Is the Eagles run defense back?

by JasonB on Oct 28, 2008 3:37 PM EDT in Philadelphia Eagles News

Through the first 4 games of this season the Eagles boasted the stingiest run defense in all of football. The list of backs shut down or hel well below their average was impressive.

Week 1 - Steven Jackson, 40 yards

Week 2 - Marion Barber, 63 yards

Week 3 - Willie Parker, 20 yards (he did get hurt, but Pitt managed just 32 team rushing yards)

Week 4 - Matt Forte, 43 yards.

At that point the Eagles were giving up twenty less yards per game on the ground than the second best run defense in the league. Clearly, they weren't going to be able to keep up that pace... but no expected the Eagles run D to drop off quite as bad as it did.

Week 5 - Clinton Portis, 145 yards/Ladell Betts, 44 yards

Week 6 - Frank Gore, 101 yards (131 team yards)

Suddenly. the Eagles run defense didn't drop off just a bit... it was porous. A big part of that problem, especially against the Redskins, was how much success teams had running off the edges. So when the Falcons and the NFL's 3rd leading rushing Michael Turner came to town there was reason to worry. Turns out, it was was no worry at all.

Week 8 - Michael Turner, 58 yards

Plus, almost half of Turner's 58 yards came on a single play. So aside form the one big play, the Eagles held him to less than 3 yards a carry. This time, says Jim Johnson they sealed the edge.

In the 27-14 victory over the Falcons, "we really tackled well and we had a lot of people around the football," Johnson said. "We set the edge."

Turner "didn't get outside except for maybe one play," he said. "We didn't have a lot of missed tackles."

There's no doubt that if the Eagles make the playoffs this year, it's going to be because they continued to stop the run. Especially in the NFC East.

So far this season, rushing yards against the NFC East have come hard. The Redskins are second against the run in the NFC, the New York Giants fourth, the Eagles sixth, and the Cowboys seventh. There's little doubt the teams that continue to do the best job against the run will have a much better chance of playing in the postseason.

Tweet Comment 4 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

"we didn't have a lot of missed tackles"

Of his 19 carries Frank Gore actually had 2 that totaled 42 yards – that reeks of missed tackle to me. Say those are 7 yard gains instead of long jaunts downfield – then we’re looking at 19 carries for 73 yards…
Not too bad.

I’d say we really only had 1 game that was truly bad against the run, and I think that may have been a game plan problem – we’ll see in 2 weeks when we play the Giants what this run D is all about.

by cavortingEagle on Oct 28, 2008 4:06 PM EDT reply actions

We had problems with missed tackles....

But our edges were absolutely getting obliterated. Anyone notice that Gaither has been rather quiet as of late?

by Joe_D on Oct 28, 2008 7:29 PM EDT reply actions

the point to me wasn’t so much that we had a couple of missed tackles, it was that we had a good game against Gore. Were it not for a couple of missed tackles on 2 plays he goes for a rather plebeian 73 yards on 19 attempts (under 4 ypc no?).

I haven’t looked at the PxP for the Skins game, will do so tomorrow – but my recolection is that Portis was gaining chunks (5-6-7-8) every time he touched the ball rather than twice going big. That game was more worrisome than the ’Niner game to me.

Holy crap I’ve been thinking too much about running the football for a while…

by cavortingEagle on Oct 28, 2008 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions

I think the real question is..

will it be around all season or takes a weeks off like it did for Washington. I hope we can stay consistent with our run D, especially since we still have the Redskins, (Portis has 944 yards already), the Cowboys (Barber – 611 yards)2 games against the Giants(Jacobs – 563 yards),

by midnitegreen on Oct 29, 2008 12:26 AM EDT reply actions