Shocking
Let's play a little game.
If I told you the Eagles played this weekend and out gained a team 506 yards to 196. They out passed the opposing team 302 to 85. They out rushed them 208 to 111. The Eagles defense did not allow a touchdown. McNabb had 3 TD passes. The Eagles as a team gained 8 yards per play, while their opponent only 3.4 yards a play.
If I told you all that stuff and then asked you who won the game. Would any reasonable person say that game was anything but a complete and total domination by the Eagles? Yet, amazingly, it was not. The Eagles lost today 23-21 on a miracle last second 62 yard FG.
The Eagles beat out the Bucs in nearly every statistical category imaginable, except for one. Unfortunately, that one stat has determined the outcome of just about every NFL game ever played. That would be turnovers.
Make no mistake about it, it was those turnovers that lost this game. I've heard everyone pointing the birds failure to score at the end of the first half, to "clock management"(which I really think few Eagles fans know what that is, they just like saying it because it sounds smart) to one fan who actually thought Westbrook should have stood at the goal line before he scored to waste the clock... Insanity. You do not win games in which you turn the ball over 4 times, especially when 2 of those turnovers go back for TDs!!! The Eagles nearly stole this game, which they had no business winning and it took a miracle kick to beat them. Still, that does not change the fact that this loss was 100% due to turnovers. Everything else is just extra chatter.
I just don't know what it is that this team can play 2 halves of good football. This is the 3rd out of 4 games in which they were awful in the first half only to explode to erase a deficit in the 2nd half. In 2 of those games, 3 TDs just wasn't enough. No team can put themselves in a position where they need to score 3-4 TDs at the end of a game to win it. You can go on the road and spot teams 17 points and expect to win!
This makes the 3rd loss out of 3 to be decided on the final play of the game. Two last second FGs and one overtime TD have beaten the Eagles this year. What does that say about this team? Are they better than their record suggests and have just been victims of bad luck or miracle plays? Or are they just flat out unable to close out games? They made one huge play at the end of the Dallas game to win it, but is that the exception to the rule?
I honestly don't have the answer.
I know this, it's not enough to prove you can beat any team, they've done that in all 3 losses so far this year. In the end however, that's meaningless. You have to do it, and now heading into the significantly tougher part of their schedule that's more important than ever. The problem is that the team has squandered their opportunity to create a real cushion and get some separation in the NFC East.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
Sick to my stomach
This team is going to have to beat Jacksonville and then go 5-3 after the bye, to make the playoffs, I think. If they can get there, they're good enough to do some damage. I'm just not sure they can play consistently and mistake-free enough to get there.
by BrianS on Oct 22, 2006 7:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Disappointed
They were good enough to beat the Giants, except they didn't. They were good enough to beat the Saints, except they didn't. They were good enough to dominate the Bucaneers and this game should have been a blowout win, except it wasn't.
I don't consider the Dallas game a fluke because they outplayed Dallas along the line and in the secondary all day. Dallas almost pulled it out at the end because they're pretty good at some skill positions and the Eagles made some key errors, especially dropped balls by the receivers.
Still, what could very easily have been a 7-0 start has turned into a 4-3 slide that has me questioning if this team can still come together and become playoff caliber.
It is what it is. 4-3 on merit.
by Dire Radiant on Oct 22, 2006 8:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On the positive side
by JasonB on Oct 22, 2006 9:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It's about time
by Dire Radiant on Oct 23, 2006 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Less talk, more action.
by BrianS on Oct 23, 2006 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dropping the ball
veryone knows TO doesn't like to practice, but the guy loved to play on sunday. I'm beginning to think Stallworth has no real passin for the game. People have come back from broken bones faster than he comes back from a hammy.
As for this season, if you can't beat Tampa, you really have no business in the playoffs. I hope we make it but it looks like we're too inconsistent to make a run this year.
I'm annoyed that the kicker made that kick but only because that, coupled with Westbrook's TD, give the Eagles an out besides just admitting they were ineffective for most of the game.
Did anyone really think the birds would get those 3 point at the end of the half or that TB would miss that kick? That's how it's been.
By the way, Westbrook could be the most dangerous weapon in the NFL. Even though teams are keying on him on the screen pass, he still gets his yards every week.
by bshur1 on Oct 23, 2006 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well
I don't think you re being fair on Stallworth. The guy is injured. Hamstrings are very tough injuries, especially for reciever. Steve Smith missed all of the preseason and 2 regular season games to that injury. Heinz Ward missed most of the preseason. TO missed jsut about the entire preseason. It's not right to question the guy. He clearly wants to be out there, you can tell that in his interviews. This is his contract year and not being on the field can only hurt his chances of landing a big deal, he knows that. However, he is no good to the team if he can't be at his best and bringing him back too early and re-injuring the hammy(like in the Green bay game).
by JasonB on Oct 23, 2006 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Drops
by Dire Radiant on Oct 23, 2006 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, OK
I'm looking forward to Stallworth back in the lineup. He sure sounds like he wants to play.
by Dire Radiant on Oct 24, 2006 8:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













