Eagles looking to deal Baskett
ESPN's Sal Paolantonio is reporting that the Eagles are looking to deal Hank Baskett to clear up a roster spot for Jeff Garcia.
over 2 years ago
JasonB
16 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
send him to SD
it’s Kendra’s favorite team
"Leave Michael Alone!" - said like that Brittany Spears fan on youtube
+1
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
Sal Pal is a schmuck. Not that that has anything to do with the validity of this rumor, but I just needed to say it. I also hope they would keep Baskett over Brown.
I am the people's troll :3™
I want baskett too
but I guess he has better trade value with his ability to play special teams and lower salary
"Now Sav Rocca played for the Magpies in Australia. I don't know if it's a bird or a pie or what it is." Ike Reese
by The Badassador on Sep 14, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
Who gives a crap about a late draft pick for Hank. He’s a legitimate weapon in the red zone. Brown isn’t and doesn’t have any red zone skills close to Hank. Also why not move the last man on the roster instead of someone who actually can make plays in the NFL.
red zone skills?
The dude has 6 TDs in in his career. That hardly screams red zone threat. Also, he has a catch for 89 and 90 yards, presumably TDs. That means he has at most 4 red zone Tds in three full seasons. Definitely not a red zone threat
Agreed
He easily has twice as many drops in the endzone as he has touchdowns.
I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.
by no1pipelayer on Sep 15, 2009 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions
How are they gonna get rid of a guy who was activated last sunday (Baskett) over a guy who wasnt (Brown).
"I hate listening to people's dreams. It is like flipping through a stack of photographs. If I'm not in any of them and nobody is having sex, I just don't care. "
salary that goes with trade. no one wants reggie + his salary
by GreenInBaltimore on Sep 14, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Brown vs. Baskett
Don’t you guys think it would be better for the team talent and contribution wise to just simply cut Reggie if hes gonna be inactive or an continue to be an absolute non-factor and keep Hank, who may not contribute heavily, but does contribute on special teams and may catch a couple balls each week.
Yeah , we can probably get a late rounder for Hank, but does that make us better now, No. If we keep him and he has moderate contributions to the team it still makes us more ready and talented to win NOW which should be the plan since McNabb and Reid’s window for success is as wide open as it’s ever been. The only argument for keeping Reggie and trading Hank is that Hank is worth more (if it’s not a player who can contribute now, who cares) is the whole Contract situation. So what if we eat 5 mil or whatever cap hit for cutting Reggie…He’s doing absolutely NOTHING for the team right now except taking up space and not doing anything to help us win NOW. No one wants to trade for him so show his ass the door.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Sep 15, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
