Eagles make the fifth round their own

by JasonB on Apr 26, 2009 1:01 PM EDT in News Comment 36 comments

Thanks to various deals for players and picks this year and last year, the Eagles have complied a hard to believe six picks in the fifth round.

As it stands now the Eagles hold the 1st, 5th, 17th, 21st, 23rd, & 28th picks in the fifth round.

Could they actually make all those picks? I have a feeling we'll see them package a few to trade up into the 4th round or flip them for 2010 picks.

0 recs | Comment 36 comments | Share

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Draft 6 wide receivers

"The brownies,'' Fernandez said after the game. "The brownies are good for me to make three-points.''

by Sabonis4Ever on Apr 26, 2009 1:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Here is the logic of why they won't go into the fourth.

They traded down to gain the picks. If they really wanted or needed someone, why would they not just have taken them with the third pick? They passed on almost all the TE by trading so far down. The 2nd day has been very disappointing. By no means will we sign all our fifth rounders. So what is the point of having quantity if they are not the same quality?

by soman319 on Apr 26, 2009 1:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Agree 100%

We have the chance to grab the second best TE available and we pass up?? WHY?? lets see who we value more then getting a Cook/Ingram/Nelson/Coffman

DeSEAN JACKSON THE 10NE

by TheILLadeph on Apr 26, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

ingram is the last guy left. His stock dropped because of an injury, much like Jack. Someone who has a lot of talent, potentially 1st-2nd round talent.

by soman319 on Apr 26, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Ingram...

Don’t want him anywhere near our team. Apparently, he strongly considered quitting prior to the 2006 season. That’s why he’s dropping. He might not be drafted at all.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 26, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Flip them for

Next year picks. That’d be better if we have no targets.

by Igglesfan13 on Apr 26, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Ellis Hobbs

137 & 141 to the Pats for Ellis Hobbs, per PFT via the Patriots Twitter

by AshburnAlley on Apr 26, 2009 1:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

really?

wow. I don’t know what we are thinking.

by soman319 on Apr 26, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Looks like we traded our first 2 picks in the 5th to Baltimore. JasonB, do you know what we got in return?

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 26, 2009 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

new england not baltimore.

unless we traded picks to baltimore as well.

by soman319 on Apr 26, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

ESPN’s “Draftcast” has those picks going to Baltimore.

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfldraft/draftCast/index

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 26, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

NE traded those those picks to Baltimore.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 26, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Are you sure?

Those are the same picks that’d go to the Pats for Hobbs?

http://www.patriots.com/news/index.cfm?ac=generalnewsdetail&pid=37082&pcid=41&rss=1

Hobbs is a starting caliber corner.

by AshburnAlley on Apr 26, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Meh. He's okay. He's better as a return man.

And he’s no Sheldon B.

by HoosierPop on Apr 26, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Special Teams

Maclin and Hobbs…Reid trying to win games with special teams next year?

by d.justice on Apr 26, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

You know..

Sheldon’s a good corner, but I don’t think the qualifier of great should be in his resume.

by AshburnAlley on Apr 26, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

I like it

2- 5’s for a 4-year starting CB…I like it.

Is Sheldon moving to S or on his way out of town?

by Bob_StudioZ on Apr 26, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

I think it is pretty solid. 16-game starter. I think it solidfies the CB core more. i think it is a good. great? don’t know. but good.

by dukeboy25 on Apr 26, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Okay, I'm probably going to draw fire for this but

Anyone else think they’re being smug, cheap, and optimistic?

by HoosierPop on Apr 26, 2009 1:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

No, no , and no.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 26, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

You can say that..

..but that doesn’t mean it’s not true. I don’t get why fans are STILL bent out of shape about this.

This could be their best offseason since ‘04. Just because we didn’t sign two ridiculously old/banged up tackles and let go the best d-player we’ve had since Reggie doesn’t mean it falls flat on its face. You have to look at it objectively..from where we were in the NFC championship game, to where the potential is now. When you do that all doubt is removed.

by AshburnAlley on Apr 26, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

The average philadlephia fan is not happy unless they hve something to complain about and they can point out how much smarter they are than the folks running the team.

It’s easy for me s I’m big sixers fan and they’ve been run by morons for while now

"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."

Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

No

I think they’re doing what they did all off season- getting younger, stronger, and faster.

Yes, we lost Dawk, but cmon people. We upgraded EVERYWHERE!

by AshburnAlley on Apr 26, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

No, prudent, sensible and willing to spend

It would not have been a huge surprise if they’d picked a corner up top, especially after Sheldon started naming guys he said should be upset about their contracts. And they’re paying Hobbs $2.5 million, a bunch more than two 5’s would have made. If Jack I doesn’t work out, they had known quantities backing up the starters. Good move.

by since1961 on Apr 26, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Edit: NO known quantities backing up the starters

by since1961 on Apr 26, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

So where does that leave Sheldon?

Any thoughts?

by Bob_StudioZ on Apr 26, 2009 1:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

With less leverage

than he had…which was close to 0.

by AshburnAlley on Apr 26, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Without very much leverage

We’ve got 2 starting caliber CBs behind him, so we don’t “need” him in the same way we did before.

He could play S in some packages, but that seems like a waste of his man to man coverage abilities to some degree.

Hobbs’ll be in there to create a CB rotation, play nickel and dime a lot (and allow Sheldon to move to S maybe in Nickel packages??).

Also leaves us less reliant on the question mark of Jack as an important position guy (dime CB)

by Alon on Apr 26, 2009 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 26, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

Draft so far...

Maclin
Peters
McCoy
Hobbs

So far, so good. We’ll see how they wrap it up…

by Bob_StudioZ on Apr 26, 2009 1:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

time to start predicting 53-man rosters...

by omgur on Apr 26, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

Casey is gone houston just took him.

by IgglesFanDeployd on Apr 26, 2009 2:53 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

hey remember how we did lito last year? if sheldon is still around at the beginning of the season (and still acting up) thats going to be his role until we trade him.

2009? 5 pro bowlers and a NFL championship!!!

by ceegramz on Apr 27, 2009 1:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs