Bleeding Green Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: ACC Power Rankings: 2.8

What Can I Buy With $35M?

Right now, the Eagles sit and wait for the draft.  Could there be a huge deal in the works for a receiver that the fans covet?  Sure, but it seems far more likely that the receiving corps that you presently see will pick up a rookie in the draft at some point and move forward.  In all honesty, barring a late veteran signing for depth, if you add some rookies to the current roster, that’s probably what the 2009 team will look like.  After handing out a pair of one year contracts to two safeties and a one year deal to Leonard Weaver, we currently sit around $35M under the salary cap.  We look at our veritable cornucopia of draft picks (far too many to utilize), put two and two together and come to the conclusion that we must be trading for a marquee player.  Add the fact that we recently shipped Greg Lewis to the Patriots and the conclusion is that we must be targeting Anquan Boldin or Braylon Edwards, right?  If not, the only other reason to hold onto all of this cap space is that it just provides more padding for Jeffrey Lurie’s money mattress, right?

Star-divide

To be honest, I’m not too surprised where we sit and that we’re not using all of this cap room that we have; some of my reasoning has to do with the future, but some deals with the present as well.  If we take a quick look, our current numbers are as follows:

 

2009

Salary

 $    113.8

Salary Cap

 $    127.0

 

 

Sub Total

 $      13.2

LTBE

 $      20.0

Deion Credit

 $        1.4

Dead Money

 $        2.4

 

 

Cap Room

 $      32.2

 

 

Now, in reality, our current team salary is somewhere around $109M, but I’m going on the premise that we will use both of our first round picks and I’m using a modest estimate that we sign $4.5M worth of rookies this year (and that’s a fairly low figure if we end up signing the 21st and 28th picks).  That gets me to the roughly $114M figure for 2009.  After we go through all of the steps and collecting our credits and adding in our dead money, we end up with a full roster ready for the season and $32.2M remaining under the cap.  I’m fairly confident that we’ll be somewhere in that range when all is said and done (plus or minus $2M). 

 

So why aren’t we spending?  Well one of the answers is actually starring you in the face in the 2009 data.  When the Eagles have seen a player they truly wanted, they had no problem spending to get him (Kearse, Runyan, Samuel, attempt at Moss, etc).  What has always given us that flexibility?  The fact that we have engineered a steady stream of "Likely To Be Earned" credit is the main reason.  Each year we’ve had a fairly decent amount of cap money to spend; not too much, not too little, but it has always been vastly increased by LTBE credit that is passed forward from the previous year.  Look at 2009; almost $20M that we are able to spend.  Well that all goes away for 2010.  Additionally, we need to worry about resigning some key players and will probably look to address some of the 2010 class as well.  Let’s take a look and do some estimation.

 

No one can predict what the 2010 cap number will be; especially since it hinges on whatever new CBA is put into place.  Initial estimates for the Eagles’ 2010 salary right now are in the area of $114M to the players that are currently on the roster that will be in 2010.  We should also estimate the 2010 earnings of the 2009 rookies (the ones that should make around $4.5M in 2009), and I think a fair estimate of that would be around $7M.  Just by contract progression, the 2010 salary is already $7M higher than the 2009 salary.  This doesn’t take into account the 13 free agents that will need to be dealt with after the 2009 season.  That’s right…  13 spots on the roster will need to be filled, and we’re probably going to want to keep some of these guys. 

 

Out of these 13 RFAs/UFAs, the ones I’m worried about retaining are Avant, Giles, Gocong, and Weaver.  I don’t think it would be unreasonable for this group, who is going to collectively make about $5.5M in 2009, to make at least $9M collectively in 2010.  We’re now collectively +$10.5M above the 2009 salary.  There are also 4 players that will be FAs after the 2010 season that will probably be approached about extensions after the 2009 season; namely Mikell, Bradley, Celek, and Abiarmiri.  For the 2009 season, this group will collectively earn about $4M.  These guys aren’t making much at all.  If we were to extend these four players, would it be all that surprising for their collective salary to jump to $14M in 2010?  I don’t think so.  After another year of across the board salary increases and free agent signings increasing market value, I could very easily see Celek making $2M, Abiarmiri making $3M, Mikell making $3.5M and Bradley $5M.  We’re now +$20.5M above our 2009 salary. 

 

If our 2009 salary is roughly $114M and we add the estimated $20.5M, we end up at $134.5M.  The 2009 salary cap increased from $116M to $127M, so let’s make a rough estimate and say the 2010 cap will be $142M.  So everything looks good right?  We resigned the players we wanted and we extended our talented youth for the foreseeable future right?  With $7.5M to spare!  So why didn’t we spend more this offseason?  Well, in our scenario, we still have 9 spaces on the roster to fill with that $7.5M. 

 

0 recs  |  Comment 24 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

+1 great post

my head got lost somewhere in between paragraph 4 and eight but after rereading a few couple times its an excellent explanation.

Should give the rookie posters a lesson on posts and this would be a great example

To me the Eagles are like that girlfriend that pisses u off, then u hate her, but the next morning you wake up and remember that thing u love so much about her

by XxBleedGreen5xX on Mar 24, 2009 2:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I’m not positive on the LTBE, where it comes from and effects it. Other than that, very informative

by pooch900 on Mar 24, 2009 2:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Basically look at LTBE this way. Say we sign Player X to a contract before the 2008 season. His contract is loaded with potential bonuses and such based on production… things like Pro-Bowls, yards, touchdowns, tackles, interceptions, etc. Player X’s base salary is $2M, but if he were to achieve all of these things, he would earn an extra $8M for a total of $10M. When you look at the cap before the 2008 season, you have to count that player’s salary as $10M, incase he earns everything. Well, say he doesn’t achieve any of those goals. When 2009 comes around, you basically are allowed to spend that $8M that year instead.

Initially, teams set up bonuses that players were “likely to earn.” Then, someone realized that you could set up outrageous things that players would never achieve and then have the ability to move money forward to the following year. Over the past 8 or so years, it’s been really heavily exploited (a lot by us), so I would count on the new CBA addressing this issue.

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 24, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Great Post

I had to use google a couple of times understand what you were saying.
Thank god Heckert is the Salary Cap Champion of the World.
I have a little more clarity now, but it is still way beyond me.

by EagleGreeninMD on Mar 24, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not Heckert

It’s Joe Banner and Howie Roseman.

by ajay on Mar 24, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Duh

I knew that too.
I need some coffee.
Thanks

by EagleGreeninMD on Mar 24, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, thanks that makes complete sense now, thanks for making it more clear.

by pooch900 on Mar 24, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

isn't there a difference

between “likely to be earned” incentives (which count against salary this year and forward to next year if not earned) and “not likely to be earned” (which don’t count this year, but if it actually is earned, it gets taken from next year’s salary)? I’m pretty sure that for a LTBE incentive it has to be a performance achievement that the player has either reached before or one that’s entirely in the player’s control (i.e. workout bonuses)…

I don’t think a contract can call an outrageous expectation “LTBE”, I think it has to be a reasonable one.

I’m just asking here, but that’s been my understanding. Anyone know for sure?

"What did it feel like? That collision, I ­didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs

by jalarsen1 on Mar 26, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You’re pretty much on point, but it’s also easy for me to blur the lines… Let’s use our buddy Klecko for instance. Love the guy; real team player and willing to do anything. Coming into last season, I’m sure Andy had a fairly decent idea that Dan would spend a lot of time at FB. So we say something absurd in his contract like, “If player records 18 total tackles, it’s worth $2M.” Dan has had 18 total tackles before. Want to know how many he had in 2008…. 4. It’s all about how creative you can get, ya know? I mean if you want to go strictly black and white, you’re correct, but I can start nitpicking through stats and load up a contract easily.

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 26, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh...

that makes a lot of sense, and it’s business brilliance!!! Thanks for clearing it up!
.

"What did it feel like? That collision, I ­didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs

by jalarsen1 on Mar 26, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's simple, you are going after Peppers

Just give that 1st rounder back to us and a 2nd to boot and bam!…you got a PB DE. See its simple.

I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by Jaxon on Mar 24, 2009 3:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How about you give us a 3rd to take him off your hands…

by Clyde Simmons on Mar 24, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

now that’s bargaining!

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 24, 2009 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

cornucopia of draft picks (far too many to utilize)

Really?

There’s currently just 48 real players on the roster, and that includes obvious possible roster casualties like Winston Justice, Matt Schobel, Bryan Smith, Tank Daniels, Tracy Porter, Mike Gibson, King Dunlap, Kyle Eckel, Sean Jones, and Rashad Barker. That’s 5 open spots and at least 10 bubble characters.

Its not hard to see the majority of 12 draft picks actually making the team given that there are 5 spots, and some truly pitiful talent at the bottom of the roster to be beaten out.

by Andrew B on Mar 24, 2009 3:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Was kinda goin from the played out angle of everyone that’s been saying “well we have all of these draft picks and can’t sign them all so we must be trading them for Player X.” I didn’t mean to suggest that i feel we couldn’t sign a good amount of them.

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 24, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dunlap & Smith

I think those’re two high-potential players the Eagles are trying to develop, and thus not really “bubble” guys so much as “prospect status we’d be stupid to lose” guys, no?

by Alon on Mar 24, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point ...

… there’s some fat that could be trimmed, but I highly doubt Sean Jones would be a roster casualty.

You could add Lo Booker to that list though, based on who & how we draft.

I agree with Alon too … Dunlap is probably in the group with Ikegonuwu, where his talent perhaps exceeds the round he was drafted in, and the Birds have already invested a year in teaching, so not sure why some 5th rounder would beat one of those guys out.

Isn’t Tank a key special teamer?

However, the overall point you make is a fine one. It’s not like there aren’t 8-10 guys whose jobs could be taken if our draft was that magnificent.

Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome

by D3Keith on Mar 25, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Doesn't Unspent LBTE go into Lurie’s money mattress?

I’ve only read this quickly but I don’t get the analysis Why wouldn’t you take advantage of the LTBE money. Doesn’t that money just go unspent into Lurie’s money mattress? Yes, you will grow into higher salaries in the future but you can spend that LBTE $$ upfront and manage cash flow by individual contracts. You have to be careful to keep players performance incented (i.e. don’t pay too much money up front) but not leveraging you LTBE seems like a big opportunity lost. I guess I just don’t understand the analysis.

by LBORTNER on Mar 24, 2009 4:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Up until this point, the way we worked the system, that’s exactly what you would do, because next year we would be counting on $X coming back to us via LTBE again. This year, we almost have to act as if that $20M wasn’t there. If we went ahead and leveraged that money this year, the only way to do it would be to use it on very expensive one year rental players. You would want to look at picking up a player that would cost you alot this year, but you know that their contract would fall off the books next year and you wouldn’t have to worry about footing their salary (plus any increase due to their contract progression) next year.

It’s almost kind of a perfect storm situation as well. If the 2009 and 2010 free agent class didn’t have anyone that we were looking to resign, then it wouldn’t be that big of an impact either. It just so happens that there are quite a few players that we will probably want to extend… and unfortunately, those players will probably be looking for large salary increases, as they are making next to nothing right now.

I agree that we might be able to sneak one more player in this year, but one with a modest salary (probably less than $4M in 2010). Otherwise we’re going to run into a heap of trouble resigning our guys and filling out our roster.

The only other option would be to give contracts that pay a ton up front (this year), but next to nothing over the remainder of the contract. Hope that clears is up a bit. The salary cap is a horribly confusing subject without involved LTBE and Deion Credit.

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 24, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

*involving

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 24, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you did a real nice job of addressing it ...

… One question I have though.

Could they use some of that money to give big upfront signing bonuses that are credited to the 2009 cap on the players they want to sign to long-term extensions?

Still waiting for the Eagles to Bring It Home For Jerome

by D3Keith on Mar 25, 2009 12:13 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sure… but you’d have to be careful. There are rules governing what % of you salary can be signing bonuses and then how much your salary structure must increase from year to year and things like that. They’re basically set up to make it difficult to get around things like the salary cap rules. So short answer yes, but the long answer is that it would probably be extremely difficult and would have to be a very specific situation.

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 25, 2009 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A signing bonus...

gets deducted from the salary cap at the prorated amount for the length of the contract. For example: If player “X” gets a signing bonus of $5million for a 5 year contract, the bonus will count $1M against the cap per year for the 5 years to get the $5M total.

However, if the player gets cut or traded before their contract expires, the remainder of the signing bonus gets deducted immediately from the cap. So if player “X” signed the terms above, played for 3 years, and gets traded before the 4th year, the remaining $2M of the signing bonus counts immediately against the cap.

"What did it feel like? That collision, I ­didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs

by jalarsen1 on Mar 26, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

my god…my head hurts.

by snowhill82 on Mar 26, 2009 3:16 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.
Start posting about the Eagles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Kitty_small
Why the Eagles need to sell out to draft David Sills in 2018
Giggs_small
The Overlooked: The 2010 Eagles Special Teams (Part 1 of 2)-Punters
Cryto_small
Your Official Off Season Predictions
Reid_small
The Official BGN Bowl Recap...
Sadie_eagles__small
Our QB brought us to the FREAKING SB!!!!!!!!

Recent FanPosts

Small
If 2011 is a bust due to the lockout?
Small
With the 65th pick of the 2010 NFL draft...
Drj_small
Where Vick Will Go: The Breakdown
Small
Super Bowl
Dsc02832_small
A Former Eagle Helped the Saints Win the Super Bowl
Dsc02832_small
The Future 40, Prospect 4: Sean Weatherspoon Scouting Report
F405714_small
Re: The Eagles Need For a DE
Giggs_small
The Overlooked: The 2010 Eagles Special Teams (Part 2 of 2)-Kick Returners/Specialists
Dsc02832_small
The Top 10 Moments in Super Bowl History

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Buffalo Rumblings
Web Rumblings: Buffalo Bills Links, 2/9
Arrowhead Pride
Arrowheadlines: Chiefs News 2/9
Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: Make something out of nothing

SPONSORS