Ruminations about the Eagles Defense
Recently there have been several notes about the Eagles Defense. Mark Eckel wrote this weekend about the linebacking corps, Igglesblog had an interesting take about the defense's supposed speed and Tommy Lawlor had a nice homage to Buddy's 46.
I personally find it easier to come up with defensible things to say about the offense because that is the side of the ball which gets emphasized during network broadcasts. Prior to the snap the camera is focused on the offense and afterward it follows the ball. It's only during shows like NFL Matchup where we get to see any coaches tape showing the whole field.
NFL Network recently rebroadcast last year's Cowboys victory and I rewatched their highlight reel a couple of times. Several plays stuck out. Three of the Eagles eleven interceptions on the season came in that game. Unfortunately one of them resulted in an immediate turnover (screw on your head before buttoning your chinstrap Quintin), the second, Lito Shepard's pick before halftime, led to the games only TD, and and the last, which turned into Brian Westbrook's infamous knee, was Dawkins' only pick of the year. Certainly you can't generalize based upon a sample size of one, but this example sure seems to say something about turnovers.
These plays were great, but one play - a 9 yard pass reception by Jason Witten - was the one that really got me thinking.

We can probably all remember this quote...
"I'm still the same player, but that scheme up in Philly was different. All I've got to say is proof is in the pudding, so I can't even talk about it. Just watch and see."
...but just in case, that was Jevon Kearse soon after resigning with the Titans. Since then he's proven he likes...well, let's not beat a dead horse.
The reason that 9 yard completion to Jason Witten was significant to me was that Trent Cole actually had decent (though not great) coverage on the play. The first watch through I wasn't sure so I rewound the tape a couple of times, and there it was, #58 in coverage. Obviously Jim Johnson had called some kind of zone blitz. Is this why Jevon was unhappy? He was asked to both play the run and drop into coverage? That in addition to his simple pass rushing duties?
Thing is, Jim Johnson does that an awful lot. His defensive ends are regularly asked to roll out and cover the flat or drop back into a zone 10 yards deep. For that matter, JJ will even ask his tackles drop back into coverage. The opposing O-line never knows where the pass rush is coming from or if it's coming at all.
I wonder how many people remember the Giants-Bills Superbowl in January, 1991. That was one of the best games I've ever seen, Bill Parcells controlled the clock with the quintessential power running game and the Giants defense only had to control the Bills offense for 20 minutes. When that defense was on the field, Bill Belichick often lined up with 5 linebackers and only 2 defensive linemen in his front 7. This meant that when one of the Bill's wideouts caught a pass over the middle, there was someone big there to meet them.
How is this Superbowl relevant to today's Eagles then? When I look at the Eagles front seven, I see names like Trent Cole, Bryan Smith, Chris Clemons, and Chris Gocong. These guys are hybrid-type defensive ends that are quick enough to drop into shallow zone coverage but strong and agile enough to create real problems when they rush the passer. They are almost like the outside 'backers the Giants fielded in Superbowl XXV (though certainly none of them resemble the original LT). Supposing we team them with a pair of stout defensive tackles, the Eagles field a base defense that seems - to my mind at least - an awful lot like that 2-5 defense Belichick fielded against the Bills. This could also tend to explain why the Eagles Defense under Jim Johnson has been so good against the pass, but not so stout against the run.
Jaws likes to say, "Points come from the passing game." I think Jim Johnson agrees and designs his defenses to limit the passing game (and thereby points). I wonder if the similarities I see between his defense today and Belichick's then are more than mere coincidence. Whatever the case, I'd really like to see more of the Eagles defense because I sure do find it interesting.
0 recs |
6
comments
Read Related
Comments
I agree that there is definitely something very interesting developing on defense. JJ has always been innovative, but something is different about the recent approach. I don’t think the approach will be quite as drastic as 2-5 (maybe on some plays, but not as a base), but we will certainly see a lot of 3-4. Media attention is always focused on the offense, and this means that this D has flown under the radar. The game always keeps changing, and faster, hybrid players in the front 7 could very well be the next big change. Coupled with the amount of WRs lining up on many plays, it’s very possible. If this is in fact the next part of evolution on D, we will certainly be ahead of a lot of teams thanks to JJ! I’m very very excited about this defense, it’s gonna be great.
The NFC East goes through Philly.
by LeonSA on Jul 2, 2008 1:59 PM EDT 0 recs
I think
If we consider Trent Cole a DE/LB and Gocong a LB/DE…
Maybe it;s a 3.5-3.5?
The thing is, Jim Johnson seems to really use his players creatively – I’ll be watching the games closely this year to see what he does on D…
by cavortingEagle on
Jul 2, 2008 4:21 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Good Call
Very well said. Also, the NFL offensive “trend” lately has been to pass more, so I like to see JJ ahead of the curve planning to stop what teams want to do the most. Also it’s another reason why Lito needs to play this season, and play hard. Three pro-bowl caliber corners behind the guys you just mentioned sounds really good to me.
by jhavrk8 on Jul 2, 2008 2:30 PM EDT 0 recs
I really like the potential of this defense.
If you look at it, the Eagles defense was pretty good last year. They finished 7th in the NFL against the run, 18th against the pass(could be better), and finished number 1 in red zone defense. The major issue was a lack of turnovers, and big plays. They finished dead last in interceptions, and dead last in total turnovers forced. Asante Samuel, Stewart Bradley, and the potential of a much improved pass rush(Clemons, Abiamiri, Smith) could change that dramatically. If this defense can start creating turnovers it has potential to be a top 5 defense in the NFL.
Jevon Kearsed – I don’t think dropping into a zone was a problem for Jevon. He actually played linebacker at Florida, and despite his low production here, we all know he is very athletic. Coverage is a not a strong point for Kearse, but he is very capable of doing it.
From what I have gathered on the subject, Kearse’s main beef was his position. He played right defensive end, and blames his lack of production on being moved to left defensive end. The main difference in these positions, is a left defensive end will typically line have a tackle and tight end line up across from them, so they tend to get doubled more often than a right end.
The thing is you do not see other left ends such as Michael Strahan, Patrick Kearney, Derrick Burgess, Kyle Vanden Bosch, Aaron Kampman, and many others all seem to have no problem putting up big numbers at left defensive end. Kearse is just making a lame excuse for playing like crap.
Ironically Derrick Burgess played right defensive end for the Birds, and then he flourishes in Oakland after being moved to left defensive end. Some guys can only play one side or the other, but i think the Eagles tried everything they could with Jevon, but he was just unable to produce results.
by Inside the Iggles on Jul 2, 2008 7:50 PM EDT 0 recs
Whoa
Something you never got with me writing. The word “ruminations.”
I’ll have to remember that!
by JasonB on Jul 3, 2008 6:06 PM EDT 0 recs
I think of
Aaron Karo the comedian and my days reading CollegeHumor.com in college.
by Whodie126 on
Jul 7, 2008 10:43 AM EDT
up
0 recs









