Aggregated NFL Draft "Big Boards" from around the web
For the below graph (after the jump), I aggregated a sampling of big boards from around the web, including CBS, SB Nation's Mocking the Draft, ESPN's Mel Kiper, CBS' Rob Rang, ESPN's Scouts Inc., the National Football Post, The Sporting News, and draftcountdown.com's Scott Wright, and charted where each of them had the following prospects listed on their respective "big boards."
I then assigned a value to each number, similarly to the way Major League Baseball determines their MVP's. I'll explain: For each "big board," I went down as far as the 64th player on each list (64 because that would cover the first 2 rounds of the NFL draft). If a player received a #1 ranking, he received 64 points, a #2 would give him 63 points, a #3 would be 62 points, and so on down the line until a 64th ranking would give that player 1 point.
Then, to even out some of the ridiculousness of some of those experts' big boards, I eliminated both the best and worst score for each player. For example, see the Sporting News' ranking of Patrick Peterson at freaking 21, and of course you always have to take into consideration where Kiper is going to rank Gary Wichard clients (just kidding, Mel). If a player wasn't ranked by one or more or the "panelists," I simply used one of the empty spaces as the low score. I then added up every score (minus the dropped scores) to give each prospect their final aggregated score. Got it? Good. For full disclosure, I stole this idea from a fan post written by "Pablo Escobar" at Mocking the Draft. Good idea, Pablo. Anyway, here are the results (after the jump):
| Rank | Player | CBS | MTD | Kiper | Rang | Sc Inc | NFP | SN | Wright | Total points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU |
2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 376 | ||
| 2 | Da'Quan Bowers, DE, Clemson |
3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 374 | ||
| 3 | Nick Fairley, DT, Auburn |
2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 373 | ||
| 4 | A.J. Green, WR, Georgia |
3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 371 | ||
| 5 | Von Miller, OLB, Texas A&M |
5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 356 | ||
| 6 | Robert Quinn, DE, UNC |
4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 354 | ||
| 7 | Marcell Dareus, DT, Alabama |
6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 352 | ||
| 8 | Julio Jones, WR, Alabama |
9 | 5 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 11 | 327 | ||
| 9 | Blaine Gabbert, QB, Missouri |
8 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 327 | ||
| 10 | Prince Amukamara, CB, Nebraska |
10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 26 | 7 | 321 | ||
| 11 | Cameron Jordan, DE, Cal |
12 | 11 | 17 | 11 | 14 | 12 | 313 | ||
| 12 | Aldon Smith, DE, Missouri |
16 | 9 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 10 | 312 | ||
| 13 | Mark Ingram, RB, Alabama |
15 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 17 | 305 | ||
| 14 | Tyron Smith, OT, USC |
14 | 16 | 20 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 297 | ||
| 15 | Adrian Clayborn, DE, Iowa |
17 | 22 | 19 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 284 | ||
| 16 | Akeem Ayers, OLB, UCLA |
25 | 19 | 14 | 26 | 19 | 19 | 268 | ||
| 17 | Jimmy Smith, CB, Colorado |
23 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 21 | 19 | 267 | ||
| 18 | Anthony Castonzo, OT, BC |
13 | 20 | 17 | 25 | 33 | 21 | 261 | ||
| 19 | J.J. Watt, DE, Wisconsin |
18 | 25 | 29 | 23 | 20 | 14 | 261 | ||
| 20 | Nate Solder, OT, Colorado |
19 | 49 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 28 | 250 | ||
| 21 | Corey Liuget, DT, Illinois |
28 | 31 | 24 | 19 | 11 | 29 | 248 | ||
| 22 | Gabe Carimi, OT, Wisconsin |
20 | 32 | 23 | 23 | 19 | 31 | 242 | ||
| 23 | Cam Newton, QB, Auburn |
11 | 17 | 18 | 28 | 53 | 22 | 241 | ||
| 24 | Cameron Heyward, DE, Ohio State |
30 | 16 | 35 | 30 | 27 | 23 | 229 | ||
| 25 | Ryan Kerrigan, DE, Purdue |
26 | 42 | 25 | 28 | 24 | 28 | 217 | ||
| 26 | Brandon Harris, CB, Miami |
31 | 24 | 22 | 35 | 20 | 193 | |||
| 27 | Derek Sherrod, OT, Miss St. |
27 | 27 | 23 | 35 | 25 | 188 | |||
| 28 | Muhammad Wilkerson, DT, Temple |
32 | 34 | 25 | 22 | 64 | 31 | 182 | ||
| 29 | Kyle Rudolph, TE, Notre Dame |
33 | 27 | 31 | 40 | 26 | 168 | |||
| 30 | Stephen Paea, DT, Oregon St. |
34 | 36 | 40 | 24 | 24 | 167 | |||
| 31 | Mike Pouncey, C/G, Florida |
21 | 26 | 21 | 37 | 60 | 160 | |||
| 32 | Mikel LeShoure, RB, Illinois |
24 | 33 | 35 | 25 | 143 | ||||
| 33 | Danny Watkins, OT, Baylor |
38 | 39 | 21 | 22 | 140 | ||||
| 34 | Jake Locker, QB, Washington |
22 | 50 | 37 | 26 | 53 | 62 | 140 | ||
| 35 | Justin Houston, OLB, Georgia |
29 | 13 | 27 | 126 | |||||
| 36 | Rahim Moore, S, UCLA |
45 | 30 | 42 | 31 | 112 | ||||
| 37 | Ryan Williams, RB, Virginia Tech |
40 | 36 | 34 | 39 | 111 | ||||
| 38 | Jon Baldwin, WR, Pitt |
39 | 20 | 32 | 104 | |||||
| 39 | Torrey Smith, WR, Maryland |
37 | 37 | 33 | 50 | 103 | ||||
| 40 | Aaron Williams, CB/S, Texas |
35 | 39 | 54 | 30 | 102 | ||||
| 41 | Phil Taylor, DT, Baylor |
43 | 46 | 32 | 58 | 61 | 85 | |||
| 42 | Randall Cobb, WR, Kentucky |
57 | 34 | 50 | 36 | 83 | ||||
| 43 | Rodney Hudson, C/G, FSU |
46 | 48 | 38 | 61 | 67 | ||||
| 44 | Ryan Mallett, QB, Arkansas |
36 | 40 | 56 | 63 | |||||
| 45 | Jerrel Jernigan, WR, Troy |
48 | 64 | 41 | 51 | 56 | ||||
| 46 | Jabaal Sheard, DT, Pitt |
44 | 31 | 55 | ||||||
| 47 | Stefan Wisniewski, G, PSU |
54 | 44 | 42 | 55 | |||||
| 48 | Titus Young, WR, Boise St |
47 | 34 | 49 | ||||||
| 49 | Leonard Hankerson, WR, Miami |
55 | 45 | 48 | 47 | |||||
| 50 | Christian Ponder, QB, FSU |
42 | 58 | 54 | 41 | |||||
| 51 | Martez Wilson, ILB, Illinois |
41 | 52 | 37 | ||||||
| 52 | Drake Nevis, DT, LSU |
60 | 38 | 34 | ||||||
| 53 | Mason Foster, OLB, Washington |
53 | 44 | 33 | ||||||
| 54 | Christian Ballard, DT, Iowa |
47 | 18 | |||||||
| 55 | Ben Ijalana, G, Villanova |
51 | 62 | 17 | ||||||
| 56 | Greg Jones, ILB, Michigan St |
59 | 55 | 16 | ||||||
| 57 | Allen Bailey, DE, Miami |
64 | 51 | 15 | ||||||
| 58 | Bruce Carter, OLB, UNC |
57 | 60 | 13 | ||||||
| 59 | Marvin Austin, DT, UNC |
56 | 9 | |||||||
| 60 | Jurell Casey, DT, USC |
57 | 8 | |||||||
| 61 | D.J. Williams, TE, Arkansas |
57 | 8 | |||||||
| 62 | Curtis Brown, CB, Texas |
58 | 7 | |||||||
| 63 | Jason Pinkston, OT, Pitt |
59 | 6 | |||||||
| 64 | Luke Stocker, TE, Tennessee |
59 | 6 |
Also receiving points: Brandon Burton 2, Marcus Cannon 2.
30 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m really confused about what people see in Adrian Clayborn, I see an unathletic DE who can’t win with speed at the next level, won’t ever be an impact pass rusher from the DE spot, has short arms, can’t drop into coverage because he is so unathletic, is too small to play DT, not long enough to play 3-4 DE, his body is sloppy and he has only had one productive season. In my defense post I called him a for sure slider, but for some reason he just isn’t sliding according to the draft-niks. So now instead of calling him a slider, I’m going to go ahead and call him highly overrated and whatever team drafts him is going to be highly disappointed. He is a 2-down LE IMO and I know that guys who are just as good at stopping the run are available later.
Merry Vickmas everyone! * Falls into pile of snow DeSean style *
"It's simple, ... I'm always striving to do more. Whatever I accomplish, it's not enough. I don't get satisfied. That's not my nature." -Brian Dawkins
"Well as long as you want to get it right it's Princess Buttercup... Jackass." -Udalango
I agree
I dont like Clayborn either. I will say his only two positives is his “motor” and he has great leverage. Can get low and has a strong base…but your right, no speed and did absolutely nothing when defenses focused on him.
by Mike Will is DoubleDown on Mar 2, 2011 9:27 AM EST up reply actions
Err
when offenses focused on him
by Mike Will is DoubleDown on Mar 2, 2011 9:28 AM EST up reply actions
He is a lesser Charles Grant
formerly of the Saints
by birds'n'raiders on Mar 2, 2011 4:51 PM EST up reply actions
Peterson at 21 and Amukamara at 26? Why the low ratings of the projected top 2 corners by “The Sporting News”? I of course don’t read it so… haha…
by 92-74-99-96 on Mar 2, 2011 8:34 AM EST via mobile reply actions
I too would love to know the logic.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Mar 2, 2011 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
The Sporting News is on drugs...
Only explanation. They have Corey Liuget at 7, Cameron Jordan at 8, Ryan Williams at 10, Jabaal Sheard at 13, Leonard Hankerson at 20…. About half of their picks were thrown out for being either the high score or low. Jimmy Smith is their #1 corner.
Pop this list into Excel and sort by SN… it’s almost comical.
Great Stuff Jimmy
Really great post. It would be nice if it were something that updated automatically each time one of those guys updated their board. Maybe there is a computer whiz out there who would know how to make that happen? It would be interesting to see how guys move up and down the aggregate rankings as we get closer to 4/28.
www.SKOHRboard.com
Call me crazy, but I’m starting to belive AJ green is the best player overall in this draft
"If I can get you to think twice, I'm in your head."
-Brian Dawkins
"Yeah, I like to hit people"
-Brandon Graham
by immynimmy on Mar 2, 2011 9:54 AM EST via mobile reply actions
What position do you think is the hardest to screw up? I feel like DT is pretty safe but I could be wrong.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Mar 2, 2011 1:44 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure. I think the thought process used to be that it was offensive tackle, with the reasoning that if they didn’t pan out at tackle, they could always at the very least move inside to guard and more than likely play well at an easier position. A common example was a guy like Robert Gallery. But I’m not so sure it really works that way. You look back at the past 10 years, and there are TONS of OT busts in the first round. DT has had its share as well, but those guys a re lower profile, so they’re not as noteworthy as a position like QB. Every position has their share, really.
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/
No. DT is very, very dangerous
These will fill you in pretty well
by birds'n'raiders on Mar 2, 2011 4:54 PM EST up reply actions
Gotta say, I’m starting to sour on Walter Football’s mocks. I like his player scouting, but his mocks are just annoying me lately.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Mar 2, 2011 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
After what Julio Jones
did in the Combine, Green has serious competition at the #1 WR spot
by Mike Will is DoubleDown on Mar 2, 2011 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
If the Eagles pick Cam Newton
with their 1st pick, I will fuckin flip…..
Do not want that guy on this team. He’s a plague waiting to be released. Especially if he has to sit as a back up for a few years.
FLY #7 FLY !!!
If we do pick him up he will develop into a winner and a star.
Our system for developing QBs is tried and tested.
I agree
Want nothing to do with Cam…if by some miracle he is still there in the 2nd round, I hope we still pass
by Mike Will is DoubleDown on Mar 2, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
he was pathetic at the Senior Bowl
he is a freak that doesn’t know what to do with himself. He has the worst hand use of any hyped dlineman in the draft. He is too small and not strong enough at the point of attack for a 4-3 DT. He is not smart enough or nearly powerful enough to hold 2 gaps as a 3-4 DE. He is a steaming load of crap.
by birds'n'raiders on Mar 2, 2011 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
Looking at this perspective...
makes me think the Eagles need to move up in the draft. The best talent dries up right before the 2nd and 3rd picks. I say trade Kolb to move way up in both the 1st and second rounds to grab one of the two top CBs and an OT. I’m suggesting that we switch picks with a team like the Panthers, Bengals or Bills. It means not getting a new pick for Kolb but it could mean two solid starters instead of a chance at three guys, with only one working out.
so for cam newton to land at 23
you crossed out 7 and 55. surely cam wont last until 55, but then why in turn did you not cross out the 53 that SN gave him? i believe he has a shot to go higher than 7 and im really wondering why you decided to cross that one out. whats the reasoning behind the crossed out numbers?
if you would have crossed out the 55 and the 53 for cam newton you get 287…which in turn puts him in the 15 spot. i think 15 is alot more accurate for cam than 23.

by 
































