Bleeding Green Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: The Big Twelve's passing offenses are overrated Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

The Eagles Rushing Attack – Part I

Westbrook or Buckhalter – Does it matter?

Tony Hunt was recently released. When he was drafted many fans rejoiced – finally the Birds had their Thunder to complement Westbrook's Lightening. This celebration obviously wasn't justified and this week we got to waive goodbye to a third round draft choice.

 

In the Eagles version of the West Coast Offense, the running game is something of an afterthought. This year, the Eagles are actually only running on 38% of plays. In a regular game that means there are 23 carries which the Birds split evenly between the first and second half. A few carries go to wide outs on end-arounds and Donovan has had a couple of scrambles which count into the attempt totals for the team. The question I'd like to examine then is: With limited carries per game who should get the ball in the running game?

 

After the break, a rather stat heavy take awaits.

Star-divide

Brian Westbrook and Correll Buckhalter have played similar opponents. Brian was the featured back against St. Louis, Dallas, Washington, and started against Pittsburgh. Corell got the majority of the carries against Pittsburgh and started against Chicago and San Francisco. He actually got the first carry of the season against St. Louis where he broke off a nice 8 yard gain on second down. After the game against Chicago, there were numerous attacks against Buck's qualifications to carry the ball in the NFL. This reaction was simply not justified, Chicago is very good against the run ranking 5th in the league in yards allowed. Football Outsiders actually has the Bears ranked third in rushing defense DVOA. If that's not enough, Pittsburgh too is highly ranked, 2nd in yards allowed and 4th in DVOA. Four weeks removed from the unfortunate 4th down against the Bears, people are again warming to Buck the ball carrier and that's a good thing.

 

If we dig into the stats from the season so far, we can find that Buck has 48 carries compared to 54 for Westbrook (if we include his shovel pass for TD against the Rams). Twenty five of Buckhalter's carries came against two of the most challenging run defenses in the league. In spite of that fact, on a carry by carry basis, Buckhalter and Westbrook can barely be distinguished. Buckhalter is averaging 4.23 yards per carry and Westbrook - 3.63. There is a great deal more variability in Buck's rushing attempts however so it is not possible to separate the two backs statistically. The following chart shows the per carry result of both backs – at first don't look at the legend, and try to guess which back is which.

Buckvwest_medium

The surprising fact is that Buckhalter has 4 of the 5 longest carries on the Eagles season so far. This is counter balanced by the fact that he also has 15 of the 29 Eagles carries (including Hunt and Bookers attempts) that have gained no yards or fewer. These facts explain the variability in Buckhalter's rushing statistics, but we need to remember that a majority of his carries came against Pittsburgh and Chicago – two of the toughest running defenses in the NFL.

 

Given all of these observations, I ask again: Who should carry the rock? My answer is pretty simple, if Westbrook isn't 100% let Buck be the featured back – he's demonstrated that he can be just as productive as Westbrook and it's pretty easy to argue that he's actually been more productive than Brian so far this year despite fewer touches. When West is back to full health, Buck doesn't have the tools that make Brian such a threat in the backfield. With only 20 carries a game however, the Eagles should be sure to give them to the most effective back on the roster and right now, with Westbrooks broken ribs, I believe that back is Buck.

 

One troubling stat remains, the Eagles as a team are averaging 3.7 yards per carry. That number is truly ugly, good for 20th place in the NFL.  Arguing over who should get the ball doesn't help gain yards on the ground, but there are some things in the play by play which I think can shed some light on why we're so bad running the ball, but that's a story for Part II.

0 recs | Comment 13 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I know! I know!

The Eagles struggle to run the ball because the TEs forget to block!

Sorry, but you did bring up Chicago.

The monster at the end of this blog.

by grover on Oct 18, 2008 1:12 PM EDT   0 recs

damn that was a good post

http://www.libertyballers.com

by Remis on Oct 18, 2008 1:44 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Well, the run blocking hasn’t been particularly good this year. I think Westbrook is the better runner despite what the stats say. Buck can take some guys for a ride though which is good.

by Joe_D on Oct 18, 2008 3:33 PM EDT   0 recs

West at 100 percent has tools that Buckhalter doesn’t – that’s not debatable.
If the ribs are bothersome though – the stats suggest we’d be better off going with Buck as the feature back and bringing West in to change the pace…

by cavortingEagle on Oct 18, 2008 3:43 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Rabble rabble rabble… RELEASE BRIAN WESTBROOK

Destroyer of Subject Lines :3™

by yomjoseki on Oct 19, 2008 1:41 AM EDT   0 recs

elaborate on the word “release”

http://www.libertyballers.com

by Remis on Oct 19, 2008 2:42 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

to me…its obvious that andy reid doesnt work on running plays during the week. Guys block fine when a pass play is called, but on running plays…its another story from my eyes.

by Bugzy on Oct 19, 2008 6:36 PM EDT   0 recs

-1

http://www.libertyballers.com

by Remis on Oct 19, 2008 6:46 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I think it's obvious from the stats that the best runner is...

Westbrook. Why? Success rate.

When running back A has 10 carries for 5 yards each, for a total of 5 YPC, and running back B has 1 carry for 50 yards and 9 for 0, which is more valuable? RB A, because his consistency give his offense the best chance to continue making first downs, moving the ball, setting up 3rd and shorts. Even though the YPC is the same, running back B only gives one boom run, in return for 9 long yardage situations he has set up his team for.

Going by the above, Westbrook has 43% of his runs going for at least 3 yards, and only 18% for no yardage. Buck, on the other hand, has only 35% of his runs going for at least 3 yards, and a whopping 31% of the time he has gained zero yards.

Think about the 0 yard gains. Buck puts the Eagles in 2nd and 10 almost twice as often as Westbrook. Or he converts 3rd and 1 at only almost half the rate of Westbrook. Sure, he has 3 more long yardage conversions, but Westbrook’s far better consistency makes him a far more valuable back, no question.

by NJBammer on Oct 20, 2008 12:54 PM EDT   0 recs

Re: Success Rate

If running back A’s 10, 5-yard carries all came on 1st and 20 – I’d rather have running back B.

In this case, the metric is skewed by the quality of opponent Buck has faced compared to Westbrook.
Both the Steelers and the Bears are at the top of the league against the run. 25 of Buck’s carries have come against Pittsburgh and Chicago. According to FO, the Bears are first in stuffs and the Stillers are tops in preventing long runs. These are the 2 toughest run defenses we’ve faced this year and the majority of Correll’s carries have come against them.

According to my calculations (using the standard for success outlined by the stats geeks which is 45% of necessary yardage on 1st down, 60% second down, and 100% -3rd and 4th down), Buckhalter had a 46% success rate against 2 of the stingiest run Ds in the league. By comparison, he had a 58% success rate against SF whereas Westbrook had a 65% success rate against the Rams (the Rams dude). You tell me – which positive success rate is more impressive – I sure don’t know both the Rams and the Niners suck. Against Pittsburgh, while Westy did have a 60% success rate, his 5 carries went for 2, 2, 2, 6, and 2 yards, that’s less than 3 yards per.

The point of my note is not so much to say that Buckhalter is better than Westbrook, it is to say that he is a good back. One who I think deserves his touches – especially if Westbrook is limited.

by cavortingEagle on Oct 20, 2008 1:58 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

I can't argue with your basic point, then

that Buck is a good back. We’re lucky to have him, and he deserves appreciation. However Westbrook is one of the best in the league, and I wouldn’t want to lose sight of that.

by NJBammer on Oct 20, 2008 2:26 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

+1 Cavorting

I just hope we have to choose between the two. Hopefully Westbrook is healing properly and not rushed back and Buck should see more carries in the offense I think he has earned it. Plus both are good screen backs (Buck wasn’t early in his career) and I’d like to see them use both in that situation.

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Oct 20, 2008 3:10 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Philadelphia Eagles.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Chiliicon_small
Eagles Fans are Class Acts
Avatar_small
Sean McDermott to become Saints new defensive coordinator
Cryto_small
Marvin Harrison
Fp4107philadelphia-eagles-posters_small
Eagles staying or leaving
Small
Eagles/Giants preview: The Why Bother edition
Eagles_v_cards_002_small
Philly Rally Beards
15976_160_small
Nick Cole
Small
enjoy this ride eagle fans
Small
Props to McNabb/Gocong
Believe_-_chad_pennington_small
Polamalu or Reed?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter