle any time with these guys"-MV7
Excellent post Whodie and foos.
I completely agree with your argument and appreciate the time and effort you both put into backing it up. I hope the Eagles’ coaching team will be able to improve VY’s game, but I hope even more that we won’t have to see him on the field very much.
Thanks
I feel the exact same, honestly if VY has a chance of becoming a better QB there is no better place for him than here. In that respect he made a brilliant decision, I still hope he never sees the field.
They call me The Professor.
Thanks. Trust me if we’d get some good discussion with quality debate we’d do stuff like this more often.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Aug 1, 2011 9:26 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
whodie
Vince Young is hands down the most gifted athelete to ever play the game of football , and who whoever disagrees is fkin right !
but seriously , dont get worked up responding to people because the more you do the more it makes you look like you hate VY for no reason which i know you dont
Like i said dude , its simply a low risk / high reward scenario … just like vick , and if he acts the fuck up then we ship his ass out
I have not witnessed any comments from people professing him as the messiah , so i cant co sign to the reason for the post … i just think you should let it ride bro and see how it plays out … no reason to get worked up about it …
"Dear Andy, Howie and Joe. I am sorry." - EvilBanner 7/29/2011
"I think pro athletes should be forced to use steroids. I think we as fans deserve the greatest athletes science can create."- Daniel Tosh
If Football Had A Church , Brian Dawkins Would Be My Preacher. -NPK
Creator of "Jibta" - NPK
"i know talent .. the eagles do not " – JIBTA
I agree
I think people are looking at it a lot like if any one can fix VY and turn him to trade bait it is our coaching staff.
turn him to trade bait
Only issue with this is, it’s a one year deal so unless they trade him this year (which they won’t) this isn’t really an option. Of course they could extend him but he seems to think he’s still a starter. This is a stepping stone for him, we needed a ‘vet’ backup for the year while Kafka gets better.
It’s just a situation that worked for both the Eagles and VY, but I doubt they brought him in here to flip him, if they did they would have signed him to a deal similar to Vicks with a second year option.
They call me The Professor.
Great Post!! Really appriciate the work and effort. However this is a no risk signing, with a possible nice reward. If VY leaves next year on a decent contract the Eagles will get a nice comp pick. Probably a 5 and possibly even a 3. He can hold the clipboard one year for that.
I wouldn’t rely to heavily on the comp pick, first I’m not sure if VY qualifies, he was released and signed off the wire, I think you have to be a true UFA.
Also you have to have a certain amount of playing time to even be considered and as the backup we should all hope that he doesn’t accrue enough playing time to qualify. I’ve never seen a pick higher than 7th round given to any player that hasn’t played in at least 10 games and started all of them or a player that has played in all 16 games and started at least 5 of them ( usually WR because they may not always start but play significant time.
You also have to assume that the Eagles won’t sign a big name FA that equals or is greater than VY’s value which will cancel him out. I think the Eagles have proven the past few years that if there is a big name FA out there at a position of need, they are going to sign him.
Again the Comp Pick formula is one of the NFLs best kept secret so this is just how I see it from previous years but I wouldn’t bet on seeing anything higher than a 6th or 7th rounder if anything.
They call me The Professor.
Young
I don’t like vince young there are plenty of other qb’s out there to back up vick
But
I’d rather have a QB similar to Vick and not a pocket passer, or else we’d have to change our entire offense
Winning is in our DNA
(Dominique-Nnamdi-Asante)
Asante means "thank you" in Swahili. Eli Manning means "here you go" in another language
by starship 007 on Aug 2, 2011 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Why would we have to do that? I’m fairly certain that every called pass play is designed to have the ball thrown while the qb is in the pocket. Every qb is supposed to throw the ball from within the pocket. As far as vick’s scrambling goes… That’s not exactly intentional.
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Aug 3, 2011 7:43 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
ehh
Post has comprehensive numbers without proper substantiation. Fallacy of biased statistics I believe, but everyone has their own opinion. Basically, the game analyses don’t reveal the “football element” involved. I can tell the posters may have viewed the games without understanding the philosophies of the individuals running the show. Case in point, its BASIC FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE that a Qb that can affect the edges of a defense like VY can greatly improve a teams running game due to the inability of the backside DE to crash hard and prevent the cutback that CJ is so adept at in the zone scheme that the Titans run Soooooo, Vy invariably made the titans better just on that note. And we all know if the running game is working then there is no need to pass and that showed up in a lot of VY’s numbers as well. This is similar in Steve McNair’s early years on the titan under similar leadership and with E.George. But again… everyone is entitled to their opinion. Have a good day.
the game analyses don’t reveal the "football element" involved
I disagree. And if you look at the stats of CJ’s carries with Collins vs Young you will see that it wasn’t Youngs abilities that opened the game more for CJ it’s that he got 59% more carries because the Titans didn’t trust young with the ball. It’s pretty clear that BASIC FOOTBALL KNOWLEDGE would tell you if you have a shaky passing QB you hand the ball of to your running back. VY did change the system because he didn’t have the accuracy to throw the ball so they needed to run the ball more.
They call me The Professor.
ahhh...
Not here to change your mind, just stating an opinion that displays another angle at looking at your stat analysis. Again, if CJ got more carries, its due to the fact that Young’s abilities opened up running lanes for him that weren’t there with Collins. And as I also stated, a coach such as Fisher isn’t going to change from his smash mouth philosophy if its working. I’m not here saying that Fisher didn’t like or trust VY, but I am saying that VY had a positive impact on the field. Its funny, Vince’s first start in the NFL occurred because his teammates forced the coaching staff to let him play… Positive result. Also, in 09’ after the 0-6 disastrous open with Collins, the owner forced them to let him play… Positive result. The W-L record speaks for itself.
Vince’s first start in the NFL occurred because his teammates forced the coaching staff to let him play
That isn’t true
Your comments are funny though.
They call me The Professor.
ok
Well apparently you weren’t “watching” the Titans then…lol… I was and it absolutely is true. I’m glad you can appreciate my commentary. See ya around.
































