Five Questions With The Washington Redskins
This week I swapped five questions with Rich Tandler of CSN Washington about all things Eagles vs Redskins. Gotta admit, it's nice getting to talk some football in this dead part of the NFL schedule. His answers to my questions are below while my answers to his are over at CSN Washington.
1. Obviously the first question has to be about Donovan McNabb. How have you viewed him in his career as an Eagle and what are your expectations of him as a Redskin?
Rich Tandler - I have always had a very healthy respect for McNabb. Except for maybe a year or two surrounding the Eagles' Super Bowl appearance I've never viewed him as an elite QB but everyone knew this-whenever he was in the lineup, the Eagles had a chance to win, despite mediocre wide receivers and a rarely-used running game.
My expectations of McNabb are moderate. The Redskins have not had consistent, week in, week out NFL-caliber quarterback play for a long time. McNabb should bring that to them (with the occasional stinker of a game thrown in there, as you and other Eagles fans have warned me). I think that an overlooked factor is that he is going from an offense run by Andy Reid, who likes to throw the ball much more often than he likes to run to Mike Shanahan, who likes to keep it on the ground. McNabb should be more efficient and productive since he won't have the carry the load.
2. One of the big stories of McNabb's Eagles career was that he rarely had great wide receivers to help him out. Ironically, as soon as it appears that the Eagles are stocked with good young WRs he gets shipped out to a team that's suspect at that position. What are your feelings on the Skins' WR corps?
It's apparent that Shanahan is concerned about the receivers. They will bring 12 to training camp in hopes of finding five or six who can produce. The key will be how much they can get out of third-year receivers Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly. The two 2008 second-round picks both had lost rookie years and both showed flashes of ability but were very inconsistent last year. They need to step up. Santana Moss is who he is, a playmaker when he's on his game, invisible when he's not. The presence of Bobby Wake, Joey Galloway, and Mike Furrey can be taken as evidence that Shanny is grasping at straws to try to find a group that he can win with. Certainly, there is hope that McNabb can do what he did in Philly and get production out of less-than-stellar receivers.
3. The Redskins offense has lived and died by the running game and with the arrival of Shanahan their run first philosophy likely won't be changing. The question is whether the 2005 All Pro team of running backs they've assembled can carry that load, what do you think?
Between the two of them-I don't think that Willie Parker will make the team-Clinton Portis and Larry Johnson can get it done. They may get an occasional helping hand from Ryan Torain, a third-year back that Shanahan had in Denver. But Portis has been a full participant in the offseason program and he has a burning desire to prove wrong those who think he's washed up. Johnson has been one of the stars of the helmet and shorts phase of the offseason, showing good burst and great hustle. Of course, it all comes down to the offensive line and if that unit, with three new starters, can stay healthy and become adept at executing Shanahan's zone blocking scheme, the running game should be pretty good.
4. Commenters on the NFC East blogs here on SBNation had a little mini war earlier in the offseason about all the talented TEs in this division. It mostly centered on how they were ranked. What's your take?
I like the Chris Cooley and Fred Davis combination just fine, thank you. If you're talking individual tight ends, I'll take Cooley as the second best in the division behind Jason Witten. You can't argue with over 3,000 yards receiving in the last three seasons combined and it seems like every one of his catches has fans of the other team wondering why they can't cover the guy. Brent Celek does have a chance to pass Cooley in my book if Davis takes away a substantial number of his chances. I'm not a big fan of Kevin Boss although he is the only one in the group with a ring and he made some big plays to help the Giants win it all.
5. The Redskins have been somewhat infamous for conducting campaigns to get their players voted into the pro bowl often whether they deserve it(London Fletcher) or not(Jason Taylor). However, if they got Donovan McNabb voted into the pro bowl this year it's going to cost them a 3rd round pick to the Eagles. Do you think that would give them any pause?
That question would have been hard to answer before last weekend but after the Jammal Brown trade, it's easy to root for McNabb to make the Pro Bowl. The Redskins' third- and fourth-round picks are gone regardless. If McNabb doesn't make the Pro Bowl, the third goes to the Saints and the Redskins get back a fifth. If he goes to Honolulu, the Eagles get the third, the Saints get the fourth and send the Redskins a sixth or seventh. So, the net difference to the Redskins is between a fifth and a sixth or seventh. No brainer there, send McNabb to the Pro Bowl.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He makes an interesting point about the Jammal Brown trade, and how they won’t have their 3rd/4th round picks regardless. Perhaps a Philly/DC alliance to get 5 to the Pro Bowl?
As for Cooley vs Celek… I just don’t see the debate there. Celek skated right on past Cooley last year, and didn’t even bother to take off his headphones to say hi.
Funny, too, that you have a Redskins entry today, JB. I’m currently working on a Redskin piece myself that details their offseason strategy over the past decade. Looks like it’s Redskin Week at BGN.
Formerly Bye, Dawk :(
by JimmyK on Jun 23, 2010 6:41 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Uh oh… Pretty good chance he’s going to fire me after he reads what I’ve written about him.
Formerly Bye, Dawk :(
by JimmyK on Jun 23, 2010 7:14 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I still have to give it to Cooley. Celek had a great year, there’s no doubt, but before I’m willing say Celek is better, I’d like to see him do it again. If he racks up ridiculous numbers, I’m with you.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Jun 23, 2010 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Cooley's numbers...
2009 – 29 catches, 332 yards, 2 TD (7 games)
2008 – 83 catches, 849 yards, 1 TD
2007 – 66 catches, 786 yards, 8 TD
2006 – 57 catches, 734 yards, 6 TD
2005 – 71 catches, 774 yards, 7 TD
2004 – 37 catches, 314 yards, 6 TD
Not bad numbers… but not great, either. Cooley’s a nice TE, has a hot wife, is good for a funny quote here and there, and I can totally understand why Redskins fans love the guy. And he’s a nice, solid player with good (not great) production.
However, Celek’s first year as a starter was far better than any season in Cooley’s entire career…
76 catches, 971 yards, 8 TD
And he passes the eye test, and by that I mean… I don’t think his great season was flukey, and I just don’t really expect much of a dropoff, if any.
Formerly Bye, Dawk :(
I don't think Celek is flukey either.
He has progressively been better each game. If you remember, he looked half decent as a rookie. During his second year, she shown flashedd, then on the playoffs he really got envolved. He totally blew up last year. We never shown any signs of slowing up. Actually, I think he catches 90 balls, with 10 TD next year baring any injuries. Kolb really likes to feed him the rock.
In Kolb we trust
Guess I'm just a pessimist.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Jun 23, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Its OK to be cautious,
We’ve seen too many guys turn out to be flops in our lives. I think Brent is ligit.
In Kolb we trust
by yophillybro on Jun 23, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
butt buddies
aren’t kolb & celek like, best friends or somethin? in that light, i fully expect celek to have INCREASED numbers this year… the TE wasn’t exactly super5’s favorite redzone target, and in the WC offense, it should’ve been… i think ol corn on the will exploit that facet of the offense better than donny…
by PHIGHTINPHILS on Jun 23, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I will be coting McNabb into the Pro bowl :)
That Redskins fan actually seems pretty inteligent and his expectations for McNabb are actually plausible. The only thing I disagree with is that he’ll get consistent play out of him. Even when we were winning games last year McNabb would throw like Montana the first two qtrs and then throw really bad the second half (think 49ers, Denver, and a few other games I don’t have off the top of my head)…
McNabb always had a good defense and that’s something the Redskins have so who knows maybe they cann have a decent season with him. In 08 when we went to the CG a LOT of us forget our D was only allowing 15 pts a game even though McNabb n the offense got a lot of credit the D is what made that team.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
It's gunna depend on the redskins line
McNabb only does well when the line gives him time. Like last season, everything went to shit after jamaal went down…he doesnt play well, or consistent, when under pressure
by FlyEagles15 on Jun 23, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I think if washington doesn't vote McNabb to probowl
Philadelphia would, just to get a better pick. I know If Kolb has an average year, I am voting McNabb. I know WIP would be all over that come pro bowl time.
In Kolb we trust
I know WIP would be all over that come pro bowl time
BGN definitely will. I’m not so sure about WIP – Getting Shane Victorino to the All Star game over Pablo Sandoval is one thing… But getting a 3rd round pick instead of a 4 seems like something they won’t bother with. If it were a 1 instead of a 2, then they’d probably be on board, but I don’t think they’re hardcore enough to put time and effort into a 3 over a 4.
Formerly Bye, Dawk :(
It would create cognative dissonance
McNabb in the Pro Bowl gives them license to annihilate Reid and Banner, especially if Kolb plays like a first-year starter and/or the Eagles miss the playoffs. On the other hand, they’d have to heap praise on McNabb and I’m pretty sure a few of the people at that station would sooner sell their children into white slavery.
by Tracer Bullet on Jun 23, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions
How much does the fans vote count?
I think players, coaches, and media have majority of the votes any way. So we are screwed.
In Kolb we trust
i thought it was 1/3rd meda, coaches, and fans… if that’s the case, we can still have some pull
by PHIGHTINPHILS on Jun 23, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
I find it kind of interesting
That Tandler thinks McNabb is better off with a run dominate team. History has shown that he’s a slow starter and tends to throw a lot of dirt balls, and bad balls in general. Will less attempts help that?
Having a run dominate team (which I find a bit of a stretch since the average Wash. running back is 72 years old…with high mileage) will give you fewer 3rd and longs, but you’ll still have to convert 3rd and longs.
It's "Kolb"ering time!
He’s the first guy this off-season that has said Cooley is better than Celek from what I have seen and JimmyK already mentioned that Celek’s lone season was better then any of Cooley’s seasons and I don’t expect that to change with Kolb at QB
McNabb always had a good defense and that’s something the Redskins have so who knows maybe they cann have a decent season with him.
Redskins had a good 4-3 defense, we don’t know how good they are going to be with the 3-4 defense
expect Celeks number to grow.
Kevin is a new QB, and will rely a little on the TEs for help in a pinch. Also, last year Kevin has shown the willingness to feed to rock to Celek. They are best buds, and are always on the same page. Unless there is an injury, Celek has a better year.
In Kolb we trust
by yophillybro on Jun 23, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I’ve telling fantasy players to take Celek. With Kolb, I think he’ll have a monster year. It was obvious how often Kolb looked to him in those two games last year.
Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook
sorry for not reading this far down before posting essentially the exact same sentiment a few posts above… at least i’m not alone in the thought process tho
by PHIGHTINPHILS on Jun 23, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I'll reiterate my philosophy on post-season honors
I always want the other team’s guys going to the Pro Bowl, not ours. Going to the Pro Bowl does nothing to help the Eagles win, and it probably drives up their salary and makes it harder to keep the team together.
I agree.
I don’t want to see any Eagles play in the pro bowl this year. I hope we get a few nominated, but since will will still be playing into February, they will have to use the alternates.
In Kolb we trust
by yophillybro on Jun 23, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
McNabb Consistent?
I have a ton of respect for Rich but… I find it laughable that he thinks that McNabb gives them a “consistent, week in, week out NFL-caliber quarterback.” Wasn’t his lack of consistency his biggest rap in Philly. Don’t get me wrong, I love Donovan but, come-on, consistency isn’t his thing.
by Wilbert Montgomery on Jun 23, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions
here ya go
McNabb should bring that to them (with the occasional stinker of a game thrown in there, as you and other Eagles fans have warned me)
Let's get it Birds.
by homestar2281 on Jun 23, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions

by 



















