Eagles Players Speak Out on the Potential 18-Game Season
The talk of the NFL lately has been the league's owners' overwhelming support of increasing the current 16-game season to an 18-game one. Commissioner Roger Goodell has publicly praised the idea, saying:
"We want to do it the right way for everyone, including the players, the fans and the game in general. There's a tremendous amount of momentum for it. We think it's the right step."
While no vote has been officially cast yet, all signs point to 18 regular season games and only two preseason games for the 2012 NFL season. However, players around the league - from Carson Palmer to Barry Cofield - don't seem too happy about the idea, and many have spoken out. The chief concern among them appeared to be that, with a lengthened schedule, the risks of injury are greatly increased, while not much quality entertainment is added to the overall season. Two Eagles added their opinions to the mix via their Twitter feeds today:
18 regular season games?... No thanks
How does the league say they CARE about players health and then add MORE games to the schedule?? More games means more injuries. Right??
Just saying... seems that players are being TOLD, not ASKED and I think $$$ should never go before health
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the perfect answer to this solution is to have 3 pre-season games and 17 regualr season games
One in England
"Thirty-nine seconds left...Manning lobs it, Burress alone, touchdown New York."
by tito (eight and oh) on Aug 26, 2010 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions
i can't tell if your being sarcastic or not...
so i’ll offer a dual response…
if you were being sarcastic, my response is: “hahah lol rofl lololol!!!1”
if you were not being sarcastic, my response is: “so you’ll send every team accross the ocean to play 16 nfl games in a country whose main interests are soccer, poor dental hygene, dry humor, and fog. if nfl europe failed, why would this work?”
by awd777 on Aug 27, 2010 8:25 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Scarcasm + Internet =
Confusion.
"Thirty-nine seconds left...Manning lobs it, Burress alone, touchdown New York."
by tito (eight and oh) on Aug 27, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
And scarcasm is of course...
Sarcasm after a bar brawl.
"Thirty-nine seconds left...Manning lobs it, Burress alone, touchdown New York."
by tito (eight and oh) on Aug 27, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
It the nfl does this I will lose a ton of respect for them
and I will be calling for Goodel’s head.
I haven’t hated a rule change this much since the NHL introduced the “crease rule”
^Nights Of Cabiria
by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Aug 26, 2010 6:12 PM EDT reply actions
The CFL is 18 Games
While I understand that more games is an added risk of injury for the players, the CFL already has the 18 game season in place and the league has benefited from it. More games means more revenue, more competitive football for the fans and players, and it gives teams on the bubble for a playoff spot more of a chance to get in.
That’s just my take on it.
Representing CANADA
True
But there’s a reason few players from the CFL ever make it on an NFL team. Just look at their 2009 Rookie of the Year, Martell Mallett, struggling to make our roster. We simply play at a higher level than they do. The hits are harder, the speed is faster, and the practices are more grueling. It takes one hell of a toll on a player’s body.
There would be more revenue, sure, but I think the main issue here is the health of the players.
good arguement against it
CFL is awful football (I’m Canadian)
^Nights Of Cabiria
by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Aug 26, 2010 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions
$$$ before health
I think $$$ should never go before health
Ironic coming from a guy who decided to take a career earning big $$$ to play a game that is undeniably detrimental to his health.
The players are right to be angry. They are face additional risk so that the owners can make more money. Too bad for the players though, because the fans benefit by getting two additional meaningful games so the overwhelming majority will side with the owners.
No thanks
I think the way they have things set up now is fine. Even though regular season games are definitely more exciting and fun to watch, I think its interesting watching our backups and younger players to see how they develop and improve from game to game in the preseason.
"Dude what the hell do you mean save my face? My face is fine." - CNCITINFO
Big Todd
Todd is upset because a longer season would take away from his True Blood watching time.
the only way i would begin to think about supporting this
is if the roster size is increased to lets say 65 players or so
Where one era ends, another begins
yeah dilute the league's talent pool
this is fucking brutal, I hate this idea SO MUCH
^Nights Of Cabiria
by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Aug 26, 2010 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions
18 game schedule i mean
not what u said, I agree they would have to expand rosters
^Nights Of Cabiria
by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Aug 26, 2010 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions
That would be one big plus
I think that where people are missing the argument here is that all of the star players don’t want this to happen. There are a lot of people who would make teams and likely have a more significant role. Stars in the league are picked all the time in the later rounds. That, I am sure, would continue to happen even further down the draft board (what would now be undrafted free agents). Yes, the star players would likely be more at risk, and they are voicing thier opinions. But the bubble players would benefit and teams could take on more projects. I don’t see it as a dilution of talent. I see it as an opportunity to change strategies when making roster cuts.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
I don't want an 18 game schedule
But it has nothing to do with the players’ health; they piss me off as much as the owners. I just don’t want the season to go on any longer than it does. It takes forever as is.
it would take the same amount of time…They’re not adding anything, they’re replacing week 3 and 4 of the preseason with regular season games.
by fhqwagads on Aug 26, 2010 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
not if I can help it!
:( I can’t :(
^Nights Of Cabiria
by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Aug 26, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Would you be OK picking the Eagles final 53 right now?
If so, go ahead and enjoy 17 and 18. Personally, I’m not comfortable with everything I’ve been seeing…and there are a couple of guys I like to get more of a look at.
Off season would be modified
And it’s not easy making final cuts even with the other 2 games. If they don’t know what they are getting from the players by this point, it’s probably not a good sign.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
Jimmy Johnson always used to say 2 games were enough. I guess it is. For me, I can’t imagine watching some guys only playing maybe a quarter and a half and knowing whether they had the goods or not.
by DLawrence55 on Aug 26, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions
fhqwagads
that’s what I don’t get, nobody really seems to understand this …
it would take the same amount of time…They’re not adding anything, they’re replacing week 3 and 4 of the preseason with regular season games.
The key players are playing about a half or two halves more than they currently play, meanwhile replacing shit games that no one cares about but pay full price for with games that everyone cares about.
Seems like a no-brainer to me.
I don’t need two extra games, but I certainly prefer games already being played to matter than to not matter.
Secretary of State for BGN aka "Most diplomatic man on this site," as appointed by Talon Talent
Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome
I just don’t get the point. 6 interdivision games, 4 against another conference division. 4 against same conference division.
Adding any other games prolongs the season for no other reason than money but would make the schedule unbalanced. I like keeping it at 16 and would cut down the preseason by at least one game.
I know the owners want more money but this just seems like greed at the expense of the health of players. In fact what is the point for some franchises when they can’t sell enough tickets to not get their games blacked out?
That's an excellent point.
They need to reduce the number of teams in the NFL first and ensure each market can support a team.
"Up yours, asshole!"--EvilBanner to effeminate yachtsman Boston Jeff Lurie
They would have to figure out a way to balance it fairly
The current system seems the most fair (though you forgot the 2 against same division same within division rank from the previous year). You could go with #1 ranked in division A also plays #2 ranked in division B and C while the #2 in division A plays the #1 in divisions B and C. Then do the same system for the number 3 and 4 ranks. I essence it would match the schedules of the top 2 teams and the bottom 2 teams in eache division, rather than rank them in the 1-4 style that they do now.
In this example, the Eagles would play the Cardinals and the Saints, while the cowchips would play the 49ers and the Falcons. The viginas would play the Rams and Bucs, the skirts would play the Panthers and Seahawks. Just a thought, but that seems like it would bring much more parody into the league, doesn’t it?
For all the times that announcers talk about parody, it really seems like teams every year stay strong or pick early. It might change in about decade long shifts, but for the most part the predictions look so similar from year to year.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
Go for it
If people can’t cope with injuries they shouldn’t be playing this game, as a high school football player we won’t go out…ever. And yes our competition isn’t anywhere near as fierce but we look up to pro football players in the end, the APs, Chris Johnsons, and MJDs always come through and overcome injuries, I know a certain 36 year old free safety who wouldn’t let injuries derail him and asante, your response should be “Eighteen games, do you want to end Dick Lane’s single season feat, cus Imma go get it” not “are u trying to give me boo boos” DeSean is 175 lbs but u don’t see him bitching about injuries
I don't like it
Mainly because I think it stunts the growth of the draft picks and UDFA and even players who are traded or signed by a new team. In 2 games not only are they not up to speed, but I don’t believe they are fully acclimated with the team and moving at full speed with the team. DeMeco Ryans earned his starting job because of strong play in the preseason, DeSean Jackson (with the addition of injuries) earned a trip up the depth chart thanks to the preseason, Kerry Rhodes made his calling in the preseason, look at Sam Bradford from the last 2 games to how he is playing now (not that I care about Bradford), etc. But its all about the owners wanting more money. Its politics.
But those players would be on the team
They would obiously have to increase roster sizes, so the players would actually have more time to get acclimated, maybe even a full season.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
Rookies
I was just reading the comments on ESPN’s website from an article and it made me think….. How hard is it for rookies comming out of college that are used to playing 10 or 11 games then having to make the jump to playing 16 games let alone 18?
I haven't played for well over a decade
Give me one of those contracts and I’ll bust my ass from OTAs right through game 18. No pity here.
It turns out I overestimated my apathy, but not enough to matter.
I don’t like purely because of the records. How do we judge properly if Marino’s record is broken. Or sack, yardage, and touchdown records. They will all be reset.
Theres also the yearly milestones. A qb throwing 4000 yards is a very good year, but with 2 more games half the league will do it. And a 2000 yard rb will probably happen every year.
this is my main issue too… athletes are breaking career and season records that stood for years, but espn glorifies these records as if they’re monumental and legendary… but the fact of the matter is that these athletes are given more time in the year to do it. baseball is very guilty of this, but if the nfl goes to 18 games, it will only be a few years before aaron rogers or drew brees breaks the season td or yards record and all the major media outlets will praise these records as if they’re something special.
by awd777 on Aug 27, 2010 8:37 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Well they already went from 14 to 16 ...
… and wiped the record books clean. If purity of the record book is your main concern, we are 32 years past screwed on that one.
Secretary of State for BGN aka "Most diplomatic man on this site," as appointed by Talon Talent
Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome
They didn't literally wipe the record books clean
but I’d be willing to bet most of the current total yardage/td/whatever records are from 16-game seasons.
Secretary of State for BGN aka "Most diplomatic man on this site," as appointed by Talon Talent
Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome
I don't think its a wonderful idea
I do know that people will keep watching NFL football games on TV, and people will continue to attend live games if this proposal passes, no doubt in my mind. If the owners want it to happen, it will happen. It is most definitely greed though in every sense of the word. The rosters will have to expand, the draft will probably become an even longer process than it already is. Will this help with a new CBA for 2011 in any way, because I have heard a couple “TV analyst’s” say it will help get a new deal into place, just don’t see how it would, especially by pissing off the players.
Brennan Huff: I have a belly full of white dog crap in me, and now you lay this shit on me?
I don't see it as greed
Greed is what they’re doing now, charging full price for half-ass games. Since we as fans are foolish enough to support that model, we’re now committed to giving them that money, and they’re not going to give it back.
To me, the next best thing is taking two half-ass games and turning them into full games.
Secretary of State for BGN aka "Most diplomatic man on this site," as appointed by Talon Talent
Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome
I don't like it
However, If they push back opening day a week or two and, add another bye week then it might work out, think about it football could span the entire Baseball offseason and visa versa. Football is where my sports heart is however the streach from febuary to April is brutal with nothing to look foward to asside from the draft and even then it never works out the way you want it.
Hey Dez, it's 2am do you know where your mother is?
by sowhatifitisasportste on Aug 27, 2010 9:42 AM EDT reply actions
longer schedule...
equals shorter careers… that’s the question… do we want more games a season or the players to last longer??? i think 16 games is enough…
by Elmo the faithful fan on Aug 27, 2010 1:50 PM EDT reply actions




















