Broken ribs = Perfect scenario for the Eagles.
Beleive it of not, I am soo excited about next week. Not that I'm happy about McNabbs injury. But ironically his short term injury provides the Eagles with an opportunity to truely gage the future.
Now Kevin Kolb is afforded an entire week of practice as the starter and will be out there with the ones to compete. If he sucks, there is no excuse for him, we know to resign McNabb ASAP. And if he is good, then maybe we can count on him as the QB of the future. Either way, the Eagles benefit, if Kolb is good, maybe you move on from McNabb in the future, if Kolb sucks, than you can move on from Kolb, of he just stays as a backup for the rest of his career.
I am very interested to see how he performes with the starters. Last week was hard to determine if he was good or not, Andy already called off the dogs and Kolb wasn't gonna make any plays by that time. Regardless to Kolbs performance, McNabb can still return and be the starter afterwards. This is a win, win situation for us. I will be watching this one closely for sure.
0 recs |
64 comments
Comments
It's only a win-win if we win.
Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(
by Bye, Dawk :( on Sep 14, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If we lose, than we know Kolb is a bust, and keep McNabb into the future.
So even if we lose, we still benefits in something, even though I love to win.
Hey, we play the Chiefs soon, so we can rebound and still be on track, even with a loss.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the chiefs
almost beat baltimore
"I think pro athletes should be forced to use steroids. I think we as fans deserve the greatest athletes science can create."- Daniel Tosh
If Football Had A Church , Brian Dawkins Would Be My Preacher. -NPK
by NorthPhillyKid on Sep 14, 2009 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i wouldnt consider it a cake win
"I think pro athletes should be forced to use steroids. I think we as fans deserve the greatest athletes science can create."- Daniel Tosh
If Football Had A Church , Brian Dawkins Would Be My Preacher. -NPK
by NorthPhillyKid on Sep 14, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"almost beat batlimore"
with their backup Qb
RIP JJ & HK
Let the future judge Michael Vick
by BadCo'09 on Sep 14, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it says more about Baltimore than Kansas City. I do believe Kansas City is improved from last year, but that’s not saying a lot. They’ll be better, maybe 6 wins or so, but I don’t think they’ll be a lot of trouble for us, even with Kolb. I just hope I’m right in this hunch.
I am the people's troll :3™
by yomjoseki on Sep 14, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They got 2 lucky plays and scored 10 points on offense, it’s gonna be a cake walk game.
by philiafan14364 on Sep 14, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the coaches know what they have in Kolb...
It’s only gratification for the fans to see what we have in him. Personally, I’d rather not know jack about Kolb and have a healthy McNabb.
Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(
by Bye, Dawk :( on Sep 14, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed, but McNabb is approaching FA soon, and we are supposed to be banking on this kid.
I don’t think Vick is a good QB, sorry, he is a good athlete, but has never been a good QB, I don’t expect him to become one now. And his only 4 years younger than McNabb. Ironically, he is only 3 years older than Kolb, so I guess age isn’t too much of an issue with Vick though.
I need to know if Kolb is any good, if not, we need to extend McNabb, I’m fine with Kolb as a backup.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kolb’s contract and McNabb’s contract are both up at the same time.
by andyreidswaistline on Sep 14, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I forgot about that. But Kolb is a RFA
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Much Rather have a Healthy Mac5..
We’re built to win now…So let’s do it.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Sep 14, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't follow
The NFL is hard. Any given Sunday, any team can beat another. The overconfidence for the games that should be easy is disconcerting. Not to mention, you take it one week at a time – right now, the only opponent is the Saints.
by cwel87 on Sep 14, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we lose 1 game with Kolb we know he's a bust?
What the hell are you smoking? I’m not going out on a limb to defend the guy, but damn, 1 game and a bust? Seriously? People were clamoring to have Feeley be the #2 (or maybe to now resign him), but memories of that guy are a little rose-colored (helloooo Seattle!); and I doubt that if Kolb gives us a Feeley-vs.-NE-circa-2007 performance against NO anybody would forgive an end-of-the-game INT in the end zone when we could have won. Oh sure, for Feeley it was a great almost-win! For Kolb, it would be another unforgiveable interception that proves once and for all that he sucks, his kids suck, and his family should be deported.
Jeez oh man. QBs need to play their way into the position over the course of GAMES. Even good ones. He needs to learn how to make plays. Hopefully the coaches realize this and don’t hurt him with their preposterous playcalling: making him stand there and call pass after pass after pass in this timing-oriented offense when he hasn’t had a chance to get his timing down. If anything, this game should be an opportunity to develop the run game and get the TEs involved to help him out. We heard all the gushing about Leonard Weaver and Jason Peters and LeSean…put them into action and save your QB.
Don’t make this another Winston Justice vs. the Giants moment where they kept leaving him all alone in pass pro down after down and wondered why he failed. They have to help this dude out.
by DLawrence on Sep 14, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, I want to see Kolb, I like him, but he is behind a HOFer. He isn't
gonna be afforded the appropriate opportunity to be a starter. He has got to take advantage of his moments. This is his moment, I know that most QB are given a grace period. But Kolb doesn’t have that. He’s gotta play well, not perfect, but good enough to see progress. He can’t be flat and be a turn over machine. He is competing for a starting QB position with McNabb, arguably the best QB in Philly history. Thats a rough gig. He he falters, Eagles fans will call for another Back up like Garcia. I hate that the fans don’t give Kolb a chance. He may be a really good QB (which I think he is), or he can be an average backup. Unfortunately for him, he’s got Vick breathing down his neck as well.
Some players never get a shot, imagine if Bledsoe would have never gotten hurt, Brady would have been a career back up, if even that. He got his 1 shot to prove it, and he did. Kolb is on that same boat.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think i agree with you YPB. Were playing the Saints next week. Unless our D is going to be as good as it was this past week, were in deep shiz. We need McNabb to be out there to put up points. I would rather be playing the chiefs than the saints this week. If i had to make a decision on the outcome of next weeks game, id probably pick the saints to win by 1 TD.
by andyb on Sep 14, 2009 10:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Kolb has to play it safe, he still wins. What if he's good, how do we respond?
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what do you mean?
Even if Kolb is AWESOME against the Saints, McNabbs the man and when he’s healthy he starts
"What did it feel like? That collision, I didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs
by jalarsen1 on Sep 14, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a question we won't have to answer
Because he’s not good.
by cwel87 on Sep 14, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess what I'm trying to say is. I better to know about Kolb while we have McNabb.
Than to learn that he sucks with out McNabb. Regarless to who is the QB, we still win next week. NO has NO Defense whats so ever. They have to woried about covering our WRs with those bad DBs, and who is gonna cover BWest and McCoy with out forgetting about Weaver.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 10:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Saints no longer a pushover D
I watched the Saints game yesterday (I live in New Orleans) and I hate to tell you, but their D is no pushover this year. A good deal of the Lions points came because of turnovers (the Saints turned it over 3 times), so don’t let the score fool you. Darren Sharper picked off Stafford twice and their corners are noticeably better than last year’s. Their linebackers aren’t bad, but that’s probably where we should start. Westbrook, McCoy and Celek can do their thing first and get those safeties to inch in closer. If we can get one on one matchups with the corners, then I don’t see the Saints defending well (if Kolb can get the ball there that is).
Also, we might have to be prepared to score on almost every possession. The Saints offense is really, really scary. Every receiver catches the ball and Brees throws passes so accurately anyone on this blog could catch them. I’m confident in our run D, but for what it’s worth, Mike Bell is lookin’ good.
by NOLACuse on Sep 14, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Saints D is no longer a pushover????
Last time I checked, they played the Detroit Lions with a rookie QB starting. How can you possibly think the Saints D is not a pushover? IT’S THE DETROIT LIONS they played.
by willydick71 on Sep 14, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm guessing you didn't read my actual post did you?
Most of the Lions points came thanks to turnovers or a short field. Only one score came off a drive that started deep in NO territory and even that one was extended thanks to a bogus unnecessary roughness call (would have been a field goal instead of TD). 231 total yards is not that much to give up and when Calvin Johnson is the opposing WR, you’re gonna give up some yardage in the air regardless of who is throwing him the ball.
I watched the game. Their D looked light years better than last year. Even if it is mostly the same players, they made a couple upgrades in the secondary and they are using a much better scheme. I don’t think they are a pushover D any longer. They are certainly beatable, but with their offense, they only need a D that can stop the run early (which they can) and stop a few drives a game (which they can). Last year they couldn’t stop anybody because their starting FS (Josh Bullocks) was so bad they would have been better off starting 10 guys on defense. Kaesviharn wasn’t much better (and he was injured anyway). Darren Sharper is a big, big step up there. Jason David was a terrible CB and Tracy Porter should have started much sooner than he did. McKenzie wasn’t a terrible corner, but he wasn’t great either. Jabari Greer is a step up there too. The D-line underachieved last year. If they play like they should, they would be a good line. All-in-all I think this will be an OK defense in general, but relative to what the Saints offense needs, it will be great.
by NOLACuse on Sep 14, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They gave up 27 points as well
Not a pushover D…that’s funny.
by cwel87 on Sep 14, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again, people need to actually read.
7 points came on a fumble return. Not the D’s fault.
Another 7 points came off a kick return to the 13. Hard to blame the D when they have that short a field to work with and Calvin Johnson to defend in the red zone (he wasn’t the one that scored, but he has to be your D’s focus).
That leaves 13 points that the D is totally responsible for. One of those field goals came from a short field, so while the D is to blame, it doesn’t help anything when special teams is spotting the opposing offense yardage.
My point? Their D isn’t great, but isn’t bad either. The scoreline is very deceptive. Don’t be fooled.
by NOLACuse on Sep 14, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What your dissenters are arguing
Is that regardless of how well the Saints D played against the lions, the lions are not a good case to examine…they’re the lions
"What did it feel like? That collision, I didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs
by jalarsen1 on Sep 14, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, but this wasn't the first time I've watched a Saints game.
I know what their D looked like last year. There were plenty of plays that would have resulted in deep passes and botched coverage last year, that were either incomplete or broken-up passes yesterday. Those things matter.
The Saints defense was basically responsible for giving up 13 points to the Lions. I think the Eagles can score 2.5 times that easy. But with the Saints offense being what it is, I don’t think 30 points is an automatic victory.
by NOLACuse on Sep 14, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Detroit only had the ball for 23 minutes
And they had 80 yards in penalties. Your offense had 3 turnovers and STILL held the ball for over 36 minutes! That speaks more about your offense and Detroit’s ineptitude than it does your defense. You played a shitty team. We played a shitty offense. Advantage- Birds
I bleed green and I piss silver and blue
by oldasquick on Sep 14, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What my team? I'm an Eagles fan.
I just live in New Orleans and keep up with the Saints when I can’t watch Eagles games (or if they are on at different times).
All I’m saying is that if you simply look at numbers it’s easy to think that we can walk all over the Saints. Without a healthy McNabb I wouldn’t be sooo confident after actually watching the Saints game. This game probably won’t be a blowout, so I’m trying to warn people that a shootout should be expected.
by NOLACuse on Sep 15, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally disagree about their D...
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/teams/depth?team=nor&formationId=16
I see a total of 2 (maybe 3) players on this D that would start for Philly.
They were 23th in yards allowed last year, and 26th in points allowed. And it’s basically the same team. Plus, there’s a decent chance that their 2 starting DE’s, Will Smith and Charles Grant will be suspended for this game.
We should walk all over them.
Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(
by Bye, Dawk :( on Sep 14, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I watched them all last year and they looked like a different D entirely yesterday.
If Smith and Grant are suspended, we shouldn’t have too much trouble. But that isn’t a guarantee so far. They were originally supposed to be suspended starting yesterday, but they weren’t. I’m not saying they are a good defense, but they are definitely better than last year and they have a much better scheme. The two worst players on the D were in the secondary and both players have been replaced by capable players. These guys might not start on an Eagles D, but they aren’t terrible players either. They really did play with a different attitude and I don’t think we should be so cocky as to assume we will blow them out of the water. Especially since 1) if McNabb plays hurt he could be less than effective and 2) if it’s Kolb, we aren’t really sure what he can do yet. And considering what their offense is capable of, their defense might only need one or two stops. I know it was the Lions D, but Brees was incredible. I don’t care who’s in the secondary, his passes are gonna find their mark.
I’m confident we can win, but this is not gonna be some cakewalk. You will all be in for a rude awakening if you’re not expecting a shootout.
by NOLACuse on Sep 14, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Saints offense played against the Lions defense. The Saints defense played again the Lions offense.
I don’t see any tangible measurements there. Their offense has Drew Brees (an excellent quarterback against bad defenses, and good against good), Marques Colston (a very talented wideout), and Reggie Bush (an incredibly shitty version of MJ-D/B-West). Their defense consists of role-players with maybe one with the potential to be a game breaker in Will Smith.
Their offensive line is middle of the pack. Their quarterback is upper-echelon, but gets flustered rather easily. Their running game is hilarious. The Eagles were made to clobber the shit out of the Saints. The only wild card is how many times does Kolb get the ball in his hands. If it’s less than 20, we likely win. Anything above 20, it’s going to be ugly.
The only thing Kevin Kolb is good at is being bad.
by cwel87 on Sep 14, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only thing Kevin Kolb is good at is being bad.
I’m looking forward to a replay of the Justice situation Sunday
i.e. everyone said Justice couldn’t handle peppers because of his first start against Osi. Everyone was wrong, and now everyone is eating their words. I hope Kolb has the same effect on BGN on sunday.
by eagleyosh on Sep 14, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Their running back now is Mike Bell.
Of Denver fame. He looks real good. He broke a lot of tackles and dragged a good number of bodies. The Eagles can contain him fine, but they don’t depend on Bush to run the ball. Bush is used for screens and pass-routes out of the backfield much more than he is used for rushing.
Vilma is a pretty good LB, so I wouldn’t say Smith is the only talent there. Other than that, they are mostly role-players, but role-players still get 2 or 3 stops a game. That is all this Saints offense is gonna need. Shockey is healthy and looks good again. Meachum is finally playing like a first round pick. Colston is a stud. Lance Moore catches everything. Henderson, when he makes the catch, is Djax fast. And Heat Evans, their FB, is a lot better than I realized. And Drew Brees is the third best QB in the league. He can get flustered, but the fact that they couldn’t run the ball (or wouldn’t) last year didn’t help. That seems to not be the case as the playcalling looked more reasonable yesterday.
If you think we will clobber them, you don’t pay very close attention to football (or at least football outside the Eagles). Will we win? I think so. We will smoke them? No. I didn’t think we would with a healthy McNabb and now I really don’t. I just think we will win a shootout. If we can grab a two score lead and they abandon the run, we might have a chance at a two-TD victory though.
by NOLACuse on Sep 14, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've watched more football in the last five years then you have in your lifetime
I can assure you, I pay plenty of attention to football. The Saints will only win this game if Kolb plays and is given the opportunity to fuck things up. Because, if given the chance, he certainly will.
by cwel87 on Sep 14, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying the Eagles won't win.
But I think it’s a bit ridiculous that people think this game is gonna be a laugher in favor of the Eagles. I doubt it will be a blowout.
PS I guess you must work in the sports industry, because otherwise I don’t see how you have watched that much more football than anyone on this board considering most of us probably watch 2-4 college games/ week and 4 NFL games/week on average. Unless you counted the AFL and the XFL. I didn’t watch those all that much. More power if you did though.
by NOLACuse on Sep 15, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree - to a degree. In thinks it's a "Win-Doesn't Suck" situation.
It’s great that McNabb will be back soon, so this isn’t as bad as if he had been hurt worse, and it does give us a great opp to see how KC performs with the first team after training with them for a week. And I agree that all he has to do is not suck and we can all feel better about them continuing to groom him for the future. And if he sucks, well it wouldn’t be as bad as if McNabb was out for the season and KC was our backup to Kolb.
Things could be a lot worse.
by IggleGrrrreen(F-da-rest!) on Sep 14, 2009 10:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
exactly. If Kolb sucks, we still have McNabb and Vick still.
Imagine we see nothing of Kolb, and we let McNabb walk, then he sucks. We would be in a really bad position then. But this is a preview of what is supposed to be our future team. I’m curuious. Regardless to the performance, McNabb starts coming back.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feeley
So, for week2, let’s say McNabb is a nogo and Kolb gets his chance, with Vick in the owner’s box again……Whatcha think, do they sign Feeley for Week 2?
by greeenmachine on Sep 14, 2009 11:03 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No choice...
They absolutely have to sign somebody. Feeley hasn’t caught on anywhere yet, so that’s certainly a possibility. Garcia is out there too, although he thinks he should be starting somewhere.
I think we see the last of Reggie Brown this week to make room for whoever we sign.
Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(
by Bye, Dawk :( on Sep 14, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand why the Eagles continue with the Reggie Brown experiment
I understand he’s talented and we could possibly net a few picks out of him, but opposing teams also realize he’s the first man to get cut, and they can just wait it out for free.
We have a gluttony of talent at the wideout position (…finally). It’s a shame we used a 2nd rounder on Brown and now we’re going to give him the pink slip, but it happens.
by cwel87 on Sep 14, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We do not sign any QBs this week, McNabb is good enough to play. He will be the
backup.
Why cut a player for 1 week. If we cut anyone, it will be Dimitri Patterson. But I think McNabb will be backup, as he can play, but may benefit from a week or so off. Especially just before the biweek.
People need to stop asking for Vick, he was never a good QB, just a good football player, but not a good QB. I prefer Kolb for 2 weeks, as he has been in our system for 2 years plus now, when vick has been an eagle for a little over 1 month.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can’t go into a game with one healthy QB and one “doubtful” QB.
Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(
by Bye, Dawk :( on Sep 14, 2009 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We would have to cut someone. My guess is Patterson gets cut.
But I can guarantee you, we do not cut any WRs. That is a bargaining chip for Andy.
I have a hard time cutting a player for 1 week. Knowing Andy, he may decide to go into the game with just Kolb and McNabb. I’m just saying, Andy is wierd like that.
McNabb can play if in desperate situation. If we sign Feeley, its only for a week.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they would have done that already, but I guess they want that bargaining chip.
They feel they can value in return, once the need arises with another team. I guess they just want a pick.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was “inactive” yesterday. At some point they’re going to have to either cut Brown (who is not going to contribute this year) or someone else. And we’re entering Week 2 with only one healthy QB. Something has to give.
Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(
by Bye, Dawk :( on Sep 14, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He will be inactive all year, just to make that 45 man active roster.
But as long as Dimitri Patterson, and Mike McGlynn are on the team, Reggie Brown will stay. Maybe its because they don’t want to pay that heavy 5 mil penalty for cutting him. Its cheaper just to keep him, and hope someone asks for a trade for Baskett or Curtis for some good value.
If we cut Dimitri Patterson, or McGlynn, no one will pick them up. And once we are through with the fill in QB, we can pick up that player we dropped.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not
asking for Vick, believe me…just focused on Week 2 before the craziness of Week 3 starts, and wondering what the approach will be…..the way Kolb holds on the the ball so long and takes sacks, there’s a fair chance we’ll need a backup, even vs a weak NO Def…..
by greeenmachine on Sep 14, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Feeley to Carolina?
talking with Carolina today?
by greeenmachine on Sep 14, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
SOURCE?
do you have a link or are you just assuming/suggesting?
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
by Eaglesgrl5 on Sep 14, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like the optimisitic perspective yophillybro
To be honest, until now I havent looked at it that way
RIP JJ
by MeanGreen5 on Sep 14, 2009 11:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
thank you, thats all, its isn't a big deal to sit McNabb 1 week. I still think Kolb wins next week,
Andy will game play to use Kolb appropriately, and you won’t see nothing risky, just simple drops and quick passes. I expect Maclin to get more time. It will be a boring outing, but I can see Kolb throwing 2 td passes and 235 yards while going 17-25 or so. Maybe throwing a pick, and getting sacked 2 times.
But we can run for 2 TDs, so that gives us 28 points plus 2 field goals
Eagles win 34 – 21, Mostly second and 3rd quarter points, and NO will likely get a quick 14 – 0 lead, but we will come back to open up and win the game.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know I come off as crazy. But I'm not always wrong.
Remember during the BGN draft, I drafted Mark Sanchez @ #4. People thought I was crazy, and many had him going 21 or so. He was drafted #5, and looks like a stud.
So even though I way say crazy things, I’m not always wrong. I’m just saying, I have a method for my madness. I don’t think we bring in a backup QB, and Kolb will start next 2 games, and he will win both.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am a football prophet.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahhahahaha,
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
5 is our QB
At least for this season and next season. He is guaranteed $24 MM over the next two years. After that, he’s gone. Maybe Kolb will be our Rodgers, but he hasn’t really shown us anything so far.
www.okupy.com
by royboy on Sep 14, 2009 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
idunno, I can see McNabb get another
short term contract when this ones up
I have always had tons of faith in this guy
Tough skin, hard nose, light harded work horse- and he looked jacked on the sideline, shed a few lbs. He’s no old man, still elusive, still accurate, still makes plays
I think McNabb is around for awhile and I love it
RIP JJ
by MeanGreen5 on Sep 14, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kolb needs to play good next week to earn that title, if she sucks. McNabb gets resigned.
Bleed green, or don't bleed at all!
by yophillybro on Sep 14, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ive had bruised ribs before..
And they are very painful. It hurts to run, it hurts to sit up, it hurts to sit, it hurts to breathe. I couldnt imagine having a cracked rib. I bruised mine playing football in highschool (also on a late hit lol) and i felt like i got the wind knocked out of me. I know how mcnabb feels and if he plays sunday, i give him tons and tons of props. I couldnt run, do a pushup or anything. Its an odd injury but i have a high opinion of the eagles training staff and his rehab should be a lot better than mine. Took me about 2-3 until i felt normal again.
by andyb on Sep 14, 2009 2:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I broke 4 ribs
and was doing one-handed push ups the next day. I also fought Godzilla a day later. I am Chuck Norris.
I bleed green and I piss silver and blue
by oldasquick on Sep 14, 2009 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

















