Klecko to FB, Hunt back to RB
The Eagles are getting desperate creative with their backfield situation. With the possible absence or limited availability of Brian Westbrook this weekend, the Eagles have moved Dan Klecko back to FB and have told Tony Hunt that he'll practice at tailback this week. Bowen has he details
Fullback Tony Hunt said he has been told he will take his practice reps at running back, where he played before being switched near the end of training camp. Defensive tackle Dan Klecko, signed last spring with the idea he would be a fullback, has been reissued his old No. 49 jersey and apparently will play an expanded role at fullback while still participating in the defensive tackle rotation.
Some of Klecko's snaps at DT could be taken by Victor Abiamiri who returned to full practice yesterday.
In trying to decide how I feel about this move I decided to make my own list of pros and cons. So here goes.
Pros
- Tony Hunt has not been doing a great job at FB
- If Westbrook is out or limited we could use another RB
- Tony Hunt belongs at RB
Cons
- Dan Klecko can't play FB, as evidence by the fact that he lost the job before camp even started
- Dan Klecko has done a really nice job at DT.
- If Klecko plays both FB & DT is he likely to be effective at either?
- We actually have a FB sitting on the practice squad presumably for this exact situation. Jed Collins.
- We already have a RB sitting on the bench. Lorenzo Booker.
Clearly the cons outweight the pros here. The Tony Hunt at FB experiment hasn't worked and frankly I'm rather excited to see him back at running back. I just hope the Eagles actually give him some carries this weekend. For a team that has had so many struggles on the goal line, you might think a powerful, bruising runner like Tony Hunt was supposed to be might be of some help there?
It's really started to annoy me that the Eagles have spent a 3rd round pick(Hunt) & a 4th round pick(Booker) on running backs the last two years and have so far pretty much refused to play them. Having lost their top RB for a good portion of the year so far, the Eagles have just let two guys they invested decent picks in just rot on the bench or out of position.
As for the Klecko to FB move... why? Who on this roster is so indispensible that we just can't make some room for Jed Collins to come up from the practice squad? I think it's safe to assume that Collins is a better fullback than Klecko since he did beat out Klecko in camp at the position. So why not go with your best option there? Especially considering how surprisingly productive Klecko has been at DT?
Read Related
Comments
Now since we lost Klecko at DT and moved Hunt to HB maybe we should try mobving booker to kleckos old spot at DT and finish the rotation. its no like booker has been to productive when he had his chances a HB.
Hounestly i like the move because i have been really impressed with hunts play at HB the last 2 years. i think he has a good burst ha can see the holes and can break those arm tackels that usualy get Buck down. i want to see buck and hunt split the carries this week. somethink like 10 each
by NickPampani on Oct 9, 2008 10:07 AM EDT 0 recs
hunt should be moved to RB full time.
i would hope that this is more perminent than temporary. i understand that the move to FB was made to save a roster spot and protect hunt for another season, but it hasn’t been successful, and since booker has proven to be unable to provide protection in the passing game, and explosiveness in the rushing/receiving game i’d honestly rather have jed collins active each week in order to free up hunt to play HB.
When they should be sacrifice bunting, they are buying effeminate designer jeans. When they should be fouling off pitches, they are masturbating. Always, they are masturbating.
by variablesdont on Oct 9, 2008 10:13 AM EDT 0 recs
- Considine
+ Collins
I should be GM
Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™
by yomjoseki on Oct 9, 2008 10:14 AM EDT 0 recs
+10202002039578457612812314646475681218923714
"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"
by Whodie126 on
Oct 9, 2008 10:16 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Now Klecko can't play DT, he dosn't have a qualifying number,
Please help me to understand this bone head move. Dan is a nice DT.
DALLAS SUCKS!!!
by yophillybro on Oct 9, 2008 10:16 AM EDT 0 recs
he can still play DT wearing #49
Foos for OC in '09!
Send... it... in!
by foos05 on
Oct 9, 2008 10:34 AM EDT
up
0 recs
yeah
he needed the number change to be able to play FB not DT.
"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"
by Whodie126 on
Oct 9, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I wasn't sure how the numbers rule works for defense line. Thanks for the info.
Is he gonna be a 2 way player? If so, which side does he play less.
DALLAS SUCKS!!!
by yophillybro on
Oct 9, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
jesus… part of me says hopefully offense because he’s doing well defensively… but then again our fullback situation is a shithouse too…
Foos for OC in '09!
Send... it... in!
by foos05 on
Oct 9, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Could he wear 68 and play FB though?
"Watching Big Ben kiss the canvas nine times in Philly was like watching a guy fighting a school of sharks -- with everyone rooting for the sharks."
by 700 Level on Oct 9, 2008 11:03 AM EDT 0 recs
as long as he announced himself as an elligble receiver before every snap… which would be a pain in the ass and asking for a penality if he forgot
Foos for OC in '09!
Send... it... in!
by foos05 on
Oct 9, 2008 11:16 AM EDT
up
0 recs
i remember the skins game at Fedex in 06
I swear the red said “number __ is an eligible receiver” like every offense play for the skins
"Watching Big Ben kiss the canvas nine times in Philly was like watching a guy fighting a school of sharks -- with everyone rooting for the sharks."
by 700 Level on
Oct 9, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
*the ref
"Watching Big Ben kiss the canvas nine times in Philly was like watching a guy fighting a school of sharks -- with everyone rooting for the sharks."
by 700 Level on
Oct 9, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
honestly, at this point, I think that this is an archaic rule… requiring certain positions to wear certain numbers… that’s why we have procedural penalities… As long as people are lined up in the correct manner, the defense should be smart enough to realize the fucking linemen are, ya know, lined up on the line… and the fullback is, again, in the fucking backfield… and it’s really not that hard for the refs to tell if the formation is legal or not… no matter what numbers people are wearing… cock gobblers
Foos for OC in '09!
Send... it... in!
by foos05 on
Oct 9, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
up
0 recs
College seems to have a loose numbe role,
There obviously no problem with them.
DALLAS SUCKS!!!
by yophillybro on
Oct 9, 2008 2:36 PM EDT
up
0 recs
yeah it’s just a leftover rule… stupid at this point… now, if NFL rules allowed you to run the A-11 offense, then I could see a use for this rule… that fucking offense is about as organized as a trailer park after a tornado
Foos for OC in '09!
Send... it... in!
by foos05 on
Oct 9, 2008 2:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
so … not that organized?
… just playing … for those of you scratching your head A-11
"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"
by Whodie126 on
Oct 9, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hunt
I like the guy a lot and think he could have good upside, but I need all of your help here. I’m in Wisconsin so I don’t get to see many of the Eagles games. But is Hunt really the answer at the goal line? I know he’s the biggest RB on our roster, but when I’ve seen him play it looks to me that through the line he runs too upright and doesn’t hit the hole very hard. That to me is all the ingredients for NOT being a goal line runner. Am I correct or just not seeing him play enough. Thanks.
by slandog on Oct 9, 2008 11:06 AM EDT 0 recs
he isnt but he can learn
he can power through the hole and when in the middle of the feild he looks good but at the goal line when you have 10 men in the box he has to learn he has to get low.
However since he has the burst to get through the hole his running style would work better the bucks bookers of even westbrook (although westbrook is better right now
by NickPampani on
Oct 9, 2008 11:20 AM EDT
up
0 recs
FB situation
We should try to make a trade for Owen Schmidt from Seattle. I’ve been hyped about this kid from day one and wanted to birds to draft him. He would be great in our system. The kid can block (he broke 10 facemasks at WVU), he’s got great hands, and even though our fullbacks don’t run too much, it looks like we could use his bruising runs to get into the goal line since Andy seems to be allergic to QB sneaks and bootlegs on the one yard line this season. Get rid of Considine to make some room, he’s garbage anyway.
by bleedgreen03 on Oct 9, 2008 11:39 AM EDT 0 recs
he sounds like
Brian Lenord from Rutgers now on the Rams
by NickPampani on
Oct 9, 2008 11:47 AM EDT
up
0 recs
is lorenzo neal still out there?
we could prolly get Lo Neal for cheap. You can already see what a difference he made blocking for LT(he just hasn’t been the same this year)
by 0sirys on Oct 9, 2008 11:44 AM EDT 0 recs
I only expect to see Klecko in goal line situations. If he plays more than that I’ll be pissed. We honestly should try spreading the field more and letting Hank Basket block the extra D back the team puts out there instead of trying to get someone to block the linebacker.
by Clyde Simmons on Oct 9, 2008 4:16 PM EDT 0 recs
I'd actually like to see him in pass protection too
"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"
by Whodie126 on
Oct 9, 2008 6:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Klecko showed some good form on goal line plays, but this makes little sense. Two words: Jed Collins. It was looking like Collins was going to take the starting job, if it weren’t for a roster numbers crunch.
by Walcott on Oct 10, 2008 12:18 PM EDT 0 recs











