Bleeding Green Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

The worst idea ever

1796524956_ac6d550d4a_medium

The superbowl held in London.

While commissioner Roger Goodell has previously admitted an interest in bringing the game to London, this is the first confirmation of discussions.

"We've spoken on what it would take to host and for us to bring it over," said events vice-president Frank Supovitz.

"The city has all the facilities needed, and in great quantity."

Supovitz was talking in New York City where the NFL Draft will take place this weekend.

"We have had very substantive conversations with the city of London. We've got to the point of exploring the bid document," he added.

The BBC article goes on to quote several other NFL officials who all hyped the idea as well.

I get the idea that the NFL wants the entire world to love them. I'm sure they have this fantasy that it will become as big in Europe as it is here... I have no problem with them playing the odd game here or there outside of the US.

But the championship game? The championship of this country's largest sport played in another country? At what point does tradition trump a simple cash grab? This is our sport. The team's bear the names of our cities. The superbowl should remain here.

You'd never see the final of the UEFA champions league being played in the US and the Superbowl should not be played in Europe.

0 recs  |  Comment 35 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Yeah, Goodell is really starting to appear to be in over his head.

The silver lining on this at least would be that it would finally start at a reasonable hour.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 24, 2009 4:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is getting to be re-doddamn-diculous...

Stop trying to turn NATIONAL Football League into INTERNATIONAL Football League.

If this keeps up I figure I’m going to see them marketing berets with team logos on nfl.com by 2012.

No thanks Duke!

by andyreidswaistline on Apr 24, 2009 4:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree jason

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Apr 24, 2009 5:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is the stupidest thing I ever heard.

Picture the English Premier League Championship in US.

by N4S on Apr 24, 2009 5:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes. Let’s make it even HARDER for fans of the teams involved to go. Brilliant idea, NFL.

By brilliant, I mean idiotic. And by NFL, I mean idiots.

I wonder if I can bill Jeff Lurie and Peter Angelos for the years of therapy their teams are going to put me through.

by BrianS on Apr 24, 2009 5:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't want the NFL to move the Super Bowl to London

However, the UEFA champions league has been played in odd locales. For example last year’s final was played in Moscow (Both teams were English). Other finals have been played in Greece, Yugoslavia, Scotland and Turkey (not Europe). While I’m sure most English “football” fans were disgruntled at the thought of travelling to Istanbul to watch Liverpool win its fifth European Cup, they did anyway because they are hardcore.

Let me follow that by saying if the Birds made the 2010 Super Bowl then I will be making the long flight.

by graveyardmachine on Apr 24, 2009 5:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

UEFA = Union of European Football Associations

All of those cities you listed are in European countries that are members of UEFA.

by JasonB on Apr 24, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i live in england

and come over with my dad to see an eagles game every season if we can, for intance we came over for the rams game this year (and caught a few phillies games to). The thing is, it’s an american sport and the british people just wouldn’t appreciate the SB like americans would/do. I went to both wembley games, and the atmosphere was completely non existent, it really would be a shame to see the superbowl taken away from it’s hardcore fans in the US just to make a few bucks. If foreign people, like myself, are that into the sport then they will make the trip over to see a game, plain and simple. If one of the Eagles home games was chosen to be moved to London it would be terrible, as loyal fans who can only afford/obtain a ticket one game per season would miss out, and thousands of interested but ultimatley just curious and not passionate brits would take there place with absoloutley no loyalty to the eagles. One game per season is just about ok, although even I dont agree with it, but the superbowl would be ridiculous. The F.A Cup final is the most cherished game in england, and theres no way the authorites could get away with moving it over 7 hours travel away.

by fredex1 on Apr 24, 2009 5:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Goodell: "We have never looked at London or Mexico City as a site."

In the ESPN article today (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4096559) they had this to say:

One thing the NFL is not doing is considering a Super Bowl in London. Goodell dismissed a report that “substantive talks” with officials in London were held.

“We have never looked at London or Mexico City as a site,” he said.

Any idea why the conflicting information?

by Fooch on Apr 24, 2009 5:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It’s hard to believe Goodell when his own people are talking about the idea.

Mark Waller, NFL Head of Sales and Marketing, said: “The NFL is a global property, has a global audience, and London is an incredible city from a sports fan’s perspective. I don’t think it’s an unrealistic prospect at all.”

by JasonB on Apr 24, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

UK Eagles fan of over 25 years

As I understand it the Visit London crowd have asked what it would take to get the Superbowl & submitted a prospectus to the NFL. NFL didn’t ask for them to submit it.

I am biased but would be cool for us in UK. Stranger things have happened.

If you stop calling the Superbowl winner world champions, then I might go along with the argument.

There was a back lash when preseason games were played over here. Including two Eagles games – Only managed to watch the one against the Brown at Wembley myself. Just as there was from Giants fans when the latest batch of Wembley games started.

As for our cities – hands off, they are all franchises and money talks. I doubt it would happen in Philly but how many times have teams upped sticks and given two fingers to their loyal fans to move to a new city.

Probably more scope to nick the ProBowl in my view except our weather isn’t as good ;-)

If it is good for the development of the game globally and strengthens all franchise teams and helps the game in the US then that’s all well and good. If not, even as a UK fan I would say stick it and leave well alone. At the moment it is all speculation & pissing in the wind. Time will tell but as I said stranger things have happened like TO ending up at Buffalo ( I hope he freezes his nuts off!)

by piginthepoke on Apr 24, 2009 6:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They can play the pro bowl wherever they like… I don’t think anyone would really care.

by JasonB on Apr 24, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this really doesnt make any sense. isnt the time difference something like 4 hours? youd either start the game at regular US time and the game would be played at 10 PM on a sunday night in London, or you start it at 6 PM in London and the game would start at 2 O’clock in the U.S. niether of them works.

I think they should play the season opener over seas sort of like they used to do in Baseball. that way you ‘grow’ the game without forcing a team to give up a home game at a crucial point in the season.

by njh3293 on Apr 24, 2009 6:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It makes more sense with an extended NFL season:

However, in the middle of the season? I am so glad the Eagles do not have to travel to London to play a midseason game that counts like the Chargers did last year. That Dolphins game two years ago? So ugly. The grass at Wembley is made for soccer, not American football.

by graveyardmachine on Apr 24, 2009 6:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It’s not even made for soccer really. Everytime a game is played there they complain. The field is just awful for any sport.

by JasonB on Apr 24, 2009 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, the Wembly field doesn't really work for soccer

Alex Ferguson and whiny ass Man U complained about it a few weeks ago.

"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."

by exitfare on Apr 24, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think it will happen

But even talking about such a ridiculous idea makes you wonder what other terrible ideas Goodell has rattling around in his head that will actually come to fruition.

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Apr 24, 2009 6:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Awful idea

I want the Super Bowl here, and the Champions League there.

"In a couple of weeks or a month, I'll be excited about this team," Dawkins said. "I've got to get used to saying that -- I'm a Bronco." Then he paused. "I'll tell you one thing -- I'll always be an Eagle."

by exitfare on Apr 24, 2009 7:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If and a huge IF NFL Europe was a success MAYBE it would make sense but they clearly showed they don’t care about our favorite sport so Goodel would have a revolt on his hands if he tries this.

As long as there is evil in the world, the cowboys will have their fans.

by vinniesdad on Apr 24, 2009 7:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

play it in mexico

boost their economy, give people a reason to go on vacation, and increase the crime rate

not to mention the weather will probably be 30x better than in london

by sports00fan00 on Apr 24, 2009 7:25 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Unless Mexico get a team, then no.

If the Bills move to Toronto and they want to play a superbowl there, fine… But there’s no reason that the superbowl shouldn’t be played in the US in an NFL stadium.

by JasonB on Apr 24, 2009 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the logic is that ...

… the Super Bowl will draw a crowd no matter where it is because it’s an American institution and a destination game for us. Think about it, if we could afford it, we’d watch the Birds in the SB no matter where it was … we just figured we’d never have to travel further than Phoenix or Cali to ever have to watch one.

But by putting it there, they feel they could draw English interest that is currently lukewarm at best. Meanwhile, our interest they can basically take for granted since a lot of us can’t afford to go anyway, we’ll just watch it on TV like we always do.

I mean, honestly, if I don’t have tickets, I don’t care where it is.

But I definitely agree that there’s something unnatural about America’s Game being played somewhere else, and I think it’s a long shot at best anyway … just guessing at why they would even consider this.

Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome

by D3Keith on Apr 24, 2009 8:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well that’s part of what makes this so annoying. They are completely taking our interest for granted. You’re absolutely right.

by JasonB on Apr 24, 2009 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Weather...

I assume the London stadium is a dome?

by Bye, Dawk :( on Apr 24, 2009 8:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They have several

none are domes. you do not play soccer in domes, thats ridiculous

by Nils_eaglesfan on Apr 25, 2009 6:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about starting with SBs in cold-weather cities a-hole?

Can you imagine what an SB would be like in Philly, Pittsburgh or Green Bay???

by phillynyc on Apr 24, 2009 11:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah how about that?! Great point. How on earth could they consider holding the superbowl in another country when they won’t even play it in most NFL cities?

by JasonB on Apr 25, 2009 1:57 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boooooo, I don't like it!

It’s bad enough they started having regular season games in different countries. As a season ticket holder, eight home games a year isn’t enough. Thank G-d the Birds haven’t had to lose a home game. Tickets to the Super Bowl are already thru the roof. Imagine having to pay double that to fly to London, while missing work to do so. Especially the rare chance you get to see your team in the Bowl. It’s our countries biggest sporting event. Basically, bottom line, they’re screwing the fans, cause It’s all about the money.

by The Mozes on Apr 25, 2009 1:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

For me...

I don’t want the game to be globalized. Football (American style that is) deserves to be here in the states where it was created. If there are football fans across the pond that want to see a game live, then they can suffer the same fate of thousands of fans here state-side that have to watch their teams on DirecTV or other means of televised viewing. Bottom line, the National Football League doesn’t belong in the UK…. ESPECIALLY not for out championship game.

by Bliz on Apr 25, 2009 3:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

BLIMEY!

fish and chips are cool.
i guess.

by snowhill82 on Apr 25, 2009 6:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

HELL YEAH!

I’m all for a superbowl in London. and yeah i’m from Europe.
as far as i can understand the stadium where the superbowl is played is filled with 90% corporate people and 10 % fans. people can’t afford to go. The ones that do, hey they can afford a plane ticket to London, which is not that expensive anyway.

I’m 19 years old and i have already flown to the US to watch several football games. It is not that hard to travel over seas people..
The UEFA champions league will be held in the US as soon as yo guys want to attend a soccer game (never gonna happen).

The biggest problem is the time differance. If the US wants the game to begin in prime time. the london game needs to kickoff at midnight.

I know it’s your sport and all that, but we all know that the NFL do not care where the money comes from, as long as there is plenty.

by Nils_eaglesfan on Apr 25, 2009 6:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

BTW

i’m against regular season games being played overseas, as the home teams fans lose a home game. We, the europeans can travel to see that. But the superbowl? no fans are going anyway. go global!

by Nils_eaglesfan on Apr 25, 2009 6:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m never going to pay $1000+ to see a football game so they can play it on Mars for all I fucking care.

I am the people's troll :3™

by yomjoseki on Apr 25, 2009 8:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mars would be cool!!!

Could you imagine how the difference in the gravitational pull of Mars would affect the game? Would make for a cool new setting on the Madden video games. I think you are on to something.

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Apr 25, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.
Start posting about the Eagles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cryto_small
What does it take to win a championship?
Dscn0101_small
The 2010 Draft
Kitty_small
Great site for OL and DB stats (defensive back, not douche bag)
Charlie_green_man_small
1st Half Report Cards
Celek_small
BGN Demographics

Recent FanPosts

Djackson-1280x800-players_small
Westbrook to miss at least 2-3 weeks
Small
What record do you think the Eagles finish with ?
Small
Eagles reshuffle LB's again going into the Bears game
Westy2_small
Mcnabb and Reid hold a closed door meeting.
Small
Tailgaiting Party Bus FOR SALE
Small
I think Brian should retire.
Eagles_giants_06_002_small
Westbrook Visits Two Concussion Specialists
Small
Take a look!
Celek_small
Would everone please relax?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS