FO ranks Eagles #2, also #13 in the DVOA era (1994 - present)

by NJBammer on Nov 3, 2009 5:58 PM EST Comment 5 comments

Read all about it here.

For those curious, the reason we're ranked so high is FO gives high points for stomping opposition into the ground. Our two losses were fairly close, one being to #3 NO, and all of our wins have been blowouts. We're basically ranked as co-#1s with NE, NO, IND, and BALT. Our defense is #1, which is interesting given that we have a rookie DC and our #1 LB went down to injury, as did our backup.

Dallas is ranked #9, which mathematically proves that Dallas SUCKS!!!!!!

	TEAM	TOTAL DVOA	LAST WEEK	WEIGHTED DVOA	RANK	W-L	OFFENSE DVOA	OFF. RANK	DEFENSE DVOA	DEF. RANK	S.T. DVOA	S.T. RANK
1	NE	40.9%	3	41.4%	1	5-2	32.2%	1	-8.6%	8	0.1%	14
2	PHI	39.9%	6	39.7%	2	5-2	14.3%	12	-19.9%	1	5.7%	5
3	NO	39.0%	1	38.5%	3	7-0	31.1%	2	-14.0%	4	-6.1%	30
4	IND	36.4%	2	36.3%	4	7-0	29.1%	3	-6.2%	10	1.2%	11
5	BAL	35.2%	7	35.1%	5	4-3	26.2%	4	-7.7%	9	1.3%	10
6	GB	28.4%	4	28.7%	6	4-3	19.8%	7	-13.7%	5	-5.1%	26
7	MIN	28.1%	8	28.1%	7	7-1	16.4%	8	-1.2%	13	10.5%	2
8	DEN	26.7%	5	26.4%	8	6-1	14.9%	10	-17.6%	2	-5.8%	28
9	DAL	24.6%	11	25.1%	9	5-2	25.9%	5	7.2%	22	5.9%	4
10	PIT	15.5%	12	15.8%	10	5-2	23.6%	6	1.2%	17	-6.8%	31
11	MIA	13.0%	13	13.3%	11	3-4	11.4%	14	2.8%	18	4.3%	6
12	ARI	12.6%	10	13.1%	12	4-3	2.5%	18	-9.5%	7	0.5%	13
13	NYG	10.4%	9	9.9%	13	5-3	10.0%	15	-2.2%	12	-1.8%	24
14	ATL	9.2%	14	9.1%	14	4-3	13.0%	13	3.1%	19	-0.7%	19
15	CIN	5.8%	15	6.1%	15	5-2	15.8%	9	4.3%	21	-5.8%	29
16	NYJ	5.7%	17	5.4%	16	4-4	-8.3%	21	-14.2%	3	-0.2%	16
	TEAM	TOTAL DVOA	LAST WEEK	WEIGHTED DVOA	RANK	W-L	OFFENSE DVOA	OFF. RANK	DEFENSE DVOA	DEF. RANK	S.T. DVOA	S.T. RANK
17	HOU	2.6%	18	2.9%	17	5-3	14.4%	11	15.4%	28	3.5%	7
18	SF	-0.3%	21	-0.5%	18	4-3	-8.5%	22	-9.8%	6	-1.6%	21
19	SD	-1.1%	20	-0.9%	19	4-3	9.6%	16	9.1%	23	-1.7%	22
20	JAC	-4.9%	16	-5.8%	20	3-4	7.3%	17	14.3%	26	2.0%	9
21	SEA	-10.4%	19	-10.5%	22	2-5	-5.2%	19	3.5%	20	-1.7%	23
22	WAS	-10.6%	22	-10.4%	21	2-5	-14.8%	24	-4.5%	11	-0.2%	17
23	CHI	-15.3%	24	-15.8%	23	4-3	-21.1%	28	1.0%	16	6.8%	3
24	BUF	-18.1%	23	-18.2%	25	3-5	-19.4%	27	-0.5%	14	0.7%	12
25	CAR	-18.6%	25	-18.0%	24	3-4	-9.9%	23	0.9%	15	-7.7%	32
26	TEN	-28.2%	29	-28.2%	26	1-6	-8.2%	20	14.9%	27	-5.1%	27
27	KC	-30.9%	26	-31.0%	27	1-6	-23.2%	29	10.6%	24	2.9%	8
28	CLE	-40.7%	27	-41.2%	28	1-7	-33.5%	31	17.8%	29	10.7%	1
29	STL	-42.3%	30	-42.1%	29	1-7	-19.3%	26	22.8%	31	-0.2%	15
30	TB	-43.0%	28	-43.2%	30	0-7	-17.3%	25	24.9%	32	-0.8%	20
31	OAK	-49.0%	31	-49.0%	31	2-6	-37.3%	32	11.1%	25	-0.6%	18
32	DET	-54.6%	32	-54.8%	32	1-6	-27.5%	30	22.5%	30	-4.6%	25

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

ranked 5 in Special teams...

…solely because of desean jackson lol

Weapon X eats babies for breakfast.

by immynimmy on Nov 3, 2009 7:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

Our coverage

For the most part has been pretty good too… Sav has been semi-consistent this year too..

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Nov 3, 2009 8:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

Using math to prove the Eagles are better than the Cowboys…YES!

I can’t wait for Sunday’s game.

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.

by Bob_Q on Nov 3, 2009 8:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

this is asked every week

but remind my dumb ass what dvoa is again?

"Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.

by ando1213 on Nov 4, 2009 2:22 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

Defensive Value Over Average

The theory is that an average team will do x in any given situation, and if you do better than x, you are a better than average team. Defensive adjustments are made given than a poor defense is more likely to allow you to do better than x, etc.

All plays for each game and season is compared to what a average team might be expected to do, and DVOA is awarded.

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Bear Bryant

by NJBammer on Nov 4, 2009 8:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs