Eagles at Bears 4th quarter open thread
0 recs |
250 comments
Comments
thanks
that was filled way to much
Homo is Romo
by anuj on
Sep 28, 2008 11:07 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
A trick play? That’s gutsy considering how they’ve played.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My bad, I meant 36 obviously.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:09 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I knew that would happen. Sometimes I think Jim Johnson should change it up on 3rd occasionally. That’s the second time they knew the blitz was coming and threw an effective screen.
by FuquaManuel on
Sep 28, 2008 11:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
can 36 still pad up?
just wonderin
Homo is Romo
by anuj on
Sep 28, 2008 11:10 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The way he’s pacing the sideline.. he’d like to.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pretty sure they listed him as inactive.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
This is why they needed to punch one of those in for 7. D can’t be perfect forever.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:11 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
grounding
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That HAS to be intentional grounding
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Intentional grounding???
Asante was coming on the Blitz nice call
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
def.
maybe it’s not grounding because he was in no imminent danger of being sacked and you’re allowed to throw it away if you aren’t in the grasp … guessing there
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yo did u guys notice we havent been getting flagged too much
by Remis on
Sep 28, 2008 11:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not in the second half at least. IN the first half it was getting ridiculous.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Fuck
not being able to see the clock is making me drink faster
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
oh boy, now we need to punch one in if we get close.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
How much time is left?
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That should be game don’t yall think? We need a TD to win. We are not getting a TD. So…
by FuquaManuel on
Sep 28, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
gould is a kicker
i dont know what akers is
Homo is Romo
by anuj on
Sep 28, 2008 11:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
a kicker that cant make a fg over 40 yards
by Remis on
Sep 28, 2008 11:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Next TD by either team wins this thing. I’m convinced.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Not gonna be us if Orton isn’t on the field.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:14 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Punt on first down! Get our playmakers back on the field.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
is it just me or is this game longer than most it seems
by Sabonis4Ever on
Sep 28, 2008 11:15 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t think it’s taking that long. It’s agonizing as hell to watch, which probably doesn’t help our perception of the passage of time.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Watch Avant on this play
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:17 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Eh maybe not
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:17 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Baskett … these guys know to go low on McNabb throws. Wonder if they work on that in Arizona?
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:19 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Shoes" McNabb!
Looking Mean in Kelly Green
by goodfella46er on
Sep 28, 2008 11:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
i think i forgot how to spell ball movement… nvm
by Remis on
Sep 28, 2008 11:19 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Just need two safeties to tie the game
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:19 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
suddenly signs of life!
Up next: Red zone offense.
:(
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Here it is ...
can we score in the Red Zone
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:21 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
eggs-actly.
1st & goal run … gained yards … good sign
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
please god let us get this in the end zone
by Sabonis4Ever on
Sep 28, 2008 11:21 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
god
guys please don’t mess this up…
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:22 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
we asked for them to run the ball.
four shots from inside the 5 with the league’s biggest line … don’t deserve it if you can’t punch it in
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
buck launched way too soon.
Looking Mean in Kelly Green
by goodfella46er on
Sep 28, 2008 11:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You have to go for it and if you don’t make it, the Bears are on the 8" line and have to move it against us.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
might end up with a safety and a kick from the 20 :)
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:24 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I fear a playaction pass here. I really do.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:24 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Man how dramatic would a safety and a last second field goal be… I hope it doesn’t happen that way
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Fuck off. There is no way that didn’t go in.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Fuck them. They deserve all of the bad things that happen to them this season after this pathetic showing.
by FuquaManuel on
Sep 28, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
biggest line in the league … give em credit for running four times.
They just don’t deserve to win this one.
’Taint over though!
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:26 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Westbrook scores on one of those 4 runs.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t think the playcalling is the problem. It’s the execution.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
where the hell did schobel think he was going
by 0sirys on
Sep 28, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Pick it or force a fumble…
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
The D might make this interesting.
2 mnute awrning and how many TOs?
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And Andy Reid is a fat fool who did an especially terrible job of preparing his team for this defense.
by FuquaManuel on
Sep 28, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We have to be fair. We’re missing 4 starters on offense here. That has to have some effect. Especially our #1 weapon.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
can 36 pad up for the last 2 minutes
Homo is Romo
by anuj on
Sep 28, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously shut the hell up or get out of here. We’re all for constructive criticism but you’re just trolling.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:29 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Looks like another heartbreaking loss to Chicago
We used to own this team…
by ajay on
Sep 28, 2008 11:28 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
“good” would not be the first adjective I choose. for either side.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
the D might have given up 24 points but they are certainly not the blame
Our Red Zone Offense gets the title yet again … last year all over
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:29 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
oh god………………………
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Redskins gonna be all kinda overconfident next week.
Birds humbled. This was that dog game they lose from time to time from the very start. Glad I didn’t record it.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:31 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
we thought that from the Cowboys game
and they barely beat the Steelers … if our offense can’t find a way to score with or without Westy we are doomed
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
horrible play calling. O line showed no will to win the game last drive.
by Bugzy on
Sep 28, 2008 11:33 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
it was a great drive. they walked down the field.
shitty red-zone performance.
what else is new?
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm going back
to see what we look like in the RZ
by cavortingEagle on
Sep 28, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We have to get some sort of good TE or decent sized receiver or something…
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
bright side, birds are humbled, westbrook will be back (hopefully sooner rather than later) and upcoming is WAS, SF, ATL
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
it all comes down to points off of turnovers in my mind
and obviously the horrible execution of our O in the red zone
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
why wasn't there a challenge?
If Roehtlisberger scored in the Super Bowl, that could have been one. And why not sneak???
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:34 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah, at that point … well, there is a timeout to lose if you’re wrong.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
why cant we bootleg with mcnabb inside the 5…it aint rocket science….we gon playfake a pitch and expect the bears to fall for that
by Bugzy on
Sep 28, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
it wasn’t the play calls, it was the execution
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m surprised they managed to keep 1:20 on the clock. give credit.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Brian Griese & Kyle Orton
What do these crappy QBs have in common?
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:36 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
playcalls.
run the ball 3 straight times inside the 5???
dmac is the qb…so many different options can be used in this situation
by Bugzy on
Sep 28, 2008 11:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
they have a 330-pound-a-man OL … if they had passed and they were incomplete, everyone would be bitching.
The calls were fine. Big line ith four shots in side the five should be able to punch it in. If you can’t, you don’t deserve to win.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
now of course you wish you had that FG already … they had to go for it there though
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:37 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I still think that was the right call.
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:38 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Jackson here. Let’s go, rook.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:38 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And if Westbrook was playing, he’d be fielding this kick.
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:39 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah, if the big one isn’t there go out
speaking of which, how was that not out?
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
WHAT THE FUCK
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on
Sep 28, 2008 11:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
what the fuck
what the fucking FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This stupid FUCING TEAM ARE YOU KIDDING ME!?!?!?! THE BEARS SUCK!
by Joe_D on
Sep 28, 2008 11:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
DAMN IT DAMN IT FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK DM
Homo is Romo
by anuj on
Sep 28, 2008 11:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I would say unbelievable. But it really is too believable. This team better get healthy soon. Or else it’s gonna be a long climb into the playoffs.
by FuquaManuel on
Sep 28, 2008 11:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Cut Schoebel Please
His whiffed block allowed us to be stopped on 4th down
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
disappointing lose. story of the game cant score of turnovers and poor playcallign inside the red zone
by Bugzy on
Sep 28, 2008 11:41 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
my boys.......
had a tough losss today but thanks to the eagirls i got over it real quick lmaooo
by canty99 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
we just did not want to win this game
by Sabonis4Ever on
Sep 28, 2008 11:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Whatever
We should have put them away
by cavortingEagle on
Sep 28, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm more upset about
the 3 and outs off of turnovers and the red zone offense before that play
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Call me a jerk
but Schobell lost that game for us. Buck would have been in if Schobell’s man didn’t grab him around the neck. He literally didn’t even make contact with the dude he was supposed to block.
by keithk on
Sep 28, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Schobel was supposed to block down it looked like
So he was following his assignment. A lot of things lost the game, but I don’t think Schobel was it. Knowing the Eagles, I’m shocked they didn’t pass on 2nd or 3rd down. And Tony Hunt’s run was really bad, he had some room, but cut outside? Fullbacks don’t cut outside at the 1.
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:47 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Culprits
1. Schoebel – useless – can’t catch, can’t block
2. Booker – this guy is a fraud
3. Reggie Who?
4. DSJ – hate to put him on the list, but there it is
5. Reid – how about a bootleg or QB sneak?
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
And Akers
MAke either missed FG and it’s game over
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The 50 yarder wasn’t his fault. Why didn’t Reid have them go for it there, or punt it?
Did anyone think Akers could make a 50-yarder? He’s completely done and everyone but Reid knows it.
"He’s in trouble. Whatever he throws me, I’m going to hit it."
-- Alex Cintron
by BrianS on
Sep 28, 2008 11:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Who was the kid placekicker from Training Camp?
I hope Andy has his number somewhere.
f you can’t make them past 40, you’re not an NFL kicker.
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not the end of the world.
They’re 2-2. But our D looks like one of the best units in the league. DJack continues to look like a player. McNabb is looking great. And despite injuries to our best offensive player, best olineman and top WR, we were an inch (and maybe that was a TD – I still think that overhead view showed the tip cross the plane) from beating a Bears team that played out of its ass. With Westbrook, this came would have been a blowout.
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm tired of excuses
Would shoulda coulda.
They are the 4th best team in the NFC East
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You are correct
According to the standings that’s true. But the season is 1/4 over. The Eagles have a good shot to win four straight and end 6-2 after week 9.
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
true but everyone thought they should be 3-1 right now
nothing is a given with this team …
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I wish I had your optimism right now!
This is dejavu – same feeling from last year’s Bears game.
Last year that loss effectively kept us out of the playoffs. This win will mean A LOT in a bad way before this season is all over.
by slackerjoe on
Sep 28, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What? What team did you watch? How is this team going to win 4 straight?
"He’s in trouble. Whatever he throws me, I’m going to hit it."
-- Alex Cintron
by BrianS on
Sep 28, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Why does this make me so mad. Did I expect any different?
"He’s in trouble. Whatever he throws me, I’m going to hit it."
-- Alex Cintron
by BrianS on
Sep 28, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Pathetic showing from secondary
Kyle Fucking Orton throwing three touchdowns?
How the fuck does that happen?
by Andrew B on
Sep 28, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
That wasn’t why we lost. 2 times we had first and goal from inside the 5. The defense did more than enough to win tonight
by JasonB on
Sep 28, 2008 11:48 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gocong gave up one of those TDs
And the other came after DJacks fumble.
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No
Gocong was forced to cover a tight end sprinting 20 yards down the field. Where was the safety? We do have two safeties on the field at all times, right? Are the safeties no longer expected to cover the endzone?
by Andrew B on
Sep 28, 2008 11:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A TE, that's the point?
It wasn’t a WR. It was a TE, and Gocong – like he does a lot – didn’t read pass right away and got caught looking into the backfield and was burned.
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nope
Gocong was running to cover the pass the entire play. Mikell was the one who spent the first two seconds backpedalling slowly while watching the backfield, and he was the safety lined up on that side of the field. God only knows what Dawkins was thinking, as there were no good TV shots of him. However, Samuel had his man covered all the way, and Brown didn’t have a man to cover after he broke off the route for a short in, so it makes you wonder what he was doing giving help to the two corners instead of helping cover two tight ends.
by Andrew B on
Sep 29, 2008 12:51 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’d like to see Gocong do a better job, but honestly that’s a bad mismatch. A safety should be there.
by JasonB on
Sep 29, 2008 12:01 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It was probably a well designed play
that drew the safeties, or maybe it was a blitz, I don’t remember. Still, Gocong has physical skills but he’s pretty atrocious at reading pass vs. run and he’s not that great at shedding blocks either.
by phillynyc on
Sep 29, 2008 12:04 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Gocong TD
The Bears lined up
WR WR OLINE TE TE
………………RB QB
Samuel and Brown were on the left with Gaither. Dawkins was deep middle. Mikell was halfway up covering the inside Tight End while Gocong had the outside Tight End. The Bears only sent the two wideouts and two tight ends on patterns, while the Eagles only rushed 4, so 7 were covering 4.
Dawkins just sat in the middle of the endzone and failed to make a decision as to which side he would cover. He ended up jogging slowly towards Olsen. Mikell failed to get deep once his man turned a short out which Bradley covered from the MIKE position. Brown didnt go deep when his man turned a short in which Gaither covered from the WILL.
At the end of the play, Brown is standing still covering no one, Dawkins is jogging around the middle of the end zone, having failed to pick up on the idea of giving deep help to a safety and a SAM linebacker covering two tight ends alone. Mikell is trailing Olsen badly.
How many defenses call for the SAM to cover a man with no safety help for 20 yards? I’d think it would be zero.
by Andrew B on
Sep 29, 2008 12:44 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes it is
You cant give up 24 points in the NFL and expect to win. There is no way Kyle Fucking Orton should go about having a career day while getting sacked 4 times, intercepted twice, and fumbling the ball away twice. Three 20+ yard touchdown passes is damn well the fault of the secondary. Where was the coverage?
by Andrew B on
Sep 28, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But honestly
Why not challenge the first touchdown or the last 4th down stop?
by ajay on
Sep 28, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I've been wondering that too
From that top angle it looked like a TD. Why doesn’t the NFL institute an automatic review of any TD on non-TD call. And can a ref really see a ball in the middle of the pile and whether it crosses an invisible plane? The game obviously never should have come down to this. This should have been a blowout.
by phillynyc on
Sep 28, 2008 11:56 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well you lose a timeout there and you really miss it.
Not saying it’s the right call, but maybe that was their thinking.
Eagles F up challenges pretty regularly.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Can’t believe we are the first team to lose outside of the East … going to be a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG WEEK
by Whodie126 on
Sep 28, 2008 11:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
add andy reid nt making any cahllenges (greg olsen td) to culprit list
by Bugzy on
Sep 28, 2008 11:49 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
You guys have the Phillies at least. I’m an Orioles fan, so I’m just going to be miserable all week. (And I’m guessing next week, too.)
"He’s in trouble. Whatever he throws me, I’m going to hit it."
-- Alex Cintron
by BrianS on
Sep 28, 2008 11:49 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Sheldon Brown was right
“What’s the point of getting turnovers if you don’t do anything with the ball?”
by ajay on
Sep 28, 2008 11:52 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hate to say it,
but without Westbrook our offense just isn’t the same. He gets in the end zone on those goal line plays.
by Nah_Roots on
Sep 28, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah. I just didn’t expect us to be completely inept without Westbrook.
"He’s in trouble. Whatever he throws me, I’m going to hit it."
-- Alex Cintron
by BrianS on
Sep 28, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
andy reid on the lack of a QB sneak:
“well… my QB was a little sore… I didnt want to put him in that position… THIS WEEK”
ummmmmm you played him for the entire game and let him throw 41 passes… WTF ANDY???
by oclafcire on
Sep 28, 2008 11:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Man.
You shouldn’t lose a game if you lead in the turnover category.
by Nah_Roots on
Sep 28, 2008 11:56 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i mean WTF
they were beggin to get blown out consistently giving us good field posistion. Just all around terrible. Andrews, Curtis, Westbrook, LJ…….get healthy.
by Joe_D on
Sep 28, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Field position?
The Eagles started drives on the 20, 26, 20, 13, 33, CHI 41, 23, 4, 4, 20, CHI 35, CHI 28, 16, CHI 31, 24, 39. They had 16 drives, and only 5 were in good field position, while 10 were inside their own 26. Thats mostly terrible field position.
Chicago started just one drive on the 20, one of the 3, and one on the 1. The rest of their drives were from 27 yards or further out. They started 10 drives from their 35 or further out. They lost about 80-100 yards on changes of possession.
by Andrew B on
Sep 29, 2008 12:03 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Night Games
Eagles are something like 2-14 in Night Games since losing the Super Bowl. Im really starting to hate night games.
by Andrew B on
Sep 28, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Red Zone Offense
That’s what it is to me more than anything.
Not just the last drive where they got zero but the two in the second half where they kicked field goals.
Way too close to the goal line way too many times with way too few TDs.
Blame whatever else you want, I’m sticking with that.
by D3Keith on
Sep 28, 2008 11:59 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
WoW
That was disgusting how can we expect to beat the deadskins ?
by TwistedZero on
Sep 29, 2008 12:15 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs














