Philadelphia Eagles Opponents previews - Dallas Cowboys
This is the next part in our series of previews of the Eagles 2009 opponents. Joining us for this feature is Dave Schwab, who writes about the Eagles at his site Eagles Lincs.
The last time we saw the Cowboys here in Philadelphia, the Eagles trashed them 44-6 in what was basically a playoff game where the winner won the wildcard. Is Dallas going to put up more of a fight this time? Check out Dave's full analysis after the jump.
The Eagles will try and beat a third straight NFC East opponent when they host the 5-2 Dallas Cowboys on Sunday Night, November 8th in an 8:30 P.M. start at Lincoln Financial Field. A win would give Philadelphia the outright lead in the East as well as a 3-0 record in the division. The Cowboys come into this game riding a three game winning streak and playing their best ball of the season. While the Birds beat up on the Giants this past Sunday in a 40-17 romp, Dallas rolled over Seattle 38-17 setting up the showdown for Sunday night. Last week the Cowboys beat a fairly strong Atlanta team 37-21, but keep in mind both these wins came in the friendly confines of Cowboy Stadium. It will be a whole new ballgame when they try and take their show on the road in Philly. Everyone remembers last year when the Eagles completely embarrassed the ‘Boys 44-6 at the Linc in the final game of the season.
On offense, QB Tony Romo has been reborn the past few weeks with the emergence of WR Miles Austin as his go to guy. On the year, Austin has 26 receptions for 563 yards and 6 touchdowns, with most of this production coming in the last three games. Another factor is Romo, who threw 4 interceptions in his first five games has not thrown a pic in the last three. He was 21 of 36 for 256 yards on Sunday against Seattle, but more importantly he completed passes to 10 different receivers. Once again getting pressure on him from every imaginable angle will be the key to derailing Romo’s game. Dallas will also rely on their running game which is currently ranked 6th in average yards per game. Led by the duo of Marion Barber and Felix Jones, they will try and move the ball on the ground to take the pressure off the passing game. The ability of the Eagles defense to stuff the run will go a long way to dictating the outcome of this game. The ultimate goal is to put this game squarely in Romo’s hands as most of his success has come against teams that were poor against the run.
The Dallas defense is their potential Achilles heel as teams have had success moving the ball against them. While they rank 11th in total points allowed, they rank 22nd in total yards and passing yards allowed. The Eagles will certainly look to attack their secondary with their biggest play maker, WR DeSean Jackson. Look for the Birds to take a couple of shots downfield early in this game to try and burn them with a quick score. Dallas could be hard to run against as they are only giving up an average of 105 yards per game on the ground. RB Brian Westbrook will be back in the lineup after missing a week while recovering from a concussion and along with rookie LeSean McCoy should be able to test the Cowboy’s ability to stop the run.
Granted, the Cowboys have looked pretty good the last three weeks but you still have to take into consideration the teams they have played. Their only win this season against a team with a winning record was Atlanta as the rest of their wins came against teams with a combined record of 6-22. The Eagles will be riding high after their crushing win over the Giants and will take this momentum into this game to try and do the same to the Cowboys. I just cannot see Dallas coming into the Linc and walking out with a victory as the memories of last December’s beatdown will come back to haunt them as it could be déjà vue all over again.
0 recs |
113 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
A real test.
And an opportunity for our team to prove themselves to be the King of Beasts. The Iggs should be stoked for this one; I know that I am. They’ve worked out a bunch of issues. They have the rookies producing at an impressive level. The D has sorted out it’s early problems and they are healthy (the 53 guys that are left, anyway).
The Eagles have shown that McNabb is still capable of playing at his best, and that they have a reliable back up in Kobb. I think they have the Wildcat experiment mostly behind them now and aren’t spending too much energy on that anymore.
Both teams seem to be playing at a high level. This is going to be the Eagles/Cowboys rivalry at it’s classic best, so this game is going to MEAN something. This is going to be real football.
I can’t wait.
by IggleGreen on Nov 4, 2009 6:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
cowboys defense
ranked 22nd in passing
ranked 14th in the run
Weapon X eats babies for breakfast.
by immynimmy on Nov 4, 2009 8:46 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This will be a good barometer
of where we are. It looked like the O was firing on all cylinders last Sunday, we’ll find out this Sunday whether it’s a trend or an anomaly. I really want to see Romo humiliated.
I bleed green and I piss silver and blue
by oldasquick on Nov 4, 2009 8:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Tony Homo
It never and I mean never gets old seeing this guy embarrassed.
It would be great to add yet another embarrassing chapter to his choke filled career…albeit a bit early in the year as we all know Mr. Homo and the rest of his squad crumbles in December…
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 10:28 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t see Andy using the same game plan he did last week. I think a large part of our success was due to the balance of the play calling. Run blocking gives out O-Line a lot of confidence and a steady run game gives our play action much more threat and let’s Donovan sell more plays. Donovan was on fire and barely got touched but a couple times.
I would like to see at least 10 touches for B-West 10 for Shady and 6 for Weaver
Can our D-Line create pressure on Romo without Blitzing on every down?
Can our LB’s hold Choice/Jones/Barber/Witten and Bennett at bay?
I think so, but I think the key to this game is offensive balance.
Astra Inclinant, Non Necessitant
by EagleGreeninMD on Nov 4, 2009 8:51 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
only thing that scares me...
Is their tight ends…they have two that can burn us for big gainers and we all know that’s our biggest weakness.
The key to our Team’s overall success is driven by offensive balance…we balance the O for the rest of the year we will be watching our team play hopefully into 2010…
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What do you think?
What’s McNabb saying to Romo right there?
“Hey man, all I gotta say is, at least I never cried during a playoff game.”
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Nov 4, 2009 9:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
“Don’t let Owens on the plane. Trust me on this.”
I wonder if I can bill Jeff Lurie and Peter Angelos for the years of therapy their teams are going to put me through.
by BrianS on Nov 4, 2009 10:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
NO, he only pukes in the biggest of them all!!!
by thruthicknthin on Nov 5, 2009 12:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At least he got there.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Nov 5, 2009 9:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Honestly (and not to jinx anything, but...)
I was more afraid of the Raiders then I am of the Cowboys.
I still fully believe the Cowboys are a sub-.500 football team. They had a very bad OT win over the Chiefs, a solid Falcons win they had to have after their bye, and a demolition of an injury-riddled and poorly coached franchise in the Seattle Seahawks (seriously, how did Jim Mora get another chance after that Atlanta debacle?).
The Cowboys are incredibly undisciplined, and Tony Romo is terrible when pressured. The Eagles blitz more times per game then most Cowboys fans can count up to. And, perhaps the most telling part; the Eagles are healthy, and the Cowboys are a division rival – a game the Eagles have marked on their calendars.
Miles Austin, the entire RB stable, and Jason Witten are playmakers. However, making plays is rather difficult when Tony Romo is running for his life and Flozell Adams is tripping three blitzers every down.
Afraid? What is there to be afraid of?
by cwel87 on Nov 4, 2009 9:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
His O-line has been giving him all day, when Romo has that much time to play catch he is extremely dangerous.
Astra Inclinant, Non Necessitant
by EagleGreeninMD on Nov 4, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
A sub .500 team? If you want to look at schedules you haven’t beaten anyone good other than the Giants, who although good are playing very poor as of late, and we beat the Falcons. I don’t see a big difference in who we have played, except you lost to the Raiders and we pulled out one against the Chiefs.
Tony Romo is far from terrible when pressured, in fact if you go read Matt Mosley’s blog from a week ago, http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/5716/mcnabbs-been-awful-against-the-blitz , Romo has the highest QB rating in the East, 10th in the league, 98.9 against the blitz while McNabb is 3rd to last in the whole legaue with a 39.6 rating against the blitz.
You want to talk about teams being healthy, I don’t think you would find any arguments from most that we are very healthy rights now and if anyone has had this game circled it’s the Cowboys after last year’s season finale. You can’t use the we have it circled on our calendar argument when the it means more to the other team.
You should be afraid of the team the puts up more yards than any team not named the Saints (we saw how that ended up) a team that has been on a defensive tear as of late with almost all of our defensive stats coming in the last 3 weeks. Jackson can’t get free up the field when he has a CB bumping him at the line and a safety bracketted over top. You guys can’t score on anything but the big play so can bet Dallas will do their best to stop it with double coverage on your one trick pony. You can’t run the ball, don’t talk to me about the Giants we put up 250+ on them when they were healthy they couldn’t stop my grandmother from hitting the hole, and McNabb will probably just throw the ball into the dirt a few more time.
If you were more afraid of the Raiders, which I sincerely doubt anyone actually said before that debacle of a game, then you are dilusional. Dallas has a point to prove and a team clicking on all cylinders. Just because you beat you the hapless Redskins and a dysfunctional Giants team doesn’t mean this isn’t the same team that lost to the Raiders 3 weeks ago.
by sduncan24 on Nov 4, 2009 10:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
First off people need to drop the Saints reference.
McNabb didnt play. I dont care how good Kolb did as a backup if your Cowboys got beat in a game without Romo than you sure as hell wouldnt use that game as a marking stick for how good they are. I dont know if we win with McNabb in or not but I know he didnt play so you cant argue one way or the other. Use the Raiders that is more realistic. McNabb was in we lost. Regardless of all of that… 44-6. Cowboys haven’t changed that much since then so if you want to be taken seriously than win this game. Until it happens I dont think the Cowboys can beat us in the Linc end of story. You can hype up Romo’s three game INT streak all you want. Pull out some Eagles game stats. I won’t even look it up myself but I can say with almost 100% certainty that Romo has never had an INT free game against the Birds. Oh and the Iggles are second in the league in takeaways this year. Good luck Tony. Cowboys fans are gonna come on this site and drop the “we are hot”, “we got 5 rings BS” all day but when it comes down to it these teams are BOTH playing good football right now, have BOTH played very similar schedules, and could BOTH win this game. It’ll be a good game we should all just shutup and watch it.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
rings
Couldn’t agree more.
HAHA…5 rings…without anyone that’s currently playing on the current roster.
How bout what you’ve done for me lately???…i’ll even stretch that to 10 years.
Anyone who makes the ring argument that hasn’t won a playoff game in well over a decade is obviously the classic Yankees-Cowboys “America’s Team” fan.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Spoken like a fan whose team has never won a Super Bowl
The Eagles are like the Atlanta Braves of the NFL. Wait – the Braves did win a World Series once. How about they are like the Knicks of the NFL.
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
any time i hear a cowboy fan mention his rings, all i hear is “it’s okay we suck.”
by Bleediots on Nov 4, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
that’s all they have to live on are the rings from the days of black and white TV. But can you name a playoff win in the last……say 10 years??
by slandog on Nov 4, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
There are teenagers alive today who were born after Dallas’ last championship.
by UnclaimedFright on Nov 4, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...morons like you prove my exact statement
How bout we factor in NFL Titles…cause we have a three of those if you want to get all historical…and trivial.
NFL Championship = Superbowl pre merger…There ya go..history rules!
So..Just so I’m 100%…You are a Yankees-Cowboys fan?…and even you aren’t please try and garnish a bit of respect and please tell me you atleast live in Texas.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not a Yankees fan
I was born and raised in Oklahoma, been a Cowboys fan since 1979 (I was 9) but now live in DC area (moved here in 1995). Is that OK with you?
Thanks for the NFL history lesson. I probably know more about Eagles history than you do.
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But that is my exact point...
Eagles fans say 44-6. Cowboys fans say 5 rings. Eagles come back with the decade of no playoff wins. That should be the title of these articles because then we could get all of that crap out of the way and talk about this season.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Quite OK.
My apologies for the disrespect earlier as I was clearly under the assumption (based on that comment) you were just another Dallas Cowboy fan that has absolutely zero to do with anything even Texas related (atleast 50% of your fanbase)
And yes. By me stating a clear and obvious fact that you conveniently left out during your history lesson proves to me that you clearly are more knowledgeable than me about Eagles history. Good point.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
it's really not ok...
there are a couple of cowboy’s fans that come here for actual debate. they are ok. you are not, sir.
"it's like i tell my ex-wife, i never drive faster than i can see, and besides it's all in the reflexes." -Jack Burton, Big trouble in little China
by snowhill82 on Nov 4, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's funny
I doubt if McNabb would have stopped the Saints from scoring 41 points or racking up 400+ yards of offense in Philadelphia. That was pretty humiliating. Whatever. Let’s just see how the game goes.
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If I have to explain all the reasons McNabb could have changed that game...
your not much of a football fan. Kolb had three picks. Saints scored 21 points off turnovers… do some math.. I know that will take a few days but get back to me on Saturday when you figure it out.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know, McNabb never has turnovers
and the Saints scored 14 points off two Kolb ints, and I took away the int ret TD already to make the math easier for you. The other TD was off a Hobbs KO return fumble. Would McNabb have stopped that? Do you watch your own games? And do you make excuses like this whenever the Eagles get humilated at home?
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You obviously are confused...again.
Ok…so you are 100% correct (congratulations) on the Hobbs KO fumble turning into 7.
But let’s do some math together.
Points scored by the Saints = 48
Points off of Kolb’s Ints = 14
Points scored by us = 22
Points that could have been scored by us if McNabb was starting in place of Kolb’s Ints = 14
Final score if those 2 picks would’ve been TDs…Eagles 36, Saints 34
Now obviously we are speaking in asinine hypotheticals, but I’m pretty sure that was the point my fellow Iggles fan was referring to..and don’t worry, I won’t be offended if you can’t follow this..I’m sure your feeble southern mind (giving you credit that hopefully you live in Texas) wouldn’t be able to handle such a complex equation.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, these are asinine hypotheticals
but I’m only willing to give you the second to last int, when the score was an already out-of-hand 41-22.
That’s hilarious that you accuse me of having a feeble southern mind. What about missing teeth? Let me guess what you are like. Fat. Haven’t showered in several days. Obnoxious. Have had at least 2 STDs during your lifetime. Am I getting warm?
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Im glad I have support on this...
But you are both going past what I said. What I meant was that with McNabb in the Eagles control the ball better. I never said we would win I just know it wouldnt have been so lopsided. That game got out of hand in the 2nd half on back to back turnovers for TDs. That pick on our own 20 would not have happened if McNabb was in. It immediately impacts the game. Also I like how we put it on the G-men and they are suddenly a completely different team then the one that beat Dallas. It’s like as soon as the Eagles beat anyone they lose all credibility to Cowboy fans.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
jus backin u up buddy.
And trust me…I hate the “if this happened…” argument. It has zero relevance.
I just wanted to use actual numbers to demonstrate one way the saints game could have been a completely different game with Mac5 at the helm. Because it’s so ridiculous to somehow fathom that not having your starting pro bowl QB play could have impacted the way a game turned out.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ya I just think with McNabb in its a closer game...
If the Cowboy fans really wanted to hit me hard they would keep pushin the Raiders game.. we had everyone except Herremans back for that one.. we just stunk up the joint.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 11:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How
How is that last comment any different than Eagles fans saying “oh, it’s only the Falcons” after Dallas stomped over them 2 weeks ago? Truth be told, the Giants from week 2 and the Giants from last week are different teams. Injuries to their secondary has exploited their merely average linebacking core and showed that they have no depth whatsoever on defense.
Also, it how is it any different than Eagles(and other) fans saying “Dallas has only beat one opponent with a winning record” when they took their only 2 losses down to the wire and were 2 plays away from winning the game? Point is, none of this matters. It does not matter who you play. As Parcells once so eloquently stated, you are what your record is. Right now, Dallas and Philly are both 5-2 teams heading into a huge matchup for both teams.
by Zach22 on Nov 4, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Uh huh. When the Giants beat the Cowboys, it’s okay, because they’re the dominant team in the division.
When the Eagles smoke the Giants, it’s “Oh the Giants aren’t the same team they were” — because to admit the Giants are bad is to admit that the Cowboys lost to a bad team in their home opener, and to admit the Giants are good means admitting the Eagles have defeated a tougher opponent than the Boys have.
It’s funny watching Cowboys fans tie themselves in knots trying to make excuses for their team. Good thing it will all be settled Sunday night on the gridiron.
by UnclaimedFright on Nov 4, 2009 2:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How in the hell did you get that at all from what I said? Look at the wide spread injuries among the Giants on their defensive side, and if you actually watched the game, Dallas outplayed New York and the Giants still were able to beat them. The defense has collapsed this season, and when it faces powerhouse offenses like the Saints, Cowboys, Cardinals(when Warner doesn’t have a 5 pick day), and yes, the Eagles, they have progressively gotten worse.
The Giants are not currently playing like the team did in the beginning of the year. As an Eagles fan, you should KNOW about teams playing streaky, as it defined your season last year(and as a Dallas fan, ours in 07 was the same). The Giants have hit a wall, and are falling off hard.
You are what your schedule is, and can only beat the teams on your schedule. Period.
by Zach22 on Nov 4, 2009 3:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So if the Giants beat the Cowboys the second time around.. then its purely because they were on the incline at the time? Please. Cowboy fans have an earful of excuses when it comes to why their team is the greatest.
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
by Eaglesgrl5 on Nov 4, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No
No, that isn’t how it works. Dallas and the Giants are about on the same talent level, the Giants play(or played) better as a team due to the positive coaching influence. Point being, the Giants beat Dallas off of a last second FG after needing 4 turnovers and after giving up over 200 yards on the ground. I never once said Dallas is the greatest team, so stop putting words in my mouth and trying to make yourself look smart and witty. Dallas, this season, at the present time, is playing around 11th or so in situational “power rankings”. Philly is a few spots higher, and the Giants are a spot or two lower.
Nice to know you can ignore things which prove you wrong though.
by Zach22 on Nov 4, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ooo, testy!
Yah, we get it…you lost to the giants before injuries. But as you said, you are what your schedule is. The eagles got the “luxury” of having 3 divisional games in a row after a bunch of fluff games (mostly) to start the year.
I would be concerned about the turnovers though against the giants. Eagles rank #1 I believe in turnovers this year (I might be wrong, but they’re close to the top). When the eagles beat the cowboys, it’s because of turnovers, mostly by Tony Romo. You shouldn’t pretend like that was a handicap for the giants or something, because the eagles have the same aggressive style of defense.
by eagleyosh on Nov 4, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's a shame the Cowboys blow
Or else maybe someone here would care what you would have to say.
Stay the hell off our site. Just because you haven’t had anything to root for the last 13+ years doesn’t mean yu have any right to bullshit.
The Cowboys are owned by Jerry Jones and employ Wade Phillips as the head football coach. You’re a laughingstock – deal with it.
by cwel87 on Nov 4, 2009 6:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
So, instead of responsibly and maturely arguing and debating a point, you tell me to “stay the hell off of your site”. Thankfully there are still enough intelligent Eagle fans here who actually will discuss things responsibly.
And I never said anything about playoff losses or anything of the sorts. Just because you hold a blind hatred towards Dallas doesn’t mean you should attack it’s fans and assuming that most of their fans are the same.
by Zach22 on Nov 5, 2009 12:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You used power rankings as an argument
You are officially branded as ‘guy who really noted power rankings and then said other people’s arguments are flawed’.
Why should I even respond to that dumbassery?
Oh right, I shouldn’t.
by cwel87 on Nov 5, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
I only used them because in a logical sense it proves a point. Power rankings, especially early in the season which we presently are, are idiotic and do not accurately measure a team, due to the parity level in the NFL as well as how streaky teams can play. Again, as an Eagles fan I assumed you would notice this.
And how cute, you know how to throw around insults and ignoring points. Glad to know you are one of “those” fans.
by Zach22 on Nov 5, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, sure
Dallas, this season, at the present time, is playing around 11th or so in situational "power rankings". Philly is a few spots higher, and the Giants are a spot or two lower.
Backtrack all you like. You tried to use media power rankings to legitimize the Cowboys as contenders, and nothing you can say will take away from that.
Unfortunately, you now realize how utterly idiotic your original point was, but it’s too late for that. The damage to any intelligent fan’s brain is already done.
by cwel87 on Nov 5, 2009 7:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
last second losses
the eagles lost most of their games last year at the end of the game…it was ridiculous. The result was squeaking into the playoffs on a miracle. come playoff time, those close games decide who gets in and who goes home (unless God intervenes, as He did last year for his beloved Iggles)
by eagleyosh on Nov 4, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is that really ther perception of the East Coast?
If so, that’s pretty funny. But, fortunately for me, you couldn’t be colder.
I was giving you credit that since you were using one of dem noo-fan-guld In-turrr-nat-sytes that you atleast had teeth and weren’t inbred.
How bout let’s go back to arguing football…or better yet, wait and see what happens on Sunday night.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Anyway, I meant no offense. If you checked out bloggingtheboys.com you’d see that I genuinely respect the Eagles. It’s just their fans that piss me off.
Frankly am very anxious about this game. I am no blind Cowboys fan, that’s for sure. But it should be a great match-up.
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oK.
Agreed.
Honestly…I’m not a fan of a big chunk of our fan base either because they give us, knowledgeable, rational birds fans a bad name. I obviously lumped you into the typical bandwagon Dallas fan that we run into over here on the East coast that gives you actual southern born Cowboy fans a bad name.
We do know one thing. Sunday night’s game will be quite exciting.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 12:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Humiliating
The Saints are undefeated and playing the best football in the NFL. Humiliating is a 44-6 lose when all you have to do is win and your in the playoffs and instead you get off the bus and embarrass yourselves. Nice game plan.
by slandog on Nov 4, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
good point on saints..didn’t dallas lose to the rams without romo last yr?
by Bleediots on Nov 4, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Did I say any of that?
I didn’t bring up anything that you told me I was wrong about. I made one very small comment about the Saints game, and you wrote a whole paragraph on it. So I will assume that you agreed with the rest of my analysis.
The Cowboys have changed a fairly decent amount since that game. Our starting left guard is healthy now, our starting running back in healthy (although he played that game was just coming back from a broken toe), Felix Jones is playing, Miles Austin has emerged as a good WR, TO is no longer here, it is Nov and not Dec. The list goes on, this is not the same team as last year.
I never said anything about Superbowls or anything else, you should keep your preconceived notions to yourself and save your rants about that line for someone who uses it. We playinng good football right now and that is why we will win, not because of the past.
by sduncan24 on Nov 4, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Contradiction
You completely contradict your own argument about schedules when neither of us have more than 1 quality win.
And we already saw what happened when teams dbl cover Djack. Go right ahead..take him out of the game. See what happens on the other side of the field.
One trick pony? Miles Austin seems to be your one trick pony if we’re gonna play this game.
And despite your team now showing up and getting destroyed and embarrassed last year, its eagles-cowboys…Those two games are ALWAYS circled on both their schedules – you would be stupid to think it’s not as important for us to embarrass you guys again.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I made no such contradiction.
I pointed out we both played poor teams and had one quality win. I didn’t use the schedule to point out anything other than to respond to the poster who claimed we barely beat the Chiefs.
Yes, one trick pony and if you watched any Cowboys games, you can clearly see that Austin is more than just a deep threat like Jackson is, that is all he can do and Austin is a much more complete reciever. (although Jackson is a bigger deep threat than Austin)
The point was made that the Eagles have had this game circled, my argument was that if either team had this “circled” and is more pumped up about it had to be Dallas considering what took place last year.
by sduncan24 on Nov 4, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
received sir.
And I’d like to thank you by proving to me that atleast one knowledgeable, present minded, rational cowboy fan exists on this website.
Good points in response to my rebuttal.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think so
When the Eagles go and play against rivals, Reid and co. do a very good job of getting the team fired up to play. You have no worries about that; after all, the Giants talked about how ‘bitter’ they were after how last season ended all last week. That motivation got them real far.
DeSean Jackson or Miles Austin? Are you serious?
You’re not serious, right?
Oh wait…you’re serious. That’s too bad.
by cwel87 on Nov 4, 2009 3:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Miles Austin
Miles Austin, this year
Week 1: 1 catch, 42 yards, 1 TD
Week 2: 1 catch, 20 yards, 0 TD
Week 3: 0/0/0
Week 4: 3/19/0
Week 5: 10/250/2
Week 6: bye
Week 7: 6/171/2
Week 8: 5/61/1
In his breakout game, he played against KC, who has the 26th ranked pass D. I’m not sure which # WR he was that game, but I’m guessing 2 or other. If he was 2, KC ranks 28th in the league in covering #2 receivers. Other WRs they rank 14th in covering.
In the next game, he played Atlanta, who ranks highly covering the #1 WR, but only 23 in covering the #2 and 26th in covering other WRs.
Against seattle, his numbers came back down to earth…yes good, but not great. That’s surprising since they really suck at covering the #1, #2 and anyone who the other team might want to throw the ball to.
Desean Jackson
Week 1: 2/9/0
2: 4/101/1
3: 6/149/1
4 bye
5: 1/1/0
6: 6/94/0
7: 2/69/1
8: 3/78/1
I’m not going to go back and look at all of the defenses for jackson because it’d take too long since his career has been defined by 1.5 years of success so far, not 3 games.
If Austin continues on this pace, then you can talk to me. Until then, it’s senseless to compare a guy that has had success in the league for 1.5 years to someone who has had 2 standout games and 1 good game.
by eagleyosh on Nov 4, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I never compared them
I said that Jackson does one thing, he is very good at that one thing, but he has no other tricks.
by sduncan24 on Nov 5, 2009 8:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, one trick pony and if you watched any Cowboys games, you can clearly see that Austin is more than just a deep threat like Jackson is, that is all he can do and Austin is a much more complete reciever. (although Jackson is a bigger deep threat than Austin)
did you read what you wrote?
by eagleyosh on Nov 5, 2009 9:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
REally?
I guess Djack’s skills as a punt returner and the 60+ yard TD run count towards a deep passing threat???
Point is…we don’t rely on any one playmaker for our offense to be successful and that Austin’s stats are clearly inflated by that KC game.
And although Austin has been a nice surprise for you guys this year, there must have been a reason why he was the #3-#5 receiver for the majority of his career.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 5, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Reason
He was unpolished at the WR position coming into the league, and he has faced two injuries the last two years. He also was playing behind T.O., Terry Glenn, Roy Williams, Patrick Crayton, and many others, not including the other weapons at the positions(Witten, HB’s). That is why Austin was only the 3-5 WR before this year.
by Zach22 on Nov 5, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You're right, Jerry Rice reincarnated was sitting on the bench and nobody noticed!
Or maybe there’s a small sample size, and the back-to-back games were two anomalies in a row.
Oh, what ever more logically explains his meteoric rise?
by cwel87 on Nov 5, 2009 3:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What
Where the hell did I ever call Austin Jerry Rice? As I said, he was an unpolished athlete with minor receiving clothes. When given a chance to fully start, he has played good. It is reasonable to imagine that Austin can be a solid WR, and a starter within this league. Is that so hard to wrap your head around?
by Zach22 on Nov 5, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A 'solid wide receiver', as defined by production in the NFL, is about 60 yards a game with about 7 touchdowns a year
That kind of production is not going to make any kind of a difference on Sunday.
Either he’s a gamebreaker or he’s not. Because, last I remember, Cowboys fans were comparing him to DeSean Jackson.
Your fanbase is so utterly delusional.
by cwel87 on Nov 5, 2009 7:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Where did I even compare him to Jackson?
It is far too early to predict Austin as anything but what he has shown this season thus far. Austin certainly shows he has the potential, now it is time to see if he can maintain it.
But once again, pick and choose what you want to see and ignore the stuff that proves you wrong. Real cute.
by Zach22 on Nov 6, 2009 12:13 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nothing proves me wrong
Nothing.
A ‘solid’ wide receiver in this league is set for about 65-1000-7 over the course of a 16-game season.
Two games against two hemorrhaging defenses is a very, very, very, very, very small and insignificant sample size, not to mention a poor excuse for comparison to someone who’s done it six times in eight games.
In that same vein, DeSean Jackson is a lot better then just 65-1000-7.
Cowboys fans are delusional. Case in point:
Austin is a much more complete reciever.
Where’s the fallacy?
Stop saying stupid shit that makes you feel like you’re in a debate you can win. I’m not ignoring anything; as a matter of fact, I’m reading more of this regurgitated bullshit (and consequently responding to it because it’s so asinine) then I should be.
by cwel87 on Nov 6, 2009 8:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
1) OT win over the Chiefs: Obviously with a 2-2 record and Romo not playing up to par, plus waiting so long to get a sack or a turnover dogged the Cowboys confidence. The OT win discovered Miles Austin and upped the Cowboys confidence which, I think, turned the Cowboys into a good team for the first time this season. So that’s where they are now.
2) Discipline: Even with the Cowboys winning, I’m not happy with Wade Philips as coach. The discipline, due to guys like Keith Brooking, is getting better and this is a more mature team than in previous years.
3) Romo vs. the blitz: Romo has historically been a big playmaker when he’s “running for his life.” There was a play that occurred against Atlanta if you didn’t see that one.
This is a game I think both teams have an equal shot in winning. In terms of motivation, I’d say the Cowboys have the edge, just because of the way things ended for them last year.
Motivation doesn’t win the game, though.
I think we could see a shootout similar to the week 2 shootout of last season because of DeSean Jackson vs. Miles Austin. We’ll see. Looking forward to a good showdown between our two teams.
2009 Dallas Cowboys: 10-6
2009 New York Jets: 11-5?
2009-2010 Dallas Mavericks: 57-25
by Grady90 on Nov 4, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think this game really has a lot of implications on who takes control of the NFC East.
Whoever wins this match up would really vault themselves into the ranks of the vikings and saints.
Lets hope the iggles can really take it to the boys and show that they are the dominant NFC East team.
by Tron79 on Nov 4, 2009 10:08 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Not a lot of implications. The winner of this game is in the drivers seat. Period.
We still aren’t in the league with the Saints yet. They have dominated a tougher schedule and done it with grace.
Astra Inclinant, Non Necessitant
by EagleGreeninMD on Nov 4, 2009 10:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The thing about the Saints...
For me it seems like they are the classic “hot” at the wrong time team. It just seems to me every year there is a team that tears it right out of the gates. They get all the breaks, they get great plays out of their whole team, and then they die in the playoffs. The triple player tip ball in Miami that Sharper takes back to the house… how often will that happen for them this year. The deflection of Matt Ryan’s pass on the 5 that gets picked off when the Falcons are about to take the lead? I think the biggest lesson in the NFL is that at some point in every season your team will not get the bounces in a game and you just have to make it happen with hard nosed, smash mouth football. Look at the Patriots 18-0 season. Every break in the world during the regular season. Smash mouth drag em out knock down football in the superbowl. The Saints are the best team in the NFC right now dont get me wrong. Vikings are a close second. But when was the last time the Saints had consistent success in the playoffs? I dont know if they know how to win when it matters most yet. Great thing about the NFL is well find out come December / January.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Very very true. This is why I want the rematch. We get better as the season rolls on while most teams don’t.
And the Vikings don’t scare me whatsoever. Old man gunslinger has shown what happens to his arm strength and accuracy as the season progresses. It would be especially easy to beat the Vikes if they have to play outside their comfy indoor stadium..
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They have been getting exceptionally lucky
There’s more than luck there, but the team looks like a typical 11-5, 12-4 squad.
I’d love the see Favre wear down soon, because I want to at least have the Iggles in competition for the top 2 seeds in the conference. Watching the Saints and Vikings win every week is getting annoying.
by cwel87 on Nov 4, 2009 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
"it's like i tell my ex-wife, i never drive faster than i can see, and besides it's all in the reflexes." -Jack Burton, Big trouble in little China
by snowhill82 on Nov 4, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Farve.
Nothing is more annoying than all the slurping nonsense by every major network in regards to god damn Brett Farve.
I cannot stand having to suffer the “he’s just a kid out there”, “he just loves the game”, “he just hits that gunslinger button”(quote from Gruden), etc, etc, etc…
And as I was watching the game vs. the 49ers, I just knew he was gonna pull some shit out of his ass to Greg “one great catch per year” Lewis and win that game. Sickening. Someone Tebow this man and send his ass to an overdue retirement….
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 4:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What killed me the most was last week...
When EVERY network cut away from their game coverage to listen to the crowd’s reaction for Favre taking the field in Green Bay. I boo’d along with the fans in GB.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That could be tru about the Saints
But they’ve had a fantastic offense ever since Peyton took over (4 years running). So it’s likely that their offense at least will remain a high-powered machine.
It does seem as though their run defense is a little suspect.
by DavidH22 on Nov 4, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Honestly
Honestly, any one expecting another 44-6 rout of Dallas from Philly is completely and utterly wrong. These two teams are completely different, with completely different line ups and rosters, and it is a totally different time of the year. Dallas is going into Philly with their two losses of the year coming against two very good teams(or at least, a time where the Giants were a very good team, before their recent collapse), but as stated, haven’t really sunk their teeth into the meat of their schedule yet, barring the Falcons. Philly on the other hand, turned it around this last week after a horribly disappointing loss to the Raiders and an unimpressive win against the Redskins, however, they came out and rolled over the Giants.
To me, as a open Dallas fan who lives in northeastern PA(and before the “LOL BANDWAGONER” talk, I spent a lot of time growing up in Dallas and have many family members there, and actually going down to the Skins/Boys game this year), this matchup comes down to for the Eagles, if they can contain all of the weapons Dallas has on offense and if they can exploit our rather hot and cold secondary, as well as put pressure on Tony and get up quick. If they can get a 10-14 point lead, I fear as a Dallas fan that Garrett will revert to his old, dare I say, “Andy Reidish” ways in terms of pass, pass, pass. Put pressure on Romo and make Dallas one dimensional, and you will beat the game.
As for Dallas, the best thing they could do was limit the explosiveness of the Eagles offense in terms of DJack(who, by the way, will give me massive heartburn and headaches for years to come), Maclin, Celek, and again, force pressure on McNabb and make Reid and the Eagles offense come one dimensional.
Both of these teams are playing the best football that they have this year, and while this game certainly doesn’t mean the division(though it will play a huge impact), it still is a massive game. And while we no longer have T.O.(and thank god, considering how much he fell off in two years), the rivalry will still be as intense as ever. If I had to make a prediction, I am guessing something like a 28-21 in favor of Philly. 44-6 will not be the case this year.
by Zach22 on Nov 4, 2009 11:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
the eagles are a bipolar team. They steam rolled the giants and got embarrassed by the raiders. The final score depends on which eagles team show up.
I should say, however, that cowboys fans should be concerned because just looking quickly at DVOA analysis, the cowboys are 22cd in pass defense and 19th in rush defense (eagles are 2 and 12, respectively). Obviously, the eagles’ strength is their passing game….if the cowboys can’t stop the passing attack, it could turn into another 44-6.
by eagleyosh on Nov 4, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh
Not any more or less bipolar then recent years. The Eagles have had the inexplicable letdown game annually (’06 Jags, ’07 Packers, ’08 Bengals, ’09 Raiders).
The difference is, we have only quality opponents or rivals remaining on the season, and we’ve already had the ‘why the hell didn’t we run the ball?!’ game this year.
I feel like, for at least the ‘09 season, the bipolar-ism is behind us. Now it’s just a matter of out-scheming and out-executing, and I like the Eagles’ chances in that.
by cwel87 on Nov 4, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The past may be tangible, but speculation is still fun
If you ever wonder what’s going on in a lemming’s brain before it plunges off a cliff, just ask an Eagles fan what they were thinking when Zach Miller torched them for an 86-yard TD . Can’t blame the hate or the stale Tony Homo jokes. When 11 Superbowl winners come out of the NFC East and none of them are the Philadelphia Eagles, it’s gotta sting a little bit.
And you can’t blame Cowboys fans for bringing up the past, because the only thing funnier than the future failures of the Eagles are their past ones. I’m glad Tom Cable took a long enough break from beating his wife to take his turn on Donovan and the Doh-Doh Birds.
So here we are, November again. I think this time last year Tony was busy stringing together wins to add to his current 12-game streak in the month while Donovan lost two games and blew his way to a tie with Ryan Fitzpatrick and the Bengals. You know…..a tie. That thing in the rule book that decides a game when both teams suck so bad they have to they have to end it on behalf of the fans.
Wonder what transpires first? The Eagles abandoning the run or fans resigning themselves to a night of drunken oblivion to make a divisional loss against the hated Cowboys easier to cope with? Just don’t puke on the seats at the Linc. Although it would be an improvement, that’s Donovan’s forte.
by baik j on Nov 4, 2009 12:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Agreed on all accounts. Both of these teams have humiliating situations in their past, especially Romo and McNabb. Both have gone out and laid eggs against teams they should have rolled over. And neither of the pasts of the team, even last season, mean anything right now. Right now, both teams are heading into a huge showdown with another, with NFC Beast supremacy on the line. Time to nut up or shut up.
by Zach22 on Nov 4, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you have any 13 year old family members? If so, they may have not even been alive for the last Dallas Cowboys Championship!
But keep holding on to those “5 rings” — and keep talking smack about a tie, moron. That tie landed the Eagles at 9-6-1, whereas after the 44-6 beatdown of the Boys they were 9-7. They would have been 10-6 if they hadn’t laid an egg against the RAMS earlier that season. Guess what? We got into the playoffs, you got to go home and watch a bunch of other teams play in the postseason while crying away the sting of being blown out by 44 points and your vaunted QB not being able to throw one TD.
Leave it to a Cowboy
by UnclaimedFright on Nov 4, 2009 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And where did it get you in the end? At home, sitting and watching the Super Bowl with the rest of the teams. Regardless of what happened last season, last season =/= this year. Any argument of how the teams did in the past is moronic, whether that be the 5-rings argument, the tie argument, the 44-6 or the loss to the Rams? It is all irrelevant at the time at hand. Only thing that matters now is that two division rivals are 5-2 and heading to the biggest game of the season for both of the teams involved. And it should be one hell of a game.
by Zach22 on Nov 4, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I totally agree..
Which doesnt explain why everyone is still riding the 5 SB wins, no playoff wins in over a decade, or even 44-6. There is nothing any fan can throw up this year that clearly says Ealges > Cowboys or Cowboys > Eagles… but still everyone is here giving it a shot.
by IgglesFanDeployd on Nov 4, 2009 3:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“Agreed on all accounts” is what you said above about your retarded comrade’s comments which was full of history lessons and silly comparisons.
Atleast we can agree that the past is the past…and nothing matters but the present and the rest of the 2009 season.
We shall have to wait and see what happens on Sunday.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 4:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And what’s Romo’s forte? Mr. November doesn’t do so well in December now, does he?
I wonder if I can bill Jeff Lurie and Peter Angelos for the years of therapy their teams are going to put me through.
by BrianS on Nov 4, 2009 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You my friend...
Are the absolute definition of why I have zero respect for your fanbase.
Really…the Bengals game? – the tie that assisted us into getting into the playoffs last year?
O and keep the Raiders game comments coming…Stale Tony Homo jokes???…how bout stale Superbowl ring comments. History lesson – Superbowl Championship = NFL Championship. We have 3 of them…obviously they aren’t superbowls, but it’s the pre-merger equivalent and even if they were I wouldn’t mention them at all since I wasn’t fucking alive to enjoy them so they don’t mean jack shit. If the birds had 10 superbowls from over a decade ago I certainly wouldn’t be parading them around because I’d be more concerned with what’s happened recently (last 3-4 years).
O yeah, McNabb puking and losing to the Brady dynasty by 3 is certainly less of an embarrassment than not being able to catch a snap for the game winning field goal in the playoffs. But I’m sure Homo made up for it the next year…or the next year…or the next year. Didn’t think so.
You must be the typical bandwagon fan. Let me guess, your favorite baseball team is the Yankees and your favorite NBA team is either the Lakers or the Celtics. And even if these assumptions are incorrect, please try and retain an iota of respect by please telling me your from Texas. I doubt it based on your idiotic comments above.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 4, 2009 4:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Your comment was moronic. I’m glad Tony has 12 wins in a row in November, because he really sucks a big one in December, and he’s back to the golf course by January. but hey, whatever makes you happy. I was happy when the eagles embarrassed the cowboys last december to get into the playoffs. You were probably happy when they beat the eagles in September because it boosted tony’s rating. To each his own.
by eagleyosh on Nov 4, 2009 6:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not expecting a beatdown of 44-6 again that’s for sure however the Eagles have a much better Defense than Dallas a argument that is being overlooked.
Dallas, being 22nd against the Pass is in trouble, the Eagles have big play weapons everywhere and Dallas’ secondary could be torched.
Dallas won’t be able to run on th Eagles either they are tied with the Steelers for the best run defense in the NFL allowing 3.4 YPC which is a much better indicator of run defense than YPG.
If the Eagles O-lne contains Demarcus Ware I don’t see how Dallas wins this game The Eagles have forced at least one turnover in every game they have played so far, and lead the NFL in takeaways,they WILL force another against Dallas period.
Go Eagles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by sportsfanatic1990 on Nov 4, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Dallas wins because
without the big play the Eagles have struggled moving the ball between the 20s. If Ware doesn’t get pressure but we prohibit the big play, then you guys are done for.
by sduncan24 on Nov 5, 2009 8:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
not really true
last game we moved the ball pretty decently and then hit a big play…not down the field bomb all the time either. It’d be 2 first downs, then a third and short and Weaver or McCoy would run for 40-60 yards. they were moving the ball with ease
by eagleyosh on Nov 5, 2009 9:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The stupidity just doesn't stop. Ever.
The Eagles haven’t STRUGGLED moving the ball between the 20’s; they haven’t HAD to move the ball between the 20’s.
That’s because of this crazy little thing called speed.
by cwel87 on Nov 5, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I kinda think this game comes down to line play.
How is your Oline playing at this time. Ours has been pretty good but we havent played a D as good as yours. We have left Witten in to protect more but with the emergence of Austin its paid off. We have always struggled with the line stunts you guys run when it comes to pulling off of one guy and picking up another. That is a concern of mine.
I think we will put Newman on Desean with Hamlin over the top mostly. I dont like that matchup as Hamlin doesnt have the quickness or hips for Desean. Still with double coverage there McNabb might look to Jenkins and Macklin, who will be a great matchup now and for many years to come. Both young goodlooking players whose stars are both rising. Sensabaugh on Celek will both win some battles and if Avant is your 3rd WR he will matchup with Scandrick. Avant is big but Scandrick (who struggle early but rounding into form) is a tough guy.
This leaves our Dline against your Oline.
Watch out for our special teams. Our kicker kicks it deep and our punter hits a high directional kick that doesnt allow for many returns. It might be what tips the scales.
KICK ASS every day!!!
by squidlo97 on Nov 4, 2009 7:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Easy schedule
As far as I know, the cowgirls have had an easy season so far, and the eagles have had a considerably difficult season overall.
You can't soar with the Eagles when you're surrounded by turkeys.
by Aeries god of soar on Nov 4, 2009 8:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding me?
Please go back and look at the schedule and come back to me. Both teams have had an equally easy schedule, pretty easy to see if you knew what you were talking about.
by sduncan24 on Nov 5, 2009 8:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A rational Cowboys fan's perspective...
I wandered over from the Cowboys blog just to get the other perspective on this game and I’ve stumbled upon inane and worthless statements from both sides of this debate. There has also been some very reasonable and insightful takes on the game that I initially came in search of…
My take…
The Eagles and Cowboys both come into this game playing very good ball. But, neither team has shown a ton of consistency (Oakland/KC). It seems this game will hang on a few noticeable battles..
Philly running attack vs. Dallas D – The receivers are going to get their yards it would take a fool to not see that. But, Reid’s tendency to get pass happy would allow the boys to bring pressure and keep up double coverage on Desean. The Boys have been stout against the run but have shown themselves to have problems with gap discipline that could be a serious problem against screens and counters. If the running game gets going it will force the boys to respect play action and not gear up against the pass.
Philadelphia D vs. Dallas O – line – in the 44-6 game the line was beaten up and missing two starters. Romo didn’t have time to throw and was trying to force too many things. One thing that has been lost in the Romo/Austin love fest is that the O-line has been giving Romo tons of time in the pocket to find the open guys.Also, all 3 running backs have spent more time committing to blitz pickups and it’s shown. The Eagles have almost always been able to get pressure to disrupt Romo but if they fail to do so the offense will put up big plays and steady runs.
Special teams – Desean has been a killer on returns. If I’m not mistaken 3 of his 6 TDs have come on ST. This will be critical to the game. One thing overlooked about this years Cowboys is their vastly improved special teams. David Buehler is a kickoff specialist that leads the league in touchbacks and Matt McBriar has been showing his pro bowl caliber leg and directional kicking. Under new coach Joe DeCamilis the special teams has been pinning teams deep and really getting great field position. Something has to give here and if Philly can maintain a very good return average they will do very well.
Turnovers – I am not sure but I am pretty sure Philly hasn’t had a ton of trouble with turnovers this year. Dallas has been great the past couple weeks but still has the ability to give the ball away and if they do the eagles will certainly capitalize and probably win the game. I think the Eagles can still win this game with a -1 or maybe – 2 differential; The Cowboys though will probably have to be even or + in the t.o.d. in order to come away with a W on the road.
This is going to be a good game I would expect. Both teams are confident and with first place on the line and the bad taste of 44-6 in the Cowboys’ mouths there is little doubt both teams will be up for this big division game. I think the Eagles are much less likely to beat themselves than the Cowboys. If the Cowboys turn the ball over they will almost certainly lose. On the flip side if the Cowboys jump out to a quick lead and force Philly to abandon the run I would believe it will be difficult Philly hang around with Dallas’ ability to run the ball and win the t.o.p. battle….
If I was a vegas line maker.. I’d say it is pretty reasonable to think Philly should be favored by 6.5 or 7 especially being at home. But, someone above me said they were more scared of Oakland than they were of the Cowboys…this is pretty absurd. Dallas is a much better team than Oakland and is at least capable of keeping this one close and making a good game of it.
This should be a good one… but, the only prediction I’m willing to make is… we won’t have another 44 -6 :)
Best of luck this week…this is what the NFC is all about!
Wade Phillips has never won a playoff game as a head coach..he has lost 4 home playoff games.
His longest tenure as head coach was 3 years.
Only once did his record as a HC improve from one year to the next (by 1 game)
Wade Phillips for DC
by SDTrueblue on Nov 4, 2009 9:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Nice post. Agreed on all counts.
Especially the part about us establishing the run for the birds to be successful…If only fatman understood running the ball sets up big passing plays…hopefully after last week, he has finally grasped that concept.
by 5 plus 10 equals 6 on Nov 5, 2009 11:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We all complain about him not running the ball. Reid will have a game where he runs the ball and we all hope he “gets it” then the next game he is back to throwing 80/20 vs the run. I feel like this is an ongoing-every season type of argument and the same thing happens. With Westbrook back at less than 100%, he won’t be able to run every play and Reid might just stick to a couple of touches for him and mostly throwing – which scares me. We’ll see though, Reid might surprise me.
In life, as in a football game, the principle to follow is: Hit the line hard.
-Theodore Roosevelt
by Eaglesgrl5 on Nov 5, 2009 1:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ahem..
NFC East !
Wade Phillips has never won a playoff game as a head coach..he has lost 4 home playoff games.
His longest tenure as head coach was 3 years.
Only once did his record as a HC improve from one year to the next (by 1 game)
Wade Phillips for DC
by SDTrueblue on Nov 4, 2009 10:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
R.I.P Jim Johnson 1941-2009
we will miss you Jim Johnson, thank you for everything you done to the eagles defense making them the best of the best, RIP JJ...
by EAGLE_MAN71 on Nov 6, 2009 1:29 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Who sucks now???
Clearly Romo sucks, Austin was a one, no two, no three hit wonder, Barber’s not that tough, and Ware is over paid… but the Cowboys are still better than the beagles. Three of your next 4 games are on the road against the Chargers, Bears, and Falcons. I doubt you win any of those games.
by Streak on Nov 9, 2009 9:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 

















