Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods, Tony Romo Grouped Together At Pebble Beach

Where McNabb Will Go: The Breakdown

Re-Post here from my new blog www.mcnabborkolb.tumblr.com — come get all your latest news and analysis on the Eagles Offseason QB Clusterf%$k™.

Donovan-mcnabb-wants-to-retire-an-eagle-secretly-wants-to-leave_medium

The speculation about where various Eagles QBs could end up never ends. Of course, that's what we're doing here. But ultimately some of the rumors make a lot more sense than others. There are certain scenarios where a player like Donovan McNabb is a great fit. There are places where Michael Vick fits. Mostly, however, those two groups of teams are completely separate. A team calling about McNabb isn't looking for Vick, and vice versa -- because they offer completely different things.

I will do another post on the situation for Vick in the next couple days, but there's been some buzzing on the McNabb front, so we'll start there -- with what kind of team will be inquiring about Donovan, and then what specific teams fit that mold.

A team interested in #5 has to have these characteristics:

Star-divide

  1. A Contender: No rebuilding team will want a 33-year-old quarterback with one year left on his contract. They'd much rather draft a prospect and rebuild in the next 2-3 years. Acquiring Donovan is a move made for next year — sacrificing a relatively high draft pick for immediate performance.
  2. Have a Definite QB Need: If there's still a large chance that the quarterback position will be fine, the team might inquire, but won't really pursue McNabb.
  3. QB Must be the Last Piece of the Puzzle: A GM would have to be convinced that all the team is lacking for a playoff/Super Bowl run is a good QB calling the shots. No reason to go after McNabb if the rest of the team isn't there. Think Vikings' pursuit of Favre. Everything else was in place, and waiting for Tavaris to mature took too long.
  4. West Coast Offense: Unclear how much this is a factor. Adam Caplan and others have argued extensively that McNabb's familiarity with the WCO limits his desirability, because he'll have difficulty transitioning to any other system. I personally find it hard to believe, but certainly for any team that runs a WCO, this is a huge plus if they can get a guy like McNabb.
  5. Willing to Offer Extension: McNabb is looking for job security. He won't be happy to play for a one year rental somewhere. And the team that trades a high pick for McNabb probably won't want to risk losing him after a year either.
  6. Not a Definite Eagles Competitor: Andy Reid is quite simply going to ask a lot more from teams who the Eagles have to compete with. The game is all about relative gains, and trading McNabb a rival won't help the Eagles' chances. For example, McNabb's not going to Washington. And while he could go to another NFC team, it would be much more expensive.

Okay, so let's look at the teams McNabb's been linked to, and how they fit this mold:

  • Minnesota Vikings: Certainly the Vikings are major contenders for McNabb after their performance this year with Brett Favre. If Favre were to retire Brad Childress would have to give his buddy Andy a call. The biggest question is though, when will Childress know that? If he's content to sit back and wait for Favre's answer, it probably won't come until at least the start of training camp. That's not going to be conducive to a trade. Plus, I'm sure Andy would rather not trade him to a big NFC competitor. This would have to be at least a #1 pick, and Childress would have to decide he doesn't want to wait for Favre.
  • Arizona Cardinals: Similar situation to Minnesota, except they know that Warner is gone. That begs the question, is Lienart ready? Other than the West Coast Offense thing, McNabb looks like he'd fit right into the lineup with Fitz and Boldin. Again, there is the NFC contender issue to be sorted out.
  • San Francisco 49ers: The 49ers fit this mold very well. You're talking about a team with good skill players, good defense, but hasn't had a quarterback in about 7 or 8 years. Their pursuit of Kurt Warner last year shows you how close they think they are to contending. And with their flop with Alex Smith still haunting them, I doubt they want to try another spin of the prospect wheel. I think Andy would also find this more palatable than sending him to an already Super Bowl-contending team. They might even take something less than a #1 from San Fran.
  • Oakland Raiders: All of this must be premised with the fact that Al Davis is a nut and could do anything. But I think Vick is much more likely here. McNabb could not overnight turn Oakland into a contender. There are still too many holes in that team. And there's not a chance in hell Donovan will stick around to try to rebuild the black and silver. Also not sure Andy will feel comfortable shipping his QB off to someplace so crappy. That doesn't seem like something you'd wish on a guy you mentored and owe so much to.
  • St. Louis Rams: This team is not a contender. They need all the draft picks they can get.
  • Cleveland Browns: See above.
  • Chicago Bears: Stop people. They are wedded to Jay Cutler.
  • Carolina Panthers: Not sure this is such a clear-cut rebuilding project as Rams or Browns. While starting over might be a good idea, John Fox won't be the one doing it. To save his job and postpone that process he's going to need a better season — not wait for some rookie to mature. McNabb could provide that (better than Matt Moore), chucking it to Steve Smith aka DeSean Jackson Sr.
  • Buffalo Bills: Similar to Panthers. Might be better to blow stuff up. Not sure they will.

What all of this adds up to is that if I had to put money on McNabb's final destination, it would be the 49ers. Their willingness to already pursue a similar solution in Warner makes sense. Meanwhile, Minnesota will wait for Favre and Arizona will give Lienart a chance. That's just my analysis based on these criteria — and of course he might not get traded at all. Feel free to sound off about what you agree or disagree about.

And remember to come visit me at www.mcnabborkolb.tumblr.com for more!

Comment 76 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

The Shootaround

Feb 2009 from Barking Carnival - 8 comments

ESPN: All Favre All The Time

Oct 2009 from Barking Carnival - 13 comments

Comments

Display:

49ers - I don't think so

They’re not showing much interest. They seem to have decided that Alex Smith will be their QB for 2010, and only if he doesn’t pan out will they make a change.

by Rabbit T on Feb 1, 2010 10:29 AM EST reply actions  

While I agree

that the niners have seemed tied to Alex Smith, they have two first round draft picks, and if they are convinced they have everything in place, O-Line, RB, good Defense, they may take a shot at McNabb, after all this is the NFL where everyone plays their hand close to their chest and they never let on what they are attempting to do

by PierrEagles on Feb 1, 2010 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

More priority needs than QB for them

Offensive line, OLB, secondary (S more than CB), WR and RB depth, inconsistent defensive line.

by Rabbit T on Feb 1, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't agree, QB is their biggest need. They need a QB ASAP.

Frank Gore isn’t getting any younger, no time for them to groom another guy if they expect to count on Gore. McNabb makes sense to me. I doubt they will give up that second first round pick for McNabb, but a package. SF first round pick for McNabb and a 5th rounder or something like that.

However, I don’t think we keep that pick anyway, No way we are gonna keep 2 first round picks this year. I would invision the Eagles trading down to the second round and adding a slew of other picks. Maybe a ton of 2 and 3rd rounders.

This makes sense only because they get true value for McNabb, although they are not really in need (or maybe interested in adding another first rounder). But they do want full value for McNabb. They will be best suited in adding second and third rounder in return. You can address some needs with out breaking the bank.

In Kolb we trust

by yophillybro on Feb 1, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't see how

They could stick with Alex Smith … he’s flat-out terrible.

by MyronBales on Feb 1, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

he only looks good because you no longer have any expectations of him

by bsencore on Feb 1, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

What About Miami

Do you think they are happy with Chad Henne at the helm, they have an awesome running game and if they added a guy like McNabb it could put them over the edge.

I also wouldn’t count out the Browns, With Heckert and Holmgren calling the shots and with them in need of a quarterback I could definitely see them making a move.

by Tron79 on Feb 1, 2010 10:31 AM EST reply actions  

re: What About Miami

I don’t see that happening. Pennington was Miami’s bridge to Henne. Don’t see them backing off that now.

As for the Browns, with a new organizational focus (from Heckert and Holmgren) comes the need to set priorities for 3-5 years. They need to pursue a QB for the future, not now. If Kolb were available this would be prime territory, but I don’t see McNabb in the Dawg Pound.

by bsencore on Feb 1, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Panthers...

Interesting possibility there. Also worth noting with them, however, is that although Fox has never been shy about trading first round picks, they don’t have one this year.

by JimmyK on Feb 1, 2010 10:46 AM EST reply actions  

I wonder what the relative dearth of college quarterbacks over the next couple of years means for possible trade scenarios. Personally, the only college qb’s coming out next year that I’ve heard elicit much excited about Mallett and Locker. If someone knows others that people are looking forward to at the pro-level please let me know. But it just doesn’t seem like this qb class or next year’s qb class are going to be particularly strong. If teams judge there to be not a lot of nfl-quality talent coming out in the couple of years, more teams might be willing to take a shot at McNabb or Vick and be willing to offer more. After all, we keep hearing there are 32 starting jobs in the NFL, but there aren’t 32 starter-worthy qb’s.

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Feb 1, 2010 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

that's definitely

a major factor in Philly’s favor. St. Louis and Washington will get shots at good QBs (probably Clausen and Bradford) but no one else. If you’re Cleveland or Oakland or Buffalo or Carolina — anyone who needs a QB — you have to come calling the the Eagles at least once, just to check the price range.

by bsencore on Feb 1, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

i would think that Arizona would be McNabb's choice if he had one

But i really think Arizona has to atleast explore the Leinart option one more time

I'd rather be an Eagles fan till the day i die and go 0-16 every year than be a cockroach cowboys fan

by 700 Level on Feb 1, 2010 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

I think the way Leinart’s contract is structured, Arizona is in a good position to test out Leinart. For the 2010 season, he’s due like 2 million or less. For the 2011 season (if there is a 2011 season), he’s due north of 7 million. So I think Arizona gives him 1 year to prove he can do it and if not, they adios. In which case, we miss out on picks for a possible McNabb trade.

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Feb 1, 2010 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

you could

get into a 2011 franchise tag + trade scenario, but that would be U-G-L-Y

by bsencore on Feb 1, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

The non-contender teams are more likely to take Vick than McNabb

What about the possibility of Detroit or Tampa Bay? Each of them has a still somewhat shaky young quarterback and could benefit from some veteran leadership (and doesn’t seem to show much in the way of other options). In this case, though, they would probably be offering less than other teams that want to slot in a starter.
Also, I consider the Falcons a possibility, given all the Vick-mania that erupted during the game in Atlanta. Not that I think it would be smart of them, but front offices sometimes are stupid.

by Rabbit T on Feb 1, 2010 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

Detroit and Tampa aren't going to bite.

Detroit emptied their wallets for Stafford, to sit him would be absolutely insane.
Tampa just signed Freeman for an additional six years. If you watch him play, he looks like a young McNabb; so there’s no way they will take an old McNabb with the possibility of developing a young one.

Vick going to the Falcons would be hilarious.

Brent Celek > Chuck Norris

by Filth2Fury on Feb 1, 2010 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

My bad

I thought you were talking about McNabb for Tampa.

Brent Celek > Chuck Norris

by Filth2Fury on Feb 1, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Regardless, they seem committed to Freeman and I don’t see them taking Vick. Wrong qb, right idea. What about Jacksonville though? Assuming they don’t pick Tebow, they need someone there to put asses in the seats. Vick or McNabb could do that.

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Feb 1, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Vick to Jacksonville

will certainly be a big part of my Vick analysis. if they aren’t sure they can get tebow, or want to bridge the gap till he’s ready — vick could be the play

by bsencore on Feb 1, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Jacksonville would take Vick over McNabb. Vick is one of the most exciting QBs to watch, and I could see the fans buying into him.

Maybe the Jags should just move.

Brent Celek > Chuck Norris

by Filth2Fury on Feb 1, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

The Los Angeles Cougars!

Let the beasting begin.

by TransplantedFan on Feb 1, 2010 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Probably not to the Vikings

Farve will be allowed to make up his mind whenever he wants but definitely after the draft and free agent signing periods..
The Vikings are not allowed to sign free agents this year and need all of their draft picks to fill needs and retirements.
 McNabb wants a long term del and that is probably not going to be what they have in mind. Farve got a two year deal. No signing bonus. No draft picks. Just a short term QB. I doubt that McNabb would want that. With his injury history I don’t see anyone giving him a long term deal.

As to San Fran. If they want a QB and have two picks. Why not draft one this year?

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

Because any way you slice it...

McNabb > Tebow, McNabb > Bradford, McNabb > Clausen

Must I continue? If the team is built for success NOW, they aren’t going to settle for a good QB later.

(Still, I’d rather see 5 wearing green next year anyway)

About 10 minutes ago, I was pondering my own existence. Then I decided that it didn't matter.

by IronHank on Feb 1, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

who care's

as long as cap’n andy finally trades him.. I know a lot of pople on this site are of the opinion that trading the worminator is a foregone conclusion… assuming capn’ andy, lurie, et. al do really want to trade him, why would they care where he goes as long as they get the best possible return? so what if he were to play for a team on the eagles schedule or conference? he’s no threat to any good opponent… put another way whatever team he plays for will be a loser! the game is to find any team willing to give up a pick or two!!!

by Elmo the faithful fan on Feb 1, 2010 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

Hmm

Whatever team he plays for wil be a loser. OH I KNOW HE WAS QB OF THE LIONS LAST YEAR WASN’T HE!

Honestly you sound like a jackass and proof that natural selection does not always work

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 1, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Great reply

+1 Way too funny to all the talk about McNabb being a mediocre QB.

by Cowboy KILLER on Feb 1, 2010 5:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Let's not forget

Jason Campbell will probably also get moved

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 1, 2010 3:40 PM EST reply actions  

No

I was just mentioning that when you look at the demand for McNabb, there is a slightly younger guy with similar skills and some success who will also probably be availale for much less.

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 1, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Who Campbell?

What makes you think Campbell won’t be traded?

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 2, 2010 10:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Oops

I misread that convo. Nevermind, but either way I think they stick with Campbell. I think he’s a good QB who hasn’t had a stable system to follow.

by Team Serbia on Feb 3, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

If he's the missing piece why trade him at all?

I don’t get why Eagles fans are willing to let McNabb go if they value him as worth a first round pick in trade, and don’t want him to go to an NFC team because that might put them over the top. If the FO lets him go it will be to the highest bidder – but only if they meet Reid’s minimum and who knows what that is.

by EANX33 on Feb 1, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone in the rest of the league is wondering the same thing.

There are only about 15 top notch QBs in the whole league. You have one. Kolb kas not proved he is one. Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t. McNabb is. So why would you trade him? Because he has caused heartache and disappointment to the fans of the Eagles? Ask a Browns fan or Lions fan what disappointment is. Never sniffing the play offs. Losing interest in football. Sucking each and every season.

You are lucky to have McNabb to train Kolb. He has one more year on his contract. He will retire an Eagle, just as it should be.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Vikes got to the playoffs

With a 2nd string QB @ best. McNabb is done, his talent is dwindling big time

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Feb 1, 2010 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Joe, I don't have a dog in this fight but are you calling Brett Farve a 2nd string QB?

Maybe you were talking about the Vikings in an earlier year.

Yes, I agree that all older QBs have diminishing skills but that doesn’t mean their experience doesn’t rate them as a top 15 out of 32 QBs in this league. I think the stats speak for themselves.

If you really believe so little in McNabb you should just not exercise his contract and let him go. After all he’s not any good anyway.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 7:31 PM EST up reply actions  

He was talking about last year

You guys made the playoffs with Tarvaris Jackson. Hence, McNabb making the playoffs does not mean he is good it means he is Tarvaris Jackson (of course, Jackson and McNabb have been to the playoffs the same number of times, won the same number of games, etc.)

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 1, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Tarvaris Jackson?

He didn’t play half the year. And let me know when the Eagles add Adrian Peterson, Bryant McKinnie, Jared Allen, and Ray Edwards

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 1, 2010 10:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Gus Ferotte, the old guy was inserted into the lineup replacing the kid

Jackson. Gus was hurt prior to the playoffs. The old guy got us to the play offs. The young guy lost it. Makes your case for McNabb being a loser worse.
I know you guys are frustrated. Hell we lost two NFC Championship games by Flukes. We know frustration. But you have been so consistently good for McNabb’s entire career. To not honor him with the dignity of finishing his contract with fan support seems a little harsh. We think the world of Farve and he has only been here one year to lose the big game for us.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I've been defending McNabb...

Joe_D said Jackson made playoffs, ergo any scrub can make playoffs. For the record, I agree with what you said and don’t think we should trade McNabb.

You’re right Frerotte made the playoffs that’s why my response to Joe was “Jackson didn’t play in half the games”

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 2, 2010 12:35 AM EST up reply actions  

OK , I missed that the first time.

Well you guys have fun. We in Vikingland have our own issues to resolve.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 2, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Hes not going to retire next year

thats the whole dilemma, he wants to keep playing, meanwhile we have a qb waiting to take over. Whos contract runs out next year as well. Couple that with several poor performances in the last few games as well as many big games in general. Why should we wait another year and watch him walk for nothing.

To me, some extra draft picks are going to help this team in the long run alot more than one more year of mcnabb. I am not stuck on a first rounder, sure I would like one, but I would be happy with an early to mid 2 and 4th or along those lines.

by Tbot86 on Feb 1, 2010 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Whats the delimma? His contract is up. Don't offer him a new one.

Unlike what GB did to Farve just honor your contract and tell him this is his last year. Its the honorable thing to do on both sides. He’s old enough to retire from football. If not then the Eagles held their head high and honored a great player. Don’t pull a San Fran with Montana or a GB with Farve. You guys have to much football history for that nonsense.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Tbot 86. I'm not sure I made my point earlier but I don't think anyone will give you picks.

The reason is that whoever takes him is going to want a contract worked out for more than just this year. And he is old enough ( and injury prone) that no one will offer him a long term deal. This will require both you and McNabb to work together to accomplish this. Its not that it couldn’t happen I just don’t think it will be as easy as “putting McNabb on the block”. But if its what McNabb wants then I think you should do it.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I think a trade could be made if the eagles would settle for a second round package, but I don’t think the eagles would do it.

To the other point, honestly I want to move on from mcnabb, I think this team will be better without him, he is too erratic and frankly I am tired of losing in the playoffs while watchin mcnabb throw dirt balls. Thats just an opinion, kolb may not be more consistent than mcnabb, but I would like to find out this year rather then next year.

by Tbot86 on Feb 1, 2010 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand. You want the opportunity to lose a playoff game with a younger QB.

Of course 4 out of the first 8 playoff teams lose. And 4 out of the next 8. And 2 out of the last 4. And one loses the Superbowl. So yeah any QB can win it for you. Put an inexperienced rookie in there. At least then all us other teams won’t be afraid to play you like we are now.

Winning is not everything but it sure feels like it sometimes

by lifelongvike on Feb 1, 2010 11:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Im trying to explain my perspective

You obviously have already stereotyped me as an ignorant football fan, one of the classic idiot philly fans that has hated mcnabb for years. I’m not, I have been a fan of his for his career but I think him leaving is better for the team.

Also, you missed my point which may have been too subtle:

I am tired of losing in the playoffs while watchin mcnabb throw dirt balls.

It just seems like every playoff game we lose, mcnabb plays terrible. At a certain point one begins to attribute the two together. I know we lost the dallas game for more than mcnabbs performance. But there have been too many bad performances. If we lost some of these games while mcnabb play decent, it would be different.

It’s also not about that I think kolb will be better, maybe he will, but he probably won’t. But if we only have one year left with the guy, I would rather get some draft picks that can help the team beyond one year.

by Tbot86 on Feb 2, 2010 8:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Dallas games can't soley be blamed on Mcnabb

Thats obvious. But our “top 10” QB put up 7 pts in 2 of our biggest games of the season. 7. Michael Vick got as many pts, taking 1 snap. Other factors are obviously present but Mcnabb’s inconsistency does kill drives. And he’s not under pressure as much as everyone thinks.

Its crazy to think the line can hold for as long as Mcnabb holds onto the ball, which he does way to long.

by Team Serbia on Feb 2, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes..

please..get rid of McNabb!!!

You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going, because you might not get there

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 1, 2010 6:54 PM EST reply actions  

haha

i see what ur thinkin man

http://phibossports.blogspot.com - a (recently started) Philly and Boston sports blog

by alcatraz0109 on Feb 1, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Saddest place he could end up?

Buffalo – with TO. THAT would be like The Twilight Zone.

by IggleGreen on Feb 1, 2010 8:36 PM EST reply actions  

dude

iggle green u dont know shitt .. cuz TO will be a free agent .. and he wont wannna go back to that shit hole ,,, TO will be a redskin or bear next season ..or some suprise team

An inconsistent coach is far worse than an inconsistent quarterback.(Route 36)

by jack is better than asante on Feb 1, 2010 9:44 PM EST reply actions  

makes me laugh

for all the people who want to get rid of mcnabb, doesnt it strike you as a little odd that fans of other teams hope we do?….that should make you think…

"Eagles fans are a passionate group who love their team," said McNabb, "if not the actual players. It's not like winning a Super Bowl before the first month of the season is the hardest thing they've ever asked of me. That'd be all those times they asked me to go kill myself."

by greenbean#twoOH on Feb 2, 2010 8:33 AM EST reply actions  

i don't

even know how to take that….either you’re sarcastic and don’t like 5, or you are being facetious and want mcnabb…

"Eagles fans are a passionate group who love their team," said McNabb, "if not the actual players. It's not like winning a Super Bowl before the first month of the season is the hardest thing they've ever asked of me. That'd be all those times they asked me to go kill myself."

by greenbean#twoOH on Feb 3, 2010 7:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn't mean anything by it

But what “other teams fans” want is completely irrelavent because we know our team a lot better than they know our team.

by Team Serbia on Feb 3, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

point

you’re completely missing the point….

"Eagles fans are a passionate group who love their team," said McNabb, "if not the actual players. It's not like winning a Super Bowl before the first month of the season is the hardest thing they've ever asked of me. That'd be all those times they asked me to go kill myself."

by greenbean#twoOH on Feb 3, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Where McNabb is going?

To Banner’s office to sign a 3 year extension.

Game, set, match, bitches.

...But if he pulls the rug on his quarterback, Reid must do it knowing that he let McNabb down more than McNabb ever let him down.

Phil Sheridan--Philadelphia Inquirer

by EvilBanner on Feb 2, 2010 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

Wrong.

Best case scenario – traded now
Worst case scenario – plays out the year and doesn’t get resigned

Count it. plus the foul.

by Team Serbia on Feb 2, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Wrong.

Best Case Scenario – McNabb Superbowl Victory
Worst Case Scenario – McNabb traded to the Vikings or the Cardinals and pooping on us in the NFC championship game

About 10 minutes ago, I was pondering my own existence. Then I decided that it didn't matter.

by IronHank on Feb 2, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

You bet.

Hank, I am again amused by the people who hate Donovan because he “can’t win” while crying about the fact that he’ll beat us if he’s traded in the conference.

...But if he pulls the rug on his quarterback, Reid must do it knowing that he let McNabb down more than McNabb ever let him down.

Phil Sheridan--Philadelphia Inquirer

by EvilBanner on Feb 2, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I think most that think he “can’t win” think he can’t win in a system like ours, but can win in a system that runs the ball and then relies on play action fakes. whether or not you think our system is good (which I know you don’t), is a different story.

by eagleyosh on Feb 2, 2010 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

You must hope

that no one watches video of McNabb’s last two games plus his Pro Bowl Performance.

If you think he is that good to take a contender to a SB and win it – why are you even considering trading him. Is it because he failed to win the SB for you despite 5 NFC Championsip appearances or because you feel you have a better QB in reserve?

McNabb is a good QB but he will not in my view be a difference maker to another team.

I also find it hard to believe that a team will acquire Vick to put bums on seats when he will again in my view not make them a winning team. After all who wants to go and watch their team lose week in week out!

by G Fan in England on Feb 2, 2010 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

UMMMMMMMMMMM

How about NO WHERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Cowboy KILLER on Feb 2, 2010 7:53 PM EST reply actions  

Where you goin? Nowhere!

About 10 minutes ago, I was pondering my own existence. Then I decided that it didn't matter.

by IronHank on Feb 2, 2010 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

I was in a hurry had to get my six year old off to bed and no time to check my spelling. Please forgive me. LOL

by Cowboy KILLER on Feb 2, 2010 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I wasn't trying to call you on your spelling

I was just reminded of a funny youtube clip.

Also, I concur on McNabb.

About 10 minutes ago, I was pondering my own existence. Then I decided that it didn't matter.

by IronHank on Feb 2, 2010 8:56 PM EST up reply actions  

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Great movie

GO CUSE, BLUE, AND EAGLES!

by tanman5 on Feb 2, 2010 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

5

honestely, i think you will see the real 5 this year. he will be our quarterback and will play to the best of his abilities, but you will see what he really wants at the end of the year. he either hates us or loves being in philly, we shall see.

"Eagles fans are a passionate group who love their team," said McNabb, "if not the actual players. It's not like winning a Super Bowl before the first month of the season is the hardest thing they've ever asked of me. That'd be all those times they asked me to go kill myself."

by greenbean#twoOH on Feb 3, 2010 7:19 AM EST reply actions  

McNabb

Is Andy’s boy. He is going nowhere unless Banner and Lurie put the pressure on Reid. If for some reason they do, I would not count out StL as a landing spot. Their head coach has a relationship with us, and if they can resolve their O line situation, they can at least be productive offensively. Me Personally, I say bring McNabb back for his last year and let him finish. If he doesn’t, sayonara, if he does. Make that decision then. Remember it is always better to go with the devil you know.

by Talon Talent on Feb 4, 2010 7:23 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Deviljj_small
The road to recovery for the Eagles is now solely on the back of Michael Vick
Evilbanner_small
An apologist's justification.
Small
Coping with the Giants win Or "Why I Put The Gun Down"
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
NFC bEAST Eternal Thread #34: The Glory of the East Returns.
Dscn0101_small
Understanding The Wide-9 MIKE

Recent FanPosts

Doc4d17342a6506a9471008801_small
BGN Playoff Pool Results!! The winner is.........
Small
2012 offseason projections
Small
Give Me Da GM Keys....Eagles Style
Stop_small
Mock Draft 1.0
Small
5 Names on Defense
Small
mock with resigns and some trades
20090903_zaf_e47_865-michael-vick_small
-The Case Against Signing DeSean Jackson-
Jim_thorpe_pic_small
I Dont Cope, I Justify

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Bgnqr_small JasonB

Editors

Img_1084_small Bob_Q

Westy2_small Route36

Pumpkin_small JimmyK

Briandawkins1_small Ben_Larivee