Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

NFL Draft Day One Recap: A View From The Media Pit

NEW YORK, NY - APRIL 28:  NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell speaks at the podium during the 2011 NFL Draft at Radio City Music Hall on April 28, 2011 in New York City.  (Photo by Chris Trotman/Getty Images)

For the third straight year I had the opportunity to cover the first round of the draft live from Radio City Music Hall in New York. It's a great venue for the event, but unfortunately their internet crashed almost the moment the draft began and never came back... It was almost funny to watch reporters from blogs to major news outlets, be completely cut off from the net for basically the duration of the draft.

All the buzz to before the draft began was about what what would happen when Roger Goodell came out on stage for the first time. He is the owners' face in this whole dispute and it was pretty obvious that he was going to get the brunt of the fans' frustration over the lockout. When he finally did come out about a half hour before the draft was set to start, he was treated to loud boos which segued into "We want football" chants. Goodell responded saying "I hear you, I'm with you." Of course, this only exacerbated the booing and chanting, but then Goodell shut them down. How?

He quiets the crowd and says he wants to have a moment of silence for the people affected by the tornadoes in Alabama. Plus he’s got all the players from Alabama and Nick Saban up there. So basically no one can boo anymore. In fact, they all cheer afterward. Now, I'm not saying he did it to get the fans off his back because it is a serious thing and the Alabama program has been especially affected by it. You could tell that Goodell, Saban and all the players were serious...

This was all before the draft started. Then when he came out for the start of the draft on TV, the reception really wasn’t all that bad because the crowd basically already figured they took their shot at him. I caught the scene on video after the jump.

Star-divide

 


Then Cam Newton was taken #1 and was the only player to get booed on stage. He was was booed in the introductions and soundly booed when he was picked. That was followed up by the Broncos pick of Von Miller, who just so happens to be a plaintiff in the antitrust lawsuit that the NFL lost (and is apparently going to destroy the NFL according to the Commish). So we were wondering how he might react to Goodell, but actually it was a really cool moment as the two had a big embrace. No handshake/hug combo. Full two armed hug.

 

This was the point that I noticed Chris Cooley sitting one row over from me. He probably couldn't have dressed down for the event more, which is maybe why I didn't notice him at first. Still, it was interesting to see a current player in the audience for the draft given the bitter labor situation.

 

The highlight of the draft was A.J. Green's girlfriend, who walked on stage in what one member of the media described as "the tightest dress I've ever seen." It was painted on and stopped at about her hips. Oh and did I mention she was gorgeous? Best moment of the night by far. Can't find a pic though.

 

Universal jeers for the Atlanta trade up for Julio Jones. They gave up two first round picks, a second and two fourths to move up to #6 to take WR Julio Jones from Alabama. One member of the media here called it a "franchise changing haul" for the Browns. Another said it was "another Herschel Walker deal" referring to the bounty of draft picks the Cowboys got for Herschel Walker, which ended up being the foundation of their 1990s dynasty.

 

Aldon Smith seemed to be called the first real "reach" of the draft. Most people in the media saw him going at least 10 picks later. Some say he could be this year's Tyson Alualu, who everyone saw as a reach last year. However, that wouldn't be bad news for the 49ers since Alualu had a really good rookie year. But if anyone thought Smith was a bit of a reach, that was nothing compared to what happened next.

 

The Jake Locker pick at #8 shocked almost everyone, but also elicited cheers from the media. It was the first real pick that media could have some fun with. The draft isn't fun until someone reaches for a QB. SI's Tony Pauline actually exclaimed "That was a great pick... in the second round!"

 

I said to Colts writer Brad Wells after the Locker pick "there's going to be a run on QBs here." Sure enough, there was. Locker went, then Gabbert, then Ponder. A media guy near me remarked, "This is like the 1999 class, except there's no Donovan McNabb."

 

Perhaps the NFL gods are finished punishing the Detroit Lions. Having Nick Fairley fall to them because of all those awful QB selections is the steal of the draft. With Fairley and Ndamukong Suh, they could potentially have the best defensive tackle pairing in a decade.

 

When Bruce Allen was hired as the GM of the Redskins, many predicted that we would be seeing a new and smarter Redskins team in the draft. Then they traded three picks for Donovan McNabb... However, here in 2011 it seems like the promise may finally be paying off.

 

Washington wisely traded down from #10 to a QB desperate team in Jacksonville, who saw a run on QBs and decided to go up and get Blaine Gabbert. Washington only moved back six spots and picked up an extra second round pick in the process. When their pick came up at #16, Ryan Kerrigan, who they likely wanted all along was still there. We may be seeing a new Redskins after all. Really nice bit of maneuvering by them. Who knows who will play QB for them, but either way this was a great first round for the Redskins. They got their man and replaced the picks in this draft that they wasted last year.

The inexplicable run on QBs at the top of the draft meant that a slew of a really good players slipped down to all the teams sitting in the late teens and early twenties. The Chargers got Corey Liguet, the Colts got Anthony Castonzo and the Giants were able to take Prince Amukamara. That's a great pick for them to get a good player at a position of need without even having to move up. It's actually interesting to see Prince fall to where he did. For months he was seen as a top ten pick, but in the past two weeks we've seen him slip in mock drafts to this late teens area. There's no doubt that the run on QBs pushed him down, but it could be that he was taken right where he belonged all along. Either way, Giants fans at Radio City went nuts and for good reason. It's a very good pick for them.

 

Speaking of Prince Amukamara, he may not have had any ladies the caliber of AJ Green, but he did have the most impressive and largest entourage. He had two ladies, which appear to be his mom and grandma out in full African dress. They were clad in long gold sequined dresses with giant gold headdresses. They wouldn't have been out of place on the Radio City stage on any other night but this. There were also probably 15 other people up there with him. It was really a sight.

 

I think the best moment of the first round was when the Eagles selected Danny Watkins, the offensive lineman from Baylor. Watkins was a firefighter in his native Canada for almost four years. So all of his old firefighter buddies came down from British Columbia to cheer him and when his name was called, they went nuts. Here's the video of all the firefighters on the balcony chanting "Danny! Danny!"

 

Later, when I went downstairs to interview Watkins, I had to wait while he spoke to Andy Reid's secretary about scheduling his meeting with the coach. This was the one sided conversation I heard,  "Are we flying down there or what? ... Oh we're driving? ... Oh it's only an hour away? ... Oh that's right! Ma'am I'm from British Columbia and nothing is only an hour away."

 

Two interesting fan notes from the draft. There was a young kid who got into the Danny Watkins press conference somehow and actually asked a question. I assume the kid was jewish because he was wearing a yarmulke, however, it was also clear that he was an Eagles fan, because said yarmulke was green and white withe Eagles logo.


The other note is about autograph seekers. After the draft concluded I headed to the bathroom and who walks in after me? Michael Irvin and Marshall Faulk. Of course, we're in the bathroom so I'm not going to say anything to them. I leave and there's this family near the bathroom with their autograph pad and pen and the mom says "Michael Irvin just went into the bathroom so we should wait outside. Is that weird?"

 

I don't know if "weird" is the word lady.

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was definitely skeptical of this pick at first (He’s 26, it’s kind of hard to get up for staying put and taking an OL after trading up to get Maclin and trading up to get Graham) but I’ve come around. Seems like he’s going to be a solid player, and certainly seems like he’s a solid dude.

by Eaglesadvocate on Apr 29, 2011 8:37 AM EDT reply actions  

eh.

Still not crazy about blowing a 1st rounder on a pick that’ll only be here for a few years.

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

you need to look at it from a $/year point of view. The draft is teams chance to get players at below free agent cost. 5 years of Logan Mankins on his rookie contract is WAY more valuable than the 5 years after.

by Clyde Simmons on Apr 29, 2011 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can you show me an example of how the rookie contract will scale in comparison?

1st round rookie contracts are turrible.

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not at the bottom of the round

He’ll be making 2M per year, not Mankins’ 9M

by HankM on Apr 29, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah thats what I wasn’t sure about. ty for clarity

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

“A few years?” Come on guys, let’s not go overboard here. At worst his career will maybe be three years shorter than if he was a traditional prospect.

The average NFL career is less than three years. If he’s still here playing and contributing in 5 or 6 years(which there’s no reason to believe he couldn’t), that’s a great pick either way.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right, but all things being the same- by drafting such an older player, you remove really any possibility of resigning him.

No one is arguing that he’s a bad pick because he’s old and won’t produce for those few years. My issue is that if you strike gold in the draft, especially in the first round, you want the chance to be able to resign him. Philadelphia won’t (and shouldn’t)

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

You really don’t. His rookie year will likely be four years when business resumes. That’s what was on the table. That makes him exactly 30, which is hardly old for an offensive lineman

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought I might like this pick more with the perspective of a night's sleep.

Nope. Still don’t like it. If he was 22, I’d love it. If he was free agent pickup, I’d love it. A number one pick with other, more attractive players on the board? Hell no. What if it takes him a year or two to get up to speed like Herremens or Justice? Do they expect the guy to play until he’s 40?

by Tracer Bullet on Apr 29, 2011 8:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed. I really wanted to like the pick this morning, but I just can’t get past his age. The thing I keep hearing is that he has “low mileage,” which is fine and good, but so does Quintin Mikell, who didn’t really get defensive snaps until he was about 27 (low mileage), and the general consensus is that he’s probably a goner. At the end of Watkins’ rookie contract, he’ll likely be 32. Obviously, if he pans out they could re-up him to an extension before it even gets there, but even then, is he still going to be an Eagle when he’s 34? Right off the bat, you have a player here that has a max number of seasons in Philly of about 7 years. I just can’t wrap my head around that.

Maybe Reid thinks he’s in his home stretch in Philly. It’s hard being an NFL coach for 10+ years. You burn out. He may very well think he’s done in the next 5 or so years. I hope he’s not changing his draft philosophy to suit that very real possibility.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right off the bat, you have a player here that has a max number of seasons in Philly of about 7 years. I just can’t wrap my head around that.

How many guys are here for more than 7 years anyway?

I’m asking because I honestly don’t know.

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Apr 29, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's kind of beside the point.

I don’t think anybody drafts a #1 pick expecting to ship him out after seven years. Plus, if it takes Watkins a year to play at an NFL level and he experiences a year or two of decline in those seven years, or gets injured, you’re looking at a functional career of about five years. That’s terrible ROI for the 23rd overall pick.

by Tracer Bullet on Apr 29, 2011 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

you’re looking at a functional career of about five years. That’s terrible ROI for the 23rd overall pick.

Well you kind of need to see how he does during those 5 years to really judge what the return on investment is.

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Apr 29, 2011 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

True, but the margin for error is reduced.

Watkins has be really good, really soon because he just doesn’t have as much time. They can’t spend years grooming him. And even if he is Shawn Andrews minus the emotional issues, he can’t get hurt.

Let’s put it this way: After five years, Watkins is very good, not great. Makes one Pro Bowl, or maybe serves as an alternate for another. At 27, you think he’s about to hit his prime and become a dominant player, so you reward him with a nice, fat contract. At 32, you figure he’s about to start his decline and you let him walk if he won’t meet your terms. But he’s only played five years. Do you let him walk? Do you sign him and hope he can keep playing at that level since he’s unlikely to get much better? If he’s a five-time All Pro at this point maybe the situation is different, but odds are he won’t be that. They bought a headache when they didn’t have to and paid through the nose for the privilege.

by Tracer Bullet on Apr 29, 2011 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

A functional career of five years? Where are you coming up with this?

This is isn’t a running back. Since when do offensive become old and broken down at 31 or 32?

Please, this age thing is wildly overblown in my opinion.

But let’ take you five years premise. Say you’re the Eagles and you have Carimi and Watkins on your board. Clearly Watkins is the better player to you. Do you take five years of him or seven of Carimi.

Not even a question do you take Watkins.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Off the top of my head, Cole, Herremans, Mikell, Patterson, Akers, J. Jackson, Avant all either have been with the team 7 years, or are locks to be with the team at least 7 years. Then you have guys like DeSean, Maclin, McCoy, McGlynn, Nate Allen, and Celek (again, all off the top of my head) that are very likely to be in Philly for 7+ years.

I hate the idea of drafting a guy where you pretty much know right off the bat that you’re not going to have him around for a decade.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Let’s hope he turns out to be very good, very quickly. I wonder if there is any chance of him playing RT for us?

by Thiago on Apr 29, 2011 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

woah woah, jumping the gun a bit there Jimmy?

Westbrook lasted exactly 7 years… 6 if you dont count his injury riddled 2010… so Westy was good for 6 years. Desean may very well slow down and be gone 3 years from now. We spent a 1 on Peters and gave him a 6 year deal… that’s less than 7 years. I don’t think drafting a 7 year player is really all that bad, to be honest.

Now I just have to hope Watkins is that guy. If he’s a 3 year guy… big problem

by HankM on Apr 29, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

injury riddled 2009*

by HankM on Apr 29, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Westbrook lasted exactly 7 years… 6 if you dont count his injury riddled 2010…so Westy was good for 6 years

Westbrook was cut when he was 30, after 8 years. When Watkins is 30, he’ll only have been in the league 4 years.

Desean may very well slow down and be gone 3 years from now.

Maybe. It’s possible DeSean won’t be in Philly for 8-10 years. It’s a certainty that Watkins won’t.

We spent a 1 on Peters and gave him a 6 year deal… that’s less than 7 years

Peters is one of the best left tackles in the game, a positon viewed by some as the 2nd most important position on the field. Danny Watkins has precisely zero NFL games played, and projects as a guard. At this point in their careers, there can be no comparisons between Peters and Watkins.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

why is it a certainty?

its not unheard of for an offensive lineman to be able to play into their mid or upper 30s.

by ZacharyD on Apr 29, 2011 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

The oldest starting offensive lineman in the league (Jeff Saturday) is 35 years old.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

On Westbrook: He had 61 carries for 274 yards in 2009… I miscounted… he played well for us from 2002-2008. 7 seasons

On Jackson: I’d venture to guess he doesn’t last past 7 years with the Birds, although I hope he does.

On Peters: Of course you can’t compare their careers yet. I was only illustrating the point that the Birds have spent a 1st on a 6 year player in the past, and if they think Watson is as much of a lock as Peters was then it wasn’t a bad pick based on his age. Besides, we give a pass to Peters for his 2009 season, but I remember him being vastly overrated that year. He really came into his own in Philly in 2010. So if Watson has a mediocre rookie year but plays at – lets be optimistic – Herremans level by his second year then it was a good pick, regardless of his potential longevity issues.

by HankM on Apr 29, 2011 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Also...
Maybe Reid thinks he’s in his home stretch in Philly. It’s hard being an NFL coach for 10+ years. You burn out. He may very well think he’s done in the next 5 or so years. I hope he’s not changing his draft philosophy to suit that very real possibility.

It sounds to me like this was Howie’s pick from the getgo. Reid may have liked the guy and signed on board with it, but I wonder, if he didn’t like Watkins and wanted someone else, would Howie still have drafted him. To that end, and I asked this yesterday, is this pick, good or bad, on Reid or Howie?

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Apr 29, 2011 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

This one was all Reid to me.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

How could I possibly have thought they would go for Jimmy Smith?
When your HC and DC were both offensive linemen and you’ve got a very respected offensive line guru all in the same warroom how could they possibly not go OL in the first round?

by brza37 on Apr 29, 2011 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

“Are we flying down there or what? … Oh we’re driving? … Oh it’s only an hour away? … Oh that’s right! Ma’am I’m from British Columbia and nothing is only an hour away.”

That’s awesome. Definitely not a geography wiz.

Universal jeers for the Atlanta trade up for Julio Jones. They gave up two first round picks, a second and two fourths to move up to #6 to take WR Julio Jones from Alabama.

That’s a team that clearly thinks they’re one player away. They’re not. Incredibly stupid trade.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 8:46 AM EDT reply actions  

At first I was annoyed with this pick…but most of that was because I wanted Jimmy Smith, character issues and all.

But as time went on and I was able to take a step back and actually think about this pick the more I am ok with it. People are complaining about his age…too old to spend a first round pick on…most people’s mock drafts seem to disagree with that. He will be 32 at the end of his rookie contract they say…exactly, after his rookie contract the Eagles can either let him walk or if he really performs well, resign him. But he will be older then and in theory somewhat cheaper. In fact, the team might be getting a guy who is suiting up in what might be the prime of his career with little to no wear on him. This team needs to protect Vick now, and this was probably the best pick with which to do that. I really do think not being able to trade Kolb screwed them pretty hard, regardless of what Andy says. The guy seems like a sincere and nice dude, a breath of fresh air if you will.

Was it the best pick the Eagles could have made? No. Was it the worst? No. Was it a pick that helps them right now? Yes. I would think that would be cool with everyone since everyone seems to want to win right now. Who knows what will happen between now and 5 years from now. But in the meantime, for the hear and now, welcome to Philly Danny.

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Apr 29, 2011 8:47 AM EDT reply actions  

If Philadelphia resigns him at 32, I’ll be worried.

Thats not the organization I’ve come to love in the past decade.

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

And they probably won’t, which honestly, wouldn’t really bother me. There are probably just as many players that they resign after their rookie contract or during their rookie contract that either play poorly or become a headache because they realize 1 year into their new deal that they are grossly underpaid. This may change that all together.

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Apr 29, 2011 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

It all depends on what he’s like. If he’s Logan Mankins at 32, they sure as hell better resign him.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

You really think they’ll resign a 32 year old lineman?

I’m racking my brain to think if I’ve ever seen them do this in the Reid era.

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

All depends on how good he is and how healthy/fit

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

With Fairley and Ndamukong Suh, they could potentially have the best defensive tackle pairing in a decade.

Maybe Ever

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Apr 29, 2011 8:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Irving was probably just looking for some privacy.

.. to do a line.

I would like to thank my hands for being so great, for allowing me to type this post.

by corn on the kolb on Apr 29, 2011 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

He quiets the crowd and says he wants to have a moment of silence for the people affected by the tornadoes in Alabama. Plus he’s got all the players from Alabama and Nick Saban up there. So basically no one can boo anymore. In fact, they all cheer afterward. Now, I’m not saying he did it to get the fans off his back because it is a serious thing and the Alabama program has been especially affected by it. You could tell that Goodell, Saban and all the players were serious…

I don’t think they chose to have the moment of silence for the tornadoes because Goodell didn’t want to hear the boos. I do, however, believe the NFL thought that the boos wouldn’t have stopped, and that it would have been a long time before Goodell could actually get a few words out to be able to get the draft underway, and they needed to do something to quiet the fans down just to keep it moving along. Now, I’m not saying that they wouldn’t have brought up the tragedy of the tornadoes at some point during the telecast, but the timing was awfully fishy. In a normal offseason with no labor nonsense, is that really what they would have led with? No way. The entire thing felt totally disingenuous.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 9:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Exactly

Goodell is a slimy spin doctor. Was it planned to stop what they knew could be an ugly scene? I truly hope not. Was it super duper convenient? Most definitely.

Your First Ever Pinstripe Bowl Champions- The Syracuse Orange

by bigbluethruandthru on Apr 29, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

With the exception of a Jerry Rice, when is it ever worth it to give up that many picks for a WR?

Methinks a completely one sided trade in favor of Mr. Walrus Face.

"This is one of the top 10 biggest bonehead trades in the history of the NFL."
-Redskins TE Chris Cooley

by Ralf E Chubbs on Apr 29, 2011 9:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Heckert learned from one of the best at making draft day trades

by Phillyrampage on Apr 29, 2011 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

When they moved up to 6, I knew it would be a hefty package, but i never would have imagined that any team could be so dumb to give up TWO 1’s, a 2, and TWO 4’s for a freaking wide receiver… that has never stepped onto a pro football field? I mean, would you even trade that much for a very young player that is pretty much already a star like… say… Calvin Johnson?

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

NO!

Every Single One of those picks you gave up could be a starter on your team.

"This is one of the top 10 biggest bonehead trades in the history of the NFL."
-Redskins TE Chris Cooley

by Ralf E Chubbs on Apr 29, 2011 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, but I doubt the Lions would give up Calvin for those picks either.
You’re right though its a dumb trade. WRs are just too hit or miss. Plus there are few good WR options still on the board. No team really needs 2 superstar wide receivers and Roddy has proven himself to be a star over the past couple years.
The Falcons’ downfall last season was defense anyway.

by brza37 on Apr 29, 2011 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am EXTREMELY disappointed that we passed on Smith

but it’s time to move on. i am starting to like this pick a lot.

soooooooo…can we trade players today??? what’s the latest on this?

by Phillyrampage on Apr 29, 2011 9:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Not until next week at the earliest is what I keep hearing. And that’s not guaranteed.

"You can commit no mistake and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." - Jean-Luc Picard

by EREX21 on Apr 29, 2011 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd rather him be good than young

I know everyone is upset because he is too old. That assumes he is going to be good enough to earn a second contract anyway.

I would much rather have a good player for 5 years than a backup for 10 years. Then I will be upset he was drafted as an older player and that he does not deserve the big money contract he might be asking for. That NE was supposedly a target and that he seems like Mankins is good news.

What are the % odds that Jimmy Smith gets suspended 4 games for substance abuse? I would hope those are just as low as any player since he had his issues a couple years ago and has turned the corner. Why did Baltimore miss their pick? Argument over Smith or messed up trade?

by phxphilly on Apr 29, 2011 9:30 AM EDT reply actions  

I buy your argument about Smith possibly dealing with suspensions and its probably character issues that kept him from being the pick. But I’m not buying the 5 year starter over 10 year backup argument.
First round picks are expected to be starters. So a team is always looking for players that will have longevity too because they are expected to start. Thats why Bowers was not picked yesterday because no team expects him to last more than 5 years with his knee.
No one makes a pick in the first and says this guy is gonna be a backup but he can backup for 15 years so its a good pick.

by brza37 on Apr 29, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

THIS IS MY POINT

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

The days of the 10 year starter are fading

If a team can get 5-7 great years from a first round pick, that’s a success.

by donniethelion on Apr 29, 2011 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree that that getting 5-7 great years out of a first round pick makes for a successful 1st round pick, but based on that criteria, Watkins has to be great from Day 1 to achieve that.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Apr 29, 2011 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well the Eagles said that a reason they liked him is that they view him as a day one starter. NFL ready. Whether or not he’ll be great from day one is another story… but everyone I talked to seems to think he’s a plug and play type guy. Throw him at right guard and move on to the next need.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

with Mudd's help

He’ll be a starter day 1 no doubt in my mind.

"I don’t know whether I prefer Astroturf to grass. I never smoked Astroturf." - Joe Namath

by David_K on Apr 29, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interest in Watkins

Were there any rumors that anyone else was even interested in Watkins at that point? I could have understood if there was a run on OL earlier but at pick 23 first round prospects Carimi, Sherrod & Rodney Hudson were still on the board with only the Bears, Steelers and Packers regarded as needing OL.

Did they have an idea that the Seahawks wanted Watkins?

I just think with the deals that the Chiefs, Saints and Bears made/tried to make they must have also called the Eagles with similar deals. It just seems like they could have swapped with the Bears, picked up an extra 3rd rounder and still gotten Watkins.
And is he that much better than Boling, Hudson or Ijalana? They could have traded with the Saints and maybe still gotten one of those three. Or is there that much of a dropoff after Watkins, a dropoff that also justifies the age difference?

by brza37 on Apr 29, 2011 9:36 AM EDT reply actions  

I heard the BEars were.

But who knows?

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Apr 29, 2011 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

paint on dress girl VS katy perry

GO! lets see some pix of this girl your talking about here. o yeah we drafted someone? cool

PHI "We Know Drama"

by DaaaBirdsDaBirds on Apr 29, 2011 9:49 AM EDT reply actions  

There’s a quick shot of her at the 2:10 mark of this video (not in that dress though.)

by youaretheman26 on Apr 29, 2011 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eagle_small
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #52: For who? For what?
Oldschool_small
A Different Kind of Eagles Redraft
Baldeagle_small
Do the Eagles draft poorly for defense? (UPDATED 5/25)
Dogbert_small
Building the 53-Man Roster: Part 13(!) of 53
Hill_small
Mock Bleacher Report Article

Recent FanPosts

Small
I know I know but what about this guy
Mickey-mouse-trap-graphicshunt
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #51.5: ASCII art is awesome.
Small
2012: The Season of No Excuses
Small
LeSean McCoy, Arian Foster, Matt Forte, Ray Rice or another running back: Who is the best?
Small
All-time mock draft on MtD
Small
Bell is out.. Now what???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bgnqr_small JasonB

Editors

Img_1084_small Bob_Q

Westy2_small Route36

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Briandawkins1_small Ben_Larivee

Fb_small Patrick Wall