Bleeding Green Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: The Georgia Bulldogs and the Presidential Election Year Jinx Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Eagles tie Bengals 13-13

Capt

 

Anyone remember the last time the Eagles tied a game? Exactly 11 years ago today on November 16th, 1997 when they tied the Baltimore Ravens in Baltimore 10-10.

As the final second ticked off the clock today I recieved the following text messages.

Worst Game Ever

A tie? A F-ing tie!?

Sh*t

What a horrible boring game

Amazing how just a few characters sent electronically through the air can sum up the feelings of a city so well. A f-ing tie!?

So rare is a tie in the NFL that Donovan McNabb didn't even realize it was possible.

"I didn’t know that," said McNabb, who played a leading role in keeping it tied. "I’ve never been part of a tie. I never even knew it was in the rule book. I was looking forward to getting the opportunity to get out there and try to drive to win the game. But unfortunately with the rules, we settled with a tie."

Is he being serious? Is there anyone that didn't know games end in a tie after one overtime quarter? The last tie in the NFL was back in 2002.

How is this for a run pass ratio?

Donovan McNabb threw a career high 58 times. The Eagles running backs combined for 15 carries. 58-15. In total, the Eagles actually ran the ball 18 times with one being a McNabb QB sneak and two being Desean Jackson end arounds that netted three total yards. So the run pass ration in today's game was just about 75-25. That's absolutey ridiculous. What's worse is that this wasn't a game where the Eagles were down big and needed to throw to stage a comeback. The Bengals only scored 13 points and there was no time in this game that the Eagles were not within easy striking distance.

If we take this back a game and include the loss to the Giants, Donovan McNabb has thrown the ball 94 times and the Eagles running backs have carried the ball 30 times.This team isn't struggling to run the ball ladies and gentleman, they aren't even trying. When your running backs run the ball 15 times a game there's no way to tell whether your running is any good or not. You simply don't have one. No team running the ball 15 times a game will ever have an effective running game in this league... or an effective offense for that matter.

That is a failure of playcalling and there's no other way to look at it. Which brings us to our next headline...

McNabb was a problem, but not the problem

Let me get this out of the way. Donovan McNabb had one of his poorest games in an Eagles uniform. He completed less than half his passes, he was off target and wild all game, and he threw three interceptions which were ALL his fault. There's absolutely no excusing the kind of game he had today. He started off the game in the poor fashion we've become accustomed to this year but never got himself in the groove. He was just as bad at the end as he was at the start.

That said... Could someone explain to me the logic in throwing the ball nearly 60 times when your QB is playing that poorly? It's inexplicable, it's stubborn, it's illogical, and it's just plain stupid. Albert Einsten once said "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

I'd say it's official. Andy Reid is insane. Nothing is going to change either, Andy has made his philosophy regarding these situations very clear. "Just keep firing"

No matter how hurt your QB is(like last year), no matter how good or bad he is playing, no matter what the score, no matter the weather...

Just keep firing.

I wonder if Jeff Lurie is thinking Andy might have a good idea there?

Let's credit the defense

The only thing that made htis game even worth watching was the outstanding play of the Eagles defense. This unit was embarassed by the Giants last week and run on to the tune over 200 yards. Today, the Eagles shut down the Bengals run game, holding them to less than two yards a carry for the game and a total of 58 yards.

They also sacked Ryan Fitzpatrick eight times. This was a destruction on the part of the Eagles defense. The only thing they didn't do today was score... unfortuntalely.

Trent Cole was huge in his return to his hometown recording two sacks and generally creating havoc all day. Darren Howard continues his suprising season with two more sacks and like Cole was generally in the middle of the action whenever he was on the field. Chris Clemons also had a nice game today. He got a sack, played the run well, and played all over the formation. At different times I saw him at DE, outsider backer, and even playing LB in the middle in coverage. If he's going to play like this I hope we see him on the field more often from here on out.

I also have to give props to Stew Bradley who had another great game. That guy is one of the pieces we need to be building this team around. He's certianly one of the things that's "right" with this team this year.

More stubborness

Like Andy Reid, Jim Johnson is also set in his ways about certian things.

Asante Samuel had another great game shutting down whoever he covered and knocking down 4 passes. His stellar play all day made it pretty frustrating to see TJ Houshmenzadeh abusing Joselio Hanson play after play. Jim Johnson has generally always stuck his philosophy of having his corners play one side of the field and not reacting to where the WRs line up... but what sense does it make to stick Asante out to cover the Bengals #3 when they're lining up their hottest WR in the slot. Is it too much to ask to move Asante to wherever the other team's best WR is? Joselio Hanson isn't supposed to be able to shut down a guy like TJ, that's why Hanson is the team's 4th corner and Asante Smauel is one of the highest paid corners in the NFL.

Finally!

Is it me or is this the first time someone has missed a big kick against us in FOREVER? Just our luck that a guy misses a potential game winning FG with almost no time left and we still don't win the freaking game.

A tie is a loss

If you're looking for a way to explain this game or how to feel about it. That's it. A tie is a loss. It's that simple. Especially when you're playing a one win team and you're fighting for you playoff lives. A tie is a loss.

"I’ve never been in a tie, so I don’t know how this works in the standings," coach Andy Reid said. "I know it’s not good enough. We need wins, and this is not a win."

0 recs | Comment 61 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I’d recommend to everyone trying to admit that this team simply isn’t very good. There’s going to be a lot of hyperbole and just plain stupid this week. Take it all in and try and keep your head on straight.

There is no magic formula for them, either. No magic bullet. There are A LOT of places this team could get better. Every position and player can be held accountable, and that’s fine. We should talk about it.

But let go of any expectations. Things aren’t likely to get any better.

We have the Ravens next week, and that could be ugly. The Ravens defense is HUGE, and our band of merry midgets are going to struggle. It is going to be nasty.

by BFH on Nov 16, 2008 10:01 PM EST   0 recs

Execution, I'm all for it

Can’t we just use that magic bullet to shoot the team? I mean, they shoot wounded horses, right?

by Baron Dainer Von Tresvant on Nov 17, 2008 9:05 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

A note

We’re all frustrated. We’re all mad. It’s ok to vent, but let’s not fight each other. Head to the Eagles message board for that. We’re all in this together, let’s act like it.

by JasonB on Nov 16, 2008 10:02 PM EST   0 recs

We’re all in this together, let’s act like it. +1 jason

I agree with you ,we are all frustrated but were on the same side , i wont jump ship thats for sure , i remember freaking out when they changed from the kelly green to midnite green thinking what the hell are they doing they just f@cked up my whole eagles Wardrobe- arguing with each other isnt going to help matters. but i do absolutely understand the frustration – anger one word -[embarassing]-

i was about to jump off of wachovia center but one of akers’ kicks smacked me right in the face and knocked me backwards…

by EAGLE_MAN71 on Nov 17, 2008 4:38 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

So when the players and coaches on offense watch film this week… that’s as close to feeling like the Lions’ you possibly can, right?

On offense, who played well today?

McNabb was awful. Curtis was REALLY awful. Westbrook was pretty inconsequential. The O-line didn’t get a push early in the game and Andy abondoned the run.

Curtis, Celek, and Reggie Brown all had AWFUL drops. Anyone else?

Hank Baskett made a play, and I continue to be mystified by his lack of playing time. What does Reggie Brown do that Hank doesn’t? The guys getting the most plays at WR should be Curtis, Jackson, and Baskett. At least Baskett can do something for you physically. He also has the best Catch Rate of any receiver on the Eagles by far.

Westbrook and Buckhalter both missed important blitz pickups.

Why wasn’t Curtis looking for the ball on that crossing route? What the hell was he thinking about?

by BFH on Nov 16, 2008 10:12 PM EST   0 recs

To abandon something implies that you were at one point committed to it. Andy did not abandon the run. I agree with Jason, he had not intention of using it. That is a problem, and in my opinion it may be THE major problem afflicting this offense right now.

The approach we took up when Jeff Garcia was filling in was good – about 55-45 pass-run ratio – and we were able to win with it. As soon as McNabb came back they completely ditched this approach and they have a 13-12-1 record since that point.

by FuquaManuel on Nov 16, 2008 10:17 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

If you’re going to make that argument you have to acknowledge a few things:

1. Tra Thomas and John Runyan are older and they really aren’t moving guys like they used to. Particularly Runyan, who used to be an absolute mauler in the run game. God bless the guy, but he just can’t do it as well any more.

2. That team had Shawn Andrews. Fully healthy. With younger versions of Runyan and Thomas. And Jamaal Jackson playing like he hasn’t since either.

3. Brian Westbrook was 100% then. He’s clearly not at the moment. He has said so himself.

This Eagles unit simply isn’t as good, even if Andy remained committed.

by BFH on Nov 16, 2008 10:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

2006 Run-Pass

Called Passes (Passes+Sacks+QB Scrambles) vs. Runs (RB and WR Runs)
Colts – 32-24 (60-40)
Panthers – 42-22 (66-34)
Redskins – 24-18 (57-43)
Giants 33-27 (55-45)
Cowboys 31-35 (47-53)
Falcons 37-16 (70-30)
Giants 37-27 (58-42)
Saints 35-16 (69-31)

Only 3 of the final 8 games of 2006 match what you are talking about. Memory is such a fickle thing.

by Andrew B on Nov 17, 2008 12:41 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

The saddest thing...

…is that Andy built this team from the inside-out. All those years of drafting linemen and the can’t convert a 3rd and 1 to save their lives.

But what is causing it? That is what confuses me the most. They can’t run the ball when asked even though they have one of the largest offensive lines in the NFL. Is it because they have no rhythm? Because they never expect to have to run block? I don’t understand the problem here.

by ajay on Nov 16, 2008 10:25 PM EST   0 recs

It's simple

They don’t try to run it. That’s why they can’t.

I’m telling you. If you don’t try to run the ball, you won’t be able to do it.

I honestly believe the following

Take the Giants offense(as is) and run the ball 15 times a game. Take the Eagles offense as is and run the ball 25 times a game.

I guarantee you that after 5 games the Eagles would be the more productive running team. I’m not discounting talent. There’s no doubt that it’s important… but there’s also no doubt that teams that run the ball successfully run it far more than 15 times a game. All good running teams in the history of this league have been ones that commit to the run.

by JasonB on Nov 16, 2008 10:46 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I'm a Giants fan

(just trolling) and I completely agree with this. I love our RBs, but Westbrook is more talented than any of them. If you guys were committed to the run the way we are, he’d be putting up Tomlinson/Adrian Peterson type numbers (if fully healthy). And I shudder to think what our offense would look like if we let Eli throw 75% of the time…

by cjmulrain on Nov 17, 2008 12:34 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Drafting Linemen

Yes, and the best of them is stuck in California with a balky back.

He certainly isn’t on the field.

by Andrew B on Nov 17, 2008 8:13 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

P.S.

Is there one team this year that hasn’t said – after the game – that our playcalling was absolutely transparent?

by ajay on Nov 16, 2008 10:29 PM EST   0 recs

Disappointing...

Cant say much else. i know i will probably still follow the team, maybe even watch the rest of these games but there’s no excuse for today. I think the writing is on the wall and I hate to think about what it could be like with no McNabb and an unpolished Kevin Kolb behind center next yr. That being said, I do think our defense looked good and can only continue to get better since most of the players are young/early prime years (sans Dawkins). I’ve been a loyal supporter of the Reid regime, but he has to go. he just looks lost on the sideline IMO.

by fcphillyboy4 on Nov 16, 2008 10:29 PM EST   0 recs

I thnk we’l all follow the team still. By friday we’ll all be thinking “Oh we’re mathematically in this!” by sunday we’ll be excited, after Sunday when we see more of the same we’ll all be pissed again.. well thats whats been happening the last month anyway lol

by Joe_D on Nov 16, 2008 10:56 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

One thing you didn’t mention jason is that every play the bengals were dropping 7. Mcnabb had all day but they were blanketing our WRs and it worked. I imagine balt is going to do much of the same thing. We’re a one dimension team and defenses know it.

by Joe_D on Nov 16, 2008 10:58 PM EST   0 recs

Later

enjoy the premature post-season

by quincyyyyy on Nov 16, 2008 11:18 PM EST   0 recs

Bottom of the division. Here we are once again!

Once again a hearty FU to Andy Reid, Donovan McNabb, and the Eagles offense.

by Philly Homer on Nov 16, 2008 11:19 PM EST   0 recs

So where do we go from here?

I’ll be perfectly honest, Reid gets a lot of crap for how he built this team but when the man has his GM cap on he’s generally been a success. Hell, isn’t he also the most successful coach in Eagles history? I know he didn’t win a Super Bowl but if Andy Reid retired today I don’t care how much you loath the man if you had any integrity at all you’d have to say his Philly tenure was a success.

All that said, the single biggest problem with the 2008 Philadelphia Eagles is Andy Reid.

Look, I’m not anywhere near as smart as Reid is at coaching football but if I got to be head coach of the day for the Eagles opponent I’d go up to the defensive co-ordinator and I’d tell him that every time he sends in a defensive call, every time he sends in a defensive substitute, to think Pass. And at least 70% of the time the defense would be guessing right. The offense is predictable and it is easier to stop your opponent when you can predict their play calling.

The offense is predictable because Reid chooses to make it so. He fundamentally makes things harder on his quarterback by doing so. Here’s what blows my mind. Andy Reid obviously has tremendous respect for Jim Johnson, he goes out and gets the guys Johnson wants and then stays out of the mix. What is it Johnson tries to do every week? He tries to make the opposing offense one dimensional so he can unleash his blitz package on a sitting duck QB. He knows and builds his defense around attacking a QB who can’t rely on his running game.

And what does Andy Reid do, week in and week out? He voluntarily abandons the running game before opening kick-off. He gives the opposing defense the very situation his own defensive co-ordinator strives to create.

Some way, somehow Andy Reid needs to be removed from the offensive play-calling and the play sheet given to someone who likes to run the football more than once every four plays. This is the only way to even try and save the season.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Nov 16, 2008 11:25 PM EST   0 recs

im willing to finally accept that the eagles are not gonna make the playoffs because they just simly arent good enough in all hases of the game. this coach is the dumbest fool ever! west coast offese does not work in this day and age and the guy makes 0 adjustments! throwign the ball 58 times is ridiculous unless john elway or tom bradey is your QB.
i just wish i knew this before i spent tickets and money on these non- worthy losers.

by Bugzy on Nov 16, 2008 11:34 PM EST   0 recs

Throwing the ball 58 times

That does look pretty bad until you consider the context of playing 75 minutes of football in a close game where you couldn’t run your way out of a cardboard box.

Maybe the OFFENSIVE line has finally been humilated enough to get mean.

by Andrew B on Nov 17, 2008 8:15 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

15 runs by backs Andrew…. They never even tried to run. That’s the problem. No team that runs the ball 15 times is going to have a successful running game.

Plus, we could pass our way out of a cardboard box either. But what did Andy do? Kept firing. When we struggle with the run what does he do? Abandon it.

by JasonB on Nov 17, 2008 11:08 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

I’m going to continue to disagree here, Jason. The Eagles simply can’t run the ball this year like they used to. I think Andy has realized that.

It’s pretty ironic that in the same season where the Eagles run game failed so magnificently against Chicago, Washington, and New York that we are back to a “not committed to the run” argument.

by BFH on Nov 17, 2008 12:11 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

imo... it's better to have rushed than never have rushed at all.

and buckhalter is averging 4.1 ypc after 53 carries… that ain’t too bad

by Joe_D on Nov 17, 2008 12:13 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

But the numbers bear that out. We only ran the ball 15 times against the Giants. We ran it less than 20 times against the Bears. We ran it 14 times against the Redskins.

I don’t see how there’s any other way to see it. That’s not trying. That’s not a team committed to the run.

by JasonB on Nov 17, 2008 12:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I’m sure we all remember the cries for “RUN THE BALL MORE” or “GET WESTBROOK THE BALL” that have been rightfully made in previous years.

But previously the Eagles running game could get consistent yardage even when it was being “underutilized”. Westbrook is barely cracking the 4ypc mark this year. The only season he has been even close to that bad was the doomed 2005 season.

And so the numbers are out there, through 8 games BWest has 123 carries. Double that and you get 246 carries for the year, which would be the second highest total of his career.

Should the Eagles get Buckhalter more involved? Probably. Especially considering Westbrook’s injury issues.

But the problems running the ball have a lot more to do with an aging Runyan, a missing Andrews, trying to block defensive ends with Hank Baskett, and a tackle playing fullback than a lack of commitment.

by BFH on Nov 17, 2008 12:37 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

How long can you keep this up?

Drive 2
1-10-PHI 34 (8:24) 36-B.Westbrook left guard to PHI 35 for 1 yard (26-M.White).
2nd and long kills drive

Drive 3
1-10-PHI 11 (2:00) 36-B.Westbrook left guard to PHI 15 for 4 yards (26-M.White).
2-6-PHI 15 (1:30) 36-B.Westbrook left tackle to PHI 16 for 1 yard (59-B.Johnson; 92-F.Rucker).
Lack of consistent forward movement rushing kills drive

Drive 4
2-3-CIN 23 (11:53) 36-B.Westbrook right end pushed ob at CIN 23 for no gain (59-B.Johnson).
Inability to convert short yardage rushing kills drive

Drive 8
2-6-PHI 16 (14:16) 36-B.Westbrook right end to PHI 21 for 5 yards (59-B.Johnson).
Finally, a successful run! But the Eagles can’t convert 3rd and 1 …

Drive 10
2-10-PHI 33 (7:28) 36-B.Westbrook right tackle to PHI 34 for 1 yard (92-F.Rucker).
Ugh! But after a 3rd down conversion passing …
1-10-PHI 45 (6:05) 36-B.Westbrook right guard to CIN 49 for 6 yards (93-R.Jeanty).
Hey, the 2nd successful run of the game!

Drive 11
2-10-PHI 29 (:05) (Shotgun) 36-B.Westbrook right guard pushed ob at CIN 49 for 22 yards (22-J.Joseph).
Hey, 3rd successful run! So we follow it up with …
1-10-CIN 49 (15:00) 28-C.Buckhalter right tackle to CIN 46 for 3 yards (94-D.Peko; 93-R.Jeanty).
Not good enough to keep the drive going.

Drive 12
2-1-CIN 39 (9:32) (Shotgun) 36-B.Westbrook up the middle to CIN 29 for 10 yards (26-M.White).
Hey look at that! But then on the very next play …
1-10-CIN 29 (8:53) 36-B.Westbrook right tackle to CIN 29 for no gain (68-J.Fanene).
No consistency.

Drive 13
2-4-PHI 46 (2:10) 36-B.Westbrook right tackle to PHI 49 for 3 yards (57-Dh.Jones).
Ugh! 3rd and short again. Guess what happens.

Drive 16
1-10-PHI 37 (14:33) 36-B.Westbrook up the middle to PHI 40 for 3 yards (90-P.Sims).
Ugh.
2-7-PHI 40 (13:57) (Shotgun) 36-B.Westbrook left end to PHI 37 for -3 yards (59-B.Johnson). {Reverse from D.Jackson to Westbrook}
Double ugh.

Drive 17
2-2-PHI 20 (6:51) (Shotgun) 36-B.Westbrook up the middle to PHI 27 for 7 yards (90-P.Sims).
Hey, a rushing first down!

Its kind of hard to “get the running back going” when his first four runs are 1, 4, 1, and 0 yards, leading to drives ending quickly.

In the first 20 minutes of the game, the Eagles called 6 passes and 4 runs on first or second down. The result was Westbrook foing 6 yards on 4 carries, McNabb going 4 of 9 for 55 yards, 3rd and 10, 3rd and 9, 3rd and 5, and 3rd and 3, and 4th downs of 2 punts, a sack-fumble on 3rd down, and a field goal.

by Andrew B on Nov 17, 2008 1:33 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

So what are you proposing? To stay the course with the current offensive approach?

by FuquaManuel on Nov 17, 2008 3:27 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Proposing?

That the players play up to their big money contracts?

Reid ran a balanced offense to start the game. Its resulted in 3 and outs, general crapola, and finally a Field Goal after the Bengals fell asleep when Buckhalter came in.

by Andrew B on Nov 18, 2008 12:57 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Reid ran a balanced offense for 2 series. There is absolutely no way to determine if the running game is working based on a sample size of 4 ruses and 6 yards.

Naturally you are going to rack up more yardage through the air, but that does not mean that the passing game is doing a proficient or efficient job of moving the ball.

By your logic, when McNabb begins the game going 0 for whatever, that should suggest that we should abandon the passing game.

by FuquaManuel on Nov 18, 2008 5:43 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

~15 rushes

“No team that runs the ball 15 times is going to have a successful running game.”

Week 1, 2004 vs. Giants – Westbrook, 17 rushes, 119 yards
Week 20, 2004 vs. Falcons – Westbrook, 16 rushes, 96 yards
Week 4, 2006 vs. 49ers – Westbrook, 8 rushes, 117 yards, 2 TD
Week 7, 2006 vs. Bucs – Westbrook, 13 rushes, 101 yards
Week 19, 2006 vs. Saints – Westbrook, 13 rushes, 116 yards, 2 TD
Week 3, 2007 vs. Lions – Westbrook, 14 rushes, 110 yards, 2 TD
Week 4, 2007 vs. Giants – Buckhalter, 17 rushes, 103 yards
Week 16, 2007 vs. Saints – Westbrook, 17 rushes, 100 yards

14 rushes for 60 yards and 0 TD wasn’t going to be turned around with a few more runs.

by Andrew B on Nov 17, 2008 1:12 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

andrewb how long can you keep posting these useless stats?

we’re 5-4-1 and virtually out of the playoff race to speak of. we’re 1-11 on winning games decided by a TD or less in the past two years.

buckhalter is avg 4.1 ypc…. wtf man? where is yoru logic coming from? stats arent everything.

by Joe_D on Nov 17, 2008 2:13 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

not hating on you Joe...

but Andrew’s the best stat man i’ve ever seen and he’s one of only a few who will actually do the work to support his points…

the rest of us just rant based on how we feel. Number dont tell the whole story, but they don’t lie either

Billy Penn who?

by 700 Level on Nov 17, 2008 4:30 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

First time here

Andrew, Joe and 700
I’d like to comment on this pass/rush ratio discussion.
I think we abandon the run game far too early and it comes with a price. I don’t know how many games I’ve watched where a premiere RB has 50 yards on 15 carries but 100+ on 20 or more carries. You wear the defense down, eat up the clock, and get some swagger when you manhandle the opponent.

by aerohead on Nov 17, 2008 7:32 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

i agree with you...

i mean 36 did rattle off 22 on that one play… who’s to say it doesnt happen again a time or two.

But i’m honestly of the impression that the problem with the Eagles is way bigger than the run/pass ratio. There is something wrong with the core of this team. Not to say it cant be corrected, and maybe even quickly, but there just no fire whatsoever on offense

Billy Penn who?

by 700 Level on Nov 17, 2008 8:37 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

This would be an interesting investigation. Find out what Westbrook’s yards per carry are after 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 carries and see if there is some trend for most games. I.e. – must give him 20 carries to be sure of getting some big runs to bring the total up near 100.

by Andrew B on Nov 18, 2008 1:18 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

ok well how about this stat: 5-4-1 and last place in the division. Will likely be our third time missing playoffs 3 out of 4 years. a 29-28-1 record since the superbowl…….. there’s stats that andrewb can’t refute no matter what.

by Joe_D on Nov 17, 2008 9:16 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Enlightenment

I’m not trying to refute anything, just enlighten.

Jason complained that 15 rushes wasn’t enough. I pointed out that this same group of offensive players has done tremendous things with about 15 rushes in the past.

The problem was that this was McNabb’s annual hairball game.

by Andrew B on Nov 18, 2008 12:59 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Out of the playoffs?

Stats do mean a lot, especially when you get them right.

Here’s the current distribution of wins in the NFC:

9 – 1 team
8 – 1 team
7 – 2 teams
6 – 3 teams
5.5 – 1 team (Eagles)
5 – 4 teams
3 – 1 team
2 – 2 teams
0 – 1 team

Only the last 4 are “out of the playoff race”. Everyone else is in it. We are currently #8 with 6 spots available.

We are not 1-11 in games decided by a TD or less since 2007. We were 3-5 last year, and are 0-4-1 this year. That’s 3-9-1. If you include 8 point games, seeing as there is a 2 point conversion in the NFL, we are 5-10-1. We were also 4-5 in 2006 for these games. Lets give it the whole season and see where we end up. We started 0-4 in close games in 2006 and had to listen to this same crap. Then we finished 4-1 in close games to finish the year into the playoffs. The one close loss was the Divisional round to the Saints.

4.1 yards per carry is league average. The NFL has had 8719 rushes for 36,057 yards this year, which is 4.1 yards per carry. If you want to hang your hat on league average, be my guest. Personally, I’m very dissatisfied with league average rushing, and near league worst in short yardage rushing situations. Obviously its a huge problem, and is mostly related to the offensive line.

by Andrew B on Nov 18, 2008 1:15 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Close games

Eagles were 5-5 in close games in 2005.

Where did that get them?

Good teams win blow outs, not close games.

by Andrew B on Nov 18, 2008 1:17 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Yeah…I wasn’t excited about drafting another o-lineman in the first round, and I’m glad they got Desean…but I wonder if trading that pick was a mistake.

(To be fair, I’ve seen about 2 minutes of the Panthers this year, so I have no opinion on Jeff Otah)

I wonder if I can bill Jeff Lurie and Peter Angelos for the years of therapy their teams are going to put me through.

by BrianS on Nov 17, 2008 10:24 AM EST   0 recs

The Reid Era is over

We just need to face the reality that the Reid Era is over.

www.reidmustgo.com

by SnowballsAtSanta on Nov 17, 2008 10:59 AM EST   0 recs

2nd.

"For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled"- Hunter S. Thompson

by phishead_psu on Nov 17, 2008 11:38 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Short list of problems

1. No long drives. Can you remember the last time McNabb led a 13 play, 80 yard, 8 1/2 minute drive? Quick scores are exciting, but like 3 and outs, don’t let the D rest.

2. No hurry up offense. Most evident during the Superbowl, and still doens’t seem to be a priority. My guess is that McNabb just can’t keep up. Consequently, the O is incapable of catching / keeping opposing Ds off balance.

3. Horrible clock management. Most evident during the Superbowl, and has only gotten worse since.

If you can’t control / manage the clock, you can’t consistantly win close games.

Way I see it, we need to finish 5 – 1 to guarentee a playoff spot. Anyone even think that’s possible?

by Scott in SA on Nov 17, 2008 12:06 PM EST   0 recs

agree on all points.
  1. is due to no run game. 2 and 3 are all on andy reid.

and no way will we make the playoffs. we cant even beat the bengals!

by Joe_D on Nov 17, 2008 12:12 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Doesn't surprise me

After all, this offense didn’t even use the shotgun until about three years ago. Why not? Because Bill Walsh didn’t? Who knows.

by Blackacre on Nov 17, 2008 4:36 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

i been optimistic about the iggles turning it around and making the playoffs this yearbut the Dallas W in Wash seaked the deal that they r not playoff bound (or quite frankly, worthy). there remaining schedule is 2nd toughest in the NFL.

by Bugzy on Nov 17, 2008 12:42 PM EST   0 recs

which i like...

because if we do make the playoffs we will rightfully deserve it. Like 2006, we’ve got to beat teams that we’re “not supposed to beat”

Why this team loves to make life difficult i dont know, but its to early to say they dont deserve the playoffs yet. Too much football left

Billy Penn who?

by 700 Level on Nov 17, 2008 1:01 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I like heart attacks

Which of the Phightin’s said it? Somethin like: “It’s never easy in this town”

by aerohead on Nov 17, 2008 7:39 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

As per the Bengals defense (yes, the BENGALS defense – that’s how you know it’s bad) the Eagles offense is predictable and easy to defend.

When one of the worst teams in football is calling your offense predictable (and they certainly backed up the talk with a good defensive game) I think we can all agree that something needs to change. At this point, I am of the opinion that at the current moment Reid might have pigeonholed this offense as essentially pass first and second (and third?) because he failed to get the personnel necessary to allow a shift to a more balanced approach. Of course, we will never know that because there is never an attempt to establish the run during the game. Frankly, if Westbrook is still as effected by injury as everyone says he is, I don’t see the harm in splitting the carries between he and Buckhalter. It’s not like he is a complete slouch – and at he seems better suited for the downhill, between the tackles running style that this team could really use.

by FuquaManuel on Nov 17, 2008 3:24 PM EST   0 recs

Another thing that bothers me

When McNabb fakes the hand off to an RB in obvious passing situations.

I digress. I want Reid to stay, but his offense needs to go. If he must keep the WCO, get some tips from Mike Shanahan. He was smart enough to emphasize the run.

by Blackacre on Nov 17, 2008 4:17 PM EST   0 recs

All I can do is laugh

Hey great post. Just started a Philly based blog myself and made a similar post yesterday as I was watching the game. Kind of predicted the tie early! Added you in my blogroll and wanted to say keep up the good work here. Been a reader for a while now.

Thanks,
Jeremy Hatfield
http://www.philadelphiasportsline.com/eagles-tie-vs-bengals/

by Jd735 on Nov 17, 2008 7:11 PM EST   0 recs

Everone please extend a warm welcome to mr. hatfield

the pic of the fan on the front of your blog cracks me up :)

Billy Penn who?

by 700 Level on Nov 17, 2008 8:38 PM EST   0 recs

Losing close ones

14 of our 18 losses in the 06/07/08 seasons have been by a touchdown or less. I think that speaks volumes about Reid and McNabb

by Scott in SA on Nov 18, 2008 4:15 PM EST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.