Two first round picks not enough for Chad Johnson
![]() |
|
|
Serious enough to swat away an offer from the Washington Redskins that could have netted the Bengals two first round draft picks, team and league sources said.
The Redskins offered this year's first round pick, No. 21 overall, and a conditional third rounder in 2009 that could escalate to a first rounder if Johnson and the Redskins hit certain performance levels, the sources said.
The Bengals have not only rejected the Redskins, but two other NFC East suitors -- the Dallas Cowboys and Philadelphia Eagles -- have been informed that there has been no change in the team's position that Johnson will not be traded.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
has no ont cought on to this
by NickPampani on Apr 22, 2008 12:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good point
by JasonB on Apr 22, 2008 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I guess that is it
by yophillybro on Apr 22, 2008 1:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Bengals are taking crazy pills
Get quality players/picks for him now. He doesn't want to play in Cincy, so they have nothing to gain and plenty to lose by not trading him.
by rhy on Apr 22, 2008 1:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
this is
by NickPampani on Apr 22, 2008 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No Way
by ajay on Apr 22, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually
Guess what I'm trying to say is, if you don't like your contract, make your feelings know... PRIVATELY!!! and accept the team's decision and go play your ass off... I'm sure that action will say alot more about you and your character than popping up everywhere like a bad case of crabs with a box of tissues crying to any asshat with a video camera or microphone.
Sorry for the rant.
by foos05 on Apr 22, 2008 2:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You are missing the boat on this one
I love how people can bash him for trying to get off a team that is clearly not trying to win a championship. I sometimes wonder if you guys ever played sports growing up, I am an extremly competitive person and if I was in a situation where my team wasn't doing anything to get better I would do everything I could to get away.
I wish I could force you to work a job you hated with management you hated and see them make bad decisions and not try to grow and see how you handled it. I'm sure you would walk in and say hey I want out jsut wanted to make that clear now I'm going to go back to my desk and do my job to the best of my ability never complain to anyone and continue to be productive even though this is not a situation conducive to that. Don't worry I won't cause a scene even though you refuse to let me move on to a situation that will be better for us both I will just sit here and take it like a man while continuing to work my ass off for you.
HAHAHA this is a joke.
by Whodie126 on Apr 22, 2008 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sorry
I'm all for players expressing how they feel about the organization... PRIVATELY! Don't air your dirty laundry. Tell the team how you feel, if they don't agree, sorry those are the breaks of life.
by foos05 on Apr 22, 2008 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's always about the money
He doesn't want more money from the Bengals. I understand why he doesn't want to play there anymore, but ultimately he still expects a new contract.
Everyone said it wasn't about the money with T.O., but one year later it was. The same exact thing will happen if the Eagles do this: they'll front-load his new deal to protect themselves, in year two he'll see he has a low base salary, then he'll complain he outplayed his contract. It's all sit-ups in his driveway after that.
No one can deny this guy is a talented receiver, but he's hot dog on the wrong side of 30 and the bar has been set at two firsts and a huge contract restructure to obtain his services. That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
by Kulp on Apr 22, 2008 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Couln't Agrre with you more Whodie
Chad wants out of a bad situation. It’s been going on for years with that sorry Bengals
organization. He’s not a cancer. He’s not a whiner. I believe the player wants to win and
perform to his max. As for living up to his contract, as other suggest. That seems to be a one way street. Teams can cut a player whenever without responsibiliy for compension as defined in the
contract.
by egulman on Apr 23, 2008 6:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
subject
by yomjoseki on Apr 22, 2008 3:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
who wants that much trouble
http://sportsbuffetstyle.blogspot.com
by eaglesbuffetstyle on Apr 22, 2008 3:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Chad
Keep him off our team and stop all the nonsense.
by Illadelph on Apr 23, 2008 11:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














