Apparently, this is Mike Florio's(PFT) take on current starting QB's that are either better, comparable or worse than Michael Vick who is 2 years removed from football and in my opinion wasn't very good to begin with. This article was from 3 days ago but i just saw it today. I'm going to do a comparison of the QBs that Florio said that is either worse or "comparable" to Vick that seemed ridiculous to me.

First, let me give some stats and info on Vick.

2006- His last and best year since 2002 season when he had an 81 QB rating(his highest)

Games started-16-Completions-204/388-52.6 pct- 2474 Passing yards-6.4 average-20TD/13INT-75.7 Rating

Rushing Attempts-123-1039 yards-8.4 average- 2TD

Quick Facts: Michael Vick has never thrown for 3000 yards or more. He has thrown for 20 tds only once. Career QB rating average is 73.6. Take away the Falcons one good year in 2004 with him as starter, his record is a sub par 27-24-1. They went 15-16 with him as starter after 2004.

Roddy White was drafted in 2005 with the 27th pick but surprisingly did not improve at all in his 2nd year when most WRs improve the most. Instead, he started 3 less games and had 3 less tds giving him a big fat 0. In 2007 with Vick gone, White posts 83 catches for 1200 yds and 6 tds under 3 different QBs(Joey Harrington,Leftwich, and Redman). Hmmm....better without Vick? I think so. Sure we all know Vick has a strong arm and is the best rushing QB in history but last i checked, a quarterback's main job is supposed to be able to throw the ball with accuracy and manage the game which Vick is umm...not so great at.

Here is the article.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/20/plenty-of-teams-should-want-vick/

Plenty of teams should want Vick Posted by Mike Florio on July 20, 2009 12:06 PM ET

Our latest item for SportingNews.com makes the case for quarterback Mike Vick refusing to serve as a backup quarterback/part-time Wildcat option once he's reinstated to the NFL.

"The question for now isn't whether Vick will win a title or otherwise become the best quarterback in the game," we explain. "The question is whether he's currently one of the best 32. 

"There's no reason to think he isn't, and so there simply is no reason for him to accept any other role."

To prove our point, let's compare Vick to the starting quarterbacks for every other team, and let's apply one of three labels to each guy.  ("Better" means he's better than Vick, not that Vick is better than him.  And you should feel free to come up with your own scale, if you think you're better than me.)

Here we go.

Arizona:  Kurt Warner . . . better.

Atlanta:  Matt Ryan . . . better.

Buffalo:  Trent Edwards . . . comparable.

Baltimore:  Joe Flacco . . . better.

Chicago:  Jay Cutler . . . better.

Cleveland:  Derek Anderson/Brady Quinn . . . worse.

Cincinnati:  Carson Palmer . . . better.

Carolina:  Jake Delhomme . . . worse.

Denver:  Kyle Orton . . . worse.

Dallas:  Tony Romo . . . comparable.

Detroit:  Matthew Stafford/Daunte Culpepper . . . worse.

Green Bay:  Aaron Rodgers . . . comparable.

Houston:  Matt Schaub . . . comparable.

Indianapolis:  Peyton Manning . . . better.

Jacksonville:  David Garrard . . . worse.

Kansas City:  Matt Cassel . . . comparable.

Miami:  Chad Pennington . . . comparable.

Minnesota:  Tarvaris Jackson/Sage Rosenfels . . . worse.

New England:  Tom Brady . . . better.

New Orleans:  Drew Brees . . . better.

New York Giants:  Eli Manning . . . better.

New York Jets:  Kellen Clemens/Mark Sanchez . . . worse.

Oakland:  JaMarcus Russell/Jeff Garcia . . . worse.

Philadelphia:  Donovan McNabb . . . better.

Pittsburgh:  Ben Roethlisberger . . . better.

San Diego:  Philip Rivers . . . better.

San Francisco:  Shaul Hill/Alex Smith . . . worse.

Seattle:  Matt Hasselbeck . . . better.

St. Louis: Marc Bulger . . . comparable.

Tampa Bay:  Josh Freeman/Luke McCown/Byron Leftwich . . . worse.

Tennessee:  Kerry Collins . . . worse.

Washington:  Jason Campbell . . . worse.

So that's 13 starters better than Vick, seven who are comparable, and a dozen who are worse.

I start again from here

The first comparison i find ridiculously hilarious is the one with our favorite Cowboy, Tony Homo! Sure, we hate him but you cant deny the fact that he is really good. Well...at least the first 10 games or so. Last three years he passed for over 10,500 yards with a 63.6 comp pct, 81 pass tds and a 94.7 QB rating. Is Mike Vick comparable? i think not.

Second ridiculously hilarious comparison, Aaron Rodgers. 2008 marked the first year Aaron Rodgers was the starting QB for Green Bay after bench warming for 3 years. The end result after Farve's departure, passed for over 4000 yards with a 63.6 pct, 28 passing tds, 4 rushing tds, and a qb rating of 93.8. Is Mike Vick comparable? Nope!

Third ridiculously hilarious comparison, Chad Pennington. In 2008, Pennington passed for 3653 yards with a 67 comp pct, 19tds to only 7 ints, and a 97.4 QB rating. Career QB rating 90.6. Is Mike Vick comparable? In his dreams.

Fourth ridiculously hilarious comparison, Matt Cassel, wonder boy of the 2008 season. Cassel filled in for everyone's favorite pretty boy Tom Brady and threw for nearly 3700 yards with a 63 comp pct, 21 pass tds and had a QB rating of 89.4. Mike Vick again, is not comparable.

Fifth ridiculously hilarious statement this time, Jason Campbell. Florio said Jason Campbell was worse than Michael Vick. I might have barely accepted comparable for this one but worse? Not a chance. In 2008, Campbell's first full 16 games as starter he passed for 3245 yards with a 62 comp pct, 13 pass tds to only 6 ints giving him an 84 rating. Add in his 258 rushing yds, playing with a gazillion coordinators and coaches over his career, and the leagues oldest O-line, Jason is no joke. I believe most people will take him over Vick at this point.

Some honoroble mentions include Matt Shaub(92.7 rtg), Kyle Orton(79.6 rtg), David Garrard(81.7 rating), Tarvaris Jackson(95.4 rtg in 9 gms last year), and Shaun Hill(87.5 rtg in 9 games last year). Other than Matt Shaub the rest of the starters are what Florio called worse than Mike Vick. I consider them comparable to the Vick of today. Also notice how all the other players except Delhomme/Derek Anderson(and the ones i just mentioned)Florio called worse are developing young players or 1st round pick rookies.

In my opinion, no more than 4 teams would be interested in Vick. If i were to bet, it would be New England where Bill Belichick can use him in the wildcat and give the Dolphins a taste of their own medicine.

Here is a poll just for kicks.