Michael Vick and the most surreal record ever
I caught this little note from PE.com about a record that was set last night...
In his first play since the Week 15 win over the 49ers, quarterback Michael Vick provided an instant spark. Vick connected with Jeremy Maclin for a 76-yard touchdown pass, the longest pass play in Eagles postseason history.
It's just crazy to me that of all the playoff games we've been involved in and all the great players we've had that it's Michael Vick who threw the longest pass in Eagles playoff history. That guy we hated for so many years as a member of the Falcons and the guy we beat on the one of the greatest days in Eagles history, the 2004 NFC Title game. Also, a guy who very well may not be here next year.
The Eagles have a team option to bring back Vick next year if they choose. They could bring him back, let him walk, or potentially trade him.
When asked how he'd feel if he were to return to play in the same role he had this year Vick said "I'd do it." Clearly, he wants to go somewhere and start. I'm fine with him feeling that way and I'd be happy to see the Eagles get whatever they can for him. With all the bad teams and terrible QBs in this league and I can't see how Mike Vick wouldn't get a chance to start somewhere. Whether the Eagles decide to move him or not depends on what they can get for him and probably what they do with McNabb. I simply don't see Vick and McNabb both back next year. If the Eagles decided to part ways with McNabb, I think it would make sense to keep Vick around as cover for Kevin Kolb.
222 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I doubt Vick stays
But I wouldn’t mind him staying here. He started to come along well. Kolb will be the starter — there’s no doubt in my mind. McNabb just isnt making the plays he used to.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
I thought Vick certainly got better, which is to be expected after such a long time away from the game… I would imagine he’ll be a lot more fit and crisp next year with a full offseason… For me, that’s all the more reason to deal him.
However, If the team did decide to go with Kolb as the starter we’d need a vet as a backup and Vick is already here and under contract…
Do you think he would want to stay though?
There’s definitely a few teams that would give him the opportunity as the starter.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
No, not really. I think he clearly wants to go start somewhere. I think someone would give him that shot, but I’m not 100% sure.
I do think he’d shut up and do it though. At least for another year.
Plus, there’s always the fact that he could see his chance to start here much greater without Donovan McNabb here.
very good point it could be an open competition in training camp if mcnabb is dumped
eff you we winning anyway
A.I. IS BACKKKKKKK
But don’t you think he would have a problem being leap-frogged, for lack of a better term, by a somewhat unproven backup? The only reason they say Vick was okay with backing up here was because it was McNabb. Now you’re asking him to backup the previous backup.
Whatever the case, the Eagles have a lot of decisions to make and, unfortunately for us, a lot more time to make them.
Smack it up, flip it, rub it down... OH NOOOooo!
I don’t know, I think his role as far as that was pretty obvious. If McNabb went down for a few games, it was never going to be Vick starting.
Touche! That’s also a good point. I wonder if they would use Vick in a similar manner as they did this year only with Kolb at the realm?
Smack it up, flip it, rub it down... OH NOOOooo!
That'd be great
But, like Jason said- Vick WANTS to be a starting QB. I really do not see him in the future here in Philly.
by LegendKnight22 on Jan 10, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah I don’t either. The tough decision is if McNabb goes, Vick is going to want to start. But I think Kolb is the next heir apparent, but then you leave yourself without much experience behind a pretty inexperienced starter already.
Going and getting Feeley would be a decent move. All I know is I’m glad I’m not in the front office today having to really figure this out.
Smack it up, flip it, rub it down... OH NOOOooo!
No disrespect, but hell no.
"THIS IS NOT COLLEGE NO MORE. THIS IS THE BIG MAN SPORT." ~Crazy Lady on BGN forums
by southjersey89 on Jan 10, 2010 1:51 PM EST up reply actions
But bringing up Garcia is the right thing
because if McNabb had even a FRACTION of the fierce competitive spirit and work ethic that Garcia (or Brett or Peyton, etc) has, he would already have a Superbowl ring or three. I am now pretty certain he will never develop it, but I think he is staying so I have no choice but to hope. I think Kolb has it.
by LordCarmichael on Jan 11, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions
We saw in the 2 games without McNabb/Westbrook
Andy didn’t worry about egos and went nuts on formations and packages without worrying about anything but exploiting the other team.
McNabb will be the starter
There is no doubt in my mind. No way do you make a change this year. McNabb has one more chance to win it all.
Reid- Best Coach in Eagles History
McNabb- Best QB in Eagles History
This is the year
Kolb/Feeley/Draft Pick
We have a chance to get a 1st rounder for McNabb and a 2nd for Vick. Hopefully we can get Feeley back as a #2 and then draft a QB out of the first round to develop as well.
by Smallbugger on Jan 10, 2010 1:30 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I was thinking about getting Feeley back too
If we can get a 1st for McNabb — send him!!! I think we’ll get lucky if we get a 3rd or 4th for Vick
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
I hate to say it
But, I think it’s time. I love McNabb. And, I KNOW you guys do, too. I mean, how do you not love a guy who has helped us get to so many playoff games, so many times.
But, his time is up. I really believe it is. If he comes back and plays for us, it’d be nice. But, there’s just too much potential sitting behind him in Kolb. Why not give him the reigns?
by LegendKnight22 on Jan 10, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I love and respect McNabb (have his jersey)
but I think he still has a “mobile QB” personality. He’s not always accruate, doesn’t like to throw to anyone unless they are wide open.
Mobile QBs are great at improving bad teams, but they also hold back good teams. We don’t need someone that can dance around as much as we need someone that can now hit Maclin and Jackson in stride on a crossing pattern and let them get YAC out of simple plays.
I hope so...
I also hope we draft another QB this offseason 2nd round or later… to have another potential guy waiting.
In my opinion...
As a McNabb honk I’m still a little foggy as to where I stand. He did well for most of the year, and I do believe that is his inability to play well the past few weeks had more to do with the Dallas scheme than him simply “choking”.
To be honest with you, I am kind of ready for the next future QB for the Eagles to take the reigns (partly because McNabb is in the final year of his contract and still has some trade value attached to him).
Honestly, I’m ready for more of a productive “dink and dunk” style passing game again with a QB that makes those reads quicker. They became too dependent on the long ball home run this year and they suffered in the playoffs for it.
Smack it up, flip it, rub it down... OH NOOOooo!
I agree, the big-play offense was exciting to watch, but it was too fragile. You need a consistent take-what-the-defense-gives-us passing attack to compete with the best teams.
"THIS IS NOT COLLEGE NO MORE. THIS IS THE BIG MAN SPORT." ~Crazy Lady on BGN forums
by southjersey89 on Jan 10, 2010 1:53 PM EST up reply actions
looks like everyone is split between mcnabb/kolb as starter
eff you we winning anyway
A.I. IS BACKKKKKKK
it could be kolb/garcia/feely
eff you we winning anyway
A.I. IS BACKKKKKKK
by eagleswin on Jan 10, 2010 1:47 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I love McNabb, I think he has been awesome
But I’m going to lay it out like this. Lets say we leave McNabb as the starter in the offseason and Kolb as a restricted free agent (I think that’s right) walks out the door. Then we bring in another new QB to pick up the slack. Then McNabb gets hurt broken ribs/knee/ankle/concussion and we have garbage to work with.
I’ll tell you right now, Vick is gone. We’re not going to pick up his contract next year. His contract balloons next year and there are too many teams that would love an “experienced” QB to play in the interim.
I think that it’s time to pass the torch to Kolb. Not because he’s crappy, not because we can’t win with him, it’s just that we’ve invested all this money and time into Kolb and if we give him an entire offseason of work we should have a smooth transition. Much the same way Green Bay did with Rodgers (Well smooth in terms of the team still being able to compete, not in terms of the crazy media debacle.)
Question:
I wrote this on another post…forgot where though.
Anyone see McNabb BECOMING the backup to Kolb? It sounds crazy, I know. But, if Reid and Co. do make Kolb as the starter, and release/trade Vick, we’ll need a veteran to obviously back Kolb up…Why not McNabb? He’ll still be in Philly, albeit not as a starter. He can help out Kolb, and if Kolb doesn’t play to his potential, he can go back to McNabb…
Crazy…I know…bash me if you must.
That's not possible
I didn’t even list that as a possibility because it will never happen. McNabb wouldn’t do it, the Eagles wouldn’t do it.
If we did give Kolb his shot, I would much rather Vick go. It is hard enough to be the QB in this town, and the last thing he needs in his 1st season as a starter is all the Vick talk every time he has a bad game (he is bound to have a few stinkers in his 1st year)
But shouldn’t they be more concerned with having a real backup than about some potential chatter on talk radio?
Plus, let Kolb deal with criticism. If he can’t take it, he’ll never last here anyway. So I wouldn’t be worried about that at all.
he's dealt with some criticism already in my opinion
but you’re right. If Kolb were to start, I don’t see McNabb being a back-up and Vick wants to start so you will have to pick up a veteran QB like Feeley in FA. I think it would be too early to draft one but if we traded for Vick we would need a 3rd QB, and thats if we were to trade for McNabb. I don’t see them letting McNabb hit FA and not get any value for him.
Guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
Vick is my all time fav QB
so yeah i want him to stay
by rainvillefromottawa on Jan 10, 2010 1:54 PM EST reply actions
McNabb
Flat out quit last night. He looked like a pouting 12 year old on that bench starting in the 2nd quarter every time the camera panned to him. Regardless of his level of play during the season or any particular game, this one included, the simple fact that he quit on this team at least emotionally, if not all the way, makes any case for keeping him impossible to argue in my mind.
Depends on how you define trying — was he out there physically? Yes, but I wouldn’t say that he was out there with the kind of demeanor a TEAM LEADER needs to rally the guys and get some points on the board.
In the past, that has been you know who. McNabb can’t fill that void — last night proved that 100%.
I really don’t know how you define “demeanor?” Should he have been yelling at everyone or something?
I dunno, he wasn’t good enough. I know that. I don’t think he quit though.
Anything
Go over some stuff with Marty. Talk to someone. Do something.
He talks about being a young team and then the example he sets is when you’re down in a big game, you sit on the bench looking like a lost puppy dog?
You are just looking for excuses to criticize McNabb
You honestly don’t think he talked to anyone the whole time just because there were shots of him upset on the bench?
Peopl;e get upset when McNabb smiles. People get upset when he acts angry. People just love to blame McNabb when the sky falls down.
You want to know why we lost yesterday? Your profile picture says a lot more about why the Eagles came up short than McNabb.
Yes
That’s exactly what I said — everything negative that happened on Sunday was McNabb’s fault.
Great comprehension skills. My point is that he cannot LEAD this team. He demonstrated that before the first half was even over. If you want to say that he was giving it his all, that’s your opinion.
And no, I’m not a McNabb hater. I think he’s a good quarterback, just a piss poor leader.
Where did I say that?
I didn’t say you blamed all the negatives on McNabb.
But to be honest, you are criticizing him for being upset when his team was losing. The camera caught him on the bench disappointed and alone. I’ve seen shots of Tom Brady and Peyton Manning like that too.
He cannot lead this team? Based on what? The fact that you saw the camera on him and he was alone. Good to the concept of a small sample size means so much to you
Sigh
It is clear regardless of what McNabb does (or doesn’t do — in this case win big games and lead this team out of a hole when it counts the most) you will support him 110%. That’s perfectly fine.
Just like you’re entitled to your opinon, those of us that can see McNabb emotionally checked out of the game before halftime would like to see someone else get a chance.
Honestly
Criticizing his performance is one thing. That’s not what you’;re doing.
I’m sorry, but no one outside that locker room knows whether McNabb “emotionally checked out”. That is pure speculation. He was pissed they were losing.
You come across as really condescending when you act as if I am biased and you know everything you’re talking about, especially when you are basing your comments on random shots during the game. It’s not like he’s the only qb to get upset because he was losing.
McNabb did not play well enough to win. But you have no idea of whether or not he “emotionally checked out”, particularly when his only TD pass came in the second half of the game! Criticize his performance all you want, but you are grasping at straws when you question his heart
He stated that he was trying, what he’s saying is that he gave up as a team leader, a captain? i agree with Greg, when your veteran QB who’s suppost to be setting examples and getting the team hyped and focused, instead he goes to the bench after going threen out and keeps to himself, he should have been more of a leader
by rainvillefromottawa on Jan 10, 2010 9:52 PM EST up reply actions
thats where BDawk would step in.
Dawk would of gotten those guys hyped, on the bench, in the huddle… whatever it took – that was where Dawk would of been.
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
Yeah but...
BDawk was here for the last decade and it’s not like every other year didn’t end the same as it did this time….
touche my friend
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
I don't think so
I’m one of the guys who wants to switch to Kolb, but I won’t go as far as saying that Mcnabb doesn’t want to win, or won’t try to win.
I'm a Cowgirls Cockroach Troll - Beware
Sorry
but you’re crazy if you thought he quit. He kept trying, but with so much pressure it was hard for him to get anything going.
Reid- Best Coach in Eagles History
McNabb- Best QB in Eagles History
This is the year
yeah
but in the first half when we had the chance to be more balanced her certainly sucked. I think he fought all the way through too, but you could tell he was flustered early on. WHen he gets flustered is when he brings his C- game.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Can someone explain to me
Why the hell we would trade away Kolb? Or not give him a chance to start here? You guys do realize he’s the first QB to throw for 300+ yards in both starts. Yes, against bad defenses, but McNabb didn’t beat a team over 500 this year, so why is he not worthy of a chance? Why the hell would we draft someone who would have to learn this offense all over again and gain NFL experience. Kolb is more than capable.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
In no way, shape, or form do I see a scenario where Kolb is sent packing UNLESS the Eagles land a stud QB from another team (which won’t happen). For the exact reason you mentioned (drafting him) there is really no way he is gone. It’s obvious they have kept him to groom him, much like Rodgers in GB. I’m with you. Why would they trade a guy who has had years to learn the system inside and out, from the winningest QB and coach in franchise history, and has showed promise through development in his limited playing time this year?
It breaks my heart at the thought of McNabb leaving because I really want him to prove the doubters wrong while in an Eagles uniform, but eventually there needs to be a change. Now might just be the time?
Smack it up, flip it, rub it down... OH NOOOooo!
But who cares about trade value
When this team is built to win NOW. How many fans are constantly complaining that this team only builds to win in the future (which never comes)? Sending McNabb packing means that we are two years out from competing again, maybe more.
Reid- Best Coach in Eagles History
McNabb- Best QB in Eagles History
This is the year
You're completely wrong
This team is not built to win NOW. That’s rediculous. We’re like the youngest team in the league. This team is built for the long-haul or else we wouldn’t have half our starters being rookies and 2nd-year players. Mcnabb isn’t the best fit for our system, and there is no point in keeping Kolb waiting since the future of this team will rely on him and our youngsters.
Not built to win now?
We made the playoffs. We might be built for the long haul, but we are also built wo win now.
Again
Rebuilding and losing aren’t tied together. We’re just lucky that we have a great front office that can make that work.
by Team Serbia on Jan 11, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions
With all of our acquisitions last off season, I was pretty hopeful for the next couple years (ie “Now”). Then we lost Bradley in preseason, and a few other hiccups early in the year and I doubted we’d do anything until next year. I was happy and impressed the team mitigated enough to get by and make as good a run as they did… but next year, when we get our players back (and don’t lose any more), is when I think they can make a deep run.. and that’s still “Now” time frame.
We’ve got a good team for the next few years but that’s one of the good things the management has always done… keep us as a dominating team for a long time by making sure the future it getting groomed while the present is capable. Without that we wouldn’t have had as many good years as we did, it would have been a flash in the pan.
People don't understand that the Eagles are REBUILDING
It doesn’t seem like it because rebuilding is usually associated with losing. But the Eagles are on a youth movement, and are setting up their future. We’re one of, if not the youngest team in the NFL. Its very hard to win and be consistent when half your starters are rookies or 2nd year players.
Trading McNabb shouldn’t be solely based on him not getting us anywhere. It’s just time to incorporate Kolb in the rebuilding process so that when we’re ready to strike (soon) he’ll be ready. Not only that, but McNabb’s value will never be higher than it is right now. You trade him for a high pick and use it to retool the defense and a few other spots.
I’ve loved McNabb over the years as much as anyone, but I want to look at this logically. McNabbs value will only diminish as he gets older, and there are a lot of desperate teams that would be willing to give up a strong pick to acquire him. Kolb is a guy whos had plenty of years to groom himself behind the scenes, and his two starts this year will both strong. He struggled against the Saints but at the time, their defense was prowling and it was his first start.
What I would say:
Trade Mcnabb, Trade Vick
Sign Feeley/Garcia as a backup, and draft a QB in one of the later rounds. Start Kolb, and let the future of the Eagles get some repport.
My Thoughts Exactly
I feel like you read my mind, seriously.
"THIS IS NOT COLLEGE NO MORE. THIS IS THE BIG MAN SPORT." ~Crazy Lady on BGN forums
by southjersey89 on Jan 10, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions
The thing is
We don’t need a McNabb with this offense. We have 3 studs in Maclin, Jackson, and Celek. Seriously, with these three, you just need someone who can get rid of the ball quickly and be able to put it in the right spot while making smart decisions. In fact, McNabb if anything, doesn’t fit this offense. He’s just not a pocket passe.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Agreed
I think there is two parts that are a positive to trading him. Mcnabb has a strong arm, but he is erratic on short passes, which I could see this team utilizing to perfection with the speed we have. Secondly, as I said, trade value is highest right now.
Absolutely
I said this earlier. If we wait another year he will have no value. He had good stats and theres teams out there that probably think he’ll make them contenders. His value is at it’s peak right now
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Not only that
But next year is Mcnabbs last year on the contract. I highly doubt we resign him because i’m sure Kolb wants to be starting and Eagles can’t keep him on the bench for 2-3 more years. So it could potentially come down to get a high pick this year, or potentially let him walk next year for nothing.
Reasonable points
Only thing I don’t know is just how valuable a guy (McNabb) who is in his mid-30s and only signed for one more year is in a trade.
They could do a sign-and-trade
Mcnabb is a good QB. He had pretty good stats. He just isn’t the fit for where this team is going and for the system. He’s gold to Oakland, Cleaveland, Buffalo, etc..
Couple of points
1. Pretty unlikely that McNabb goes unless the Eagles really get something that is hard to turn down (No. 1 draft pick that is mid-later round). When he got that 2-year extension last offseason, it really was pretty definite what the Eagles plans were with McNabb. They had 2 more years to win it with McNabb. After that, they were going to move one way or another.
They went out last offseason and really retooled the offense to help McNabb. This year they will likely do the same with the defense while continuing the youth movement in the process to a degree. Also figure they will resign a few key secondary guys on offense (Avant, Weaver) while trying to figure out a couple of things about the OL and making 1-2 strategic acquisitions to address the offense via draft/FA.
All of this leads up to giving McNabb one more shot to win here and after that he is done here.
2. Vick clearly had a problem this year with being the backup and the amount of playing time. He grumbled at several points this year about it. Only reason it didn’t get ugly is because Vick likely realized he didn’t have any leverage for several reasons (e.g., McNabb is Reid’s guy, Vick was clearly out of playing shape to start the season).
I can’t see Vick being a good soldier next year though if the Eagles trade McNabb and give the job to Kolb. Pretty much assume Vick will demand to get traded to a team where he could possibly start.
3. Eagles are going to move one of their QBs to clear space and likely try to get a pick in this year’s draft to address a need. All signs point to Vick including his notable escalation in salary.
If we did keep Vick, I don’t think he would be a bad soldier either. Considering his bankruptcy and the face that he was in prison for the better part of 2 years, I do not think he would be too unhapyy with making 5 million this year.
While I am sure he would not be content, and even say as much to the media and perhaps even ask publicly for a trade, I seriously doubt he would lash out in any way. He is in a very short leash as it is, and any actions that reflected negatively on his character would really put a dent in him signing a future NFL contract. While it will be easier from a PR perspective for the next team that signs him, people won’t forget what he did, and any negative publicity can have serious consequences on his value.
by captain nodar on Jan 10, 2010 3:20 PM EST up reply actions
This offense isn't built around McNabb anymore
A bunch of young talent. it’s built for a qb who just needs to get the ball into our play makers hands.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
oh come on
in the first half he made some awful throws which helped snow ball that beat down
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Which happened because he was under pressure.
Reid- Best Coach in Eagles History
McNabb- Best QB in Eagles History
This is the year
Even when he WASNT under pressure
He stil fucking blew. Did you watch the game ?
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
man, I saw a couple times he had FOR-EV-ER
to throw. But there were a few times he was under pressure too.. either way he blew.
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
No not on every play! But
What about the Niners and Broncos games. He had time to throw the ball plenty of times yet he forced throw and got pick off once in each of those games. And the Oline gave him time to throw. We all called it in the Niners game..“Oh No. Please don’t let me Donnies do his to us at this point of the season!” The Oline wasnt very good. But u r in denial if u blame the line for all of his awful throws. U have to be honest man
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Who the hell are you to say that
Maybe, just maybe, the team is better off with the guy who’s won the most games. Just maybe, even Tom Brady and Peyton Manning have bad games from time to time.
There were not many open receivers yesterday. McNabb made a few bad throws but it would not have made much of a difference. He DOES hit receivers in stride a great deal (see most of Maclin’s big plays, Jackson drag routes). You can’t throw quick passes if your receivers are getting held up at the line all the time.
And you call a throw a bad throw when it goes to the ground. But a lot of them would not have been completed if thrown at the receiver. If the guy is well-covered, you just have to get rid of the ball.
No, McNabb did not play his best game. But he would have played a LOT better if the line played better and if you deny that then you are letting your hatred of one player and not love for the team blind you. You can have a different opinion but you are an absolute piece of shit if you think somebody who else who thinks the team is better off with McNabb does not love the team as much as you. Go fuck yourself
ahhhh typo city...I try to type so fast! My bad guys really
meant to say, “oh no, Please dont let Donnie do this to us at this point of the season!”
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Just for arguments sake...
The Eagles didn’t extend McNabb’s contract for two years last offseason. They merely gave him more money as a monetary apology for benching him and not believing in him. I think that suggests more that they aren’t planning a future with him, but, instead, just made it easier for them to deal him or let his contract run out without committing to anything more.
But I do agree with you on this:
I can’t see Vick being a good soldier next year though if the Eagles trade McNabb and give the job to Kolb.
My agreement is based solely on the statements he has made this season while playing behind a well-established franchise QB. To take a back seat to a first-year starter would would, I could only imagine, create animosity.
Smack it up, flip it, rub it down... OH NOOOooo!
McNabb
I would agree that McNabb was the reason we lost last night if the following were true:
1. McNabb caused weaver to fumble
2. McNabb caused the failed exchange between Vick and Weaver
3. McNabb caused the defense to be fooled over and over again by the WR screen.
4. McNabb caused the majority of the team’s penalties (yeah, I know he had that intentional grounding)
5. McNabb told the ref. that Jones actually didn’t have the interception.
6. McNabb caused the O-Line to be in complete shambles and wanted to be running for his life on nearly every play.
7. McNabb caused multiple injuries in our secondary.
To put all the blame on McNabb is ridiculous. Saying he had a hand in it is much more fair. Really, the team lost in nearly every phase in the game. Even if McNabb was razor sharp I still don’t see them winning the game. The O-Line and defense need major repairs this offseason; Something that is relatively do-able.
by Nah_Roots on Jan 10, 2010 3:19 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Who's putting all the blame on McNabb?
No one, but he sets the tone. He starts missing a few plays and we get a few three and outs, our D gets put in a couple bad positions and it just snow balled from there.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Its crazy becuz even Reid admitted that
our defense had a “good first quarter” and the “offense didn’t play well.” I thought the defense had a solid first quarter but stunk after that and the offense stunk period! And u r right our D got put in some bad positions but also didn’t help us in the end! Also he does in fact set the tone (McNabb). When u come out on the first drive of the game, and throw a freakn dirtball to an open Maclin…on the FIRST play of the game with no real pressure from the Dallas Defense…really! 15 playoff games and an 11 year vet and you come out like that..C’mon Man!
But im not just blaming everything on Dmac
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Why did he throw the dirtball to Maclin, though?
Maclin was blanketed on the play and McNabb was just getting rid of the play.
Kevin Kolb would not have been successful last night. For that matter, neither would Tom Brady or Peyton Manning. They had us beat at every significant matchup.
If anytthing I give McDermott credit. The first quarter he baffled the Cowboys. Clearly, they adjusted and destroyed us in the second quarter, but that was also due to the fact that we were playing without a full deck and they were.
Maclin was NOT blanketed on that play! If he was...
then I wouldn’t be stating what I said. I like Dmac and want him to succeed! When he does good things then I congratulate him. But he does things wrong, u have to be real and honest.! It was a come-back-out route and Maclin had a good step on Jenkins. If Dmac didnt throw a dirtball and connected with Maclin, it most likely would have been a catch and completion for positive yards.
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
You'te ralking abuot the first play of the game?
It would have been a short gain and Jenkins was in Maclin’s back pocket. McNabb did make some bad throws, but that was not one of them
Whoa buddy
No one is blaming McNabb here. No one’s saying he should go away either. We’re just all pondering as to what will happen during the offseason with the three starting-caliber QB’s we do have.
by LegendKnight22 on Jan 10, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
thats the ticket!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
I know one thing......
The Vick pass to Maclin, the one that hit Maclin in stride with the perfect spiral and touch, was a beautifully thrown TD pass! Haven’t seen an Eagles WR get hit with a pass in STRIDE since the Kolb to Djax connections vs the Saints and Chiefs! I hope McNabb works on this in the offseason (if they decide to keep him). Can’t blame the line for not giving McNabb time becuz Vick played with the same Oline and Kolb played with the bizzaro Oline at the beginning of the season. The one that was missing Herremans, and our RG spot was not definite as is we were Rotating RG’s at the point in time between Stacy Andrews, Nick Cole and MJG! Kolb and Vick just made great TD throws! I like Dmac, but he needs help with his accuracy, touch and throwing motion! And also his defensive reads/coverage reads. If he’s committed, he CAN correct this!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Basically its what I been saying for weeks now
McNabb thwos balls behind WRs and they have to stop dead in their tracks just to catch it (if they do). Lead a WR, and they make plays like that.
That said, Vick is not that accurate of a QB nor can he read defenses. I like him as a Wild Dog guy, but I want Kolb as our starter.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Question
I can’t really remember, but in his early years, did McNabb throw to his “recievers” in stride?
by LegendKnight22 on Jan 10, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions
no
and he didnt even do it well last year either. but we had defenses that could bail us out and previously he made plays no matter what. He also used to beat pe ople with his legs and those days are over
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Bing!!
we had defenses that could bail us out
I’ve been saying this for the past 7 weeks. In the past, our defense was our strong hold! They helped us win games and kept us in many games. Our offense was ok to solid, but our defense was great. This is what happens when ur head Coach waits sooo long to add more offense weapons! Your defense can NOT be great forever. All great things will and must come to an end. Injuries or not! Now, I know talent doesn’t grow on trees..I know I know. Talent is hard to find. I know. But, many of us knew we needed more weapons than just Bwest way back when! We needed more threats. But Reid waited too long to pull the trigger. Yes he got TO and yes he tried to get Moss..but what about before and after that! Why did he wait so long to get legit weapons other than Bwest! Why did he stick with James Thrash and Pinkston…oh and Fred-ex! This is what made me mad. The fact that we had such a great Defense for so long, but didn’t have the offensive power on a consistent basis year after year..and Now we have an Offense with a struggling Defense.! Reid thought his defense would hold up longer and took his time adding weapons on offense. Now look at us. Defense stinkin! Now how long will it take to get the defense back to being our strong hold! Here’s to a good offseason…i pray
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Are you kidding me
Look at all the big plays we got on slants and curl routes this year. The intermediate passing game was good and you are high if you think he doesn’t hit receivers in stride
He doesn't hit his receivers in stride at all
What do you watch? The time he hits them its because the player had to adjust to the ball thrown behind/under/over him.
by Team Serbia on Jan 11, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions
U have ur opinion on Vick...its cool!
I didnt say that Vick was good at reading defenses though. I dont know that, as he hasn’t really played “Behind the Center” for most of his active career. So can’t asses Vick until I see him play “Behind the Center” for an entire season! I can’t believe anyone until I see this! But i do agree with what u said about McNabb! Mind u, I am NOT bashing Dmac. I have been a support of his as he gave us the best chance to win! Im just getting tired of all these same issues and inconsistencies now. I just want to move forward past all if these QB problems
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Draft Ideas and stuff
Okay if we manage to trade McNabb for a first rounder, it should be to the Seahawks. Depending on which pick we get from them (6 or 14) we should either draft Eric Berry 6th, safety out of Tennesee, or Taylor Mays 14th, safety out of USC. Prior to the draft we should attempt to sign one of the many linebackers in free agency like Shawne Merriman or Karlos Dansby. If we manage to do that we draft a defensive end with our other first rounder like Derrick Morgan (GT) or Everson Griffen (USC). If we don’t sign a linebacker, we draft Sean Weatherspoon, OLB out of Mizzou (hahaha we’ll have two spoons). Anyways thats just a little early offseason ranting. Lemme know if you can think of any better ideas. (ALSO this all depends on if they declare for the draft)
I personally dont trust Taylor Mays!
just my opinion
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
NO
Don’t trade McNabb, get a second or third rounder for Vick, get Earl Thomas (who is a better safety than Taylor Mays) in the first round, and get Julius Peppers or Aaron Kampman in free agency. Go offensive line and defensive line in the second and third rounds.
Defensive ends take a couple of years to become productive.
I am surprised
that the top vote is to let McNabb go.
I know he has a love/hate relationship with the fans – but is he really that bad? After all he just got a contract extension….
As for trading him – I just cannot see anyone offering a first and paying a lot of money to an old and injury prone QB when teams are having success with drafting rookie QB’s.
I would say a 4th for McNabb.
However, if you let Kolb go he could get you a first or a second and fourth (or something like Schaub’s trade value from Atlanta).
by G Fan in England on Jan 10, 2010 4:28 PM EST reply actions
1st for Kolb?
Not a chance. Nobody has really seen what he can do, especially with consistency. You’d be better off spending that 1st on a quarterback in this draft.
The
scouts have seen enough of Kolb this season to make a judgement on if he is worth it over a rookie QB.
by G Fan in England on Jan 10, 2010 5:22 PM EST up reply actions
WHY would we let Kolb go?
He knows the offense and is a potential franchise QB…WHY would we trade him!!?!?!? and for what!?!?! so we have no Qbs?
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Joe
Everyone knows that Kolb’s contract is up after next season and he will want paying if he is going to start for you in 2011 or earlier.
So Joe would would you do with McNabb this coming season trade him, release him, start him or bench him?
by G Fan in England on Jan 10, 2010 5:24 PM EST up reply actions
Everyone knows that Kolb’s contract is up after next season and he will want paying if he is going to start for you in 2011 or earlier.
Thing is, Kolb would be a RFA. It doesn’t matter if he wants to stay or go, he be basically be with us past 2011 unless some team trades use couple of first round picks.
RIP Jim Johnson, best ever.
True
But when does Kolb replace McNabb?
by G Fan in England on Jan 10, 2010 5:56 PM EST up reply actions
Does
Reid have the desire or character to say mcNabb your time has passed especially after the little dance at the end of last season.
by G Fan in England on Jan 10, 2010 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
NEXT YEAR MAYBE NEVER
Reid- Best Coach in Eagles History
McNabb- Best QB in Eagles History
This is the year
No way McNabb gets traded...
You figure McNabb has what? 3 years left in him? With the possibility of the lockout in 2011, do you really think any team is going to give up a first rounder for the possibility of 1 – 2 years with McNabb? Not a chance.
I want to see what Kolb can do as much as anyone, but for next year, McNabb is our starter. Vick will be gone because they won’t pay him $5 million for 4 plays a game.
McNabb/Kolb
McNabb has one year left on his contract. He deserves a chance with a real offensive line.
You are seriously brain-damaged if you thought Kolb or Vick or Peyton Manning or Tom Brady could have won that game playing with the Eagles. How? The Dallas pass rush has been fierce of late, as have their cornerbacks. They made Drew Brees look like a pedestrian quarterback. The pass rush was constantly on his face, and Dallas’ coverage schemes took our receivers out of the game (Maclin aside). Plus, we turned the ball over 4 times (two were not McNabb’s fault).
Dallas was a better (because they were at full strength) team. Our defense cannot handle all the firepower they have on offense, and we were playing with a makeshift offensive line. If they go get Julius Peppers, draft a safety, add some depth at linebacker, we will be back stronger than ever. A healthy offensive line is necessary to put up more than 14 points on the Cowboys.
When Mcnabb is constantly killing drives with bad throws and turnovers, going 3 and out, the defense gets no rest.
Yep. Only when MCNABB turns over the ball it kills drives. That makes perfect sense.
And srsly, how can you possibly expect him to have a good game with the way the O-line was playing. Did you even look at jason peters once all game? or nick cole?
The fact that the Eagles fell behind so quickly, forcing them to throw the ball, with a joke of an offensive line, and a pass rush that has been totally dominant is why they lost.
McNabb has gotten opportunities with good offensive lines
No one said a good QB wouldve put that game on their shoulders. Let’s face it. mcnabb is OLD and not getting any better. It’s not his fault, but a lot of it is
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Actually, a quick release QB can hide a crappy o-line. Someone on bleacher report talk about 2007 Colts with Peyton Manning being sack 1 while having 4 O-linemen out. Give me a few minutes to find it…
RIP Jim Johnson, best ever.
by Imp on Jan 10, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Dont bother
The McNabb supporters don’t even know what a good pass is. Even when the ball is thrown a yard behind the WRs it’s not McNabb’s fault. It’s either play calling, O-line, poor running game, or on the WRs.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
A good pass to you people
Is clearly one that results in an Ed Reed pick six.
Like I said, McNabb has made more good plays than bad plays. Think Kolb makes that scramble against Denver? Or even the throw to Maclin? And the receivers were not open on quick routes they were getting beat up at the line.
Imp
has a HUGE point. I mean, just look at this year’s Packers- that offensive line was just garbage earlier in the year. Then, Rodgers started to make quick, smart throws that made sure the ball hits the receiver either 1) in stride or 2) where ONLY the receiver can make a play for the ball.
by LegendKnight22 on Jan 10, 2010 9:05 PM EST up reply actions
but not coincidentally
the packers finally found continuity on their o-line, if not health, towards the end of the year. i think they were able to run out the same line for about the entire second half of the year. Long story short, it improved, and Rodgers began making better throws – not a coincidence.
you know what a major difference was between McNabb’s best games and worst games this year? Injuries and continuity on the offensive line. At the beginning of the year, we had Herremans out, Justice making his first starts, that dreadful guard rotation, etc. We were good, but inconsistent.
At Oakland? Peters got injured, we had to play musical chairs there, and we lost.
And that six game winning streak? No significant lineup changes: Peters, Herremans, Jackson, Cole, Justice all started; other guys appeared from time to time, but we got a consistent line.
Then these past two weeks? Dramatic lineup changes with Jackson out forced the Eagles to adopt a new center too quickly and led to two bad losses where McNabb was under pressure against a defense that could rush the passer well and had a quality secondary.
In sum, as the Packers’ line gelled, Rodgers played well; when McNabb had a line that was able to stay together, he played his best football. Not saying line play was the only culprit to his struggles, but you can’t deny it had a significant factor.
by alcatraz0109 on Jan 10, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions
If Kolb starts next year or McNabb will will lose for the next 3 to 4 years.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
What!!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
No Way..
To all that say Kolb/Vick, you’re idiots. It’s McNabb/Kolb… Vick is trade bait, that’s it. I may be convinced of a McNabb/Vick year, w/ Kolb being traded and an early round rookie pick up. But the only way would be if we just groom Vick for another year and then trade him.
Naw
Kolb is untouchable. Mcnabb is gone before Kolb.
Kolb will soon be worth more to another team than our bench, and there is little hope of him starting anytime soon.
why in the flying mother fucking fuck
WOULD WE TRADE KOLB?!?!?!?!
Dont you get it? HE KNOWS THE OFFENSE!!! He’s shown promise that he could be the future of this team. He’s played some games for us, he’s a west coast qb.
WHY WOULD WE TRADE HIM? WHY? So our old qb who is on his way out can play another year? Would we not want to go ahead with a QB who can take this team another 8 years? Unbelievable logic! It’s just unreal
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Agreed. There is absolutely no way in hell we ship Kolb out of Philly. No way in hell.
"THIS IS NOT COLLEGE NO MORE. THIS IS THE BIG MAN SPORT." ~Crazy Lady on BGN forums
by southjersey89 on Jan 10, 2010 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
It doesnt make any sense
Oh we’ll just draft a potential franchise QB… Oh he played well and he knows this system? Fuck that, let’s ship him out of here, let’s try and groom another QB while our old fat qb continues to come up short in big games… Interesting leap of logic isn’t it?
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Umm yea............No!
Simple as that
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
I didn’t say that was my first choice.. but I could be convinced to it, he’ll be worth more to another team where he could potentially start then to our team where he’ll be on a bench.
WHERE IS YOUR LOGIC!?!?!?!?!
If we feel he’s a starting caliber QB…WHY WOULD WE PUT HIM ON OUR BENCH? He will be our starter next year.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
NO
Don’t you get how this works? If you draft a player to eventually be the heir to the throne, you feel he’s good, YOU DONT TRADE HIM AWAY! You PLAY HIM!!!!
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
While I like McNabb and am greatful for having him on the Birds
I agree with Joe D…which doesnt happen very much at all ha! That says a lot in my book. Now..if I start agreeing with JIBTA, u know Armageddon is upon us!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
What I say is right, more often than not
It’s just that people dont see things as fast as I do. remember everyone bitched at me when i was saying I wasn’t happy against all of wins against shitty teams? Now most people are just saying what I’ve BEEN saying.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
In this case
It’s not. Our “Old Fat QB” (as someone above said)… is still considered one of the better QBs in the league.
And thats exactly why you trade him now
Because he has value. Teams will eat him right up. He’s not playing well enough for our system these days. in the old days we had a defense and he was able to use his legs to make plays. It’s not so anymore. He’s staying in the pocket and hes hurting us with his poor throws.
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
What u say is right, more often than not.......
…the, “Than NOT” would be your view on Reid and the playcalling! As I dont feel comfortable as Reid as our head coach anymore. Frankly, ever since last year! I dont trust him. Same mistakes every year with him. But he’d be GREAT in the front office NO doubt there
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
He's a great coach
and before the Dallas collapses everyone was saying how Reid should be coach of the year after they bashed him and I stuck with him.
The Dallas games, IMO, was a difference between personnel. You can scheme all you want, but if you don’t have good players nothing is going to work. A 2nd string O-line and a make shift LB corps aint cuttin it
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
I can agree here
After 16 weeks… too many damn IRs finally caught up to us. I can’t blame them since injuries come w/ the game, but it definitely hurt us more than anything else.
Its ur Opinion!
He’s fooled me too many times in the past. Aint a silly rabbit any longer! I aint falling for his tricks anymore!! He’s a great Organizational guy who can in fact build a contending team! Front Office Guy!!! Thats it though.! Thats just my opinion. And until he wins a Superbowl..then and only then, will I change my view on him!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Yea, so I’m to believe they downgrade QB.. just because they drafted him. He’s an alright QB, he got a decent chance to display his stuff. Teams will be willing to deal. My honest opinion is that Vick goes first, but for some reason, should we decided to pay $5M for him to run a few plays a game next year.. they’ll make due by dealing Kolb, they’ll pull in another young talent and train him. They jumped the gun w/ Kolb, but atleast he had center stage for 2 weeks to prove his worth for another team.
How do you KNOW that Kolb is just an alright QB?
He’s only started two games!?!?!?! You’re an engineer so you should be bright, but you certainly dont have a damn crystal ball.
If McNabb is the best chance we have, we have no chance. Put it that way
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
So
Where’s your crystal ball then? McNabb is a better chance than Kolb, if not where is the logic in benching Kolb for McNabb these last few years. Just some #5 hate coming from you. I think Vick goes, over Kolb. But I don’t easily see Don going next year.
That logic doesn’t really work though. You don’t know exactly what you have in Kolb yet. He could be better than McNabb in the distant future, but there’s no way to find out unless you put him on the field.
"THIS IS NOT COLLEGE NO MORE. THIS IS THE BIG MAN SPORT." ~Crazy Lady on BGN forums
by southjersey89 on Jan 10, 2010 7:24 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for your expert opinion
Sorry but you don’t “know” shit
You might think McNabb is worthless, and you certainly have a right to your opinion. But you really need to get off your high horse.
The fact is we made the playoffs despite having a weak defense. We set a franchise record for points. That. Does. Not. Happen. With. An. Awful. Quarterback. Period. It doesn’t even happen with a mediocre one.
One can argue that all the offense’s bad performances came when the line was not healthy. When McNabb had time he was as accurate as anyone.
Exactly!!!!! Kolb could be great or could be only solid...who knows
But we kno what we have in Dmac right now…whatever ur opinion!!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
If they trade Kolb, and somehow someway he ends up on the Redskins...
or Cowboys by chance..and he pans out…U will regret what u just said!!!!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
No
It’s business. You always try to improve, if he goes and we get an improvement elsewhere.. then we’ve lost our highly competent yet butt warn backup QB, and gained a starter elsewhere.
Hmm.....so we will improve if we trade Kolb
?!?#@%!!!
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
Any trade is meant to improve us somewhere. So yes, trade a backup gain a starter.. I’d call that situation an improvement.
Cool trade a Backup to gain a starter! But dont mess with a
franchise position such as the QB position. Sorry man. I dont agree with messing with a potential franchise starter!! It’s ur opinion though so its cool. Hope Reid doesnt do it though
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
I dont agree with messing with a potential franchise starter!!
Yes… me too. I also don’t agree with messing with a current franchise starter!
Well I would agree with u if Dmac hasnt already
been here for 11 yrs and have had the same inconsistent problems!! After 11 yrs and still struggling with accuracy and reading defenses! Again im not bashing Dmac, Im just being honest!! Thats all. Besides that
Yes… me too. I also don’t agree with messing with a current franchise starter!
Then why u do think we should trade Kolb…he’s the potential franchise starter
"... You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win..."
To answer
just go back to my original post. I firstly believe Vick is the one gone next year. Since day one, I viewed him as a 1 year investment that we use to get something later. I said I could be convinced that Kolb is traded and presented a pretty small situation where I think we could, the thought is we’d just start training a new “Kolb” to ride the bench and we let DMac & Vick try to do something next year, while teaching the new kid… then we’d send Vick off and the rookie would move to #2, giving him another year to grow while DMac finishes out his time. I don’t really see DMac her for more than 2 maybe 3 years, and thats a decent amount of time to learn up a youngin.. time that I don’t think Kolb would like playing on our bench, time where he could be starting for a team that has horrible QB troubles (ie not us, DMac may not be the answer but he’s not horrible) and would be happy to give us some picks or something else for Kolb.
But again, my honest thought is just that Vick goes and Kolb ages on the bench another year. I’m just playing around with other possibilities.
Me too.
Look. I love what McNabb has done for us, but Joe D is right. McNabb was effective when he could move around more. Do you remember back in the SB days when teams had to scheme for him? Defenses used to have to spy him. Not any more. He never was and never will be a pocket passer. He’s inconsistent. He disappears for quarters, if not entire games.
Is putting Kolb in a risk? Sure it is. But ask yourself this. Do you really feel confident that McNabb can string together 3 – 4 straight good games against quality opponents in the playoffs? I don’t. That’s not hating him, it’s just being realistic.
I'm a Cowgirls Cockroach Troll - Beware
He did it last year
Hell he did it this year too. Jackson going out hurt this team big time. We had no running game to speak of, constant pressure, and face it, Dallas’ cornerbacks are really good now.
He can still move around. Think Kolb would have made that 25 yard scramble? Kolb proved that he could move the offense against a bad team. So did Matt Cassel. The Pats found out they had a guy who could run the offense. Did they get rid of Tom Brady to maximize the value they got out of him? NO
The numbers don’t lie. McNabb is an extremely productive player. Kevin Kolb is more turnover-prone, and while he may be the qb of the future, he should not be the qb next season.
But who says we have to make that decision now?
The trade deadline is midseason. In the first few weeks, more teams might realize a need at quarterback. If McNabb is floundering, they can still get rid of him then. I think they should go in with McNabb and Kolb and see how it goes.
Can't be as strong as the shit you're on
If you think an incompetent quarterback puts up 3500 yards, 22 TD, 10 INT, 92.9 qb Rating, 8 Yards an attempt without a running game.
He may have short comings but incompetent? Are you brain damaged? And this production came in just 14 games.
Incompetent for our system, yes
Our system is no longer built around the QB. We have playmakers in practically every skill position. The offense just needs to get them the ball so that they have an opportunity to make plays. Mcnabb is NOT a west-coast offense QB. He was never known as a pocket-passer. It worked earlier because he could use his legs to make plays.
West Coast offenses thrive on quick throws and short routes, which mcnabb can’t hit worth anything.
by Team Serbia on Jan 11, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
how
how is vick/kolb different than kolb/vick?
by HawaiiEaglesFanatic on Jan 10, 2010 9:12 PM EST reply actions
'kay
Who would give us the BEST chance of winning, getting us into the playoffs, and winning the Super Bowl?
Of course you know that
So we would have done better with Kolb? That’s what you’re saying.
Kolb would have been swallowed by the same pass rush. In fact he would have done worse because he can’t escape the pressure. Kolb would have had to find receivers in very tight coverage (look what they did to the Saints, unless you think Kolb is better than Drew Brees).
Despite having little to no continuity on the line, different wide receivers at different points of the year, McNabb still got us 11 wins, put up good numbers, and got us to the playoffs. The Eagles were beaten by a healthier, better team that would have beaten us even if we marched out Joe Namath in his hey day at quarterback.
My bad
McNabb was 10-4 with 22 TD, 10 Int, and 3500 yards and 8 yards an attempt while completing 60 percent of his passes. If he sucked as bad as Joe D thinks he does, he would not have had those results. I think that’s pretty cut and dry.
Stopping putting it all on the QB
The Eagles issue is the line up they have….If Andy really wanted a SB ring, he will draft or trade for a power back. Someone that will keep defense honest….When Kolb played this year Andy ran the ball alot more…..If they call the same plays they call for Dmac Kolb will have a worse result. All Dallas did yesterday was sit back in coverage. Every time Djax was thrown to, he had at least 2 guys on him sometimes 3. You cannot win in this league the way the Eagles cal. plays. If you believe Dmac should go, please go look at all 5 TDs Warner threw today. All were quite imperfect but he gave his receivers a chance…In fact he threw a ball similar to the one Maclin missed last week and it was caught. The best receiver on this team though very fast is undersized, he cannot win most battles (hence the ball must be delivered to him in space). Dmac is not one of the better pure passers in this league but Kolb isn’t either (not from what I’ve seen from him).
If Andy let Dmac go, he knows his own clock in Philly will start ticking because if he makes the gamble on Kolb and this team fails to make the playoffs the next 3 yrs which I think is a high possibility, then he won’t have a Job for long. The question does Andy have the time it will take to rebuild a new team or does he want to develop his young guys with veteran presence? I hope he makes the right decision. I would love to see what Dmac could do with the Vikes team while Kolb gets the chance everybody seems to think he earned.
Why do we need to change anything?
We know a few things for certain.
We had a TON of injuries this year. We are weak at left end and free safety.
Why not see what happens when our entire roster is healthy? Maybe we can’t afford Vick anymore. That’s fine but Vick is a lot older than Kolb. I’d rather have Kolb.
We thought, going into this season, that we’d have an awesome O-line, a solid defense, and either McNabb at a Pro Bowl level, or Kevin Kolb if McNabb didn’t work out. Why can’t we do the same thing again? If this team is doomed to failure with McNabb at qb, that should be apparent early next year. Then we can either trade McNabb at that point or at the end of the season, and put Kolb in.
From the Dallas fan perspective, we'd be very happy if you traded McNabb.
Maybe Kolb has the goods (he certainly looked capable when he got a chance to play), but it occurred to me several times on Saturday that anyone not named Donovan McNabb would have been sacked eight times, rather than four, trying to come from behind with that line.
Jackson might end up setting every record in the books someday, but the only guys that have scared me over the years on Philly have been Westbrook and McNabb. Westbrook looks done, or at least on his way out in Philly, and I personally find it very difficult to imagine that Kolb is in any way better than Donovan.
Different, maybe. But not better.
"I hope they become a 'Doomsday'. I hope they consider this bunch better than any of the other ones. I want them to do well. I want people to say they're better than the group I played with. That would make me very happy." -Randy White
Disagree
McNabb scared people in the past because you could do everything right, and he would escape and run for big yardage. Defenses used to have to account for that. Not anymore.
McNabb holds onto the ball too long. Another QB (Kolb) would have got the ball out quicker and not got sacked any more than McNabb did.
I'm a Cowgirls Cockroach Troll - Beware
Held the ball too long because the recievers couldn't get open, or held the ball too long because the o-line couldn't hold up?
Because those are the only real choices. That was not a game where he could afford to simply throw the ball away. Philly needed points, and quickly. Dallas would have given you checkdowns all day, but they weren’t going to help by halftime.
I’ll say it again. Kolb gets sacked eight times in that game.
"I hope they become a 'Doomsday'. I hope they consider this bunch better than any of the other ones. I want them to do well. I want people to say they're better than the group I played with. That would make me very happy." -Randy White
by Big D Bam Bam on Jan 11, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
And I'll say it again
No he doesn’t . We’re just going to have to disagree on this one.
I'm a Cowgirls Cockroach Troll - Beware
No one could really say
what could’ve happened in that game… but I doubt a Dallas fan would know more about our back-up QB’s than us.
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
Do you guys feel that kolb would have won 11 games for us this year? I dont see how Kolb is a better option, even next year then a veteran mcnabb. In my opinion it wasnt our quarterback that fell apart it was the defense and the offensive line
I just dont see how mcnabb is falling off when we possibly were in the best position to take it all since the 2004 superbowl run…… Its not like we packed it in . in december like tons of other teams.. we were right in the thick of it, almost a number 2 seed behind the saints… Droping mcnabb just doesnt seem like whats going to happen. The only way i see that is if they have long term plans for vick. Otherwise Mcnabb is gone after next year unless we win it all. Once again i dont think Kolb would have had us in the spot to take the number two seed. I mean shit really, the giants got their asses beat this year. are they calling for a new quarterback?
You guys are gonna be crying like little pussies next year (IF) when Mcnabb is gone and we are back to an 8-8 season IF LUCKY
I love how everyone
Just KNOWS that Kolb will suck. Theyve seen him throw for 300 yards in two games but NO ONE EVER could EVER replace the great #5. In fact, it’s back to the late 90’s for the Bird’s once McNabb leaves. All hail !!! HAILL!!!!!!
E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!
Hey Joe D that was the stupidist comment ive ever heard made on this website, ok i lie but… You are criticizing me for saying we will go back to 8-8 without mcnabb but you are SO CONFIDENT THAT KOLB will be good… ARE YOU NOT DOING THE EXACT SAME THING? DUH …. Jeeze your a pretty smart guy from previous posts ive read of you but this comment is just retarded.
You are assuming that Kolb is the answer… that is quite an assumption based on your stats above.. WE HAVE SEEN HIM PLAY TWO GAMES , 300 YARDS.. HOW CAN YOU BE SO CONFIDENT WE SHOULD DROP OUR FRANCHISE QB FOR THIS GUY YOU KNOW SQUAT ABOUT BECIDES WHAT YOU FEEL?

by 





















