Making the Case for Larry Johnson
Today, the Kansas City Chiefs made a bold transa
ction and released veteran Pro-Bowl runner Larry Johnson. The 7th-year player (pictured) was constantly involved in controversies within the organization, and despite his great career and contributions to the Chiefs, was cut in order to free up both team salary space as well as any more potential trouble with the Running Back. For some reason, it is typical that when a player of high value in the league is moved to the free agent market or rumored to be involved in a trade, the Eagles are mentioned as possible pursuers of the certain player, and once again, they have been listed as one of several clubs interested.
Johnson was selected in the 1st round of the 2003 NFL Draft by the Chiefs, and quickly overcame then-starter Priest Holmes as the team’s leading Running Back. Through Week 9 of this season, the 7th-year player has compiled just under 6,000 career rushing yards, 61 total touchdowns, and a pair of Pro-Bowl appearances in 2005 and 2006. The primary reason the Chiefs chose to let the veteran go was because of the disputes that occurred between the team and him. Such questionable incidents include a contract disagreement in 2007, several charges of assault and misdemeanor off the field, and most recently, a suspension for the RB after he used inappropriate slurs during a press conference and via the Twitter online social website.
Now before you write off this article as another pointless gossip story, I suggest you read ahead to get a glimpse of why Larry Johnson would make a good fit in the Philadelphia Eagles’ organization, as well as some reasons as to why it would not be a smart move to sign the troubled back, with my take on the entire situation based upon the listed reasons at the conclusion of the article:
Why the Eagles should sign Larry Johnson…
- Johnson played his collegiate football career at Penn State University, located not too far from the home of the Philadelphia Eagles. Although this fact might not play a big factor in Johnson’s preferred area of signing, he has expressed interest in returning to the place he became a football star. If Johnson is comfortable where he’s playing, it is more than likely he won’t be as upset when things go wrong and he experiences times of difficulty.
- The Eagles are undoubtedly a better team than the Chiefs, record-wise and management-wise. Therefore, Johnson would certainly be attracted to a winning organization since he’s been stuck with one that primarily hasn’t for six and a half seasons in the league. Of course, this isn’t guaranteed, but it’s quite obvious that after suffering through years of dismal losses, staff changes, and barely any postseason play, Johnson would like to be on a victorious franchise before closing out his career. With the Eagles sitting at 5-3 and in a fierce battle for their division, there is plenty reason to believe L.J. would be wide-eyed at the chance of playing for the Birds, ruled by some as potential deep playoff contenders.
- Over the course of the last two seasons, the Eagles are ranked as the worst team in terms of converting on short 3rd and 4th-down situations. Part of this disappointing statistic can be blamed on the lack of a true power Fullback since the addition of Leonard Weaver in this past offseason, but either way, the Eagles need to be able to pick up a few yards (or sometimes even less than a yard) to succeed in close games such as last night’s. At 6 foot, 1 inch and 235 pounds, Johnson would provide the Eagles with a physical runner who has proven to be capable of carrying the ball up the heart of the field for tough, short yards.
Why the Eagles shouldn’t sign Larry Johnson…
- Johnson might not take well to being reduced to a backup role after serving as the Chiefs’ starter for most of his career. Because the Eagles already have Brian Westbrook and rookie LeSean McCoy solidified as the top two backs, the team would have either Eldra Buckley or P.J. Hill to shed from the roster (assuming they would remove another runner to allow Johnson to be on the team), and that would place the athletic Johnson in the official 3rd-string spot. Of course, it’d be likely the Birds would use him frequently as the 3rd rusher, but even so, it doesn’t seem likely he will want to play as a reserve after leaving Kansas City as the longtime starter.
- In addition to his likely wish of starting, Johnson is also expected to want a hefty contract. After all, there were constant issues made out of his money status in Kansas City, and the Eagles might not be willing to part ways with a large amount of salary space for what would likely be a backup runner. As mentioned in the previous reason, they are already attempting to satisfy Brian Westbrook and LeSean McCoy as significant parts of the offense, and it would be hard to fit Johnson on the field as a backup, especially with a starter’s contract.
- Johnson must first pass through the NFL waiver process before becoming available for the league franchises to compete for his services. This means that because of the way the Chiefs released him (it has to do with contractual details and other NFL league rules), specific teams will have a chance at claiming him and his current contract before any other team can. If one of these teams has any interest whatsoever, they might snatch him up as their own free agent signing, and obviously the Eagles would have little shot at acquiring him.
Honestly, I believe the addition of Johnson to the already-explosive Eagles offense would be phenomenal, but I don’t think a move for him is necessary, and we really do not need to add someone of his caliber, despite his big play ability. As long as we can work on converting on those short-yard situations and be sure that Westbrook is able to play consistently without pain, as well as some other factors, there is not much reason to pursue the former Chief. However, his presence on the team would surely boost the stock of the Eagles’ weapons.
1 recs |
31 comments
Comments
I like the analysis, but...
We don’t need a second Mike Vick. Even if we were willing to take the bad press from signing Johnson, I doubt the the former pro-bowler would consent to being reduced to a third-string/gimmick back.
Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
by Bob_Q on Nov 10, 2009 7:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Missed the biggest reason the Eagles shouldn't sign him...
He isn’t good anymore.
2007 – Missed 8 games, 3.5 yards per carry.
2008 – Played a little better, missed 4 games, 4.5 yards per carry.
2009 – Just abysmal – 2.7 yards per carry. His longest carry on the season this year (in 132 carries) is 17 yards. I’ll repeat that – 17 yards is his long carry of the season.
No thanks.
by Bye, Dawk :( on Nov 10, 2009 8:59 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Herm Edwards destroyed him. How many times did he carry the ball in his breakout season? 411? Dude’s body is used up.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Nov 10, 2009 9:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
336 in 3005, plus 33 receptions (261 carries and 27 catches in the final 9 games)
416 in 2006, plus 41 receptions
So in a 25-game span, he carried the ball 677 times and caught 68 passes, for a total of 745 touches, or just a hair under 30 per game. That’s brutal.
by Bye, Dawk :( on Nov 10, 2009 9:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oops, 2005, not 3005. Larry Johnson didn’t come back from the future to play for the Chiefs.
by Bye, Dawk :( on Nov 10, 2009 9:54 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But if he did, I would want him on the team just for story value.
Let the beasting begin.
by TransplantedFan on Nov 10, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LMAO
"I think pro athletes should be forced to use steroids. I think we as fans deserve the greatest athletes science can create."- Daniel Tosh
If Football Had A Church , Brian Dawkins Would Be My Preacher. -NPK
by NorthPhillyKid on Nov 10, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
if he is going to put up those number in 3005, imagine how fresh he is now!
by Tbot86 on Nov 10, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
rec
"I think pro athletes should be forced to use steroids. I think we as fans deserve the greatest athletes science can create."- Daniel Tosh
If Football Had A Church , Brian Dawkins Would Be My Preacher. -NPK
by NorthPhillyKid on Nov 10, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not interested...
i could take your constant posts a little better if you commented even half as much as you posted. Every other guy here has hundreds or thousands of comments to a few or dozens of posts.
"What did it feel like? That collision, I didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs
by jalarsen1 on Nov 10, 2009 9:14 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
So because he doesn’t ever comment that means you don’t like his posts? What does that have to do with anything….it was a decent article take it for what it is. Don’t complain because he never comments on others posts.
by slandog on Nov 10, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
much respect to kingmcnabb5 and the huge effort he puts in to his post’s
"I think pro athletes should be forced to use steroids. I think we as fans deserve the greatest athletes science can create."- Daniel Tosh
If Football Had A Church , Brian Dawkins Would Be My Preacher. -NPK
by NorthPhillyKid on Nov 10, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He puts effort because he uses the same posts from his website.
World Series- check
NBA Title- check
Stanley Cup- check
Superbowl- In progress...
by Route36 on Nov 10, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
big deal
he still had to write them up once. I see no problem with him copying and pasting them into his own fanpost. He takes the time to do some research and does a good write up with his opinion and facts. Take them for what they are, good reading with some thoughtful insight.
by slandog on Nov 11, 2009 11:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I know, he puts in a lot of effort, but rarely says anything beyond the general news that JasonB has up on the front page. It’s obviously not a big deal, and I’m not gonna say anything further about it, but you have to admit it’s a little ridiculous when we’re all trying to have a conversation around the “recent posts” and more than half of them are his
"What did it feel like? That collision, I didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs
by jalarsen1 on Nov 10, 2009 1:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ridiculous
I don’t find it ridiculous and he also get information to the site before JasonB or anyone else does. He by far has some of the better thought out posts then anyone else here. Give the guy a break he’s just posting on some good topics and not looking to “ruffle any feathers” by posting them here.
by slandog on Nov 11, 2009 11:03 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Penn State Running Backs …. just say NO!
Jim Johnson 1941-2009
"The 0-2 pitch, swing and a miss! STRUCK HIM OUT! The Philadelphia Phillies are 2008 World Champions of baseball! And let the city celebrate! " - Harry Kalas 1936-2009
by Whodie126 on Nov 10, 2009 1:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yeah Linebackers okay … running backs no thanks.
Jim Johnson 1941-2009
"The 0-2 pitch, swing and a miss! STRUCK HIM OUT! The Philadelphia Phillies are 2008 World Champions of baseball! And let the city celebrate! " - Harry Kalas 1936-2009
by Whodie126 on Nov 10, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Cut him some slack...
he fucked up his knee on his first carry of his career (preseason). Technology/medicine was not as good 14 years ago as it is now. Who knows how good he could have been if he didnt screw his knee up.
by eaglemaniac814 on Nov 10, 2009 4:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he played for a legit 7-8 years … I don’t think we missed anything. It’s cool 95 wasn’t much of a RB draft anyway remember Rashaan Salaam. I should say first rounders because Terrell Davis and Curtis Martin came out of 95 and they were good.
Either way I’m not going to give him a pass because of his knee injury, he was however an injury machine, elbow problems, dislocated knee cap, broken wrist. He was unfortunately doomed from the get go.
Jim Johnson 1941-2009
"The 0-2 pitch, swing and a miss! STRUCK HIM OUT! The Philadelphia Phillies are 2008 World Champions of baseball! And let the city celebrate! " - Harry Kalas 1936-2009
by Whodie126 on Nov 10, 2009 5:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was a Cutback runner coming out of college...
and he relied on his knees for his running style. He had to change his style of running. If they had the technology now then they did then, he would be a decent HB, not saying he’d be a HOFer, but he would have been a good back.
by eaglemaniac814 on Nov 10, 2009 10:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
the biggest improvements in ACL surgery have been in the past year with a new drilling technique and using cadaver hamstrings. Other than that I’m not sure much has changed.
I’m not saying this injury didn’t hurt him some guys come back and some guys just don’t. Maybe he was rushed back by all the pressure of being the number 1 pick who knows. All I’m saying is he still managed to stay in the league for awhile and never “broke” out I’m not so sure he would have.
Jim Johnson 1941-2009
"The 0-2 pitch, swing and a miss! STRUCK HIM OUT! The Philadelphia Phillies are 2008 World Champions of baseball! And let the city celebrate! " - Harry Kalas 1936-2009
by Whodie126 on Nov 10, 2009 11:17 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you...
other than the fact that he never broke out. That is unknown. He was rushed back and I heard from my uncle that his surgery was poorly done. He was probably also afraid to take a hit, fearing that he’d make it worse.
by eaglemaniac814 on Nov 11, 2009 9:15 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
we don't need another running back
we just need to work on runblocking in practice, get better with playcalling balance and Marty needs to figure out which run plays to call when. IF we got Larry Johnson it would be so he could carry the ball 7 times a game. Waste of resources.
by Eagles need to run on Nov 11, 2009 11:44 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's why we have Weaver...
it’s his job to get the short yardage carries. I find it funny that the only person who got a first down on short yardage was Weaver. Shady is not a short yardage back. Hopefully Marty learned that this past Sunday. We need to hand it off to Weaver a lot more. Give him 20-35% of the handoffs.
by eaglemaniac814 on Nov 11, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs



















