Bleeding Green Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

With the fourth pick in the 2009 NFL draft the Seattle Seahawks select...

Representing the Seattle Seahawks in the 2009 BGN community mock draft yophillybro selects...

Sanchez_q389_medium

Mark Sanchez, QB USC.

I think most would agree that Aaron Curry would have been the most ideal pick for the Seahawks at this spot. But as you can see, Seattle may likely be a little slow to the punch, as he doesn’t make it past the Chiefs. Many Seahawks fans would argue that the move to trade Peterson was done with objective to relieve money from that linebacker position. Who knows? I personally think BJ Raji is too talented to leave on the board. But that’s just me. I have to do what’s best for the Seahawks.

 

With the recent free agency addition of TJ Houshmandzadeh and the return of Nate Burleson, combined with slow times and recent injury to Crabtree, I do not think Seattle will draft a receiver in the first round.

 

At this point Quarterback appears to be Seattle’s biggest need. It is the most important position for a West Coast Offense team especially one built identical to that of our Philadelphia Eagles. I am of the school of thinking that you should always draft Quarterbacks high. You really don’t want to fool around with draft day left-overs. So, basically, if you are going to address the Quarterback position, it serves you best to draft them high. Especially in Seattle's case, as it appears that they are primed for rebuilding.

With an aging quarterback who missed significant time over the recent years, Seattle has to consider who will be the next "guy". Most experts like Matthew Stafford as the top quarterback in the draft, but there is a growing number of scouts that would say Mark Sanchez is better.

 

Strengths: Sanchez is probably the most intelligent quarterback in this year's class. Playing out of USC's pro-style offense, Sanchez excelled at reading defenses and properly going through his progressions. Is always looking around on the whole field, keeping his face mask square with the line of scrimmage. Good arm strength to make just about any NFL throw. Put  passes in good spots for receivers to make easy catches. Accurate passer when he's moving to either the left or the right. Probably a good fit for the West Coast offense because he doesn't have great arm strength. Has quick feet to get into position to make throws. Makes quick decisions and is a smart player. Team captain as a junior.

Weaknesses: Sanchez' release is a windup, slow release. It's not as bad as former Kentucky quarterback Andre Woodson, but it's similar. Does he have the size? Only 225 pounds, Sanchez needs to get bigger to handle getting hit in the NFL. Prone to some inconsistency. Had 22 touchdowns in six of his games. Still developing as a quarterback. Only started one full season and was injured at the start of the year. Started 16 games total. Has some injury and character questions. Was arrested but not charged with sexual assault in 2006. Before the 2008 season, Sanchez suffered a dislocated kneecap.

Final word:
Of late, there is a poor track record for underclassmen quarterbacks in the draft with Vince Young and Alex Smith. Teams will have to do their due diligence with Sanchez. He certainly has the tools and makeup to be an NFL quarterback, but he's still not a completely proven commodity. May have to learn for his first year or two, which could make him slide some. Was urged by USC coach Pete Carroll to return for his senior season, but still decided to leave early.

 

Sanchez’s stock has sky rocketed after a good combine and pro day. His intelligence is a needed plus for a team looking for a good quarterback who can absorb all of the intricate dynamics of the West Coast offense. Mark Sanchez projects to be that prototypical West Coast quarterback.

 

It’s also an added bonus that Seattle still has Hasselbeck under contract till 2011 which affords them enough time to groom Sanchez to ensure he is ready when the time comes.

 

In reality, I think Seattle trades down here, but if the actual draft board mimics our Bleeding Green Nation’s board, and Seattle doesn't trade down. I think Mark Sanchez is the best pick for them.

 

Commish's take is after the jump. Picks are coming in quick now... The Cleveland Browns and Captain Nodar are on the clock.

Star-divide

Commish take - A suprise pick for a few reasons. Seattle really could do several things here. After losing Rocky Bernard they could opt for a DT like BJ Raji or they could go for MIchael Oher to eventually replace the aging Walter Jones... But QB is certainly something they could do as well. Matt Hasselbeck is coming off an injury plauged year where the rest of QBs on the Seattle roster showed they aren't starters... Hasselbeck turns 34 this year and the Seahawks may see their chance to grab their franchise QB of the future. This pick is also somewhat of a surprise in that Sanchez, not Stafford is the first QB off the board. A surprising pick, but not out of the realm of possibility at all.

Poll
Do you agree with the pick?
Yes
91 votes
No
492 votes

583 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 48 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Wow

First upset of the draft! I’d like to hear more from yophillybro about why Raji wasn’t selected. Not that I don’t like the pick necessarily, but if Raji’s talented and it’s a position of need it seems like that’d be another good choice.

You’ve got balls though ;-)

by ajay on Mar 19, 2009 12:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I would have drafted Raji,

I beleive the Seahawks trade down maybe to 6 or so and draft Sanchez. They realy, realy need a QB. Sanchez is Uber smart and similar in a lot of ways to Hasselbeck. I thought the first pick was the first upset.

I really don’t think they hold that forth pick though IMO. I had to draft who I thought they would draft, not who I wanted.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was under the impression the Seahawks were not ready to give up on Hasselbeck yet. You really see them drafting a QB for the future rather than give Hasselbeck a chance to win in his final years?

by Clyde Simmons on Mar 19, 2009 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he is McNabb 2.0

Also consider the success of Flacco and Ryan last year. Sanchez seems perfect for them, more than Raji. You can get a stud DT later. I did not value many LB that high, other than curry, and I think to draft Oher at 4 when he should go 15 is a gamble (only to have him ride the pine for a bit) its the same deal with Sanchez.

I just think he is the best fit. You can’t go to war with a 2rd round QB, you need the best possible. And Sanchez is super smart guy.

I am getting mad ripped for the pick. But I understand, Raji is a stud, but you can get a DT later.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow… There’s the first curveball folks… While I agree that QB is a position that Seattle needs to be concerned wtih, I think that’ll happen next year. This is a postion that Seattle can take one of three positions, in QB, OL, or DL. I could probably see them going in either of those directions, but to be honest, I’m leaning toward Raji here a bit more. I think part of the mystery at this point is that it’ll be their first draft in awhile without Holmgren… so alot of it is going to come down to the direction they see themselves going on. I think we’ll learn alot about the Seahawks by their draft choices. Good pick… and way to think outside the box a bit.

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 19, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I love Raji,

but, I doubt they hold that pick, I think Sanchez is ideal for them, just possibly a little lower, maybe 10 ish. Maybe if they stand pat, Raji is the man, but I beleive Sanchez is the best west coast QB. And man, Hasselbeck has been hurting Lately.

I liken Seattle situation to ours, there is no way to waite to the last second to get q QB. And I really dont think Stafford is for them.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like this

I never liked Sanchez however i do think he is the better fit in Seattle. he could learn under hassleback his first year and be ready to step in and go in his second yeat. i believe he has more tangible skills than Stafford and could perform well under pressure. overall i agree with this pick.

by NickPampani on Mar 19, 2009 12:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Just like Kolb and McNabb, that was my point

Some people project Sanchez as #1 all the way down to #15 or so. Not a bad pick IMO for Seattle.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Sanchez stock has taken off,

His biggest knock is that he lacks senior experiance. He can ride the pine for a year or two and be ready to take the wheel. His senior days and Combine can’t be ingnored.

I’m not the only one feeling this way, a lot of people are opening up to Sanchez. Some have him going #1 to Detroit. I doubt that.

I think LB and DT, and OT can be addressed later. You can’t address QB later.

I don’t think Oher is top ten,

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 12:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice Pick ...

wow I definitely don’t think Sanchez is the best QB in the draft, but given the time to learn under Hasselbeck could help him. When your own coach Pete Carroll who many people believe in says you aren’t ready I tend to believe him. No matter how good you look throwing the ball without pads. So given the opportunity to learn and not be an immediate starter I think this is a good way to go.

I disagree because I don’t think you take someone in the first 5 picks maybe even first 10 that isn’t going to come in and start immediatley. That is why I would have gone with Raji. There are to many question marks (no pun intended) with Sanchez.

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Mar 19, 2009 12:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree completely,

I just think DT can be addressed later. I think Seattle trades down to about 9 or 10 and snag up Sanchez. Its too perfect a fit. He can just sit and learn.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah I agree with the pick just not where you picked him but I realize we couldn’t trade so it makes sense.

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Mar 19, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow really surprising

but thanks for putting in the work

by homestar2281 on Mar 19, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I wonder what the reaction would have been if I would have taken Crabtree?

I would have gotten boo’d out of my pants.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 1:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Heck, Sanchez may be better than Vince Young, he went #3

(Like I said, May be better) too soon to tell.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 1:03 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

he'll definitely be better ... VY is a bum.

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Mar 19, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

VY is a bum, I agree. I have nothing to really back it up. But I’ve heard some interviews he’s done and he has always sounded like the starting QB job should be given to him. It was, and after defenses found out how to play against him he can’t do anything as a QB……and now he wines about it.

by slandog on Mar 19, 2009 1:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Also, lets not forget this

He came HUGE in the biggest game of his life

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 1:24 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

With an amazing supporting cast around him against a team that was clearly out matched. but he did play well I guess.

by homestar2281 on Mar 19, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow,

only 25% of people agree. Its all good, I like controversy. Thats what makes these mocks so fun.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 1:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I personally disagreed with your pick

But thats just because of the nature of the NFL. All the pressure is on winning now just think about it yeah the cardinals were a good team last year in the playoffs but during the regular season they were not anything amazing and only went 9-7. Now when Seattle gets Hasselbeck back next year they have the number two QB in the NFC west and with a little help in the draft at a position of need that would actually have a good chance of seeing the field and helping this team out sooner rather than later. So with the right draft this team could push past Arizona and make the playoffs. Also I think that Staford is a better prospect than Sanchez.

by homestar2281 on Mar 19, 2009 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think it time for Seattle to rebuild, they were not very good next year.

If they play well this year, they will have a mid round first pick next year. Who do you get then? A trade down for Sanchez is perfect.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

I believe that they need a LB, DT, DL, and WR way more then a QB. Personally I think they will go with Crabtree or Brian Orkapo

SEMPER EAGLES!!

by USMCSLB on Mar 19, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

They did get Houshmandzadeh… so the WR is not as great.

I probably would have taken BJ Raji, but they could take a QB.

by JasonB on Mar 19, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I just feel those lost mostly due to poor QB play. But I love Raji as well.

I just don’t see Seattle picking Raji, I think they sell that pick to the highest bidder. Unless Curry is there.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

think this is risky for Mora to do his first year?

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Mar 19, 2009 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i still wonder what Mora’s future is there… i think he’s a one year guy

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Mar 19, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think he’s making the picks…

by JasonB on Mar 19, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he has to have some input … right?

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Mar 19, 2009 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Houzyourmama is 30 slow and a possesion reciever not aplaymaker like Crabtree or even Harvin who I think is better then Crabtree

SEMPER EAGLES!!

by USMCSLB on Mar 19, 2009 2:47 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ok, but they did spend a ton of money on him to shore up their WR corps… Not saying they won’t take Crabtree, but WR isn’t the dire need it was before Housh went there.

Plus, they still have Branch

by JasonB on Mar 19, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You know what, in rerospect,

I should have went with my gut and personal favorite Raji. Notice in my write up, I was on the fence. I guess its too late now.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 19, 2009 4:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yikes

Ruskell and Mora made it pretty clear right off the bat that Matt Hasselbeck is their man. They also made it clear that they are going to draft for immediate impact. Tim Ruskell is the GM. He’s the man who makes the picks.

Sanchez is coming from USC, which has produced a lot of questionable QB’s lately. Matt Cassel was a perennial backup, only to step into a “system driven offense” and succeed. I think he’s going to tank in KC. Palmer was benched, and Leinart is backing up an old man (damn good old man though).

Raji??? The seahawks just tied up about 50 million for the next five years in defensive linemen with Cory Redding and Colin Cole. I’m a big BC fan, and I love Raji, but we can’t afford to tie up that much money on the D-line. We just got out from under all the money we had chucked into the LB corps. (Although if Raji is the real deal, I’ll gladly dump the money and chuck someone else.)

I agree Curry is probably going to KC. Sucks for us.

I think the logical picks are

Brian Orakpo (a true DE, but can play LB. He’s 6’3 and 263 which would fit.) It also gives them future flexibility in the draft when it comes time to fill in the LB/DE position.

Mike Crabtree (personally… I don’t think this is logical… but a lot of sportswriters are still picking Crabtree to be this pick. I think he’s going to be a bust.)

Eugene Monroe (an OT to eventually replace Jones or Locklear depending on whether or not Locklear can make the move to left. Sportswriters love this pick, but I think it fails to make that immediate impact unless they are planning on moving Locklear to the inside and starting this guy at RT on day one.)

Personally, if they can’t get Curry, and they want to make an impact, I think they should trade down. Why settle for paying 10 million this year for a decent player who we don’t really need, when we can get 2 decent folks for a fraction of that price that might make immediate impacts.)

by shredhawk76 on Mar 19, 2009 5:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

With this pick i forsee McNabb like booing

To me the Eagles are like that girlfriend that pisses u off, then u hate her, but the next morning you wake up and remember that thing u love so much about her

by XxBleedGreen5xX on Mar 19, 2009 7:14 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You know what, after thinking about it over night.

I do not regret my pick. I think sometimes we all want to follow what other mocks are doing. But we do not look at the situation individually. Its easy to draft Raji, because he is the big name. But thats not thinking it through.

Its true what Shredhawk76 said about, Seattle just dumped a ton of cash recently on DL. What make us think they are gonna do it again in the draft? They just moved Peterson to free up cash from LB. That basically excludes Orakpo/ Raji/ Curry as logical picks, at least IMO.

I think given the needs of LB, DT, DE, OT and the non willingness to dump that kind of cash in those position. I think Seattle trades down to Jacksonville or so, and gets another second round pick or so and address all of theyre needs.

1st round. #9 Sanchez
2nd round. DT
3rd round. OT
3rd round. LB (via the trade for Sanchez under my scenario)

Sure beats waiting till next year to see where you draft. What if they win and get the number 25 pick, which QB do you get then? Another left over!

It makes more sense for a Sanchez trade down than to draft Stafford @ 4.

I would argue that Sanchez (system West Coast QB) + a 3rd rounder is better than Stafford who would be expected to compete NOW.

I love my pick more now than ever.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 20, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Also, I wanted to address that 15% people who agree!!!

They know football and can thing ahead.

Most just disagree because Mel Kiper Mock is different. Sometimes you gotta think for yourself and stop letting other peoples mocks influence you.

City of Champions!

by yophillybro on Mar 20, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I disagree because I hate Sanchez … nothing against you.

I hate Mel Kipers hair too …and the fact that he gets paid a lot of money to continuously be wrong.

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Mar 20, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

all very valid points… but mel kiper’s hair is really annoying.

by awd777 on Mar 21, 2009 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

MARK SANCHEZ no sir

I had to write something on here being a Seahawks fan there is no way in hell that they will draft Sanchez first of the seahawks have busted on QB’s in the draft here is the dreaded list : Dan “i’m not the man” McGwire , 1st Rd 16th and than Kelly Stoufer bust 1st rd 7th and than there was Rick "im so not slick Mirer 1st rd 2nd, so drafting a QB for any team is a huge gamble i personally think seahawks pick up a OT jason smith or maybe even Aaron Curry since the lions got Peterson but who know as far as drafting a QB Mathew Stafford will be pick way before Sanchez

by slate-c on Mar 23, 2009 3:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.
Start posting about the Eagles »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Cryto_small
What does it take to win a championship?
Dscn0101_small
The 2010 Draft
Kitty_small
Great site for OL and DB stats (defensive back, not douche bag)
Charlie_green_man_small
1st Half Report Cards
Avante_small
BGN Demographics

Recent FanPosts

022_small
stole from HR ...funny as HELL!
Eagles_giants_06_002_small
Bird Watch: Balanced Offense Propels Eagles to 24-20 Victory over Bears
Pc270011_small
Stuff my wife doesn't care about...
Small
10 games in....playoff picture
Small
#5 = Class Act
Small
4th Quarter Comebacks
Small
My first half assessment of the Eagles Bears game
Eagles_giants_06_002_small
It's Hunting Season in Chicago: Eagles vs. Bears Week 11 Game Preview
Djackson-1280x800-players_small
Westbrook to miss at least 2-3 weeks
Small
What record do you think the Eagles finish with ?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Titans vs. Texans 2nd Half Open Game Thread
Pats Pulpit
MNF Open Thread: Texans vs. Titans
Pats Pulpit
MNF: Tennessee v. Houston. They don't like each other.

SPONSORS