Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

A little CBA history and reading the tea leaves

I have been following the CBA pretty near to obsessive status for a while now, and I just wanted to highlight what seems to be happening what what I am extrapolationg from all of this. I don't really care who's fault all of this is, though it amazes me that both sides are so stuck on thier high horses when they both have such glaring weaknesses in thier stances. That said, this will be a pretty anti owners piece, but simply due to the fact that they have had the biggest shifts in thier position through the course of this process, and through the process they have revealed some pretty shady tactics. But, let's get into breaking down the whole thing.

Star-divide

As you may or may not know, there was a CBA (collective bargaining agreement, which is the deal between the players and owners in order to play football) renegotiation back in 2006. The two sides agreed to a deal that seemingly heavily favors the players. At least this is the stance the owners are taking now, despite the vote being 30-2 by the owners in favor of the (recently extended by 24 hours in order to remain) current CBA. The 2 owners who voted against the CBA were a notorious miser in Mike Brown (Bengals) and the smallest market owner, Ralph WIlson (Buffalo). However, a little under 2 years ago, the owners agreed to opt out of the current CBA (which would have run through the 2012 season) two years early. Since that time there has been various build-ups along the way to get to the point that we are at right now. So let's look at it in further detail.

After the owners opted out, there has been various posturing and strategizing by both sides. Until about the last month, that's all that there was, save a few meetings which inevitably were followed by various accounts of finger pointing. About a month ago the sides decided to try and sit down and get something done. This round of negotiations ended badly after the owners created a stink one meeting and simply left the meeting and cancelled all further negotiations.

As an aside, I would like to say that this was the moment that I officially lost hope for a full NFL season. I had a feeling that the only way that this would get done was by the players ceding to nearly 100% of the demands of the owners. I felt that the Players weren't going to do that, but would actually have to after not getting thier game checks because they have a difficult time handling thier money and couldn't sustain financially for very long. Then it would be up to the owners to go through with the season, or just call it all off to really twist the knife in the gut of the players to provide an experience that they wouldn't want to encounter again for a long while.

Meanwhile, the owners had just about all the money they needed. If we break down the numbers (something I do naturally, so this always seemed obvious to me), we all know the NFL got about $9 billion this past season, and that the owners got 40%, while the players got 60%. So the owners would see only 3.6 billion. That works out to an average of $112.4 M per owner. Now the owners signed TV contracts that net them $4 billion dollars this season, which works out to $124.3 million per owner, even without any football. Look at that, a 10% raise without the overhead of having to pay the players! No wonder they were ready to sit back and wait for the players to cave. However the owners got the first billion off the top, therefore got about 4.1 billion as a group, or 126.6 million per owner. Now the owners also signed TV contracts that net them $4 billion dollars this season, which works out to 124.3 million per owner, even withough any football. So we are talking about the difference between 2 million dollars per owner, or less than a 2% loss, in order to get the long term concessions they were looking for. No woner they were ready to sit back and wait for the players to cave!

But they continued with thier negotiations, and even brought in a mediator. He agreed to keep a media silence, so we were left in the dark, with only the fact that the sides were talking to try and figure out what was happening. And it seemed like they were doing a lot of talking, but no resolution. The mediator did give one comment, and that was to say the sides were still very far apart on the "core issues" after 7 straight days of talks. I assume he was essentially talking about 9 billion of these core issues.

Then a funny thing happenned. On the evening of March 1st, Judge David Doty ruled that the owners violated fair labor practices by setting up the TV contracts in the way that they did. It turns out that they actually took money off of the initial 2 years (being the '09 and '10 seasons) in several of the TV contracts, which would have been more money to give the players thier 60% split (along with thier 40%), in order to have the insurance money of $4 billion that would go directly to the owners should there be no football. After the ruling, the $4 billion will now either be put into escrow, or split with the players. This money had been called a number of things by the media. A security blanket, war chest, cushion, and a hanful of other descriptions, and if combined they were all spot on and then some. Basically it provied the comfort the owners needed to operate from a position of power. No matter what happened prior to this ruling, the owners would go home no worse for the wear if they had the TV contract money. Yes, they would have had to pay a good chunk of it back, but that would probably come right out of the player's pockets after they caved to the owners demands. But now all of that free money was either put away or to be split by both sides.

The owners lost their leverage, and about 1/8th of a billion dollars per owner is up in the air. They also lost the ability to keep up with their high profile mortgages. (I wonder, if anyone has asked Jerry Jones if a potential work stoppage would be devistating to the NFL today, what his answer would be.) And the people saying that the owners will appeal it, well, look at the report that Doty issued. He basically blew the lid off of any case that the owners had, and they would have to discredit everything that the ruling meant. I'm not a betting man, but if someone was giving me an even spread on the players ability to uphold that ruling in an appeal, I would gladly take the opportunity no matter the minimum buy in.

Now is when another set of numbers come into play. This is the estimates of that the NFL projected it would lose should a work stoppage happen. They said $500M by August, $1 billion by kickoff (one month later) and $500 million per weekend. Going by the current CBA, now in the owners eyes, they see about a 5% loss (or $6.25 million per) by August, another 10% by September and 5% every week after that. That's over $20 million that these guys would lose by not playing the first week of football. Thier losses are now real and can be felt. On top of that, the players union would decertify, and the players would then try and sue the owners for the possibility of getting more money. The roof is really starting to cave in on them, and they're forced out of their bunker into the open field where the players have been waiting. Whether they fight and cause more casualties or kiss and make up, it's up to them. But at least there is no where left to hide.

This one was the crack in the dam that us fans were waiting for, and look what's happened since. On Wednesday, the mediated talks continued, but only for a 4 hour session. Though the owners went and had thier own meeting, which was scheduled anyway, they ended it early. I imagine it was pretty short because they voted for plan B, which was to play ball in the negotiations. Shortly after, Goodell scooted back the mediators office, and after another short round of negotiations today, we have an extention on the table. I honestly think this nightmare is coming to an end folks, and quickly. And I'm not the only one.

Poll
Do you think the NFL labor negotiations will come to an end soon?
Yes, I do
77 votes
No I don't
70 votes
Jerry Jones is an asshole
430 votes

577 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 27 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks for the birdseed :)

by EAGLES805 on Mar 3, 2011 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

Nice job.

I appreciate the summary.

Here’s hoping it gets fixed soon. We have to move Kolb fast!

Veritas Liberabit Te

by DSmith215 on Mar 3, 2011 11:15 PM EST reply actions  

I feel generally optimistic, but that could just be wishful thinking. My feeling on this is that it’s going to be an 11th hour kind of thing, where the two sides get together close to last minute and somehow get this thing done. It worked with the deadline, so maybe it can happen with the CBA itself.

It’s remarkable that, as President Obama alluded to, these guys can’t reasonably find a way to efficiently split up $9 billion dollars amongst themselves. Just think about the poverty that exists in the world… It’s such a shame. People die of starvation while these people fight over the division of a large amount of money. Ridiculous, when you think about it.

"You don't call retarded people retards. It's bad taste. You call your friends retards when they're acting retarded." - Michael Scott

by PhiladelphiaEagles on Mar 4, 2011 12:17 AM EST reply actions  

Nice summary.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a fucking clock.

by KByars on Mar 4, 2011 12:19 AM EST reply actions  

Nice write up. I feel a little better about the chances of them actually getting something done now. Still I have a healthy fear of the general stupidity and greed of all involved screwing everything up.

And really could this poll have any other outcome on an Eagles’ fan site? No matter your feelings about a possible deal you always know that Jerry is an ass.

by Eric Gaskill on Mar 4, 2011 12:35 AM EST reply actions  

Of course

The poll doesn’t really matter to me obviously. I figured only the people with the strongest opinions about the course of the negotiations would vote for something other than the last option, but as long as that one is still the strongest sentiment then I’m happy.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 12:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Despite being quite asshole-ish, I don’t blame the owners for the approach they are taking. Likely, most of them are billionaires from some method other than football (with the exception of family legacy owners). In an NFL franchise, they saw a very solid, very stable, and very profitable investment. Sure, they had to fork over a ton of money in the first place, but get a consistent fanbase and a winning team, and you’re golden for years to come. They’ll do whatever it takes to keep that consistent stream of revenue. When you’re that rich, all you suddenly care about is making sure your money isn’t disappearing. I never want to knock anyone for making money, but they should really try and look at the situation from a separate angle to see what will help themselves in the long run…and that there really are no sure things in life.

by joetimek on Mar 4, 2011 12:43 AM EST reply actions  

Absolutely

As a failed business owner I know how tough it is and how difficult your life is when it falls through. I actually tend to side with the owners and think the players are getting way too much. There are a lot of ways that they could have gone with thier money that probably would have netted them as much or more than the NFL (though a lot of them would have been crushed by the downturn). I think it’s crap that they have to give in to these riddiculous salaries. But at the same time if they are being underhanded or shady in thier approach they deserve to have it blown up in thier faces.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

What kind of business did you have?

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Mar 4, 2011 1:17 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

a little resaurant in Colorado

with some friends. I actually never really got off the ground, so I guess I never even was an actual owner, but we put in the time and work and made sales pitches, used a lot of credit and energy just trying to put the whole thing together. After that, my friend went and created an LLC and bought land to subdivide it into a number of plots. He rented the plot for a year and used $100k worth from his and other people’s money. The land was initially valued at $1m ,and when he was done a year later it was worth $2.15m. But this was right when the housing bubble started to burst. Then main investor who had agreed to buy the land from the other party for the million backed out from the final sale in order to keep his assets more liquid.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 1:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Oof, sounds rough. Thanks for the thorough breakdown on the actual CBA post. Great work.

http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/

by JimmyK on Mar 4, 2011 1:38 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Mine wasn’t so terrible, but it took 4 years of struggling to get back on even ground. My friend kind of went into a downward spiral after the land bit. That wasn’t pretty.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 2:02 AM EST up reply actions  

I love the poll results.

Bleeding Green Nation -- Home of the REAL Slim Shady
36-5-20-JJ Bleeding Green Forever

by DeSean10 on Mar 4, 2011 12:45 AM EST reply actions  

Nice

only 25% of the results were actually pertaining to the article

Me Gusta Los Eagles

by RanjeethR on Mar 4, 2011 12:54 AM EST reply actions  

Never underestimate just how large of an asshole Jerruh is.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a fucking clock.

by KByars on Mar 4, 2011 12:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Fact.

He is a tremendous asshole. Something we Eagle fans know all too well.

by 92-74-99-96 on Mar 4, 2011 6:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Nice job, bud

I’ve been thinking it’s more the owners trying to screw everybody than anything. I mean all sides (players, NFL and owners) have done their fair share, but the Owners are the ones who pretty much weaseled their way into getting free money no matter what happens.

Everybody blames Godell for not getting this shit done, I was one of those people for a long long time, but slowly I’ve been seeing it’s more the owners trying to screw the players than anything. And honestly I think the owners need to be happy with 40% because the players are the ones putting their body’s on the line.

All this being said I’m sure I’m missing some very key things, but I’m young, I don’t understand all of this CBA, legal whatever stuff but it seems to me the ones who are always pointing the finger first (Owners/Players association) are the ones keeping this thing from getting done.

Defensive player of the year for 2011 is...

Wild_Eagle!

Yes, Wild_Eagle's infamous reputation did help him get this award. But he shows that he walks the talk that he serves...with his keyboard. Wild_Eagle protects the motherland (BGN) from the evils of noobs, douche-bags, and other assholes. Although he may be crude and unnecessary, all great defenders draws the yellow flag from time to time.

-Awarded by Number5

by wild_eagle on Mar 4, 2011 2:11 AM EST reply actions  

Being that I’m not from America it’s difficult to keep up with all the CBA stuff over here so cheers for the update and the analysis!

by Brit Bill on Mar 4, 2011 4:20 AM EST reply actions  

More to it than that

Firstly the President of the NFLPA himself said the players got a great deal last time.

Secondly it’s not all about splitting money – thanks to the last deal and various decisions that have gone against the NFL there are issues with:-

  • Discipline, you can’t do what the Eagles did to TO any more and send him home with pay.
  • You can’t recover money you have paid up front for a contract where the player goes to jail!
  • The ludicrous amounts of money that are paid to people who have never played a down in the NFL after the Draft.
  • Rookies holding out for outrageous sums.
  • Judge Doty always sides with the Union – in your analysis you totally ignored the fact that the Special Master took the exact opposite view to Doty who then over ruled him. Getting Doty out of the NFL’s hair is a deal breaker for the League.

by AlanMilnes on Mar 4, 2011 5:04 AM EST reply actions  

You're right

The above was a general overview, so I didn’t include everything. But the key to this, far and away is the money. If that’s right, everything else becomes much more flexible. The ins-and-outs of the deal are too specific to really try and examine at this point. Funds allocation, contract stipulations, wage scales and more are all adjusting the give and take once there is a general consensus on the larger allotment of the “pie”. I don’t think any one of those points you highlighted would take very long at all to hammer out once the numbers are good.

I noticed you didn’t include any player demands, so I am assuming you’re confronting my anti-owners tone, which is not really what this post is about.

About Doty, yes, he ALWAYS sides with the players. But that doesn’t change the fact that he blew the NFL’s case out of the water. They may not even appeal, and if they do they most likely won’t win. They are battling the clock now as well, and they would have to build a new case from the ground up since this one was so throughly dismantled. You aren’t taking that bet I laid out, that the owners will get this one overturned, are you?

The Special Master did rule that the contracts were legal. That was expected and this was Smith’s plan of attack to eventually put this in front of Doty and it looks to have paid off. Honestly, I don’t care who is right or wrong in the legal sense (though it looks like the NFL coerced even the networks into signing these, so I don’t like that the owners think they can get away with whatever they want unchecked). The one thing I was trying to highlight was the monumental shift in position that the outcome creates.

Lastly, I have no idea what this means or why you are including it:

Getting Doty out of the NFL’s hair is a deal breaker for the League.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 6:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Well done

Kudos to you for a well constructed post about the CBA.

by Two Nickels on Mar 4, 2011 8:56 AM EST reply actions  

Do you think New Stadiums are an issue?

Einman – thanks for a great post, logical and informative. Do you have a view on the one (other) thing that has changed since 2006 – the fact that owners face a very different situation with regards to new stadiums? When Jerruh was out getting financing for his $billion+ monument to himself, commercial real estate credit was free and easy, and local governments were falling all over themselves to issue muni bonds to subsidize the new development and keep their teams happy in their city, generate construction jobs, etc. Now that is gone. Cities are broke and have realized that they don’t get a return by subsidizing a billionaire owner’s pet project for hundreds of millions in taxpayer funds. Commercial real estate REITs are way underwater, with strip-mall vacancy rates skyrocketing even as the underlying land values plummet. So owners who didn’t get a shiny new stadium built pre-2008 are stuck – and those with a big shiny new mortgage are underwater and unlikely to be able to roll over short term debt or refi any expensive bridge financing. And with the economy down, those shiny new facilities probably aren’t bringing in the big boost in skybox, food, merchandise and event revenues that were part of the business plan. Faced with that, the owners are saying “we need more than we needed before”.

I personally view that as absolute BS. That is in my mind like the owner of the circus saying to the acts – “sorry, I decided to build a new roller coaster onto the circus but people didn’t show up and pay what I thought they were going to pay for that, so I am going to cut the pool of salaries for everyone in the big top to pay for it”. The fact is that if the big new stadium was hugely successful and boosted the value of the franchise by a couple of hundred million – then the players wouldn’t have gotten any of that increase in value (revenue share or equity value). So if the owners haven’t offered any equity in the NFL or the franchises to the players, then they cannot expect the players to bear the downside costs of their poor investment decisions.

But that (unfortunately) doesn’t change the self-justified sense of “needing more” that is probably pervasive among the owners based upon their common inherent exposure to municipal real estate finance issues. And as long as they have some basis to feel aggrieved in a common way that leads them to stick together, they will be a powerful force to be reckoned with. My only hope is that they are working from the same math that you outline above. If they do lose 20% of a season’s revenue by missing opening day – then it will take them 2-3 years to recoup that loss even if they were to get the rev-share to 50/50, which is dreaming. So if the players are willing to go to 55/45 now, the delta is 5% maximum – which is then 5+ years to recoup the 20% lost. Lets hope they use your numbers.

by PrincetonGreen on Mar 4, 2011 11:09 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

Great comment!

These numbers are based on cursory knowledge of the situation. It’s the only number I have to go with, but it’s just breaking down what everyone is bandying about. Since the owners aren’t opening their books, then really we have no idea how desperate their actual situation is. The idea is that they would have been getting by well enough with the TV money in itself, and the ruling about those contracts was an enormous piece to the NFLPA’s cause.

But yes, as you outlined (very well by the way, you obviously have a much deeper understanding of macroeconomics than I do) there is a lot that has changed since the last collective bargaining agreement. If things are as bleak as you painted, then the owners should open their books. The players don’t have any equity in this, but it still seems as though they are willing to be understanding of the owners situation (at least that is the lip service they are paying right now) if they do open their books. I would say the stadiums at this point are the owner’s downfall and what is forcing them to make a deal. Just like the players, the owners are overextended themselves and can’t hold out now.

The key to real solvency may come from eventually making good on those plans go international. There an article I read about that,which I would love to link, but can’t find right now. It really took a look at where the NFL was trying to go with international expansion as well as using different technologies that could mean a lot, and how the owners are trying to set the table for it now so once the plans go into the works they have the cuts they are looking for. Even without equity, if benefits for retired players were increased to include a decent enough percentage then that could serve to mollify their demands.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Great summary. One comment however.

It relates to the 9 billion split. I believe the 60/40 split is based on income, not revenue. The 9 billion number that’s thrown around is revenue. Now, I think they have a specified amount that goes to owners before the 60/40 split to cover operating expenses (not including player salaries) and such, so they aren’t splitting the 9 billion. It’s probably something more like 6 or 7 billion that gets split 60/40.

by AZ Eagle on Mar 4, 2011 1:20 PM EST reply actions  

Oh man!

I can’t believe I forgot about that! You’re right, the first billion goes straight to the owners. That makes it around $130 billion they got last year, so they are looking at about a 4% loss on only the TV contracts. Not killer, but not an actual raise. I’ll have to edit that. Thanks for reminding me.

Currently searching for a better signature.

by einman77 on Mar 4, 2011 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eagle_small
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #52: For who? For what?
Oldschool_small
A Different Kind of Eagles Redraft
Baldeagle_small
Do the Eagles draft poorly for defense? (UPDATED 5/25)
Dogbert_small
Building the 53-Man Roster: Part 13(!) of 53
Hill_small
Mock Bleacher Report Article

Recent FanPosts

Small
I know I know but what about this guy
Mickey-mouse-trap-graphicshunt
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #51.5: ASCII art is awesome.
Small
2012: The Season of No Excuses
Small
LeSean McCoy, Arian Foster, Matt Forte, Ray Rice or another running back: Who is the best?
Small
All-time mock draft on MtD
Small
Bell is out.. Now what???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bgnqr_small JasonB

Editors

Img_1084_small Bob_Q

Westy2_small Route36

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Briandawkins1_small Ben_Larivee

Fb_small Patrick Wall