Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Myth: Andy Reid's not good at drafting

(I urge people to skip down to the Basic Thoughts section if you're in hurry, its the most interesting part)

When grading Andy Reid's ability to draft its easy to make an argument either way. If you're trying to support Andy you talk about Brian Westbrook and Trent Cole. If you're an Andy Reid detractor you talk about Jerome McDougle and Freddie Mitchell. With all the disagreement I wanted to see if there was a way to statistically compare the Eagles round by round against other NFL teams since the beginning of Andy Reid's tenure. I googled and some guy on a Cleveland blog did an analysis categorizing players based on talent and then showing the chance of picking a player of this talent pool in each round. Here's a link to his article if you want a full explanation of how he grouped players (recommended):

http://realcavsfans.com/showthread.php?38395-NFL-Draft-Success-by-Round

Its not perfect but he laid out a pretty good system. I then grouped Eagles players into categories due to his guidelines. I only went through 2009 because at least 3 years are needed to properly assess a players potential. Even three years are sketchy because although we know a players potential, its hard to say if they will consistently meet that potential (i.e. DeSean Jackson)

Heres the short version of the categories. The players are ranked largely by WCAV (Weighted Career Approximate Value). Here's a full explanation of that statistic: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?page_id=518

Anyway here's the categories:

-8 GP: Simple, any player who plays in 8 NFL games, 77% of all NFL players drafted between 1999-2006 got this far.

EAGLES: 76% of Eagles drafted between 1999-2009 made it at least this far. Including 100% rounds 1-3. Examples: McDougle, Tony Hunt, Freddie Milons, Victor Abiamiri.

-Just another Guy: Players who stick around for at least a few years but contribute little, 55%.

EAGLES: 58% of Eagles reached this level, once again pretty much on par with the league. Examples: FredEx, Barry Gardner, Doug Brzezinski, Max Jean-Giles

-Depth: Below average starters or solid backups, 28%

EAGLES: This is first significant stat. 41% of Eagles draftees at least contribute. The Eagles are ahead of the league average in just about every round. The biggest difference comes in the 2nd round. 80% of Eagles 2nd round picks reach this stage, whereas the league average is about 58%. Examples: Broderick Bunkley (based on his time here), Todd Pinkston, Jason Avant, Kevin Kolb,Winston Justice, Sean Considine, Omar Gaither.

-Good Starter: Above average starters, 14%

EAGLES: 18% of Eagles draft picks reach this level. However the Eagles are way higher than the league average at picking starters in rounds 1-3, they then fall below in the late rounds. In Round 1 six of Andy's nine first round picks have become solid starters, where the league average is 50%. He has however only gotten three players of at least this level from rounds 4-7 (Celek, Cole, Herremans). Other Examples: Shawn Andrews (a hard guy to place), Lito Sheppard, Jeremy Maclin, Mike Patterson.

-Upper Tier Starters: 6%

EAGLES: 8%. The Eagles are slightly below average in finding this caliber players in the 1st round. The league average is close to 30% and only 2 of 9 first round picks (Corey Simon and Donovan McNabb) reached this level. However the league average for 2nd round picks dips below 10% while the Eagles have had 20% of their 2nd rounders reach this level. Examples: Sheldon Brown and Corey Simon...for the record: Sheldon Brown's WCAV didn't justify this position, I kind of went on opinion. On the other hand Pinkston's WCAV had him as a good starter and I put him in the "Depth" category.

-Star: 3% Examples from around the league: Jason Witten, Frank Gore, Richard Seymour

EAGLES: The Eagles have picked 5 stars in 92 picks, putting them slightly above the NFL average. Here they are: Donovan McNabb (say what you want but he went to 5 straight pro bowls at one point), Brian Westbrook, Trent Cole, DeSean Jackson, and LeSean McCoy. A little preemptive on McCoy and Jackson I know. They are basically ranked on the average of their first three seasons.

-Superstar: 1% ex: Ed Reed, Edgerrin James, Ray Lewis

EAGLES: In 92 players Andy has yet to have one emerge as a superstar, although I see no reason LeSean McCoy couldn't be the first based on his improvement levels so far. One of 100 is about league average so you could say were due.

BASIC THOUGHTS

-This research tells me that Andy Reid has unfairly labeled as a poor early round drafter. Reid has consistently gotten starters in the first couple rounds at rates higher than the league average. He has been consistent albeit unexciting. Fans take it for granted when your first round pick becomes a starter even though 50% of first round picks never become consistent starters. I know fans want the first round guy to be a pro-bowler every time, but in reality Mike Patterson is a good pick. Also remember that the Eagles usually draft in the bottom half of the draft. The chance of drafting a starter drops from about 75% for a top 5 pick to about 40% when picking around twentieth.

-On average teams first round picks become stars once every seven years. Reid is 1 for 9, it just so happened it was his first draft and this is very much a "what have you done for me lately" business

-The chance of drafting a star in the 2nd round is about 5% (1 in 20 years). The chance of doing it back to back years is about 0.25%. (LeSean McCoy (2008) and DeSean Jackson (2009) both qualify)

-Hearing about stories like Tom Brady or Brian Westbrook and Trent Cole sometimes skews our vision of just how hard it is to hit on late round picks. The chance of drafting even a modiocre starter/quality backup in rounds 6 and 7 is about 5%. Kurt Coleman=GREAT PICK. Jamar Chaney=GREAT PICK (Even if they never improve). Moises Fokou=pretty good pick (its true). Jason Kelce and Brian Rolle=potentially PHENOMENAL picks

-If Casey Matthews can maintain his role as a nickle linebacker hes better than about 75% of players picked in this round

-A lot of people bash Andy Reid based on his last two drafts but we really don't know how good Brandon Graham and Nate Allen will be yet. Considering Reid's history we should at least give his players a chance before ripping him.

-Lastly, 14% of NFL players drafted become above average starters. That means if a team has one pick in each round and ends up with one starter it is an average draft. I urge Eagles fans to remember these statistics when complaining about every pick we make that doesn't pan out.

Comment 125 comments  |  16 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thank you

Finally someone who agrees that Andy isn’t THAT BAD at picking in the draft.

That being said we’ve had some brutal drafts… Im sure if we really looked, though Andy overall isn’t bad, Im sure there are a couple where they are just cough bad cough

Fortunately for this year Keechly seems like a no brainer FO wise with a 12-20 pick right now. But hasn’t Casey already proven that someone without athletic ability regardless of family, ability to get to the ball (college wise at least) and instinct can’t succeed in the NFL? My only issue with Keechly is his athleticism this is a passing league you need to be athletic at LB nowadays.

by Lets Get Real on Dec 29, 2011 11:05 PM EST reply actions  

He is athletic enough

And he’s had a lot of INTs … 7? I think.. and I know he returned 1 for a TD against the hurricanes to win the game

Just wait until December..

by maximdim on Dec 29, 2011 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

7 is a lot

considering Burfict has had 3 in his career (none this year)
and Manti Te’o hasn’t had any..

Just wait until December..

by maximdim on Dec 29, 2011 11:13 PM EST up reply actions  

None of this is true about Kuechly:
But hasn’t Casey already proven that someone without athletic ability regardless of family, ability to get to the ball (college wise at least) and instinct can’t succeed in the NFL?

He isn’t Burfict in terms of athletic freakishness, but he is more than athletic enough for the NFL. His instincts are unmatched in terms of college LBs right now and his ability to get to the ball is evidenced in his insane tackle numbers.

Or were you just saying you don’t think he isn’t athletic enough? Your last sentence throws me off.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

What issue do you have with his “athleticism?” Have you ever seen him play or this just based off a report? He’s more than athletic enough. Just go watch some highlights. He flies from sideline to sideline.

And please, do not make the silly mistake of comparing him to Casey Matthews. They are nothing alike. Casey was no where near the player Luke was in college. It’s a ridiculous comparison that no one would make.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.

by JasonB on Dec 31, 2011 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Donovan McNabb, Corey Simon, Freddie Mitchell, Lito Sheppard, Jerome McDougle, Shawn Andrews, Mike Patterson, Brodrick Bunkley, Jeremy Maclin, Brandon Graham and Dany Watkins.

Those are our first round picks, that’s not a good list of players. Outside of McNabb none of those players contributed to the Eagles in a big way over a long period of time. Simon, Sheppard and Andrews had nice runs but they flamed out. Patterson and Bunkley weren’t difference makers. Mitchell and McDougle were complete swings and misses. Jeremy Maclin looks like a hit. Jury is out on Graham and Watkins.

You’d like for your first round picks to be a bit better than they’ve been.

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 29, 2011 11:22 PM EST reply actions  

Flaming out

Unfortunately, I don’t think this analysis is considering the length of each career. According to the link, the categories are generally based on the Weighted Career Approximate Value per season. Nonetheless, the analysis does a nice job of showing that even first round selections are often unsuccessful.

http://realcavsfans.com/showthread.php?38395-NFL-Draft-Success-by-Round

by AnotherAndyR on Dec 29, 2011 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Its true, length of career isnt factored enough. I think alot of NFL players put together like 3-4 good years though before injuries start too add up.

by dstern77 on Dec 29, 2011 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Great post overall

There really isn’t a perfect way of doing this, but your approach is far better than just focusing on a few players, and it’s great that you could use objective ratings from Pro-Football-Reference. I just looked at the total WCAV (rather than per season), and the Eagles are ranked 12th overall from 1999-2009 (including 13th in round one & 19th in round two). This total perspective will place more emphasis on the earlier draft years because those players had more seasons to accumulate WCAV. From that perspective, a draft cannot be fully evaluated until all of the players have retired (i.e., when it is no longer relevant). And yes, I agree that many NFL careers are only 3-4 years anyway.

by AnotherAndyR on Dec 30, 2011 12:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Andrews was tough, he couldve been a great pick if he could keep his head straight. But I have no regrets on Lito, Maclin, Simon, Patterson, Bunkley, and i think Watkins well be good

by dstern77 on Dec 29, 2011 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Andrews was a rising star, and was one of the most dominating O-linemen in the league. Then he got hurt, and then was never the same. We tend to lose perspective because we remember the circus of the end of his time here — it’s too easy to forget that the guy was a total masher and extremely athletic.

When you’re looking at it from the perspective of the draft, I’d say AR hit it out of the park — he picked a guy who was clearly a stud. The fact that he got hurt and was never the same afterward can’t really be blamed on the guy who drafted him. It happens in the NFL.

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Word…Made his 3rd straight pro bowl in ’07 at age 25

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Just goes to illustrate

how amateurish it is to claim to be able to quantify the success of a draft pick.

by waterfield on Dec 30, 2011 9:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Jesus Christ man,I’m not claiming it’s perfect. But a concrete statistic about what an average player selected in a given round goes onto do in the NFL is very relevant

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Also yes it is hard to grade a guy who had 3 pro bowl years and then some sort of mental breakdown…It doesn’t happen often

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree 100%

Sorry I didn’t see yours before posting mine

by PrincetonGreen on Jan 6, 2012 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Whether you, or anyone else, has regrets is completely irrelevant when it comes to rationally grading draft picks.

I hope you understand that.

If you are going to make a legitimate case for or against Reid, et al, you will have to compare their drafts to other teams’ drafts.
There is no other valid way to judge.

by waterfield on Dec 30, 2011 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Comparing our drafts to the NFL average is exactly what I did, how do you not see that? I’m saying no regrets as in when you look at the other players drafted around the same time I like the pick we made

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd say Maclin was a nice pick

Formerly number5
RIP JJ
"But for you to open your big fucking mouth and call Shady "overrated" makes me want to take my big cock and shut you up." - Brotherman initiates EB’s prison stay/Brotherman on getting his dick wet.

by HawaiianGreen on Dec 30, 2011 2:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Andrews was DOMINANT

Sean Andrews was perhaps the most impressive new O-Lineman to enter the game in years. Not only did he contribute mightily right away (at a position that normally takes 2-3 years of seasoning) but he changed the way defenses played against us (as soon as he had his ‘nasal polyps’ removed at the end of his rookie year). This of course makes his head-case drug-fuelled Phelpsdown all the more tragic – but how can you possibly pin that on the pre-draft analysis??

by PrincetonGreen on Jan 6, 2012 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm indifferent on him when it comes to offensive drafting

When it comes to defensive drafting, he’s been bad. Simple as that. Check the defensive players taken from 2005-2009 drafts by the Eagles and you can’t deny its been bad. Count how many defensive players we still have on our roster’s after those drafts. Look at where most of them are now.

"truTV is like BET for white folks." - Chuck
"Brian Dawkins is always 100% Eagles related."--macjack09 & BGN Nation

by macjack09 on Dec 30, 2011 1:21 AM EST reply actions  

2005: Patterson and Cole makes it a solid defensive draft.
2006: They got Bunkley who was an ok starter, I really liked the pick when they made it though.
2007:No 1st round pick: they miss on Abiamiri and then Bradley

This sounds like a cop out but I think the Eagles really caught bad luck with Stewart Bradley’s injury. I think pre-injury we was gonna be a upper-tier starter, he looked like a hell of a player in 2008 and I believe would have been a great pick

2008:No 1st round pick. Trevor Laws is a rotational player which is OK for a 2nd rounder
2009: They don’t address defense until round 5, so you cant expect much.

Bunkley and Bradley were tough misses, so the Eagles haven’t got what they needed. But overall I wouldn’t say that Reid can’t draft defense

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 2:53 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Love this post

Bunkley was a good starter for this team. Him and Patterson formed a good run stopping team. Ask Denver if Bunkley is a bad pick.

by PhilsForever on Dec 30, 2011 8:50 AM EST via iPhone app up reply actions   1 recs

Ask Philly how Bunkley is contributing, that 2013 6th round pick sure is helping on the field!

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 30, 2011 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

So you disagree with trading players for future picks?

Luxury rap, the Hermes of verses. Sophisticated ignorance, write my curses in cursive

by Eaglesadvocate on Dec 30, 2011 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

You really think that 2013 6th round pick will amount to something?

The Curse of Lombardi
#TeamFireAndyReid
"Stats are for fantasy and losers. Winning is an attitude."

by d-jackfan10 on Dec 31, 2011 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Jason Kelce: NFL Draft: 2011 / Round: 6 / Pick: 191

Starting center.

by eagleyosh on Jan 1, 2012 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

yea bunkleys like pro-bowl caliber on profootballfocus.com..You can see why we moved him though, were deep as hell at DT

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 10:24 AM EST up reply actions  

He is the best run stopping DT in the NFL this according to them, but he isnt much of a pass rusher, so he does not fit the wide 9.

by Anders Jensen on Dec 31, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Not my problem that you are at a loss for words.

-Depth: Below average starters or solid backups, 28%

EAGLES: This is first significant stat. 41% of Eagles draftees at least contribute. The Eagles are ahead of the league average in just about every round. The biggest difference comes in the 2nd round. 80% of Eagles 2nd round picks reach this stage, whereas the league average is about 58%. Examples: Broderick Bunkley (based on his time here), Todd Pinkston, Jason Avant, Kevin Kolb,Winston Justice, Sean Considine, Omar Gaither.

Where to begin. Bunkley at pick 14, Justice at pick 39, Avant at pick 109, Gaither at pick 168 all put into same category.
Those four players , plus Gocong, who you didn’t even mention, have nothing in common, except that they were drafted, along with Considine, Jean-Gilles, Bloom and Ramsey, in 2006.

If 80% of Eagles’ 2nd rd draft picks reach the stage of “below average starter or solid backup”, then that is evidence of failure, not success, as you imply. 2nd round picks are expected, or at least realistically hoped to be good starters.

Who is grading these players? You? If so, why don’t you give at least an inkling in your post that you know how to rationally grade draft picks?

Whose ass did you pull the percentages out of? Yours? If so, why don’t you give at least an inkling in your post that you know how to derive percentage of “Good starter: above average starter” (what ever the fuck that’s supposed to mean ), for example.

by waterfield on Dec 30, 2011 9:51 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Nice post. Nice to see actual analysis instead of just “Gramm sux we shud of got JPP!!!”

by groot on Dec 30, 2011 2:55 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

As long as we keep drafting high motor guys and quality subs in the 1st round then I’m happy.

"Fuckin right G."

by andyb on Dec 30, 2011 4:01 AM EST reply actions  

The way I see Andy's drafting

At least in recent years, he drafts for his needs (or solves them through free agency) a year late, or at best some rounds late. Last year we badly needed offensive line. Not a single OL player was drafted, Jamaal was rushed back and re-injured himself, and even with Celek staying in to block most of the time the line was still a mess. Also we needed an RCB and he waited until the 4th round to take Lindley. This year we needed linebackers and he didn’t draft or sign a single one. This year we got Watkins and Kelce (and Harris and Mathis), after one year of Vick running for his life. Now after a year of being gashed by run offenses, we will probably sign an LB or two in free agency and draft another one or two.
But by being slow to address needs he hurts the team’s overall performance.

French fries are really Belgian, sausages and bagels have the same amount of protein, two countries' names mean "turkey", and Santa Claus was invented by the Coca-Cola company. Is life weird or what?

Debe ser verde y volante - Πράσινο και να πετάει - It's gotta be green and it's gotta fly!

by Rabbit T on Dec 30, 2011 5:35 AM EST reply actions  

to his defense

he did sign casey mathews and brian rolle. dunno where you got that they didn’t draft or sign a lb this year.

by phillyfan330 on Dec 30, 2011 5:06 PM EST up reply actions  

In late rounds

Which means they clearly didn’t make it a priority

French fries are really Belgian, sausages and bagels have the same amount of protein, two countries' names mean "turkey", and Santa Claus was invented by the Coca-Cola company. Is life weird or what?

Debe ser verde y volante - Πράσινο και να πετάει - It's gotta be green and it's gotta fly!

by Rabbit T on Dec 31, 2011 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Well done. Finally a dose of realism.

by Wokjab on Dec 30, 2011 9:33 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t know that I would agree that just because a player taken in the 7th round is playing that he’s a “great pick.”

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.

by JasonB on Dec 30, 2011 11:05 AM EST reply actions  

If you pick a player who’s better than 90-95% of players picked that round, i call it a great pick

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 11:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, there’s the problem. Are they better than 90% of the players pick in that round or are they just getting 90% more opportunity than those guys.

I don’t really know that Jamar Chaney is better than 90% of the 7th rounders taken that year. He’s playing more… but can I say for sure that he’s better?

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.

by JasonB on Dec 31, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I would Chaney/Coleman have the skill level of a quality back-up/below average starter.Are there players of Chaney’s quality who were cut from the Steelers cause their LBs are twice as good? probably. But there are also teams like the Browns who’ve probably started even worse players, and those players will grade out on Chaney’s level as well. So i think it evens out.

by dstern77 on Dec 31, 2011 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

It doesn't matter who has more talent, it is who gets on the field

Chaney could be worse than 50% of the 7th round picks but if they never see the field then they did nothing for their teams and made no impact which means that Chaney was a better pick. I get what you are saying and maybe X linebacker would have been a better 7th round pick if the Eagles had picked him but team Y did instead so he didn’t see the field but there is absolutely no way to prove that outside of how they perform in the NFL

"Some people think they should go to heaven but NOT have to die to get there.
Sorry, but that’s simply not how it works."

Follow me on Twitter: @alexvanroekel

by sctrojan13 on Jan 1, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly though, why wouldn't you?

What would you really expect from a 7th round pick? I tend to expect them to get cut in the preseason as a rule, not become starters. That they have to become starters may speak to other team problems, but I don’t think you can label a 7th round pick who is starting as anything but good.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's the problem...

When you have a bunch of “How much can you expect from them” guys starting for your team, you have a bad team.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 31, 2011 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Because...

Anyone can start a 7th round pick if they so desire. It doesn’t mean that the guy is a good player or he’s helping the team. The mere fact that a guy is starting is not proof that he’s a good pick. Playing well is proof that he was a good pick.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook.

by JasonB on Dec 31, 2011 12:18 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

QFT

The mere fact that a guy is starting is not proof that he’s a good pick. Playing well is proof that he was a good pick.


Writer at Iggles Nest
#HireSpags

by PhiladelphiaEagles on Jan 1, 2012 4:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Nice Post

I thought Reid would be a little below average but looking back he made some nice picks. My biggest issue with Reid drafting is two fold first he refuses to draft Lbs in the first 3 rounds and second he usually misses on defensive players in the early part of the draft. Off the top of my head Trevor Laws, Jerome McDougle, Victor Abmairi (could be a late pick dont remember) my point is Andy is struggling getting us young talent on the defensive side of the ball. So while he isnt a poor drafter overall I would say he is a poor defense drafter.

by Mr.electric10 on Dec 30, 2011 11:47 AM EST reply actions  

Addressing your issues

I counted 142 linebackers drafted in rounds 1-3 since 1999, which represents an average of 4.4 per team. The Eagles drafted five of those linebackers, so their rate is essentially equal to the league average. Unfortunately, most of those five players have been forgettable (Matt McCoy, Quinton Caver, Barry Gardner, Bryan Smith, & Stewart Bradley).

As I mentioned above, the Eagles overall drafts have ranked 12th from 1999-2009, including 13th in the first round & 19th in the second round. When looking only at defense, their rank has been 17th overall, including 16th in the first round, and 18th in the second round. So yes, they have been worse at drafting defense than offense, but even their defense is close to the league average.

The Eagles typically have a relatively late draft position, so if their performance is near/above average, then they are probably doing better than would be expected. I also wonder if draft performances look worse when a team is active in free agency (like the Eagles) — are those teams more likely to bench/cut the players they drafted?

by AnotherAndyR on Dec 30, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

All fair points

I am surprised that the eagles are that high (league average) at defensive drafting it has seemed a while since we drafted a strong defensive player (Mike Patterson).

by Mr.electric10 on Dec 30, 2011 9:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Excellent post. I’d say you were pretty conservative in several of your rankings. e.g., you could easily bump up Avant from “Depth” to “Good Starter” — he may be the top slot receiver in the league not named Welker. And you could easily bump Maclin up to “Upper Tier Starter” — he would certainly start for every team in the league.

The fact that the posts haven’t really quibbled with your rankings speaks to this, and it strengthens your point.

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 11:52 AM EST reply actions  

i agree 100% with your thoughts

by phillyfan330 on Dec 30, 2011 5:09 PM EST up reply actions  

-Lastly, 14% of NFL players drafted become above average starters. That means if a team has one pick in each round and ends up with one starter it is an average draft. I urge Eagles fans to remember these statistics when complaining about every pick we make that doesn’t pan out.

but the eagles draft some time two times more players than other teams and that is one of the things that drives fans crazy is the trading down that seemingly amounts to nothing.

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

So….Reid trades down a lot, and gets more picks by doing so. And he still drafts quality players at a higher percentage than the league average. So that means he gets more in terms of quantity and at a higher rate.

And that’s bad because….?

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

but is getting players that just play and are "quality" a success

I mean really is that what this team should strive for is having a bunch of decent players and very few great players

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Reading comprehension

Look at the post - dstern77 broke players down into each category, and shows that AR has done well across the categories.

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

no the eagles select more players than almost any team

so their success should be greater. I mean yeah the percentage is on or a little bit above the average but that also means that there are any more misses.

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

No it doesn't.

You aren’t reading the post very well I assume. The numbers are based on percentages, not just numbers of players. Reid’s drafting is above average based on percentages and since he tends to make more picks than most other coaches, that above average drafting based on percentage is actually even more impressive.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Good grief

I’m going to go way out on a limb and guess that you are struggling with 5th or 6th grade math. You should try to pay more attention in school and not tax your brain with football blogs.

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

No

If the eagles draft 20 player and the x team drafts 10 and let’s say they are both successful 50% then x team has 5 failures while the eagles have 10 I mean that is how percentages work

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 12:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

...keep going...you almost have a coherent thought....

…and that means he has more successes as well. And the data show that Reid drafts quality players at a higher percentage than the average. So he’s getting a greater number of quality players, at a greater rate. That means he’s doing a better job than most of the mouth-breathing critics say (no offense intended if you prefer to breathe with your mouth open).

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

And they would also have 10 successes versus just 5 successes for x team.

Soooo, what’s your point? It still ends up being a better draft in the Eagles favor based on pure success vs. failure (as you set up in your hypothetical).

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean really is that what this team should strive for is having a bunch of decent players and very few great players

Um yes? That’s what good teams look like. How many teams have more than just a few great players? It’s finding ways to replace the few shitty players with decent ones and then putting all the players in schemes that maximize their talents that ends in great teams.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

also why would you want to strive to be on the average and not better

I bet if you look at the patriots, steelers, or ravens they will have better averages

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

We are above average.

Did you read this post?

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Read? Perhaps.

Understand? No.

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

my bad

the eagles beat the average BY 1 TO 5% IN MOST CATEGORIES.

except the “depth” category. Which who knows how this was compiled its a weak metric made threw another weak metric(it put Todd Pinkston as a “good starter”). and all of this information was compiled by a guy with less than 100 career comments and whos last post was this gem http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/2011/12/20/2649756/guess-whos-back

I would like to see that Data before we all go saying that the Eagles are above average or even to say this is a good way to access a good drafting team.

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not trying to rip dstern77

but lets not act like this is some credible study

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

yo you cant just say “Im not trying to rip dstern77” , you’re clearly calling out my credibility. I’m on my way out the door but i can try to upload the full list of players later and how I categorized them and we can see how much you disagree. Like someone else said I was intentionally conservative, cause I knew this was the one area of the research that could become subjective

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

you did a good job putting together a well researched post and I’m truly not trying to rip you if half of the people on this blog put as much in to there posts this blog would be way better in the fan post section. Don’t feel obligated to upload all of that over 100 players that Reid has drafted might be a little much.

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

The metric isn't that weak actually.

Reading through the PFR stuff on WCAV it seems that it’s a decent measuring stick for how well a player’s career went/is going (which is a good way to evaluate draft position). Like any metric though, it’s not perfect. The categories are made up and the WCAV is used to put players into those categories, but the categories are overall pretty solid and well thought out IMO (though again, nothing is perfect).

And at the end of the day, the point of the post was to analyze the belief that Reid is a terrible drafter (something that is claimed many, many times here and elsewhere). I think this does a good job of proving that Reid is not a terrible drafter at all. The truth is that most fans don’t analyze and dissect any other team drafts aside from their own, so they only see the successes or the extremely visible failures of other teams. They don’t see the everyday, average picks that even teams like New England make.

As far as dstern77 and his last post goes, it wasn’t that bad. He just made a couple egregious spelling mistakes that were hard to look past. He took offense in the comments, words were said, etc. I think this is a pretty good way to come back with something of quality though.

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

But 2 of his best picks he traded up for: Shawn Andrews and Jeremy Maclin

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

thats why people are critical of trading down cause it doesn’t have the same kind of results

Let's get it Birds.

by homestar2281 on Dec 30, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope you can see why the fact that two trade-ups netted good picks does not, without more, support your point that trading down “doesn’t have the same kind of results” as trading up.

What else do you have?

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

My point is that when the Eagles see a player they like they go after him aggressively. They’re 2 for 2 on those. If they look at the players in the 1st round and don’t see one they like in their scheme why not trade down and get more depth without handing out 1st round money.

Im not sure on this, but i think only 1st rounders get guaranteed money. So if you don’t like what’s out there then trading out makes a ton of sense

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Jerome McDougle

Was a trade up too.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 31, 2011 1:43 AM EST up reply actions  

2 for 3 then lol, cant deny we shat the bed on that one

by dstern77 on Dec 31, 2011 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Brandon Graham...

is not exactly a homerun either. But I’ll be man enough to admit he was the player I most coveted in 2010.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 31, 2011 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Damn we did trade up for him, i forgot that…Well hit or miss the original argument was that the Eagles trade down too much when they actually do a lot of trading in both directions. Even if they aren’t as successful doing it as I claimed.

BTW congrats Earl Thomas pro-bowl starter lol

by dstern77 on Dec 31, 2011 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Is it considered better in this analysis to re-sign your own drafted free agents, or to sign players drafted by other teams in free agency?

Oh boy, is this great!

by MayIhave10,000marblesplease? on Dec 30, 2011 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

So a little above average statistically without taking situational needs into account. Sounds about right.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Dec 30, 2011 3:08 PM EST reply actions  

But like how was the spelling?

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

DEFINETLY better.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Dec 30, 2011 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

My issues with Reid's drafting.

- Throws away 3rds like they’re useless.
- Likes to trade down for additional picks. (I’m more of a quality over quantity guy)
- Is never right when he reaches for guys. (B. Smith, Teo, M McCoy, Gocong, etc, etc, etc)

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 30, 2011 3:18 PM EST reply actions  

I generally think AR does a good job with the drafts, but I agree with your last point. I’m trying to think of one of his I’m-more-clever-than-everyone-else picks that has actually worked out. I’m all for taking the occasional shot at a diamond in the rough or a small-school guy, but it seems like we go for those guys with higher picks than are necessary (like the guys you list).

by Clyde Simmons 96 on Dec 30, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Does the ToddFather apply?

Todd Herremans, 2005, Round 4, Pick 126, Saginaw Valley State.

The views expressed by this comment belong to they who wrote them, heretofore referred to as "comment maker."
The views do not reflect the official views of the comment makers employer.
The views do not reflect the official views of the organization through which the Internet was accessed by the comment maker.

by ChaosOnion on Jan 2, 2012 11:04 AM EST up reply actions  

3rd round picks

Believe it or not, the Eagles are the 5th most successful team with 3rd round picks. Their high ranking is mostly due to Westbrook and Burgess, but even Bradley and Gocong have been above average for the third round.

by AnotherAndyR on Dec 30, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll give you Westbrook...

but that was a long ass time ago. The Eagles essentially got nothing out of Burgess or Bradley. Gocong is no different than Fokou which is basically just a warm body who only played because the Eagles were bereft of talent at his position.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 31, 2011 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Well he hit right with Westbrook at least.

I’m not sure if that really counts as a reach, but it was considered a bit of a reach at the time (I think Westy was pegged for the 4th round by lots of scouts).

Clear eyes, full bologna sandwiches!

by NOLACuse on Dec 30, 2011 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely was a reach

A tiny 4th round RB from tiny little Villanova that not too many years before had NO FOOTBALL program at all. It was in my mind perhaps the greatest positive draft surprise ever. DeSean was a steal – but not nearly as big a risk coming from Cal.

But that may be part of the problem – AR wins the lottery in the first dozen tickets he buys, and he seems to keep believing that it is going to happen again, instead of working the numbers “moneyball” style like Belechick

by PrincetonGreen on Jan 6, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

But like how was the spelling?

by dstern77 on Dec 30, 2011 5:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks, EB!

French fries are really Belgian, sausages and bagels have the same amount of protein, two countries' names mean "turkey", and Santa Claus was invented by the Coca-Cola company. Is life weird or what?

Debe ser verde y volante - Πράσινο και να πετάει - It's gotta be green and it's gotta fly!

by Rabbit T on Dec 30, 2011 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

tried to rec but it came up as a flag

French fries are really Belgian, sausages and bagels have the same amount of protein, two countries' names mean "turkey", and Santa Claus was invented by the Coca-Cola company. Is life weird or what?

Debe ser verde y volante - Πράσινο και να πετάει - It's gotta be green and it's gotta fly!

by Rabbit T on Dec 30, 2011 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s red’d, it just doesn’t look like it when you do it. Flagging brings up a whole window.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Dec 30, 2011 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

this website has the draft picks for every team from every year.

Its all about the []_[]
#FirePaulHolmgren

by philiafan14364 on Dec 31, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

it took AR ten years to draft a decent WR.

by fitzy first on Jan 4, 2012 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

EB

What about Laws he was the eagles first pick in 08.

by Mr.electric10 on Dec 30, 2011 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Detective Electric strikes again.

AR should have to wear a Flava Flav necklace until he learns how to manage a clock.
I am the proud target of temper tantrums.

by KByars on Dec 30, 2011 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Reid always hits big on a mid rounder

and drafts very well on the offensive side of the ball. Overall I’d say he’s good, not great.

Formerly number5
RIP JJ
"But for you to open your big fucking mouth and call Shady "overrated" makes me want to take my big cock and shut you up." - Brotherman initiates EB’s prison stay/Brotherman on getting his dick wet.

by HawaiianGreen on Dec 31, 2011 12:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Basically my conclusion. He hasn’t been amazing but people act like he’s a huge fuck up in the draft, when it just doesn’t bear out

by dstern77 on Dec 31, 2011 2:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Scary when you look at that list...

there were whole drafts that we got essentially nothing out of our picks.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 31, 2011 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

That's ultimately why I disagree with the premise of this post.

If you check this list, you will see that the drafts like ‘99 and ’02 (indisputably good drafts that brought in many good to very good players) are the exception, not the rule. Hell, Reid wastes many ENTIRE drafts bringing in nothing. As Jason said above, just because you draft someone and then force him into a starting role, doesn’t mean he’s good. I really don’t think you can count a guy like Casey Matthews as a quality contributor. Just because someone “makes the team” (hardly a difficult task to do given Reid’s famously low expectations for performance and talent), doesn’t make him a “contributor.”

God Damn you, Andy Reid.

The fat queen has failed us again. Reid must go.

by EvilBanner on Dec 31, 2011 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

You could also ask why Reid spends so much time coveting 7th round picks...

…after looking at this list. “Oh, but EvilBanner, Kurt Coleman is our starting safety and was picked in the seventh round.”

My reply: “Shut up bitch. Your fat hero could have drafted Polamalu instead of Jerome McDougle. Polamalu is better than Coleman, or PIBTC.”

God Damn you, Andy Reid.

The fat queen has failed us again. Reid must go.

by EvilBanner on Dec 31, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Players like Fokou, Cheney, Matthews, Rolle, Gocong, M Harris, Q Demps or even Nate Allen are/were starters for this team but anyone who sees them as quality or even average at this point is deluded.

I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.

by no1pipelayer on Dec 31, 2011 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Without seeing how seeing how dstern ranked the individual players, I don’t think you’re at liberty to say that.

He said he went conservatively on many of the player grades, but like I said, we don’t have any idea who was ranked where. It could be the case that he ranked someone like Matthews as a backup, not a starter.

Its all about the []_[]
#FirePaulHolmgren

by philiafan14364 on Dec 31, 2011 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d say 2001 and 2003 were the only drafts we really got nothing. 2004 we end up with nothing but only cause Shawn Andrews had a breakdown when he was 25

by dstern77 on Dec 31, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Great post

I think the thing that gets lost when evaluating drafts is context. Saying the Eagles are bad at drafting is useless unless you look at how other teams are doing in comparison. Look at the Patriots draft in 06. Ouch

Yes, we’ve had our DTO’s and Jarrett’s, but so has every other team. I also don’t think its fair to fault a team for drafting guys that eventually got injured, like Abiamiri, McDougle, Graham and Allen. You have no idea the kind of player Graham would have been if he hadn’t shredded his knee.

Its all about the []_[]
#FirePaulHolmgren

by philiafan14364 on Dec 31, 2011 11:23 AM EST reply actions  

wow, this is like a trailer for pt. 2 that I just wrote

by dstern77 on Dec 31, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I am a Cowboys fan, but always thought the Eagles were very good at drafting and picking up free agents.

Reed and Roseman make a great tandem in the front office.

In the scouting department you have some great folks with Griggson and Riddick and the rest of the scouting department.

Add in Alec Halaby as the analyst. You guys are pretty solid.

You have to play this game like somebody just hit your mother with a two-by-four. Dan Birdwell. Oakland Raiders

How do you want to be rememberd. Go out there and play every play like it is your last play. Be remembered as the person you want to be for the rest of your life. Spike Dykes, Midland Lee and Texas Tech Coach.

by Birddog26 on Dec 31, 2011 3:50 PM EST reply actions  

only howie and lurie are cheap SOBs who throw tons of money at the “flavor or the year” FA

by fitzy first on Jan 4, 2012 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I just cannot completely buy this.

I look at how the Eagles have evolved since the SB year and what I see is an offense that is just as good if not better. I also see a defense that has dropped off significantly. If you look at Reid’s record before and after the SB I think that you can attribute the lower winning percentage to the defense not being as good, IMO. Why is that?

I have no problem with our draft record on the offensive side of the ball. Defense is another story. Look at the defense now. I can think of only one defensive player that we drafted that I would consider a top level player, Trent Cole. Yeah there are players that we have drafted that are OK, guys like Patterson, maybe Bunkley, but I am sorry, I don’t expect a home run every year but when’s the last home run we have had on defense?

I know that JJ passing away hurt us and consequently the coaching has dropped off. But you still need players. We have had to bring in too many FA’s on defense and it takes more time for them to integrate themselves in with the team.

My worry is that the whole Castillo debacle smoke screens the fact that we have holes in our defense. Just getting rid of Castillo won’t infuse more talent into the defense.

I really don’t see how anyone can look at our defensive draft picks since the SB year and say, “We did a good job there,”. What am I missing?

Go Eagles!

by MRPH on Dec 31, 2011 5:29 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Our defensive drafting hasn’t been good. Andy Reid clearly is much better at recognizing/developing talent on the offensive side of the bowl.

You could argue that bringing in a respected guy like Spags will help our drafting because you’d assume he has an eye for talent and that he’d have Andy’s ear with his reputation.

If we get Spags I’m entirely optimistic our defense we’ll be a top 10 unit next year because I think Nate Allen, DRC, and Nnamdi will all play better. Top 5 if we draft a MLB who pans out like Kuechly

by dstern77 on Jan 1, 2012 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I think alot of the problem is Reid completely ignoring needs during the draft. There is always that WTF pick. He has a track record of completely bombing the 3rd round also.

by Easedel on Jan 2, 2012 3:24 AM EST reply actions  

Excellent article – only issue I have is it seems to grade all players in a round the same, would be interesting to see that broken down further especially for the first 2 or 3 rounds, perhaps in blocks of 10.

by eagle_alan64 on Jan 2, 2012 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

Yea man perhaps I should’ve done that, but i tried to keep it concise. I know I’m way less likely to start reading something if it looks overwhelmingly long

by dstern77 on Jan 2, 2012 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

To me this article proves that Andy is a slightly above drafter. I don’t think I’m content with a slightly above average drafter. I want a significantly above average drafter for my football team.

by BrandonB on Jan 2, 2012 6:57 PM EST via iPhone app reply actions  

You and the rest of the league

by BarbarosaNo on Jan 3, 2012 11:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Eagle_small
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #52: For who? For what?
Oldschool_small
A Different Kind of Eagles Redraft
Baldeagle_small
Do the Eagles draft poorly for defense? (UPDATED 5/25)
Dogbert_small
Building the 53-Man Roster: Part 13(!) of 53
Hill_small
Mock Bleacher Report Article

Recent FanPosts

Small
I know I know but what about this guy
Mickey-mouse-trap-graphicshunt
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #51.5: ASCII art is awesome.
Small
2012: The Season of No Excuses
Small
LeSean McCoy, Arian Foster, Matt Forte, Ray Rice or another running back: Who is the best?
Small
All-time mock draft on MtD
Small
Bell is out.. Now what???

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bgnqr_small JasonB

Editors

Img_1084_small Bob_Q

Westy2_small Route36

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Briandawkins1_small Ben_Larivee

Fb_small Patrick Wall